ML19329F079
| ML19329F079 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 02/28/1974 |
| From: | CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19329F074 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8006190883 | |
| Download: ML19329F079 (107) | |
Text
'
1 .. t '
_ _5
~
, i. ^.
s .,
- q":i
.gd O
' NONCONFORMANCE-REPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK ~~
MPOH AS Of' $
Pact cowl .,,
PROJECT NO. 7220 7_-
} $kj- a.c. Ena. st9tq -
~~
PREPARED BY CR NO. NONCONFOltfAANCE SOURCE ' STATUS L.. ,
CLOSED BY DESCRIPTION / REMARKS DISPOSIT. ROUTE 'XMTD
.2..m_ REPLY RETD C-1 3:12:0 l)icl<_Gro.to Vall dowels and Access Tendgp_G_gllery__ Slab. Unit 2. Field PE Rc-;.ccued 8:20:E IJuc};.};inney With sketches attached. PE AA on C-1-1
!:>1- 1 -[3- 12--73N.ek_Grydo WalA__doweln atyd Accooo Tendon Gallory Slab.
Fiold PE 7-12-73 8-14-73
_._ 8:20:7J EuckJinnoy_ at_t. ache._d_Ske tches.
PE AA u-2!9-7-73, . Buck Eilmey 8-2_0-1 8LReharn .in. Containment.#.1.aroJndoraised _
PE Buck Kinney 0-1.-73 10-h-7.~,
%C~-1 4 '[ .
PE AA C-3 9-R:73 stevo__ Grant 28ea //p_9R bays culoff q 3821-6" to not cer_ Min F_i. eld PE J-13-73' 0-5-73 10-9-7.
,10-9-73 Steve Grant Columns for supporting frame. Reactor'Blde 41 PE M C-h 2-2,8-13 Clay Clark Liner Plate S-1-5-2-1 v.e.ld cracked _after Fi_ eld _ PE 10-1-73 1-11-.7,h M _ P,_I_!andrick _73 Application of_ primo conting. PE AA 10-5-73 C-5 3-28_-7. Steve Grant Trumplates by INEYCo .in violation oLdocumentation_ Field 1-30-7h; PE 10-1-73 T. E. Valenzano Roouirements L.73 PE AA 10-5-7]
IC-6 b:7 Clay _Claric Liper Plat _S-1--th .U_-L11111J. tamp.edJumbers' and g
11-6-711 i
01_cLOlark Vendor Stamned Numbers do not nat_qh_,
Jicld___ PE I0-h-73 10-15-7
.b J
e '7 PE AA ;4 G 10-8-73 Eurno,CC(575 3 Ri chard _Grnt.e Pour CC 7 .1.eketTickets J12$j)a 11L81. 6a; Lair._&_51" 11794, 117 Field PE 10-15-7: U 1217-73 Richard Grote Slu'_ube.
Mr nteDt_2. 0,_2.An._lL2 3 5_I2DpectiYely.93, 117 ?6 1 3 , .73 C-8 PP AA j 7; m 10-8-7\ Richard Grote Pour No. A(5))IlauTicket 11711,__ Lov Air Content & r-A Field.____ PE 10-1$-7: , j g .73 11-70-7k S, Graham 11712. No Tecting.
PE AA 11~20~7 3 C-9 10-29M3 Clay Clark C_
Linor Plate S1-7-U1 Mill Stac: ped Humbers and ' Field Mat'l
- 11-1h-'Q Clay Clark % ndor Stamped Kumbera do not match. Spvsr. 10-29-73 1 00 _7 )-
C Y.0 Sita 11-13-71. _
.30-292713 _. CnrE.W. Knoll .1d"...Concute_.Asgregate. fRiled_gradstioALL. Test =_ . icid___ PE 10-29-73
_ 11-29-7k Gary W. Vnoll' ing did not rotest or notify Ecchtel. AA 3 1 _73 PE 11,23-73 C;11 _?.1-Ji-7 Steve Grant E18&__ Grade 6') rebar. he,. .s 20LO failed strenett Piala PE 11-9-73 11 Steve Grant tests ran by independent lab.
.. c.3 r 17>.n *
,r .. M3') NONCONFORMANCE-REPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK -
nEPORT AS OF _' _ . _ -
PROJECT NO. 7220 PAGE COMPL - [.U'7U Q.C. ENG. SIGN /' :- .d' N #2m
{$j; PREPARED DY NONCOtJFORMANCE SOURCE STATUS C _gED BY E . _.. .
__ _,_ ,_ ___g_ESCR N gfyRy_.gRKS
- _ , , _ , , , _,__ D g OSil. _ R 0 UTE,,_ WT_g_, REPLY, RET C-12 11-2-7.3 L__J_.._Stockton Rebar. lengths increased from cut sheets 10-1h _ in.
2-21-7h Field PE J.. C. Fitzgerald 11-16-73 1 1-26-7 J Test bars cu.t_from fabricated bars w/o approval. PE AA C-13 11-19 't i
c._Edinney codweMs._in_nlac.c_hav_e_yoida_srontar_tban allowed 12-31-73 6
L. R. Albert Field _ PE 11-20-73 11 7 by__ Spec. C-231 Rev.h. '
s...
PE AA t,-1 h 11-16 .7l3 S. Grant 11-28-73
//JLRebardeat # C380]) mASTM_. Grade _.64 Failed twoviold PE 11-20-73 11 71 1_-21_]_h 2 F. A. Kapla of six test _o, PE AA C-15" _13-16.-7 a 11-23-7 3 B. J stockton Tenaile_tecting_requirementa'at__1970 nhat-dom Field _ PE 11 20-73 12-13-23 L._J_,._S tockt on 1 2-3-7$
- Cut 2 Splices from Unit {1. - PE AA (11-28-73 C-16 11 -16 'f 3.. Stey.en_ Grant Type "B" Cadweld_aln.even on thickened _ liner _ plate Fiel d PE 1-1h-71 L. R. Albert 1969, show rust.insido. 11-27-73 1-10-7 PE AA C-17 1.1-21-73 C._E J.inney 1-9-7h
_CaduelLSp1 ice No.__h-E-107 shawa_.ne_ eyidenee of Field PB 11-23-73 1 2-6-73 12-1 'l-]l C. E,_K_i.nrlev .. permanent reference 1_ine_per_.0-23LQ R. PE M e v. L 0-18 k 1-2.J-7_'. S. Graham 11-30_7 3 SPacingof_rebars_A_miccing_rchars_ Aux.-. Bldg D T.h.. Field-- PE 12-6-73 S. Graham 11-26-73 12-6-73 Wall. Elev. 57h' PR AA 11-30-73 t'*9' b 29.-]3 C. R.__Kinnev Listing of Cadweld splicon_gt.th_.intN rap. tad _ deform.. Field L. R. Albert PE 2-15-7hj 12-5-73 it. . -J .. . .t . . , . c .v u ations, per Spec. 7220-C-231 Q, Rev. h. PE AA l'29-71 C--20 lj -JLQ-23 C. E,_Xiruley
,, , . . .. Listiny of__C a_d_vpld Splicca_ytth_interrup_ted_defom Finia .PE 1-10-7! B. J. Stockton 12-1h-73 -
-ations, Der Spec. 12_20-C-231 Q,_R_ev. h. 1-10-f E AA 12-31 '3 C-21 11-20-2] L.,_Rm Albert 50EA 60' 18S Rebars heat # 79T45]_ rejected for Field PE 12-5-73 "2-21-73 L. R. Ilbert failure of elongation test _per ASTM-A-615-72. 13-17-7M PE AA 12-13-7)
C-22 11-29-] ._..__J2._ R,_.Al_bert t j%f s n Md Se n.
.Lipting_ of Rebar_Hgat_1[ umbers onuhiclLuser__ testa _ _Fi al d PE d.h.03 C.E. /dn n O uffr, gf,,br/ A have not been Verf_qrmd. Mat'l re'd prior to 11/70, PE AA /Yv8 bpe->t3-)
C-23 11-30 '
L. R. Albert Cadweld onlice 4 h d to have cenerally Pi nl d 2-31-T5 T. R. Albert N.A. N.A. N.A. N. A. 1 ni ne._.com u.m norr.us matal ver Snee. 7PPO-O 11 0. Rev. h. PR ,
, . .1 .
- f. :
C . .
NONCONFORMANCE-REPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK '
REPOHT AS OF
^.t.a. PAGE COMPL PROJECT NO 7220 Q.C. ENG. SIGN l
{jY,y!;- PREPAR_D BY NONCONFORMANCE SOURCE STATUS lCR NO. - . - .
CLOSED BY DESCRIPTION / REMARKS DISPOSIT. ROUTE XMTD REPLY RETD C-2h 51-30-11 B. J_.__Stockton Rebar size 18S_,_ heat _#C:38922_ fail.ed_iniAial_uaer_ _Eis1L_ PE 12-5-73 2-17-7:
~
2-19-73 B. J. Stockton test. 2ea sub_sqquent samples p_anned_LS214_A-616 PE AA
'C-2$ 2 4-73 B. J. Stockton Reb 3r size 6. heat # 91117 failed uger_ test. (2681! _Eield__.
U.A. N.A. H.A. N A.
2-12-75 B. J._Stackton delivered. Not uged for s_truqintal_ reb _;tr Reject 26 L2=5-73 c R Kinnoy Q Arena _.of_Rorth Plant _ Dike._Went Plant Tiikn _ Morti piela PE 12-17-73 cas1_l)1ke _&._100'_ Derm._.7220_C 206 Reym2__ teat freqt.en. PR aa
'C-27 L2-3 .73 C. E _Einnev liner Plate S1-6-U-1._Dispoaition of NCR #C-h not Field PE 1 2-10-73 1-22-7L 2-21-7If L_.Ps_JIqpdrick f_qllowed per Spec __7_220-D-$_0_, _PE AA C-28 op-4-73 C. Knnll Adair.ture tanks on On-SilcJatch Plant do_.not_have Field PE 1 2-7-73 u2-27-7J 2-26-7h L. R. Albert a means of agitationJer_12;20-C-2.!30.Roy..LEnra._1,; _P3 AA 12-20-7)
C-29 2-6-74 S._ Grant Two Sleeves ualded on thickened liner plate for Field N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
inner _Eritnary_ nhi_e_1d wall _ prior __to_ECR_0-2h_approvr l_Ibject C 2-12-7, S. c2 ant Two "Ba Cadweld sleeves welded on thickened lingr__ _ Field _ PE 12-13-73 1-8-7h Rnv.1 1-8-7h S. Grpnt ~3 ~
plate using P1-A-LH. No weld specified in 7220-C-11 1PE AA C-30 ' 2-12-73 R.*Crnnt CQpine of Reactor Bldns Base Support Columns excedcd Field PE 12-1h-73 1-22-7L 1-22-71 S. S. Grant minimum allowable. PE AA l~7~7b C-31'12-12-73 C. F. Clnvk A fit-nn luc _Was removed from T.innv pinto R9-1h TT1 Pi ni a PE 2-19-7] -
1-03-7h 1-16-7h C. F. Clark creatige a gouge _crn!Lter than 1/16" deep. PE AA 1-k-7N C-32 12-1h-7b C. F. Clark E6010 Wald Rod Ser dh2660-U document.ation reports Field PE 2-27-7; 18% elongation. C-111. Rev.2 reauires 22% PE AA C,33 -7 _ _ C._E _ Clark Eln've_asaemblies S2-h-U1 & R1-1-112 innt pressurn nn Fi eld.-
N.A. U.A. N.A. N.A.
j2-19-7h C. F. Clark test. ncyorp -
C-3h 1_-h-7.ld B. J._Stockton Certain 18S rehars from INBlCp__gre not cut to with . Field U.A. N.A. A. N. .
l L. R. Albert in 1/8" from square.nei _ c C-39.Rev, 6 Rework ee inca acv. :is n .
_. __PAGE 3
(.)
- C.)
(7 .
NONCONFORMANCE-REPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK REPORT AS OF PAGE CoMPL.,
O.C. E fJG. SIGN _ .
R NO. c oN PREPARED BY NONCONFORMANCE SOURCE STATUS
=s y n [ Ct.OSED By DESCRIPTION / REMARKS DISPOSIT. ROUTE XMTD REPLY RETD
-35 12-3-73 C. F. Clark Plate assembly S1-6-U-1 gas channel blocked 2'0" from Field PE 2-19-7] 1-QS-7h 1-16-71 C. F. Clark left edge,_ylewed_from_holiom. PR AA
/ *
-36 12-11-7;l B- .T - Stockton some_ Caducld_clecyca_haye_burra,_ahavinca,__eic- Field PE 1-2-74 1-10-7h 2-1-71t _.__L._R. Albert Tancnnforming_to e-231 Rey. h PR AA 1-8~7k
>I" 12-2.0-71 _L._.R._ Albert b-2_Sec.ti_o_n.Ah,_Ricid.Jheathing_must_have end._ cap.p .. Field PE 1 2-31-73
-11Rh ar,other devise for protection from damare. element: , PE AA '-7-7b
-38' 12-11-7:t B. J. Stankton .
rygs_ fo_r_3/8" plaj;a_fabricaied_pmong side of FJ_ eld PE 1-2-7h I-22-7h
___ 1-22-71 S. S. Grant ' late _for_13ase Slab UDi',s 1 & 2. PE AA 1-7-7b
-39 + 12-18-71 G. Knoll bring tanks below specified temperature. C-208Rev.P Field PE 1 2-28-73 1-10-7h 1-10-71_ G. L.. Knoll PR AA 1-10 7 4
-h0' 1-1-7h. __M. P. Hendrick _
3 lain _ assembly Sh-1-U-1. heat discolorations and Field N.A. N.A. N.a I. A.
2-20-71. M. P. Hendrick Sulge_s, Elev. 633'-2" and 648'-h". Rework
-141 '- 1 9-7h S Crnnt JI11 19"trimbara(mkE12)_Hanufactured13'-3"nnt Pi ni a PE 1-8-7h /./f'-jy' /v8Jg 3-6-7h L. Shively 13'-O" out-to-out as on INR.YCo cut Shts. PE AA
'9 1-h-7h Trumplate assemblies R/B 1 & 2 crease vents. coatinrs. Field '
S. Grant PE 1-h-7h 7h
-143 L 1_-7-7 h B. J. l3tocktop :lorizontal 36_x 8.6 o not fabricatad_in accordance Field PE 1-8-7h 1-10-7L 1 -214-7h F. A. Kapla n/ INRYCo DwgamE.-3. E-b, E-7. & E._.8. PE AA l-5-7b
-14!4 1-15-71 M. P. Hendrick 1/8" E-6010 Weld Rod SN 114023-0 & Sh283-0 received Field PE 1-17-7h l at .iobsite with twelve (12) broken containers. PE AA l
-h5 l9,, w c. w ,-r 7 Sen log _ sheet _L._.-
- l. .g y. ,.t a r w L38A ' 7h L . T. stocks T PE's disposition or ncn c e anthnri2na unn or P1- A vi en:_.
2-21-t _ . A. Kapla on colunn lucn. Field use..- 1 T.h . Devort 2-21 h_o y yn nev. : s e-7 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ PAGE_ 1 _____ __
- . 1.D O'
r
?.T!h .
I.::
( 3,i;L:
U;lk"8 ,
NONCONFORMANCE-REPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK -
nEPORT AS OF PAGE COMPL - ' YI Q.C. ENG. SIGPI[ . II 7 I # -
PP.EPARED BY NCR NO. ~ct . - ' - ' _,
NONCONFORMArJCE SOURCE oAye CLOSED BY STATUS DESClllPTION/ftEMARKS DISPOSIT. ROUTE XMTD REPLY M-1 2 :10g RET L. n. _ ribert Jea 12 3/h" weld " cap (E.O._E63h2=33,__1 ten 320. Trn # viela PE 2-5-7h II. I). Foster 12-12-73 1-8 SQtIB) Shop Inspection (PT Examination ) Not perforred PE AA 1-3-7h Tha balance of this sheet is not scinte used. see patre 7.
. i S
m _e n sa wm &P o-%_ _-__ ------------------ -- - - - - - -- - ----- - -^ ^ ^ _ _
l l I l ll i
' D. A*
,C T
E- E O R-8 Y.
L.
P.
A I
~ I E
a b'
S U
T R_ -
D _
?. F r A . I .
T -
O2Gt O f
S T. A L
S P S N A M . M.
X T O G J t ,
R C E _
O E . E_ -
P AG E C. T_ A R P Q U_ I I
O_ .
R_ ,
E T. d d -
C I S. l l R O. e e :a U P. i io O S. F Fr S
I t
D. s l
3 l K _ 7 A O _
9 &
O _.
1
- e B _
0 s S _ 1 a C
U _
T _
3 r o
A 7
- f T _
8 S 1 A
_ - 1
& S 0 -
E K_ 1 C G C R_ T O NA 3T N L AM 7 ME I
- S T RI / 6 A R ON 1
- f -
CI R NR. s r .
t o 7 E OC.
NS r
o c
C E . .
p re e c
N D_ e a A R o r
_ N M c e R _
_ i . e h 3 s O _ p 7 F a - .
N r14 d O E 2 e C O - e i 0 n N _
d 1 O _ a g N
R & n
_ i.
e b
t k k o 0 c c n 0 i pY rri d d n
7_
B y _. i D _
n e e n t B_
D H n E H R E_ S_ r_ r a
A h O P O L __
e e c N E k k T R C r a r a i n
P
_ C _
P P h E _
t J . .
- O _ M M r R _ n P l ll
] . n 7 3 e
[h -
- 7 m
%J. y T. %2 -
, ./. $ _ 6 l ml 8
c_ _ O 1
b n
' 1 O
e h
Oi ( .
' .d, * ,
N R
C.
1 V-T
C . , ,
e NONCONFORMANCE-REPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK grJ '
, R t* PO f t T D A T E '
[ P Cc COMI L Q .C. E NC. SIG N
. PROJECT NO. 722.0
' ' STATUS
O R IG.
NONCONFORMANCE -
CR NO. DATE PREPARED BY DESCRIPTION / REMARKS 6. 1.oxye e.o,yc s.o ,7c io.
ROUTg XMTD RETO CLOSED CLOSED aY Nonco ifumance Reports written u2 der C-3 Rev. Oh were deflicuated by letter (annnting Civil, Mechanica". and Wc lding) and by numben . Nonconfomance R( ports written under G-3 Rev. 05 will be designated by consecu11ve nunbers orly.
"t L. R. Albert 14 5 1-18-71; G. V. Knall C-230. 1 1/2" & 3/h" connrnte_arenp+n enn+nm- Field PPy1 3' ];22-7h 2-21-7h innted with rock salt on 1-15-7h & 1-16-7h. .
Not 16 ' 1-21 'l. L. R. Albert C-19. Rebar lit #79Th47 fniled n 77 500 pnT Il ~
. b2W M4 L L hd during tensile test of qualifying spl3ce X-7-V. 2-5-7h not 17 1-21-71 C. F. Clark C-50A. Dacrepancy between mill etampod nna ahn ? MR Applic 1-30-71.
L. R. Albert ;
stamped slab numbers, plate S2-6-U-2 uppar plat 21 7 i able 2-26-7h Rot 148 1-21-71 'C F., Clark C-111. Lenk chase charnel: Rh-2-U 1 A n3 1 if 1 applic_ 1-23-714 repair procedure not folloued. ablo
/ Not 19 1-21-71 C. F. Clark C-111. Weld /mp between Penetration R-19 T. nna Applic- I-23-7h 2-25-7h A. L. Boulden assembly S1-3-U-2 not within specs. able 2-5-7h
' Not 2-21-7L J. Tice 50 1 71 P. T. Carpenter C-208. Frequcncy of testing _ aggregate-.for nnn _ pield Applic- 1-2h-7l Superseded by UCR crete not conpljed with per USTCo QA Manual. 1-21-7 1 able en nov. 1 1
Hot 2-21-7L 1-22-71, P. T. Carpenter 0-230. Placementa_CC(589 95)nn A(57R 47)"h, Field Applie, VOIDED Superc'ded by 3C(582.0)a, A(573)a, & CC(585)a, hir test data. 1-22-7a ny3 , 2-7-7h NCR 51:ev1 J. Tice not 52 j
1-23-7l P. T. Carpenter 3-210. Placement A(47h)a, 3cy nnnnvnto pinnna gppyge 2-8-7h 2-27-7h L. R. Albert alth air too high. able 2-27-7h 50 1 - 214 -71 P. T. Carpenter 0-208. hoquency of testinmmecnto fnv non- Field 2-22-7l crete not complied with per USTCo QA Manual. 1-2h-7 ;
, Rr .1' Not ~
53
- /
l1-29-71 c. v. Knoll c-230. 1ta innnming_aggree,+n ou_t nf cenan+4nn- rield ipp11e 2-h-71; 2-6-74 P. T. Carpenter 1-29-7 4 able
^ Not MW ED W FOR $h ,E 1 111. Un nrocedurn in 0-11 7. 2 for removal 5f4 1- 30d IL. R. Albert of rejecte'd-Cadwelds from Tl_.ened Liner Plate .
I* -
g .g., g 94/-
e C-o s.:
_ ~ -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _
n.P_A G E g
. .. <- s. .
. L,
- NONCONFORMANCE-REPORT LOG & STATUS EOOK
' ' - noronToaTc
/ PAa C CO MI t.
a .C. ena. saan -.
- i. PROJECT NO. 7220 STATUS
' ORIG. NONCONFORMANCE so.
PREi \ RED BY DESCRIPTION / REMARKS i.o ,1c s.o,yc e.oxye NCR NO. DATE ..
MMTD RETD CLOSED CLOSED OY HOUTE Not3-7-714 55 ?-14 -7h L. Shively C-210. Placine of out-of-npec material in relati o PPlic to moisture content of 3o110. _able Ut R. A. Moray 0-39. Rebar received with end cut creater than Field ,2-8-74 2-8-7h L. R. Albert 56 2 - 1, - 7 14 Agli 1/8" from square. Parts 13,14,15, & 16. 2-5-714 ,
Not 5 14 , 2 7h L. R. Albert C-111. No procedure in C-111 Unv.9 for romnvn1 Applic- 2-13-74 of rejected Cadueldo from Thickened Liner Plate.qble 2-27-711 P.sv 1 Not R. J. Woleclagle P-39. Plongation tent of Unbar Ht 475P689 rniln/ Field Applic 2-11-74 .
57 2-7-714
- .nitial and two subsequent testa. 2-7-71. able eld M A. L. Boulden C-111_ DT YC 1 Rov- O anon not mnenmnnnn mm enae "
58 T 2-13-714 Proposed Section III referenced ir. "C-111 Rev . 2 p_3 3_7; Not L. R. Albert 59 ?-1 3-714 L. R. Albert 0-111. Un procca nrn enr vannvn1 nr "n" novinn Field AW 2-22-7); 3 7 14
- looveo from thickened liner plate in C-111Rev.2 2-13-7t]itin 60 2-114-.714 S. S. Grant 0-60A. Sumn liner plate fabricated incorrectly- Field 2-18-7l 2-18-71 2-15-7 fnfo.
Not 2-19-714 2-27-7h L. R. Albert
- .?-1h-7h G. W. Knoll 0-210. Tinn of not tent for enmnnt not in enntnT 1i mance with ASTM C-150 & Spec. C-230. ^$ ',
2-27-7h 0 910. T.innia namivturan one nnnnento nlonna +n 2-19-714 2-27-7h L. R. Albert G. W. Knoll 62 '?-114-7h 2-27-7h date in violation of Spec. C-230 (contain Chlor ikkh ,
Not 3-5-7h 2-114-7h A. L. Boulden C 111- P1 ain R1-3=U 9 m av (;n9' hena ynntor Field Applic-63 2-1h-7L 337g than A" measured w/ 214" straight edge.
.C-230. Placemcnts CC($8 M d}m _A($78.671nAh. 2-18-7h 51 2-8-7h P. T. Carpenter R v. 1 CC($8.0)&,, A(573)a. Air, test data.
,33 ,
^
.atie received w/o M.S. Not 2'-27-7 A . Moray
- 6h 2 h R. A. Moray P*-SP-1.2. Li. quid venetri !
2-18-7hApplio- 2.-27-7h matl certification. -
mm- .
)
.... . t
(. .
NONCONFORMANCE-REPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK PAGC Cor.tPL Q .C. E NG. S 8G N
- i. PROJECT NO. _7220
- ORIG. NONCONFORMANCE STATUS NCR NO. DATE- PREPARED BY DESCRIPTION /HEMARKS e. 1.oarc s.oxyC *.oxre so.
Et O U T g XM10 NETO CLOSED CLOSEDBY 65 2-18-74 A. L. Boulden C-111. Teinnr Platn ponntration holes mi n lonnte l.,llot p 1gg 2-22-71. ,
uhle_._
66 2-21-7h S. Grant C-62. Secondary shield vall. thickened 1innv pplic 2-25-70 L> late, bow in piece #G1A. gg 67 2-22-71 C E. Clark C-111. Pene.tctation installed 3" from ponitinn g 2-28-71 shown on drawing. able
~
llot 68 . 2-22-7L B. J. Stockton 1-52. Secondary shield wn11 thickoned linar pin :e Fielct Applic 2-25-7L fabricated incorrectly.
2-22 "hable 69 2-22-71 'C. F.. Clark C-50L T.inar plates for Unit //2 have the edrea of 3-28-74 plate located incorrectly.
70 3-4-7h R. A. ..aray 0-52. G-321D. Black 16 not filled-in corrnetly-
>arto numbered A3-A, B3-A, & C3-A. 5-h pb able not 3-7-74 71 3-5-7h C. F. Clark 0 111; Butt welds of leak chase chanaels. C-111 A 9,10,16, & h0. Full penetration welds & notch ao.pplic ablo
,2 3-6-7h S. Graham. 0-33)_ Anchor Bolts FC 102G 'Pynn TT hent numhnr painted incorrectly.
' Not 3-7-7h 73 3-6-7h V. O. Howe 0-?. Fillet volds listed on form have lemkn behLnd 3ppu lube tube. cable h
w w
'- -- - - - - - - - _ . m. m_--_..--.,_..__a,. = . - - . . . . . . - , , g _ _ g-m._ m .
p*GE 1 OF 2 "
N;.
i g?
d.
~
NONpONFORMANCE
\
R' E P O R T SKETCH Y;s O 2.
C-12 uO DAY n ATTACHED DATE
,
- PROJECT NO. - '7220 2 l ':
.1 LOCATION ARE ArCLDG. S. OWG.P ART No. REV. G. _.!1 E ?.1 *: AME Q No. 1 71 Ueinforcin Steel *
$ILa)__,C_ontainment #2 722C-C_110 2 neelnyf. O ,t.p=etten nt -
- 7. InSPLCTION CRITERIA O'.)CUMENT f4UMSDM7ai ti 9 g., .g OWG O SPEC O OTnER 2 (EXPLA;N) Inlanil EyerSon, vandor drawings 5 . - F-12
"" S * "-
- s. SOURCE: ENGRG. O CONSTR.O OTHER 2 < EXPLAIN)
_._nland I Everson Ccnstruction Products Cc many Box 5532, Chiceco, Ill. 7220-C-39
- 12. 11 tJONCONFORMANCE (DiSCREPAl;CYi DESCR1rTION: ASME YES .]
.NO 7J PJo. (LIST SERI AL NUMBERS V.'HERE APPLICABLEl 1 Febar Lent *ths (Horicontal Dimensions) do not confem to_.cyt-to-cut dimersiens
'(I 1 inchi ns cited by Pas ngrnph h,~4. ACT St nnA, -5 115 65. un r 1 ere + h r i-=-ei n-e a e --,
increased from Inland Ryerson cut chea'.;.s_by h-10 %he - N <- ~6e th= c~ ple+a 1 caducid_e_d_.bar about 10-lh inches longer ther recuired.
2 Rebar Lengths (Horizental Dimension) do not confer = to out-to-out dimensic.s (I i inch) as cited by Pararrraph h.3. ACI Standerd ~415-65. ':'e s t Enrs (L'-O" i vere cu-l frnn fah,-i nn t e a hn ,-c - 4 +w n t- nn+4 finn +4n- nor approval of Pechtel.
J (,%e At*nche? Rh ee t. )
m f
Date / t 0::e
- 12. NC R P H L 8 COriCURRErqC47 No""'~.k. ) .2$~~~L. ll-!]:23_
- 13. FIELD DISPOStQ,p'v.
. "EEN'(52M . !$ *
/ML&1 REWORK [$ REJECT'2. RCUTE ,TO PROJECfENGRG h NOTIFY AUTHORIZED INSP T . r ':110UTE TO P/AT'L SUPV. C Cerigip bars have to be cut and re-cadvelded to obtain minir.um clearance. ;
2 Extra h'-0"i rieces are cadvelded cnto the short bars. _ _ . _ .
l
\ p.) F (!fI, l' .- *:2 (. I Short lio.oks vill be cadvelded to enke up re-*H red lere-th. I'd " ~ l' '
'4 t.
- . u I
. m r n , . ,. .
t w .' L U 17.i t e l I
l
.~-~.rrr 1 EW '!"' O!? 3 Date APPROVA OF FI D DISPO54 flord l
df_d'__ llfl?. A ?$N- l
- 15. uiciSPOuT eca: O DCN nEOo: Ye5 O_, oCN No.
REPAIR h REJECT USE AS IS d SEE BELOW d NO L*3 1 We concur _y_i_t;_b Field's proposal to correct the #18 nonconformine rebar as per their comments 1 & 2.
2 We also concur with comment 3 of Field's proposal to make up the required length I for short hook. However, the lent,th of tail should be 4'-4(3'-6 + 9" cadweld sleeve + 1" cxtra) instead of 3'-45". , , _ ,
66// UAj/7g Qg as
/2i/?A i
' /
1 l
^
,-~/
. .m m n 17. tit lNSPECllON
- _ PPHOVAL OF
[' .fLj N' / g'
~ h+ 'b' ~+ 1ghatea .t ACCEPT 3 16'Z&-
espon,,1,,f no,.
au --
wa cc ,
' ' oste, ENGRG. ' ' '
- PFE N MM UO Y "
RElECT O
- ?"'
nespoas >ie Leaa Enw.
o:=
DISPOSITION COtEURR.NCE AU1 H. I'.tP. __.
fJ i./
Das CONCURHENcE: Autti. nt:5 (; , -
I'lNK - O.A. ENGR. SH ADED ARE AS AIT.LIC AULE CF - 2t=CH WHITE - O.C. [NG R. '* 7172 (TAQY - FIELD ENGil. .8 LD ENROD - RESP. ENG R. TO ASt.1E COMPOfJENTS
NAwG N p. T NONCON- > R M A N* C E REPORT C-12 :
"' SKETCH Yes C 3. M0 DAY YH I
C"NTINUATION SH EET ATTACHED DATE PROJECT NO. 7220 g 11 NONCONFORMANCE (DISCREPANCYI CONT *D or 7
- 13. FIELD DISPOSITION CONT *D or .
i 15. ENGRG. DISPOSITION CONT O '_
- 3. Rebar Lengths (Hooks), do not Conform to Standard Hook details as Cited by Table 2.1, ACI Standard 315-65. Length of tail required by EeChtel Eraving, C-324, is 3'-6". ACI Standard I'inimu= is 3'-4 ". Field dimensions verf- from approximately 2'-6" to 4'-6".
s l
~t ,) .
C/
a fm
--) .
e WHITE - 0.C. ENGR. PINK - 0.A. ENGit- OC - 3NC R C NAIW - FIELD ENGR. GOLDENitOD - RESP. ENGR. R '.7-1 72
l I j ,. 11p .
1 O F V. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' b sMh,h NONCONFORMANCE REPORT
' ll..' ,f-foQ 1l
\ Mhif E.k ? 220 SKETCH ATTACHED ,W hk f.
- g* ' i'. . . MO CA
1DATE.,[1 ~
V ',Y PROJECT NO.
- , i, ' g 25l 7 4 -
LOCATIOf4 AR E A/ B LOG. 5. DWG/PART No. R E V. 6. ITEM NAME l. , ,gsi. .g g
- _ ..lil
,.m --
i
- t. #1 Base Mat 7220-C 310 Reinforcin6 B ds i' t
- 7. SPECTION CHITEHlA DOGUMENT, hU.'T6ETTT TITC. .-
Dwo O SPEC 8 OTHER D iEXPLAIN) 7220-C-55, Rev. 1 -
,N .
ENGRG. O CONSTR.i9 OTHEn O (EXPLAIN) f:... < y\. . 3 w .- n. nwe
- 10. 11 NONCONFORMANCE (DISCREPANCY) DESCHIPTION: ASf/.E YES O N r. (LIST SERIAL NUMBERS WHERE APPL' CABLE) NO 3 ,
1 Spec. C-55 Rev. 1 Sect. 4.3.1 States, "The bar ends to be srliced shall be in good condition with full size undamaged deformatiens."
A reinspection of all reinforcing steel Cadweld solices found I interrupted deformations with'in the solice sleeve on the followinc splihes in Containment #1. See sheet 2.of 3.
I Date CO:JcVHRENCE: . '
Catt
- 12. NCn PHEPARED t;Y:
f W
is. FleLD oiseoSiTiON:
> b V C'b w f _J2h_c;/n "tTE$ /%g -c < -< <^7'
/
//ff'$f REwoRx 0 RE;ECT O ~ R;uTe TO eRO;eCT esaRcK NOTIFY AUTHORIZED INSP. . .! ROUTE TO M AT'l SUP*.' O 1,_ Spec. 7220-C-39, Rev. 2 rakes no reference to deforr=rion reruir=~e --?
on ends to be spliced. Attached as reference are: 1) Aucust '2 7 . l ' - ~. !
letter to Inland Rverson frce J. H. Bl a s ing_are , 2) 5.g.pr emb e r 2 . 1F- !
letter to Inland Rverson fror J. '2 Blacingare and ?) Inspe.r-icn !
Report on Cadwelding dated October 5, 1970 by J. Nee: v. Pr:.cr to I reference 1) instructine Inland 9verson to chance ar rroxi r= '-= 1 v 751 -
of the reinforcine steel for the bottor mat ir Contz,2 - nent U base !
slab had been fabricated and delivered with interrtnted defermation= :
allowed within 12" of the bar ends. Continued on sheet #3. l i 14 FIEI..D DISftDTION BY: Date APPROVp OF FIELD D:! POSITION . D3:e f / g/$ PFE P lh' " . N ! ' I' '
r.lA' /
~
/?5l7i S?!?$s'?'M _
A' '
_l l 15 LNGRU DibPOSITIOS : #
REPAIR O REJECT DCN REQD: YES DCN Nc. I USE AS IS O SEE DELO%' _ NO a l
- 1. Engineering concurs that the references 1) thru 3) in ite= 13 were issued l, i
-af ter a substantial quantity of rebar was fabricated. The intent of the severIQ l reterences was to ass- e that acequate recar ceformations were incluced witan the cadweld sleeve uv nuvide suffluleuL ivad Li m afet uopouluy .
l
- 2. Engineering has been advised that all splices listed on page 2 were cade wit" North Star Steel Company deformat.ons. By placing the mill marks or missing )
bar detornations in the most crif1 Cal position to give nin. cum number of l deformation arcrutthin the splice sleeve, we have dece miaed chau uet e is Contd. on page 3 A )
PE g.{,4 ((g ${. ]Eh;g6d.'5H S~.ri.M..,s.,,
DISPOSITION CONCURRENCE- ./ / . f l AUTH INSP. .. __ _ _ _ _ _ . CONCUHHENCF : .bn. cp ,/ r.- !
WHi1 E - 0.C. E NGR. PIN K - 0.A. E NGH. SHADED AREAS AH'LICADLE OG-2NCH CANARY - FILLD ENGR. GOLDLNROD - HESP. ENGR. TO ASME COMI'ONENTS R EV. 7172 2513 (7 72) l
R)O N C O "' F 0 R M A N C FR E P O R T ~ N 'cc1w Y;s O SKETCH a. t .o cAv.
,- CONTINUATION SHEET ATTACHED i DATE
'* yan, yy7g .
PROJECT NO.
IO*
- 11. NONCONFORMANCE ID:SCREP ANCY) CONT *D or S '
No. 13. FIELD DISPOSITION CCNT*D or
'ONT*U 15. CNCRG. CISPOSITIO'J CONT'D Splice No. Splice End Dimension "X" East 4" 32/3R16 2,/3R19 East 4 1/2" 29/3R20 East 3 1/11" 34/3R22B East 4 1/2" 18/3R23 East ,
1 1/2" l'9/3R25 -
East 3 1/4" 13/3R30- East 2 1/2" tl 6/ 3R49 East 4 1/2" 42/3R50 East 2" 65/3R55 East 1 3/4" 70/3R60 East 2 3/4" 54/3R68 East 3 1/4" ll7/3R95 .
East 3" East 1 1/2"
( l79/3R131 3 1/4" 136/4R40 South 129/4R47 South 3 3/4" 133/4R48 South 4 1/2" D I 132/4R62 South 4 1/4" !
AY b/3R53 East 3" 120/3R93 East 3 1/2" *
+
131/4R54 AYh3 4't : 1 /-2 *
~
South -
12 8 /-4-RSL South 4 f"2"- l' i 3 < ' :k l A r G4.6%
- 2L. l l
ou
-Gk ,X*. Cadweld Sleeve- . X ' , ,
I' m ;
, [#18S ; y ,.
'? h '< .' .- -
/ *. /19 s.;/; l , s 9 . _j . ,
g
. . _~
I . I l 7 'q~ 4 ,
~
g 1
-1 -
4!? \ Lgfj One Side Only ,
(#18SV '
- Interrupted Deformations Interrupted 2eformati I IInterrupted Totally Enclosed Within Partially Enclosed Deformations ,
Cadweld Sleeve * ,W ithin Cadweld Sleeve
! (Tvnical)
WittTC - 0.C. ENGR. PINK - O A. ENGH. OC - 3NCR CANARY - FIELD ENGR. GOLDCNR00 - RESP. ENGR. REV.7172 2h11 (7 72)
n _ - _ _ . ___ . _ - ___
NONCO .ORMANCE R E P. O R T N;.
C-19 l'
. o SKETCH Ya O a. .uo oe,y
. . CONTINUATION SHEET ATTACHED
~
???n DATE 11 29 -
l PROJECT NO.
- ' 11. NONCCNFORMANCE (DISCREPANCY) CONT'O or No. 13. FIELD DISPOSITICN CONT'D or J T'O 15. ENGRG. DISPOSITION CONT *D Project Engineering should investigate the possibility of accepting the bar placed in Containment #1 Base slab "as is". On the bar remaining : '
be placed, ends where interrupted deformations exist will be cut back to a point where the' splice can be made on uninterrupted deformations a:
the subsequent missing.~bar length replaced using another Cadweld splice Item 15 Contd. ,
still remaining an average deformation spacing of 1.00 inches which is less than Erico's required maximum deformation spacing of 1.18 inches (re Erico manual RB 20 Ml?3)
- 3. Therefore, listed splices in page 2 of this NCR are acceptable, and should be "used as is."
- 4. Field's disposition of remaining bars is accepatble as per item 13.
- 5. Request Field to test three cadwelds with interrupted deformations within the sle.e q ,to verify adequacy of splice, b .- M -i t9 74-WittTE - O.C. ENGR. PINK - 0.A. ENGH. OC - 3NCR
. CAN ARY - FIELD ENGR. GOLDENROD - RESP. ENGR. , R EV. 71 72 all (172)
i ~
bcca d!. 3. Brunor/. L. Johncon wo'/a o -
- . M. J. Mitchcll/R. W. Stalwick
- wo/a 4 "" "* '
%'777 % J. D. Franklin /J. C. Quigley . fr/S ;
W T. I. McCugh ((j3,6!b'/a C O P Y. -..'
p AUG 3 1 1970 y .,
(7 - -
x/ - .-
ECHTEL CORPOR ATIO:1 g'
SEP 02 70 cG.*i.
August 27, 1970 CfMV s vD Inland-Ry. icon Con.2truction -
Product Ccmpany -
Mct.f_
~
6\.'.id.Qi-3 P. O. Box 5532 9W D, .8Is-Chicago, Illinoic '60G00 *
~
t- .
'Att$ntiba: It.*J. V. Daher -
Mr. D. J. Leitgeb
Subject:
Concumcrc Power Compan'/
Midland Plnnt Unito 1 & 2 l Job !!o. 7220 -
Roinforcing Stool l
-. File: P.O. 7220-C-39 (PR) __ l Genticmon: .
Attached for--your information .ic one copy of our Specification O
d
- /220-C-55, Rovicica 1 por Auguct 2G,.1970 tolophone rcquent by D.,Loitgeb to D. N. . : chock.
Thic will confirn our requiremont that No. ICS robarn with interruptionc of bar 'doformations in tho region of bar enda which require et .clac aro unacceptablo and vill ba rejectri..
Thic problen occurs with certain fregnancy on barn whero tW tradomark for North Star or Inland Stcol in allowed to interrupt the. normal bar doformation. For thic reanon, wo would profer ;
to have thoac barn which do not interrupt the norrni pattern, i auch an-Coco barn, furniched for all Co. 1GS which requiro
- caducid splicco on this project.
Further, wo find that the mothod of Thonr cutting Ho. 10S ,
bara altors tho deformationc for a longth of appro::i:.'.ately 2 ~
l inchos at bar enda. This alteration of doformaticac ia alcoPicaco -.
~
unacceptablo at ondo uhoro'cadwald cplicca will bo mado.
acucuto bara at tho onds which vill requiro caduald spl.ico at the unit prica of 45 C por cut bar and ao quoted verbally by D. Loitgeb-to B. N. Pucheck, and wo will preparu a chango order accordingly. -
~
, Vory truly youra, Crir,inal sigent by .
IL H. BLASINGA.',G ,
p ,
J. H. Blacingamo Q
l -
Project Engincor i '
- Dochtel Cortpany l E
llHP/dh' *
-(In dupl'. ) *
! - cc: Concunora Pouar Co. (3) ,
. ~
m p
1 d bcca .T. I. McIlu ,..
af.
.. s ' , (j
...:. . . , 2,f , 3 .,
MC,D . Bruner/ D. L. Johnson -
i* **
Plutcl'ak
]p F. -
COPY .
], -
l 4, *i .
i p.4 y y .
September 2, 1970 Inland-Rycrcon Construction 1 Producta Company,_, ,,,. ' ,
} - i
^
P . O .. 13o:c-5 5 3 2 , . . - a
/
Chicago, Illinois 60680 s l .
Attontion: Mr. Paul Dackus Subj.oct:Connumers Pouer Company Midland Plant Unita l'& 2 Job Ho. 7220 Reinforcing Gtcol Filo: P.O.'7220- (PR)
Gontlomant Further to our lotter of August 27, 1970, and por your tolophone requent this vill clarify our requiremont for bar
,_ ond preparatica at caducids. In cddition to sau cutting the (3)
'w '
robar and which requires caduelding, the normal bar deforma-tionu shall be uninterrupted at bcr endu requiring cadwelds no follouas i
- 1. Continuous normal bar daforrc.ations for a minint a of 6 'inchos at the ends of !!o. 18S barn uhich will be apliced bar to bar with an Erico cadwold sleevo of typo RBT-lG01-H. -
- 2. Continous normal bar deformationc for a minimu a of 9"
. inchos at th'o onda of No. 10S barc which uill be cpliced to structural platoc or chapon with caduald slocyoc of typo RDB-lG101-A.
Very truly yours, ORIGINAL Clet. lit.
BY ,
, . C. R. VAN TIES f, J. H. Blasingano Bochtol Co:{.g@ah('h' non[9
- i DNP/dh (In dupl.)
V ggp 3 B70 cc: Consumorc Power Co. (3) u- .
vicH rCL CORPORr*
- g e
e
. . v ._~
jJCE..Gilj Oct. 5, 1970
- ~N i v-Listed Today we started our first ' production CADUELDIUG.
below are the problems wa faced and the methods we chose for solution: .
Five out of the 20 production splices had one out of 1.
the two rebar ends to be spliced deficient in deformations, due to the bar identification stamp falling at the end.
Since these bars were received on the job prior to the attached letter dated Sept. 2, 1970 to Inland-Ryerson from Mr. J . H. Blasinga.ac, I felt we had no alternative but to CADWELD these bars'the same as the others. One of these five splices tiere pulled to be tested. Of the last set of test specimens tested by Flood & Co. last month, one was an identical case with one rebar end deficient in ,
deformations. The tensile strength of this splice vas 97.5 ksi which was well above the specified minimum f 125 percent of the yield strength or 75 ksi. We did act have the situation where both ends of 'he rebar have this 7-y deformation deficiency, but if this.comes up I plan to
(~ 'j 'ut out 2 feet or 3 feet back from the end of each bar c
and splict uith two CADUELDS similar pulling a section for test _ng.
- 2. The specifications call for a selective number of pro- .
duction and sister specimens to be tested per certain lot of splices for each CADUELDIEG crew. Ue had 3 crews of 2 men each CADh'ELDIEG in the CADRELD AREA, but all under the direct supervision of one foreman. Since all of the CADRELDING uas confined to a small area and the forc=an ,
could readily oversee all of the work simultaneously, I considered this as one crew and pulled my test specimens accordingly.
O1 . 20 L Oc.f. 5, W i&
M%
)
L .
.r
("J'd3 CADWELD PRODUCT. N AND TEST REPORT TC U TAN %
. .. - ~s f.g3 p f 3
T / /
~
N YL, ' , ,
) '"
CO , (9s
- 1. PROJECT NO. 7320 MidLAN O 2.DATE Y!50 [7h* PAGE I CF I
" POWDER
- POSITION PRE. VISUAL INSPECTION
- DESTRUCTIVE TESTING $*OTTED
" SPLICE SLEEVE REMARKS.s r:0. [v . LOT NO. LOT NO. y y HEAT 10.
. Entis
- 11. 12.
T.ipHo:e Centrg.
13.
TENSILE RESULT L4.
TYPE FAILUnE 15 AVG
- TENSILE Ora DwG.
NO.
a gMR48 X 5 s 98.5 Bar Fract ure- P4 N/ 8:'. c.4 X 5 s 96.0 Bar Fract ure l' Ii
- . s. ..: ' er )( s; 5 99.7 Bar Fract ure l ' 'l- .
Nc1Ti ', im s c- (Ansdca ps H/ JG rati (.M.uP Co 4 rot ua r/c.us io. r/t ml n#6 _ .u wa.n I 4 c:e/G . U t r_ r' /4 t?6 GC en - 0 -it 4 A r recs:'id ri r. % v 'A o c ,:. c e <: T- 1c ' (i u Wi:.
/
k for.;A A via J 're : %4e wme M.(1 -c' -1 / . TI\ G . Pl.lcEs 11 A' G- Pse tu (V'i' 1 c, .!
ocr cf CGE ::a ', c. A: .1 Gh M/ r. s /,,
,.s.,'..,
u //ime.- -
IM /,:lR/le XX)N X lKl V 's I \l__\ J 4
! L l 1 .
l 2 F./ll(X- i-
~
r ~t .1
,'0 G W \'t h!\lVt\/ 9 1 u -
.s l
l.'/ [-f l
1 Ist i A.aM -
l , .,
I XXRW Y liOj!'.y1'\/ 9 .
j L. - a l
._f
\ - h* ,
I I
_ _ - - - _ - - - , . . _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ m__.s_..___.. _
24.,,, MA i s. can c zt !_'.,._._.LS*,io.cnADE_.bC 20. SE RIES "T"h"B"O L3 CH;DIAa 7'J'd, @,h.,T,,.,'j' "
b.
ll,ab.'M .
'%i, nv i '3 -U i7 ,s*f, -- zu. y'l'tt,'< h; . : rco.. .<,cn a, . rami. m iinnoi. no.---- 2reni w nu. :..i. n t t o i n uiro.t n m e n. . is,ut. "1
- - - - - ~.
f ~E 1 OF 2 Ia 7 .;
\ ' p. -
- a. r .,m& s+ rp;.c- e .. M' i ftytv N O N Q O ri F O R M A N C E REPORT SKETCH Yn- .!. M hN 7 S. PflOJECT NO. 7220 ATTACHED f,(f j[f,[f. .
~
G. ITEM NAME wCM LOCATION AR E A /ti'.DG. 5. L*WG/PART No. HEV. f . l * *.d u : no. . *$. 21~ "
~'
ithinment #2 1.iner S-1-5-U-l Liner Plateie~ ssen.il d lO~.?
.9y..
.t.g :":ane TTNSPECif 0N CRITERIA DOCUMEN.T NUMBER & T6TLE Re ac tor. .3 u L r .;; =.
DWG O SPEC 2 OTHER O (EXPLAIN) 7220-C-EO.Rev.7 & Accessor d 6MJ_ 9 N.i__
<.- 'i ADDRESS -
8.
SOURCE: ENGRG. O CONSTR.O OTHER 9 (EXPLAIN) / %. P .O . t. : - ' <'
Southern Boiler & Tank Works, Memchis, Tenn. , rTW.TM/g */
- 10. 1* NONCONFORMANCt: tutSCREPANCYJ DESCRIPTION: ASMF YES b' No. (LIST SERI AL NUMBERS WHERE APPLICABLE) NO O 1 S-1-5-U-l Liner Plate (Ref. NCR No. C-4)
Disposition made on NCR !!C-4 for repair of liner olate was not folle:-
ed when repair was performed. The followine deviations were noted:
- 1. A 12" x 14" section of liner nlate was removed by fla e rutti ng.
- 2. Epecification 7220-C-50 was not followed.
- 3. Appendix B "Reoair Procedurfs for Reactor Buildine Liner Plate" of Specification 7220-C-lll had not been issued for construe ic .
COrJCURRENC M , sm
- 12. NCH PHLi% RED U v.; .gg et , , l
.'b'hf I
_, h [:f'\ -n'-m ' W y_ _ E6 Y7 % L$$C _/_'N /
- 13. FIELD DISPOSITION. REWORK O REJECT O ROUTE TO PROJECT E GRG V NOTIFY AUTHORIZED INSP. C ROUTE To f aAT*L SUPV. O 1 !NCR-C4 was written to cover a defect in the -he wel' =+ w '-g
- ll l leak chase channel to the subiect liner olate assembly. ' he defe :i ce weld was removed by 7rindinz. Visual ins- ection of the liner plate under the chase channel revealed lamination on the liner clace. The chase channel in that E.rea was removed and the defective area of the pla':e was heated to cetermine the extent of lamination. The defect proved to be toc extensive to recair by addin: weld metal to the an=
so a 12" x 14" cut out was made to remove the affected area. l A 12" x 14" catch plate was removed from a futurd nenetrati: n area -f I i
- 14. FIELD DISPOSITION SY; Date /-PPROVAL Oi F i:LO 04P SITaON: Du i PFE- !I ' L' I-
/ I ! o"*/' # l 0 F Gary /2.-z.7si?nfry.r'e r l
- 15. LNGHG DISPOSillON: O YES DCN No.
REPAIR O REJECT DCN REQD:
- USE ASIS E SIE BELOW O NO _I
/ Engineering concurs with Field's disposition #1 to repair the def ective area of liner plate with plate cut out from a future penetration area and weld the plate I
- with parent plate with Bechtel Welding procedure pl-Ac-LH. We concur that the re-:.iic should, and do in fact, meet the intent of spec. 7220-C-lll n' //- ?
' I
I Rev. 2, App. B.
2Pt2 12/27/n 1 l
PPROVAL OF <* -
s Date 11. HEINSPECTIOfJ . v z
pg/k,- 5L<b! k 5% hW!.g"> j'Er . ?3
' ' l' * *> N *?~ '
ACCEPT hespni 0+ Eny. ,- D., t e Date
_)
ENGRG. e PFE -' -' ****' W ?d U"5PO*"e Lc.d Lr; .
" ~
C.::
' O.ne REJECT O DISPOSITION CONCURRENCE AU114. INSP
- }. . _ _ _ _
CONCURRCNCE: Ani i ,n n-.
PIN K - O.A. ENGR. Sl(ADED /.4E AL APPLIC AllLE UC - 2fiCr4 W1(ITE - O C. [NCl4. R EV. 71 72 CANARY - FIELD ENGR. COLDF.NROD - RESP. ENGR. TO ASMC COr.1PONENTS .
2512 (7 72)
s 3 vnuE JC'Wr;7G
,M / NONCON JRMANCE R. E P O R T No.
' CINTINUATION SHEET
'~ A A HED PROJECT NO. DATE 12 5 73 IU*
. 11 NONCONFORMANCE (DISCREPANCY) CONT *D or [
- 13. FIELD DISPOSITICN CONT *D or
~
'No. 2 .
T* D 15. CNGHG. OfSPOSITICN CONT *O _
Plate assembly S2-4-U2, Heat 51721292, Slab Z97021.
All edges were prepared for welding in accordance with Bechtel Welding procedure Pl-A-C-LH. Back up strips were attached to the back side of the liner plate and' patch was welded into place by Boilermaker Welder No. B-8 in accordance with Specifications 7220-C-lll, Rev. 1. The joint was examined by radiograph and leak chase channel installed over the seam. Prior to welding S subsequent to weld edge preparation a liquid penetrant examination was performed of the edge. This examination showed,no further evidence of plate lamination.
/
2* '
Opecification 7220-C-50 was incorrectly referred to on NCR-C4.
The applicable specification for field work on liner plate is e m -
7 2 2 0 -C-.111.
%s;
'Q 3*
The field requests engineering to evaluate field disposition #1 for compliance to the intent of Specification 7220-C-lll, Rev. 23 Appendix B.
i l
i
/
(
\
.)
I W141TE - O.C. ENGR. PINK - O.A. ENGR- OC - 3NCR CANARY - FIELD ENGR. GOLDENnOD - RESP. ENGR. R E V. 7172 t 2bt l (F-12)
' . . E _.L. OF 1 .g -., , q
- h. REPORT SKETCH Ye
~
[s.. .-
?
[ O cay s
N O P C O N F O'R M A N C'E .ATTACHEO <*2
- 'l
.., / " D ATE ;l17 g : l - -
[b.f.I. PROJECT NO.
7220 z
~ REV. 6. ITEM N A*.tE ,. ,
- g. O.No. ~-
ATION AHCA/DLOG. b. OWG/PART No. .- % .- .-
ITE -
Socc. 7220-C-230 ? Concrete .
Dn-Site Batch Plant
- DOCUMGT t4U'.inER ta T6T LE. Spec . 7220-C-230., Rev. 2 PECrioi4 cRiTERI A For Oney_a. _t_inr'*-=0n-Si te - Bh ch Fl e--
owG D SPEC @ OTHER O texPLAIN) Technical Soec. AOURESS *
- 9. P.O. f t.e
,t :
. ON: ENGRG. O CONSTn.O OTHER C (EXPLAIN) " Chamolon ,
, Inc . Iron Mountc'.n',h,t... ' 220-C AS?.1E i ES ' J --
O. 11. NONCONFORMANCE IDlSCREPANCYI CESCRIPTION: NO 3 No. (LLST SERIAL NUMBERS WHERE APPLICABLE) 1 Paragraoh 8.3 of Spec. 7220-C-230. Rev. 2 states admi_xture m ks e h -_ _ I include an aoproved means of acitation. do not have a mea.s of Admixture tanks at the On-Site Batch Plant agitation. .
Urs Deze CC. .CU.,r. = * . /j
)
12.1"CR F HE pat'.l.() B N :
R:sponuble b . .
) '
9-G l1 Resgnns ble /
Lea E,:.. Ze fa_ .'e/- d.Q'[0- /d'e9'/A.a Erv. _f)h.le ' _1U ~ d.
- 13. FIELD DISPOSITION: REWORK O FsEJECT C FCUTE T'; PPC.'EC7ENGRG X i ROUTE TO *.1 AT*L SUP /. C NOTIFY AUTHOf<l7ED INEP. ]
field has discussed with croject e..cineerintField the fact that the The recom. ends .
~ l admix manuf acturer does not reOuire acitation.
l deletion of, the .g;;itation .recuire .ent.
l
! Di > l$ IP li ti {; N U j iW ~ ' \U) g l -
uu , , _ , , _ r ., ,
l s.'.* g.. t >"-
i I
I gggrgt' pnWER CORP. raSSITIOil l J O B JC ZO AFPROVA OF F LE L J.
Datt g' s
- _ . . .D.It s ,f. 1
- 14. FIELD utS6'OSITION DY: PCP PFE W f1. - v<f*df 'I [.hf // '+ 3 12-T-73 f,$[ k h
)Clty. UJ. k .u J.l g ,
Ib. LNblib Dit> POSITION: g g NO Fi USE ASIS O SE E cetOw :.3 I
i will revise the Snecification 7220-C-230 ? 8 3 to Hence,require Jne ineerine- __
anitation in accordance uith manufceturers reco .menda tion.
12/14/73, _
based on letter f rom raster Builders to Richard Grote dated- - j no agitation vill be necessary unless raterial has been frozen. v ~ * " . / . t f.' 4
~-
,a a ,: r: , , . ,.- -a. .e.a- -
-a .i
- '.8
. .i : . .t. ; .
. i 2 /> eim ? -
GA/4 /*./-en/"3
- gyv-r n
f)/m A -..
1/. HtlN$i EG1 LON s
16.ll' PROVAL OF
/ / )r/
- -l N ':' ' - ~ v 0'.q .= i
'/{pg/;Alld^ T!) /%C-.d'N'W*7 l~'AC/rD MO Reg'ubie Eng<.'
N ENGRG. p//
/
i *j ~cm/ *? ** Y ' *'
?
i N Q,*** W %
PFE -
*.
- h *1.i O I -
Dm REKCT C , -
DISPOSITION 'CONbORRENCC
) . COf CURAE'!CE: h6.h . .s .; . .
Is . [
Aulli I N ?~i' . . ._ _ _._ _ _
00 - 2fdCH SHA:.:LPs AD.EM ArPLICASLE R EV. 7172 Wlilit - 0 C. ENGR. PIN K - Q.A. LfJGlt. TO ASME CO*.*PONENTS
--' eari n r or n 'nOLDENRUD - REM RNGR. - _ _
m -
, h)([% C - E- $
L RGASTER SCJUE DERS
%h '
@~ue asarsetLD. C&tytLANO. Onto sen se e en0NE 2ss ,7s 5000
- Casts umstuttH00 CLivtLANO December 14, 1973 Mr. Richard Grote Bechtel Corporation Midland, Michigan c/o Champion, Inc,. ,
Dear Mr. Grote:
Attached are notarized certificates on MB-HC and MB-VR Standard as requested by Mr. Jack Neuman, Manager of our Detroit branch office, showing compliance with the requirements of paragraph 7.4.2 and 7.4.3 of the proj ect specification 7220-C-230, PSV 1.
The following remarks are relative to the minimum cement and water reduction requirements as outlined on page 5 of the proj ect f'} specifications, paragraph 2, subparagraph 7.4.3, water-reducing L/ agent.
Based on test data obtained from evaluations conducted in our own laboratory, which is regularly inspected by
- Cement and Concrete Reference Laboratory; we feel'reasonab1: u.nfident that at a dosage rate of 1 fl ozs/100 lbs of cement, tro-HC should achieve an average water reduction of approximately 5% with an accompanying !
cement reduction of approximately 11% based on psi increase over -
a plain reference mix at equal cement contents using identical concrete making materials. This cement reduction is computed using the accepted rule of thumb where 10 psi equals 1 pound of cement !
for an established mix design. .
1 Sincerely yours, 1
GPER BUILDERS *
, pgd df Afa.sk JHS/lh James 1. hprouse
() Attachment Assistant Director, Engineering l
~' cc: Champion, Inc. -
l P. O. Box 1306 Mr. J; E. Neuman l Midland, Michigan 48640 Mr. I. V. Troutman l Devdopeu atul Snuindtacu ej blud % hg.w:,i. Cn.c,ine, 2 Si.t.s, D0 0
.s .,
- %w wasreas.uewcas q3
== -
b5
,,r~y mavereto. etsvatamo. onso 44:ss '. enome ate 27: sooo casts unstvate.oo ctavata6a December 14, 1973
' (j - '
Re: Consumer Power Company Nuclear Plant
- Midland, Michigan To Whom It May Concern State of Ohio ) ,
County-of Cuyahoga)ss ,
Before me, a Notary.Public, in and for the aforesaid State and County, personally appeared James H. Sprouse, who being duly sworn, deposes and says:
That he is Assistant Director of Engineering for Master Builders, Cleveland, Ohio; and That Fm-HC, a product of Master Builders, co'mplies with b.A ASTM C-_494, Type D; and That MB-HC contributes no chloride to concrete through its use, i.e. less than 5 ppm by weight of the cement; and .
That chloride is not an added ingredient in the manufacture of this FB-HC; and -
That MB-HC does not require agitation except that necessary '
for reconstitution when the material has been frozen prior to use.
ndh?ilkh/ti$+2LV2L
?
sistantiptector, Engineering
',,' Subscribed .and sworn to before me this 14th day of December,
! 1973. . .
O / Ab- / e <. . ..b. c e-, -
.v}
l 't) CAP.Eu E. Gr.hi'M. '%"."i P uT #2r.-n.
pit.:r. u..u r, it.:: '
Notary Public gy cam.ms; n D;rts 0:::.scr 21.10 j . .
DcNdepeu a,14 Acui,!uctiinsi c) p.mt.ucs p..Ixya.:p cen u:.s. si..-: Ieoo .
-*' * ~ * * -
L
-N _____ _ _ _ _ _ __
- . py W _
A 'MS$7EN 3888[ CA-.MO
~. g~ t y5
[%urnico, etivitano, onio seite enons ais u_Oooo . casta uanu swoo ctivitano December 14, 1973
' \. ) .
Re: Consumer Power Company Nuclear Pleut Midland, Michigan To Whom It May Concern State of Ohin , )
County of Cuyahoga)ss . ,
Before me, a Notary Public, in and for the aforesaid State and County, personally appeared James H. Sprouse, who being duly sworn, deposes and says:
That he-is Assistant Director of Engineering for Master Builders, Cleveland, Ohio; and That MB-VR Standard (Master Builder' Neutralized Vinsol Resin Solution) is an aqueous solution of Vinsol resin that has C T been neutralized by sodium hydroxide. The ra tio of sodium V hydroxide to Vinsol resin is one part.to six parts. The percentage of solids based upon the residue dried at 105C is thirteen. No other additive' or chemical agent is present in MB-VR Standard; and That'MB-VR Standard conforms with all the requirements of ASTM C 260, Specifications for Air-Entraining Admixtures for Concrete; and That MB-VR Standard is. capable of entraining air in the range of 3 to 6' percent; and That MB-VR Standard does not require agitation except that necessary for reconstitution when the material has been frozen prior to use; and ,
'Tht2t MB-VR Standard is free of chloride inasmuch as it contri- .
butes chloride in an amount equal to ab j ut 6 ppm by weight of cement in the concrete. /
f /
'..~ *' ' ,
h/}yy1A89 0L ,< JCWLE s _
sistant 'Dyctor, Engineering i j Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14th day of December, 1973.
- f. . pf, una e accus.mu. my Pub lic CuWIRAA Cud *D W,0
, g, .,
W rerns.ir.i sa f tra M.*x: 21.1W8 Nolicry Publ)..c D/v'IOp(MJ MOI., .ld*Mut[0daMu eh f.todandi %I.q.'tr.2.vg I C.Mtr.:* ?, Ola10 > h'O 3
^
No, g_33 gf.)Q NONCON.FORMANCE REPORT SKETCH Ya O 3. Mo cu . z-ATTACHED
%d PROJECT NO. -7220 DATEk7l17 7 AR E A/8 LDG. S. O.';gPART No. REV. ' 6. ITEM MAME O No. 1*21
.lTEM LOCATION ntainment Unit #2 S2-4-U1 S Sl-1-U2 Liner Plate
. PECTION CRITERIA .
OCCUUEN.T tsUMNITLE owG O ' SPEC 2 OTnER O (EXPLAIN) 7220-C-lll Erection of Liner Pla'te
- s. souHCE: ENGRG. O CONsTR.
oTnER E (EXPLAINI Southern BoiTypSE Tank WorI8s"~ '" '
Memchis, Tenn. l 7220-C-50
- h. 11. NONCONFORMANCE (DISCREP ANCY; DESORIPTION: ASME YES C (LIST SERI AL NUMBERS WHERE APPLICABLE)
NO Od N a.
1 Plate Assembly No. S2-4-Ul: I While building pressure in the leak chase system for the orer rurd decay test, air escaned from the back side of h clare. indicati.- i a faulty weld. The fault is at the shot weld of the unter and le-=-
plate. The back side of the welded area is severelv strair.ed.
2 Plate Assembly No. Sl-1-U2:
Additional insoection initiated due to item 1 revealed a ruprur+
in the came weld on plate assembly S1-1-U2. The back side of the welded area is severely strained. -
- 12. NCH PHEPAHEu uy. Date coi4CuHH E q ..
3,/ g .re
";*"* [ h.Y G A c. n - n-n-n D;R"LY'16-/Lm[/d5' _/2h@s
- 13. FIE LO DISPOSITION: / l REWORK b REJECT U ROUTE TO PROJECT [NGRG U i NOTirY AUTHOpt7EO INSo U ROUTE TO f. TAT"L SUPV. U 1 E 2 Remove and reclace defective areas in accordance with snecificarfr- l 7220-C-lll, Rev. 2 3 Appendiy. "B". I i
I i
i Date AFPROV LOFFe CO Di ? St IGN:
/ /7 L: .
- 14. FIELD OISPOSIT80N uY:
is / 'L !J!11._ / -O '
PFE.
o 1w1
~
cwcA m _
n-a-n m sm lb. ENGHG DlbPOSITION: P O O m em mG ma a USE AS IS U SEE P.ELOP! C NO O i I
f i
__! l APPROVAL OF Dae 1/. HEINdPECTION g
/ ,,
b 2'
~~
l l Date r N PO.NbD"J ~'C':*
ENGRG. .,
~ ' '
I-'**'" --I' PFE Nte REJECT O c Hespor swe 'cau tocr. a :.
DISPOSITION .CONCURAENCE AUTH. INSP. .
CO*! CUR R Ft:CE : Amri W o. ]
PINK - O.A. ENGH. St1ADEO MEAS AFPLICANLE GC - 2f*G 4
' WHIT E - 0.C. ENGR. R EV. 71 72 CANAllY - FIELD ENGR. GOLDENROO - RESP. ENGR. TO ASME COM:'ONEN1S 2512 (7 72)
< n.
p" _
.. - 5 AGE 1 OF 2 .
y'd -
No.C-36
[,1ph NO.NCONFORMANCE REPORT SKETCH Y;s O 3. uODAY vg
- ^
ATTACHED PROJECT NO. 7220 .
DATE 12 31 7]
- l. lTEM LOCATION , ARE A/ BLDG. 5.
/gP , T o R V. 6. ITEM NAME O No. 1 111 Bise' slab Cont #1 & #2' 7220-C-310 2 Cadweld Sleeves
- 7. INSPECTION CRITERI A DOCUMENT NUMBER & TATLE rormin Placing Finishine DWG O SeEC 0 OTwER O (EXPLAIN) 7220-C-231, Rev. 4 Curinr.;gdoncrete o,f Concrete; and
- 8. SOURCE: *
- ENGRG. O CONSTR.O OTHER S (EXPLAINI Erico Products, Inc., Cleveland, Ohio 7220-C-255-AC
- 10. 11. NONCONFORMANCE (DISCREPANCY) DESCRIPTION: AsME YEs O No. (LIST SERIAL NUMBERS WHERE APPLICABLE) NO @ .
- 1. Cadweld sleeves do not conform to Para.Traph 10.9.3 of Specification 7220-C-231, Rev. 4. Specifically, sc~e Cadweld sleeves are improperly rachined, i.e., burrs, shavings, etc. rgrr)/'i g;';i(}TihC-MTyy, and'sete have' rust alo.n;; the inside grco te Y8 IMNM D t d. iI Ph "* e t"" v % I " "N W
- 6 C Lf l V C . )
J AN 101974 RFr*WT M P.%/ ' O (* O R P. g 4_1/> 197A J 0 D 7r,'.0
' f".
CM 10
/~ Q U A lit Y CONTROL i2. NCR esterARED BY: Date CONCURHENCE:
'ta "'*
E A L. j'/:. /'l -
/_ w / a;m"g.'
EHEL M 20 par ihh4 13 FILLD OtSFOSITIONy REWORK O REJECT O route TO PROJECT ENGRG 2, NOTIFY AtJTHORIZED INSP. O ROUTE TO MAT'L SUPV. O
- 1. Prior to Caduelding, burrs , shavin s , rust , etc. , will te removed by reans of a "j
wirebrush, small metal picks or other suitable instruments. If necessary, the inside of the sleeve will be sandblasted. Cadweld sleeves which will n , neet the requirements of Paragraph 10 9.3 of Spec. 7220-C-231, Rev. 4 after reverk, will be re;iccted by the field engineer insnectins- the Cadweld sleeves.
See Continuation Sheet. !
- 14. FIELD OtSPOSITION BY: Date
/ [ 1 APPROV L OF Ft SJ TIO N: Dat e O OfSP PFE\ / J' / ( * { I < u ~- '
l !
) / ' .
Y-] * "h/ $uf"u"5f lf _i
- 16. ENbHG DISPOSITION:
REPAIR USE ASOISREJECT O SEE BELOW p3 oCN REOo: veS DCN No.
NO pS
{
- l. Ennineerinn concurs with the field disposition with the follow: nn modifications: l a) Small amounts of burrs, shavings etc. are not_ caused by improper cachining, l but incomplete cleaning.
b) Removal of small amounts of shavings, burrs, and rust ja not required sa long i as the flow of molten filler metal is not inhibited. ,
c) Do carefully inspect for, and remove any ecisture inside of the sleeve. .? .
, , See Continuation Sheet, n ,,'"
.v /. i -
W r4- /.:- itl .
( .% . .Z -
APPROVAL OF
/h Q Y 4'f M ,fLf _- '
' ~
l Da 17 f . ,
'" pgA' 'b- ] l j W W5 o[tehl>z j .REINSFECTIONj .__ / 0 6 L - t
__2 /1 ( 7 4 - \
f PFEt i f l Ir 'f'tnf ] 'I OtSf'OSITION CONCUHRE AUTH. INSP.
'E / / DL,W / REJECT O g e m W w ,}
CONCURRENCE: / Auth i m p.
=
[Nm l WHil E - 0.C. ENG R. PINK - 0.A. ENGR. SHADED Af TEAS APPLICADLE QC - 2NCH CANARY - FIELD ENGR. GOLDENROD - RESP, ENGR. TO ASME COMPONENTS R EV. 7172 2513(772)
~
. NONCON )RMANCE REPORT No. C-36 SKETCH Y:s O a. mo o^v vR CONTINUATION SHEET ATTACHED 7220 DATE 3 21 7h.
PROJECT NO.
30*
- 31. .NONCONFORMANCE (DISCREPANCY) CONT *D or No. 13. FIELD DISPOSITION CONT *D or
-D 15. ENGRG. DISPOSITION CONT'D Project Field Engineering has elected to inplemerit the recommended field disposition in lieu of that suggested by Project Engineering.
Th.e reason for implementing the recommended field disposition is that it satisfies everything that is suggested by Project Engineering plus exceeds it by more thorough cleaning of the sleeves. ;
PFE:
jjs .
(j, ,
a4 p/-7f
&CL)S[hY '. '
(,, & C. 5*Sh
,,rx 1
- wl l
l l
l
. . l l
l l
l l
l y-4
%)- '
'L WillTE - O.C. E NGR. PIN K - O.A. ENGIT. 00 - 3NCR CANARY - FIELD ENGR. GO LD EN ROD - H ESP. ENGR. R EV. 7172 2S11 (7 72)
L m
\ ' (g g
P 3 1 OF 1 #' I No. C-36A flyyrap NONCONFORMANCE REPORT SKETCH YIs C :s. t.10 O M *:
' 7220 ATTACHED b . PROJECT NO. ,
DATE , e _
~ ~
n 4.EE r.1 LCCATION AR E A/B LOG. 5. DWG/PART No. REV. G. ITEf.1 NAf.1E Oh 1
- t' 5 l se Slab Cont. #2 7220-C-393 5 Luts fcr Cross Eracin on '.:3 - Ci 7.mce'ECTIOf4 CRITERIA DOCUMLN T.NUf.;t!ER & TITLE owo O SPEC O OrsER G (EXPLAIN) Welding procedure P1-A (Structurc1)
- a. S uRCe:
ENGnG. M CONSTn.O OTHER 0 : EXPLAIN)
- NA
- 10. H. NONCONFORMANCE (DISCR EPANCYi DESCRIPTION: A3.,g., ygg Q No. (LIST SERfAL NU'.*BERS WHERE APPLICABLF) NO Td 1 Engineering's diseosition to NCR-C-38 received on 1/9/74 authorized 1 the field to weld lugs on the suoport colu=ns shown on Dwg. 7220-C-393 according to welding procedure Pl-A. On 1/9/74 the field welce:
12 lugs on the columns according to welding procedure Pl-A-Lh.
The difference in the procedures is that welding procedure F1-A requires welders be qualified to AWS reOuirements, and welding nrocedure P3-A-Lh recuires welders be cualified to Section IX of t.s ASME Code.
- 12. NCH PHLPAHED isY: Date COf4 C L,R R E N Li. , - -
.'. r.t .l r 9' s ./.
- 13. FILLD UthPO5tTION:
_ _ , f_ *$~ cE h 'O f.: _T f"l 'h REWORK d} REJECT C RcUTc TO pac;ECT E.. ,RG u NOTIFY AUTHOol7ED If S:. O ROUTE TO MAT t. EUPV. ]
1
^
TWX #2670 from the Proiect Engineer on 1/10/74 amended NCR-C-3E ::
allow the lues to be welded according to either welding procedure Pl-A or Pl-A-Lh, at the field's option.
The 12 lugs welded on the columns can be accented for use as is and ifuture welding of the lugs will be in accordance witt...'CR-C-36 an- '
TWX #2670, which allows the use of weldin; crecedure F1-A or P1-A ~. r Grp u;.??su. 5 slf'. o.'. ; ? O. i * /. 21 7'r'
- 14. FIELD DISPOSITION BY: Date APPHOVAL OF FIELD D.M C56Tsun: #- E, a - t
,s ll NCURRE.CE 'i j*! e AUTK If4SP *)
/ C *t
- 16. LNGHG OtSPGslTION:
O mm O e em mO ma USE AS IS O SEE bELOW U NO :i l
f l
l l
- 16. ' OVAL OF Da te 1/ 6 h ah5t'ECilON < l
,, ,.7 . . ; , ,
,, j PE
.GRG. g , ACCEPTh Responstte, Lnry. ,
- n. ,L n e , ,l PFE .c.. ... '
DISPOSITION COflCURR ENCE REJECT O scinoas ue ' x' Ear- ;-
l AUtif. INSP _i CO NCUR R E NCE': Aum e u.
WHIT L - O.C. LNGR. l'IN K - O.A. E NGR. SH ADED Ar.E.AS At f$L;Ct.SLE GC - 2NC n 2- Q f '
! CANARY - FIELD ENGR. GOLDENROD - RESP. ENGR. TO AST,1E COf.1PCNEf4TS
. 2S1D (7 72) R E V. 7172
sQF\
i .
g,p i .
. r . ., o
~
s .
h t;7f.C ,
3ICHTIL :!IDL ffy,d f '
.i ...gpphLi-
DIC11TIL AS.,. ,g, ,f ('
&l0-223-6032 CLG S10-266-9497 -\,'.,, g . ( br ! s'N
- Tux s2670 1/10/74 07 sa i b., .'n. .. U9.'
ATT:1.' : I. I. FELTO:s D . :.1 't '.
. 2- JAti l r ;7., , i.gj 0000*PLIASI RUS:t DEL IVERY * * * * * * ( .- MClint "T.',.'a cc, p, cf,. ,/
\ yvezn. .,
s 3
', b , . :,y. ? -
.\, .w/ j ~.: y '
DISC - 148 S1'7.1ECT: C M'SU:: IRS POUIR CO::PANY IIIDLA:JD PLA:1'I - U: !TS 1 4 2 J0D *0. 7220 MISCILLA: ZCUS iETAL ~
FILI: C274, C-33 i
/^ AGRAPH 7.4 0F SPICIFICAT IO:: 72?3-C-33, P.IV . 2, 1[ILL 3I .7I- j (PROCIDURIS LID TO ALSO I: CLUDI UILDI:J3 CF l11 SCILLA:-1.i:OUS l1IT' AL US I.JJ A:D VILDIF.S CUALIFIID I:J ACCCRDA: CI UITH AS!!I SICTIO::
IX.
OUR RISP O:JSI T O 1CII C-43, NCR C-38, AID FCF. C-40 IS A!::iI!!DID TO ALLOU STRUCTU!iAL '!IL!s I JG US I :3 IIT1tIR VILDI::G PROCI".s*JIIIS PI-A OR 71 - A-LH AT THE FIILD 'S OPT I C::. l 1
P. A. :1 ART I :II, PROJECT I!!3 !!!IIR AtJM ARIO:1/7PZ211 G/7220-001/HT:1
- . m't Qi .o m P*
- 1 % w) 0000 *PLIASI RUS!! DILIVERY* * * * * [,. V L ;'
g g} 1 0 .'. f '
~
DICl!TIL MIDL l'
e ..... 1,
- c c, . . . ;. s Q U s, , , ' y-
,,' 7noo ~~
BEOM' e ..
~ ~
- 1
- ~ ,
% / $
L/
- i
. . l n __
. jw
~~ '
- 1. 2*
GE 1 OF 1 N:. C-ko b
,. -- NONCONFORMANCE REPOHT SKETCH Y:s 3. MODAY 'n-i ATTACHED '
PROJECT NO. 7220 - DATE 3 3 7p LOCATIOtJ AR E aid LOG. S.XX%2.PART feo. REV. G. IT E M N A?.'E 1*21 O No.
SainmentUnit#2 Sh-3-U-1 & S3-2-U-1 DOCU?.4bT t. UMBER & TITLE Liner Plate
/. le.hi'EC180N C541T E HI A Owo O SeEC D OTHEn O (EXPLAIN) 7220-C-111 Rev. 2, Appendix B, Rev. 2.
" ^ "* * "- "-
ENGRG. O CcNSTR.O OTHER E lExPtAiNi Southern Boiler & Tenk Works. Mecchis. Tennessee 7220-C-60
- 10. 11. . h0NCONFORMANCG IDILCREPANCYi CEbCRIPTION ASME YES O No. lLIST SERIAL NUMDERS WHERE APPLICABLE) NO I3 Plni.c._a E mbly Eh-3-U-1. Ea"ini "unber A h2618. Aftnr 4"<tn11etien en t'a En=t Fahrication Jit . a visual inspectierutnierneath and ton side revealed the folloui... __
co.nditignct 1 At_Mqy.gtion 631'-2" en the subject plate. hent discolcration nnd bu, Age = vere notsi I
adjacent to the vendor's butt veld and the field sens veld.
? .f_t Elevati0n._{h8'-h" on tha enro plate. ndjnennt to thn fi eld sens veld. hnnt diacgloratien ord bul p e vere niso noted.
- c. o Date ConCuny M r u. a
,j 12.NcHPHew(h
??o
. LE .-..L{__ .- I 'r - 70 Se'h~' ETr1 '_h' f !H**
ia. FitLo oistosmON- ,.EwoRx 3 nE;ECT O n6UTE TO PR JEC,d,$'[GRG )
NOTIFY AUTHOPlZED 6NSr. O HOUTE TQi.1 AT'L SUPV
[
i Remoye_ defective Arca_b,y._. torch cutting - rephceJ11.th 'O' 'listpd nla to in accordance with specifications 7220-C-111 & App. "B" to C-111.
- /-
('r *).X o_ .t?. Y( -f*.Y A/$4 l h$,$ l *O
- 14. FIELD D65 POSITION SY: Dat e APPPOVAL OF FILJD D 51 T iOi. . f' O.S ,
w l pFE 1); fn s Iru* .._s-lh l-4 N
,'> h OU7 i..=
t-1-r> 1l@,%"s\"cc O __" p lb. LNGHG DidPObiTION:
REPAIR b REJECT O OCN REDO: YES O oCN No.
USE AS IS O SEE DELOW O NO O j i
4
- A m A a ( (> f ) .U. i' _
Loco +tr imt nm 7n irhm d Ulcw I i
~
f g l f
0h l V
- 16. - tiOVALOF Date I /. HLIN58't CT Iota . f ~~', f ,,
ENGRG.
PC O,ie ACCEM d
/[4c;panscie,t nf . M ,m ,~
g (f. . a . . ' n . . . w u. ~: 2 '.
REJECT C ' nesswa> t>le 'e a t 'er. L'a : -
DISPO,itTION ONCURHLNCE Date AU T H . IN SP. ._ __ _ _ _. _
CONCtf R R E NCE - 'A7h intp. L d ,
- WHi1 E - C.C. LNGR. 1 IN K - 0.A. ING R. SHADED AREAS Al PLICABLE UC a'ACH l IN mv.VFM't cr.vvmarmswcwvmra WPLAMS L._
,g/4 .i,eej NONCONF0RMANCE REPORT -Nh'if * *@h '
Vg'"a.+J.
SKETCH ATTACHEO Y.s[h'3-- I' ' *f. m .Ch.-:-
PROJECT NO. 7220 ,/ ,rQ q..,<.
, of. r. F 4 : . -lIl2'10i lTEM LOCATION AR E A/B LUG. S. DWGM%t+t fto. REV. G. ITEM NAME **
- '~
[ '. , ( *[
ntadpm7Dt_J2 M - 178 3 _ Weld cap 5") ' /) ,. ' < i, PECTION CHIT kRf A DOCUMElif NUMBEH 5. TITLk .. s g'p ' #,,,e,, ,- ~~~~""
- 8. SOuRC E:
o O SPEC G OTHEn O (EXPLAIN) 7220-M-102 Rev. 3 AnnRt SS hk P O.
/.
~
/N, '/
/
1 ENGRo. O COnSTR.O OTHER 2 (EXPLAINI M. W. Kellogg CofDpan'V ,y/h M.lg[AC
., s
- 10. 11.
m 334 ,~. ., + wnn .
^
lT701 G2 M "L05-NONCONFORMANCE (DISCREPANCYi DESCRIPTION: '
ASME YES N No. (LIST SERIAL NUMBERS WHERE APPLICABLE) NO O 1
12 3/4" O.D. X 3/8" vall veld can (P.O. !!83h2-33. Iten 320. Ht. # SQ:Fi. F-7. Iter.*
(SA h03 - WP 30h) was received 11/26/73 under !"RR Ilo.-Q.C.-24. This item was blaf,_ed on 0.C. hold in accordance with TW #1095 dated 9/7/73 fron P. :'artine t:
E. E. Felton and remained on hold in accordance with TWX #2187 dated 11/28/73 fr::
P. Ihrtinez to E. E. Felton. Shon Incimetion (Ft. Exa tination) vas not terformed prior to shippinc as 2 cauired by recuisition 7220-M-105. Rev. 3.
U NLR PHLPAHku lsY; Date ~~
tONCUHHLrCE: /~ . U.n g H 3f o"S'bte ,f . ,4 / ng.ponsibic 7 f*W- .__.
- 13. FIELO DISPOSITION:
' .N h*. * *
.- f_.T!*2.!_E_.R Lead E n y. W ?.h%-f t' ( A m ' _
REWORK C REJECT O (0,'JTE TO PROJECT ENGRGs(/s NOTIFY AUTHOnl/ED IN$P ,. ROUTE TO MAT't SUFV. O
~~'
- r. o .
t -
' , . M .
~
I .,
L , , . . ., ., s. ...
Crg g:: .-.,. , ._ , . ,
,e , j , .- , . . .
,Md
- 14. F4ELo o:SPOS1110N BY: D* .
- 3*""' O./J. O. F4-i fi us O I T IOp.: Da:t PFEr '?** '?
-** . # u U ?
- b. /.,-c. . <M 29 / 7 d7//.?
is. LNosu vis&cSmON SI[$ T sP '_f 8._.(d_b N .d - __ _ _ 9k"' l b/ REPAIR O RCJECT O DCN REQD: kYES
- ACN f'o. '
usE AS is O SEE cELOw:0 NO !
The PT examination was performed and documented by M. W. Kellogg Co. as recuired '
by the Ibterial Requisition. The weld cap was shinped prior to Bechtel shcp !
. inspection; however, the PT examination report has since been approved by the Ecchtel Inspector. Verification that the cap ecets the requirements of the Material Recuisition should be cade by comparinn the cap and shippinn tan with l the quality verification documents which ennineerinn has revieced and transnitted fll to _the field by Bechtel Transmittal Forri #00618. dated 12/28/73. Once this in- l spection has been completed and documented by PFE signoff belou, the " Hold" on the cap is rc3easede '
( dry ~E: Hotel *TIL6 Ssr :to'tM <d!b 'N/?'O r o '
// -
Ddie / = 1 31. HLitoPEC 11 A 4h !\2..-&. M w -A/ i$!71 g /, CV0?7</-w
' /-
.2 - ?> &
"lG. APPHOVAL OfF/.':l / <? (G(eQ n> l= $ f [Y 0 C 1 I ' '
?"~ y .,. a.,./lg'*n:ll,'Y$h $'
' DISPOSITION CONIN'.P URRTNCE/c e g,, ' '
. REJECT O ' sa c n- $ "*$ od" l'
J. g.[/2r/4_L*>
,4 ~9,',_[f/fi '
s._
AUTH. __..
tuim inm [l [ [.y.^f
CONCURRENCE -
f ' ;[_ ,;'
HITF - 0.C. E NGR. l'INay- 0.A. ENGl / CC L'.'.W H CANNf.Y - FIELD ENGR. LhADFD AHLAS AlellCACLE . '2; GOLDENROD - RESP. ENGR. TO ASME. COMPONENTS
[/ 4.f' R EV. 7172 2510 (7 72)
I 1
N r. M-1 NONCOh. ORMANCE REPORT ,oc ca. .a SKETCll vs. O a. I CONTINUATION SHEET ATTACHED DATE g 10 73 1
l PROJECT NO. 7220 9~ h 11 NONCONFORMANCE (OtsCitEPANCY) or .
CONT *O or C
) 13. FIELO DISPOSITION CONT *O .V.
C r0 15 ENGRG. CISPOSIT40N CONT'O l
H. W. KelloCg Co. has been notified so that no further errors of this nature occur in future orders.
. .s .
e 9
,ir
. T,:.T.2(.i L .
- . ,. i . i ' I : s.. h t
.M ;:rg.,~ k:' i . . ' : ; .
~f
.i
. J A.'i G 197.:
- !j 4
BECHTEL .pOy.> .1 CORP' 100 ~2 zo b
FIL (
OC - 3!.C A pgy 7,3,p-Witt1C - O C. ENGR. PINK - O.A. ENGH.
<a,.ns riri11iNGR. GOLWIWO - HESP. ENGR. _
~~
- I. . .r. . _ .
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT
' ' 'j ' l 45 _ _ _ _
. Cs H A W 8 ?*G /Pm IIT NO. 1, PHoJatcT NO. 12 caOHTc0 uv 'DATc 25. DesPOSITeoM cONCuuHLNcC
.e M c V. i 7220 9 7+
pec. 7220-C-230 l2 S ll- M
.c.h.
.&a3(.t'.Ludt.' ioave X -
.v oem. Prion .. rca tocav.oM .n m . . 1co uv
- oming Concrete Aggregate On-Site Batch Plant I L ife-[ y !/-3. 7'/ 7,y,, d. h 7 c uiAs.nvuota s. sranvue sysrcu No. .
,'? , c ri. cc u t N r e.7 No. j ncv.
-om /.u-. . -.y;.h,,,,a _/g^/g 14/A N/A -
11/A / I ., .s ,1 . a . .. a..,.
. Pu :cN Arc onocse No. s o. oc recto sNseccTeON Pt.AP4 NO. 3 6. R EPL ACE'McNT GERI AL, No.
/[{V/ t s f_. g. (, f * [. (,. /
~
?0-C-230 N/A N/A :"7' *"" '"* " ' "'[-
,(j vos t
^
~i GrHiiU4Ti5cav oM ii.asuc .,.souuce i vcU' 10 No Subcontractor, Champion,I ac . _ ___ _
i_m i .. nout P . N_o_n. 1 oNss 3 NsvHocr .I n c . g nourt to ricco cNc.NccuiNo O aourc To "arca' i sur'av'Soa ID. HONC3Nrof tMIPsG CONDITeoNa
- b. On January 15 and 16, 1974, the 1 1/2" and 3/4" concrete aggregate' delivered to the On-Site Batch Plant was contaminated with rock salt.
- 2. qrecco oisPositioa Or'c'o accouacao^T8oalaourc vo Pao ccr cNciNoci. No 2 . ricco oispositioN ncsutgAM. gA
~J 4 2 y-N Aggregates rejected due to contamination by rock salt.
i
- 1. As of 1-22-74 all contam-inated aggregates have been l
Stockniles to be re-inspected to insure complete removal of contaminated removed from site.
l
[ w u_,.LL.-.AA. s-es ,4 Stockpiles have been re-I material.
b inspected E are accepted fo,
$ N3.NocRING DesPosITION 23. ENGINccHiNG DisPostTION Rcsutist uSC
-&,,W.a l 2 cs-'ex.
ww w
' t'*/Fr*ir Pr -. A" rA/* ^>r ? t ' s~" * ) b Ot !?s
]f , .o ('. ,. ase. .*m a tar Nssir",?:
/M4 r ?, ~/~, s <, H .nsiv> $ 4. '
e ~. , . *, s
"'^* **% ^"
- W A. . //s 's-?r_d at. s3 ocasCN CHANGC RcQulHc3 DNO O ac= > ' '
~2 /2. l74r O Yos. set ATTACHcOs a s ee aa n a b.se.=a m e ' on,6
^
03 A W e N'G n cv. OCN
. Jaeseste sesessiose e.gs R c V. A D O. --_
./ - --- -
C_ e c c_. _
w . _ _ . -.-
C c-G 2-s ioosa-a eg.qq
- 2. 2$. - ~
..m.....m.
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ' ' " " " ' "
cv _ x2_ * " "h6 n AinN,Gira n t No. E-10' "'*-
M t. net - Byerson~'E-3 thru l 0
'2'""
,- io^'" '*"'5' 5"' "' " ' " " " ' " "
. . i u u ..,.. u . u, N
- 7'20 2 / [' I*' - n .f I N'**/'/ " " '" " ' " ~ " " ' ' ' " ~
. . n t o a.o.:^ "
' ' ' ' ---' l "S.Beinforcing Bar " Field St. orate Arc 9 " ^ ' ' '
1084 tab esuMg,ctX }_ Cont. //2_ Base Mat
- 9. STARTur S VETcM NO. <
- ,fM.
A' -Y7"'^
t
@l N '"_"I/Af- -
RTNO.
l/ 3/'7Y t
e s e e ma.sen . o cji .. H LPLa CC ML H TJP '"* J l' R C V. s-? ,, ,y {gg.,4 MT t
__. __. . .. N/ A . . N/A .:m s ; l runenuc owns.n No. ,_
.U/A 1 o ggfy',, gd no. oc riti.o sNsecersoN ra.AN No. is. nre t.Act ut nr stasat No.
3 g
_ _ _ _ _ C--39A __
A NTn ACTOn/ Loc AT8QN C-55 hA .____. N/A " " " ' " ' " " * * ' " " " ' " ' ""'
99.ALMc Q Vc5 8 7. SOuHcE coac Subcontactor Ilynd -Ryerson, eveu ElNo _., Inland-Ryerson i nour No in .vuucvioNs> gnourc yo ria. o cNG Ncen.NG O uuure to uartuiAa.suecavison t.
N ENCSNrof4MONG CONDIT80Nr During_the_ course nf tenting _Yertied Qu-l i fiention_ Splice Y-7-V; Grnae 60. 18s reinenrnine hn-
_1fom U.
S. Steel Corn. . Heat H_Q.s_79T.h5.7_us_qd_in_ making .t. he_, splice __ broke _at_nn_indi.cated_t.olnLlond_of_31Q.QQD_pannds. This total load indicates a tensile stress at failure of 77,500 P.S.I. The tensile requirements of Grade 60,18S bar is
_90,000 P.S.I. as specified in ASTM-A-615-72, Table 2, Page 689.
O r':'o o'5'asir'o " Krar'o accoaucaoarioNinoure io cao cc1 cuciNceniNo 2 . ricto oiscositioN acsutvs.
Re-qualification of reinforcing steel is not included as a part of the testing progr.am for Cadweld splices.
The testing referred to in block 3 9 is governed by Specification 7220-C-23), not 7220-C-39 as listed in block 5 Justification for this is the fact that a Cadweld solice is comprised of three (3)._ items: 1 ) The Cadweld_slq_qye. 2} Thq._ filler etal transferring shear from rebar deformations to sleeve grooves, and 3) The reinforcing 4ct Engu,t.r t s.iuc. cess o saraoNiecringconcurswithField'spositionnottoconsidertherebarasanonconfdMMd"ued) 23. cNGI1ccHfNG DeSPOS8TaON RcSULTsa i tt et. The test is used to qualify the Cadweld crew for Cadweld operation. Rebar has previously successfully passed the user test requirements and the average tensile stress of tha ten qualification tests, using the rebar from heat number 79T457, is 107.87ks;
- sce telecon, R. Ryden to D. Grote dated 1/22/74) which is also greater than 90ksi as requir d by Specification 7220-C-231. Engineering recommends that the test result
. ss Dc7 C.N cN ANGE RcQu1HCD 0 26. R t"JCc Tc0 M A7elal AL DISP,0sITsoN Oa n " a * * = = *
- 6>< a 2 2. oc Acc,cerAr.cc .
j O ves. sec arracNeo. .. .... e PAWetN;g
- es c V. OCN
.uvaomessonase.svo. _ e.ru 4 C. R cV. A D D. ~
y _ - . . - .
..i
% m e, /
n !h '
.i. . Block 2.~0 .(.C. on.t. . .) NONCONFORMANCE._REPORT . ~ .,_(CONT
~. _'D) s. u cc 2_or_ 2 i .. ac a no._. I'$.
-.- ~ . _ .. _ .. s .- - . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
. nt.cel.
Tact.ing refet red to in block 19 reprencnt: theco three (3) iter.n an,a unit. There fore , acceptability _o f_the nplice__is. governed _by_the_requirementa_of_.Section_10 3._of_SpecificationJ220.--C-291 reenrdl ens nf whether the fnil m n is sleeve fraotitre,[pullqut, or rebar fracture. It is Field Engineering's position that this is not a nonconformine
.itC2.
' :**~
' . . . ' .I,.'.- *
.Q< .. \-
. i[.. L'g..,..,,'..'
- - * '_ _ / ., ,
_ i} *- " V' ' N l< g_L h'h v . -' ,, c -, ; - - - ---- -/ EY- '
',."r.,
, ,. -'. ; / l e W'QM
, 1, - .-
Black 22 (Co.nt,) -- --
(77.5ksi) be t. sed to evaluate only the intended material under test -
1.a. the cadwold. As such, this is an acceptable value. .
.-p b" '
/
O
~
80198 2 Q C-G 3 3
\Jm g r .3
.. NONCONFORMANCE REPORT " "'"" '
r n u. win c;r4 Rv n o.. . - _ . _ -
' 'o r]
inev. 7. caosccr no. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h7
.2 l.-U-2 u .. t ro n e rp i.v
' oars u. paseoserson cor.cu ucuce l___
...............1,...
Upp;r. Liner.21 ate 7220
. , , m, m. . . , o ,.
0)kk'$(Wt i
, , 7, i. , o . u .. .. . .
2
.~._-C7f o.rc .'""~~'"T._"".._~"""
- ~
52..4.. uuocu .. Liner sv uru,Eln.te_Aes.cably _
svsrcu uo. Area hf [f
.c,. C,ccucnr ,7 no.
kh lI'2'N 1...uj. N [i n MCI 19 4 /
p Sua Plock 19. . .NA__
j new. - .m . -.-o ry on.
- ru... .....c o n e n u no. . _....
. _ . . _ _ _ HA
. . . oc . .c u> in s.t.c . _ .rion
_. r ..u oo.
. . . . _ _ _ . I w'
. .. u. n.a c o u. n r r.ci,.a i. no. ...
7220-C-$0A _
i i,_ , ,. - .- . . . -. ..
3 t :, c ( ./,,./. .-. Z ./ V,,
o u ruac ro n oc. _4 rios C-111:37 _ FA ""'
7/,,,,,,, """ . . .." ."'7' n.asuc_ _ _ - -0 n5- ' 7 Sou"cc South rn., Boiler,&_Tanic Works / Memphis,, Tenn. Code m ...'/'
s ounuc eustnuctions. . irc = 00 no Vendor .,-,.
O "o u' c '* o r". u cin ce.u r.c. _ -
0] n..ou io uau niat.curi.uvisou____
~
'J. N ?_;NC3 N r 3HMING coNutytoN t ,
Di_screp_angy_ gists b_e_ tween.__ slab _ numbers stamped on the upper nlate of assembly S2-6-U2. '
Mill stamped _plab_ number _is._Z-9703h.-
Shop clnmped i s1gb_ number lo Z-97.0_th Documentation ceeps to authenticate.the shop stamped __ number. ~
c' , , la gr.2to osseosition ,cgricto achommi nox1.oninoure to enosect cuc.uccniac
. rici.o oiscocirion ncsutrs:
Field Material Coordinator will contact Vender Attached lotter frcm Southern and wiii foilow up for positive identification in Boiler & Tank Works, dated Jan.
writing of correct sIab number.
This wi,ii be furnished
._2 5, 1974 is authority to re-to PFE and documented in Block 21. J stencil correct Slab I!u: abor 0Alll5L l'~I-f W
.C NC LHI.sG D45Po$sraoM
( 2-9701h.'h ', N l"' :5'
~ 2 8. LNGINcEHING DesPo%trion nctuLrst s
l i
Is Dc51CN CHANGc RcQulHc Ono 2' "c'*c'c " ^ ' c " ' ^ ' o ' So 5 o " O"""**-**"'"
O ves, sec arracuco. U-* =1. oc Accyerance A W6N B RcV. _ DCN 3
7'^
cc mEs.se.ase
^W N -2/ c / ' 9 ' '
E C. M c V. awTwoseasso .=s,s cro" ado. *s
'" '-~ ~ ~~ ~
1~ ,
. BechtefPowerCorporation- r l .
Interoffice Memorandum 0-v '
n ' J. Connolly o.= January 28, 1974 se Job 7220 Itidland Project From L. Carter '
NCR No. 47 _
P0 7220-C-50A or Field Procurement c.p., J. Brush -
Ai Midland, Michigan I
i PO File .
-1
. s . .. .
Attached is a letter from the Vendor indicating the correct slab number -
to be used on'part flo. S2-6-U-2.
- This information should be entered in box Ho. 21 on the Monconformance Report.
/
./
'j s vi /- .y f:::,-
P L. Carter L.s Material Coordinator I
. . . l t
i
)
BSN (47H __. .
, ry L t~ ,.
- . i Sounmnn EarLEn & Team WORKS, INC. ,
MANUFACTUFsCRS OF' CARDOI4 STECL. ALUMirduft & STAlf4LESS STCEL , ,
TANKS, PRESSUHC VCSSELL AND FADRICATops Or PLATE STEEL s isoo str.7ars.nos inoMAs sincer , MN, s. o. nox nr .ucupais, tenu. seios l
Janu..1r 25, 1974 I
Bechtin1. Power Co. * '
P.O. Don'2167 Hidland, Mich. 48640 Attention : Mr. Lee Carter Centic:acn : '
i cur files on shcIl liner plate n.aterial 2S-2-6.In responce to our telephone con t
se' ^ 4Our investigation 207014 indicates that the correct heat number should rend 51721292 ,
number
\' Th
) is Ictter will cerve as your authority tos particular re-stencil thi '
iner panel accordingly. shell Sincerely,
~ }
l SOUTi112N BOILER & TANK L'ORKS, INC.
j h .h 7 h-O(.00h <s3Wvw1 Robert L. Strong RLStdh Chicf Engineer G '
)
j
. . 1 I
1, :
I l
)
I.I I b
u - '
~
. 1 l
l
U.S.,iiD g
j "N NONCONFORMANCE REPORT lx.co% oxnPA. aT .. No. .. ,i H E v.
- 3. rRO2ECT NO.
l Or _j . . h9 j-12-L l 7220
. . .. . .;O N T, c o a v f jnAiC 2,. o ces s. r O N 4.O N C u... 6 NC C
. . . u . . . . . . n. . . u N
((;f: V i s.
R ll- L i h+ " ' " ' " ' ' " ' * " ' " **
bnetration
.. . . . M i n. A i .n N , . v A. ,n A r t u .. . . i OATC J" b.L ed e s. L N UM u E R 1
Jig Building
- 9. bT A R T ur S yETEM NO.
., Q' , g- ,, ,- ('[,1.j/ _ l/-2/- /Y
~
- jngjk... . fg.g J.f J y
p h JIL8'L ACEMLNT PAf NO. 'HEV, .
NA ' i. se ef.e.sa. 9 r
.12. .L fuslCoetCCftOERNO.
7 UA l ',.."..'.'."....,I'" D;.
t o. CC t'IELO INSPECTION PL A N NO. 3 6,9#L PL ACEMEN T SERI AL NO.
. 1. . ..'. 7, 220-C-50A C-111-16 UA J M] ,/ 1 [.h "JQ,
[. _; N TC A C T4 R /LO C AT IO N -~~~ ~~- --~'~ /
- 43. ACME C YCS 17.SOURCC J **'
k .
CODE iou t SNG sN sts#UCT80NS.
eigM @ NO CCnStruction .
@ ROUTE TO F4CLQ Ef4GlNLE'ltlNG O *< o u r s t o = ^ i <'a ' si> Pcia v iso ++
( N .:. N C ' NFG HMING CONOST80N .
L The veld gap between the Venetration R-12-L and the liner plate assembly S1-3-U-2 is 5/8" l
which is in excess of the 1/2" Enp permitted by specification 7220-C-111.
I
} -
l l
Q F8ELO OLSPOstTION
@FIELO RECOMMCND ATIONfROUTE TO PROJECT ENGINEERING
- 21. FIELD OasPOS4 TION RESULTS3
% use es is and malee additional stringer passes between the 1/h inch liner plate and the
.hterene'd liner plate. This will fill the 5/8 root gap with properly applied weld i
pterial.
Clh_Yn_. ,
l ~~ 7. ,'t - 7 Lj_
o...l,._ j .'. a+ - ?,2 Ja.4 E E R 4NG D8C POSIT 80N 2 3. ENGINEERING DISPOS 8TIOf4 RESULT 54 tslecen approval on 1/24/74, and confirming TWX BEBC 166 sent 1/24/74 to "use as is" i
as described in item 20 above. Rationale: With proper care and inspection, the wider hostgapcanbeproperlyweldedtomeet the spec intent. ( ', . ([ /-/,. ".
,j 1,',k) /-jg.
p
/
13 DE!sGM, CH ANCC REQUIRED 44 0 O TCs. sEE 47T4Cseo.. ......,
,, , / h / '*fg.
LW4N g . R EV. OCN .. ........ .
.. ,y C. REV. ADO. - Awvenomease seesescro. "
eava
"^^ ~
~ ~ _-
__._.g _ _ , -- . - - . - - - - - --
- - - - ~ ~ -
m- - .- .
. . M'FV. .
s
- gV
/b \l, "*/ N t
I BECllTEL MIDI, CllTEL AP.D 810-223-6032 CLG El0-266-9497 Q . s.I..U l'"
.. ,o .a' 6.'~' t-_I
'~;" ' '_\ l
- 11) l 16 30
~
2 ), ',1 J.'.yJ"-l'?! ,
TUX #2895 ATTIJ . : E. E. FELTON 1/24/74
.[k'\(di'U"*..t,.110
'~
/q' '
, ,. D'/
_.<<:.y BEBC -166 x.h'g3,.g . - *
SUBJECT:
MIDLA!!D PLANT UIJITS I a2 J03 NO. 7220 NCR C-49
- FILE: 0274, C-IllPF. .
S'Ad 9 -Pun !!IN;; Ai]D C. C L A P.X ,
C ONF IR:11NG 1/24/74 TELECO:3 DITUEEM J.
RE I;CR C-49 E:13INEERI:33 APP.70VEi TO "USE AS IS"D E7)!E S/S" S C P.1 5 E D UELD GAP, AI:D : LAME ADDITIONAL STiil:GEP. PASSES A3 IIJ ITE:4 10 0F TIII SUEJECT I;C?..
, f2['
R. CASTLEDE3riY TOR P. A. !! ART I:JZZ .
//
AMN ARD,0R/7PE2118/7 220-OG 1/l'T::.
.#)[tW,)pl, l /.
77 Q '%/ ,o hcg-C -y y
(\ ,
BECHTEE,. MIDL
" a Ly w y .-
4Dw& -
-v.- #c
-Ec,-e . < , -
R=Cw' c uD "5 '"~*O*
f 4y&w gg ,
'JAN 2 51974
,f A < p g-/ -(,..
C " h L IT Y cournot h fM ywg ,
BECHTEL JO3'7220
~
,fy -
~
. < ~ .
! 1 y~ .
. g 4
9
W,
- g' NONCONfullMANCli ItLPOlt T
' " ^ " ' ' "'"'"'
or 2.._. /D r.c, Awr. irARi N o. Ts.2vT T. rn~o7 i cH.o.- -"-~ '-~~^' --- ~ h 43.ii.~iov- jkTc " 23. o scos.rioN coNcuunt Np' f a Ji~
~~
nn. 2b8 l2 7220 -
jf"l Ib/ t A -. -- . .. W
'" Y- ~~c' " " " "
( .).]( c.;'s,T.~.,
'f e j, < f, ('.- p'-~ ~y.
!.^ . . . . . . . . . n r . .o M
. .... ..oc A i .o M oAiL --
'esting Prcquency U. S. Testing Laboratory l/ -2 / 7'/ l.. 6. ,g _ -
jf /r/
bb b[8 A L b u M ea cle 9.67 RTUP S[sTr.M No. , 15. H th A CE.M E N T ' H A N T P.o. H c V. Pa * ** ' T ' # *84" g n...
l N/A N/A I N/I g b Pu t#L .. A".e. Osa nt' Se No. 30. QC Flcl.o GNGPcCTeoN PL. AN No. s G . R E Pt. A C L M L N T Lt.f t t A R. Peo. #? , ,.r{g / / ./ /y
- >~' ~'=
l n/A N/A N/A * ~,'* -
L CoNTC ACTOR /t.oC ATIoM S 8. Aa c O vcs $1.sounce __,___ _
L S. Site Testing Laboratory ,'y,,' goo H/A -
ii,HuisNu e m uuruoNs, o nouTc To recto cNGiNccu.No O Nourc To = ATc.n Ai. sue.cn vison .
... oNecuronu.Nc. coNo rioN.
{ f to used by Chanpion, Inc. in the production of concrete for Job 7220.. . - . . . . - . . . - . U. S. Too ng Laboratory Q. A. Manual ctates such test-ng vill be' mado on every incoming 120 tons. This was nat done during the pp iod 12-3-73 thra t-16-74; a minimum c,f 20 testa rere'indic'ated on the coarse agg. received and only 7 were made, p ,
., T' A t 2 . rici.o oiscos Tion acsui.Ts.
- n. g) reci.o o s.os Tion or.ci o uccomucNoATioNfuour c io c4 CItNGiNcen.NG As '97 Phc following corrective, action has been taken:
_, [
L.) U. S. Testing Laboratory Chief was notified o,f, Ea discr_epancy.
? ._) He was inforned that even though final acggptance of concrete aggregate is based on test resulte of samples obtained from the_be] s' loading the plant bins. He is still expected to fully comply with the require fo of his Q. A. Program that str tes (Con't on Sht. 2)
_42. .NGIN E c R 6HG oISPoSITioN ,' 23. cP4GINccRING ossPo .8TeoN MosuLT5s
_+
/
/ * " " " " " " " ' " " " * "
- 24. 83 OcutGN CH AN NcQUSHoo O No @ [1" " ~"" ".'.".. "%Q%1 _
- > y -y O vca. see aTTacNco. . .... .,4 - ,,,.
^
oR AWIN S HCV. oCN _
/ a c v.
_s _ec c.
,_ ___- - _ _ _ _ _Aoo _ __. --_ _ - . . - - - - .- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f _
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (CONT'D) s . nc e_2___o r 2 8 4. aca a 3. .51 __
.. - -.. . - - ~ ~
(Item 19. cont'd) ._ . _ . _ . _ . _ , _ . _ _ , , _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . , _ _ _ . . _ . _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ . , __
(3) Concrete placement No. CC($82.0)a - pour Ilo.15 ; _ Inspection Plan //C-231-55. - shoun 8.c.y._cach.of. A .1 mix. cn_ticke tn
- 11835, &,#11_836 placed with_an_out _of spe(entrained air content of_6.5%._. (see Item 1)
/
((l;) _ Concrete placement. No. A($73)a - pour.No._.17 _on field placement form QC-C-2 inspection _ plan _C-P31-66_ _.sho'3h 2_c.y, load of A-2 mix ticket No. Il87hyas,placed with an entrained air content of 6.h%. _(See_hA__u)_The..fpdowine tao loads 3. c.y. on ticke t ll873._and lh c.y. on_ tic _ket_ll87$_were .placed without testing._A_ signed _ state t at_the
/
lottom of the sheet states that a 2% air loss between plant & placement _would_ bring _the air down inuydpec. ran,Te. The ptatement_dres_no_t reference documented correlation data to vali_date this._ Research _showed_ther- 1s /'no documenied_back-ap_f ncLrd, of testing for air loss in transit. _
($) Concrete placement No. CC($85]a - pour No.19 on plant _and_ field _ placement forms q#$-2 shows that 8 c.y_. of A _2
{
nix on ticket No.11881 was placed with an entrained air of 6.8% 8 c.y. was plaen- ticket No. 11882 without testing.
~
b inspection plan No. is C-231-71.
_.. J, 18.L _ QY, i g@~ t x4
- J pga j
j,r * .g{cy,p
, _p agt -}
c
@0'6I'y
/
~ ~
QC-G37 3 .
- 3) O!!EUil. cy
.. -$h y2~ _-
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT >
.,_,..,_/__ _ _ _ _ . _ _
or $0 Rev.1
, pH A W8NG/PA N Y NO. $ R E V. 7. PROJECT hO. 82. O HT 'O gY DATE 25. DIGPOSIT aO H CONCU tt R C hCC
. Spec. 206 l2 7220 ; & b1' 7<[ " ' " ~'" '
ITCM O CSCR4PT80N \ 8. 87 EM LOC ATIO N \
D13 Vfn IDATCD W &V h [l
- I DATE
_Teating_Fre_quency 3CN BA L NUMUCN U. S. Testing Laboratory
1/ A (.j'( < !/- 2N/REV.
w[ en
,+ n M 2-en d
. j't . /# E P L'A C C M E N T P A H T r b emosa c t r[6e a =.s.
II/A N/_A N/A I -
. PuACN AIC ORDER NO. S O. QC FIELD INSPECTION PLAN NO. 3 6. RCPLACCMENT SEMAL NO. .,..*li.,h s, . ,, gt ,........
{(., [ 8[*
_II/A N/A N/A [f * '"' """ * * * *"f
. CONTR ACTOH/ LOC ATBON tt.ASME Q VCS t 7. SOU RCC CODE BTCM b NO NjA /
O. R12 WTIN S IN ST R UCTIO N S: { r80VTE TO FICLO CNG8HCCR8NG O ao urc 'o =^'ca'a'suecaviso a
- 9.
- NCCNFORM8NG CoraDITION:
. Failure to comply with the frr:auency requirement for cradation analysis of incomine concrete arg.
b9 used by Champion. Inc. in the production of concrele _ for_ Job 722_0. U. S. Testinta Laboratorv O.A. Manual states such tbs ing vill be made on every incoming 120 tons. This was not done during the period 12-3-73 thra 1-16-7h; a minimum of 20 tes ward indicated on the coarsb agg. received and only 7 were made.
\
- 13. @ FsELO 08SPOSITION OFaELD HECOMMEND ATION/ ROUTE TO PROJECT ENGINEERING 21. FIELD DISPOSITION RESULTSs
_Th e follow $nc corrective action has been taken:
1.) U. Sdating_ Laboratory Chief was notified of the di_s_crepancy.
2.) He was informed that even though final acceptance of concrete angrenate is based on test results of samplos obtained from the belts loading the plant bins, ,
He is still e::- -
pected to fully comply with the requirements of his Q.A. Program that states (Con't eht.2) _
R2 ENGINCCRING DISPOSaTtON
- 23. CNGINEERING DeSPOSITIO 4 P CSULTSs 6
d i
Et.13 OC2tGN CHANCC REQUlRCD/ / @NO . Osc-..
O vcS. sEE avTACNEo. .. ....
p2AwlNtB REV. DCN
_ avv.oesano es..rscrom sage SPEC. E V. A D O. .
J l
l l l 11 1
\ 1 l ,
JlJ IMo R -
0 5.- s o e w
n t c
a a a
m _
e ^
- a. r s c n n -
f h
t
.'a e g f
r ui n
o t m n h i co 9 e n r h e i o t- h g t no 9 n n i i g e m o c r mL a o a
- r. f r s i
)
. n cb i o a e r L z e P i c e -
s i . t f i e f A. s
) n O 0 D o e t e d h
'T s g e t .
N ot y H p l O b g ce a C ( t
(
n c i T g. 't i a i
n R g s r O e e i d P T e n E e h a R s . t r S t E a h i C o . t d - _
N c U i u w a A f o y M o t e R s e c
n l
l
~
O F
n o i c
i a a n
~
~ _
N t f l p
o f s O 0 O m r C 2 o e N 1 't c p c
O g a t l N n r c l i
m o
c t i n r o t c s i
v r
n b o i u r s S o i h
c f v %
l r a e y e e t t p -
h i u -
n c_ s S o e s e
R e .
c d y e ba a b nL m
e t D
b e
t
- n. h s
- o. t s T e -
' l f T l e o . ,
N i b 0 -
O w d C l n0 s l a .
N t i l k O s vy e e I e c t e r_ - w p en T t h w I c
~
S n t. i e a O
P e
e iei c B e
S I
D s r
c l_
Ad fe h T
e c n
o
) D L '
E ) ) -
i T~ ,I .I ,
g 6 ,1 9 - ,. - . .
..q
, NONCONFORMANCE REPORT is.Aw:na;;s..r W ' ; n e v. T'i.. soke , no. ~~ " }*[ " " ' " " "
.Opoc,97220-C-230 ! 2__ __p7220_ _
TT <.-)a:. 1;;; ~ 7 "~ "
, ~% G~~ ~ """" ' l*> >. a.}.mer n ... , n acwin ou .
..ncu ocariou -/ (_ th<xc4
_.y v 4 .,nuco o y __1 h.z2-D * * '-
""7 " * * ' " --
oarc Jon.cretel.c,.acements l A m .c ~ u ..s,s_Shown.in_
. m u, mrcu .a. Item 19 "yNc _c E ?'
r .71, o.
! /~2 W en4 oa6c ~. uo. TGe~T R irc c1 isis EruTo-~ -~~'- k.:KR'dihcarsc.7isi.Lo.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' " "
11/J._
. c; nrn acro nit.ocar.ou Aa Shown_in_ Item.Ih. .
H ** * * "
n.acuc Co D L.
O ves **.counce/A . , , , " , , ,' ', ,' ', ,,' "' ,' ", ' ' , , ' ,
-- ..N/A , . . . . _ , n i. n O uo ,,,
Concrotc nupplied by ,Ch u . >ior ,Jno,.,,_,,,,_ ,,,,_ _ - _ - ._
- q. mur.uc _ inst nuc cious, g uourc to ria.o encincen.uc o ncure io u ren.ai. suecav .on __
.. rancunvonusna conoereon.
(1) Concrete _ placement _ Hoi _cc(582:25)a_ .. Pour _1To...lr-s q. c-ca_ rom _ror_concreic_Elac
,in tha field, ticket #116h5 chowed 8 c.y. of A-2 mix going into the pour _y.itlh entrained aij_. con _ tent of_2Jff. Tno _ allpwable hang, no chown in Spec. C- 230, Para. 9.1.5 is 30 -6 The three follochgloads - tickets #116h6.116h7 & 116h8 vere ulaced l ithout.. testing.
fr _..The inopection plan. for.thisJour.is No. c-231--1 C..W _(2)._.. concrete-placement 3o 4(57.8.67.) cab = pour nn B-hspcetion
\
t Plan 0-231 on field placement form _qc-c2 ticket 10. 1175.7 shows 8 c.y. of__ A2 mix beinn placed w y.ined airois.content of 6.10A, maximum allowable item 1 above) rig- is 6.0$_d_..(,h
- b. O r ecto us.rion onct.o accone.icunar.ournou Laccr nciutcuenc (cont'd 9hnet M zi. raci.o osseosition ai.sut.rs.
Procedures for placinti_ concrete have been reitoj to o all placing engineers.
points stressed were testing procedures and.%bjd et that no specification relaxation Par /ticular N is ,
A d]oued for lean backfill concreto. <*
Past cylinder results for the placemd} entioned int '
\ p f j{
'\ N \ \ / /
- t. .s4 GIN cCNING DISPoserloM )
/ l I i N \ Mt#
f
[eGINccFdlNC OlsPOSirtoN 9c50f.rsa s x \ \ / '
/ .
p [ of ?
, N,.M\' \/ '
~
s V
as o cuar.cc nzous""
Owo """^""'***"'""
O ves, ser arracuco. S , "" " ""
/ AW4N S ' RcV. OCH '
'.'. p* 7F^ "" .. .
2.y /
^** av.eeomen.oeas.ecion
!c _. _- .s
? *- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - ----
3 @J_ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - ---- ---- ---- - - - - - - - - -
j .. , , - -
.. .m_ --. ,..._ _ _ _ __ _ _. ._~-- .NONCONFORMANCE
. ....m _. m, m . ..R E PO R T (C ONT'D) s . n c e 2 o r_2__.
u . ~ c. - o.__. 5.1 (Item 19 cont'd) _
.(3) _C,oncre_te placement No. Cc($8_2.0)a - pour No. 15 ._
_Incpection Plan _j/C-231 chows 8 c,y_,__each_qf A-1 mir en tict-ata
- 118}5, & #11836 placed vith .n out of spec. cntrained air content of 6.5%.
(SeeItem1)
()). Concrete placement No. A($73)a - pour No. 17 - on field placement form QC-C-2 inspection plan C-231-66. . c 8 c.y. load of A-2 mi;; ticket No.11871; was placed with an entrained air content of_6.]df. (See Item 1) Th_q_fpllnwing two loads _3,_c.y.
on ticket 11873 and 1h c.y. on ticket ll8]$_ vere,placed wi.thout test _ing. A signed statemqnt_nt_the ~
bott,om,of, the, sheet states that n_27$ air loss _betwe_en plant & placement would bring the air down into spec.
7 _ . _
Therange, t
tearnt does not reference documented correlation data to validate this. Research showed there is no documented back-t ec of_t_es_ ting for air loss in transit.
(5) Concrete _placemo.nt No. CC($.8J)a
' pour No. 19 on plant and field pl. ace _ ment fomo QC-C-2 shows th.at f, :,y. of_.A-2_
pix on ticket No.11881 was placed with an entrained air of 6.8% 8 c.y. was pleced on ticket No.11882 without testing.
hinspectionplanNo.isC-231-71. __
G W
6 G
9 w
, , , _ ' -- _ * --D-
_ . , . =%y ,
g
, . ;,- 8;- ==
e e
g NONCONFORMANCE REPORT , . .
' ~ "^'{'{'2 "'" 'bh$v.
$ 1 e s a. n.s4. . a . .a . . sas s am - - -- -. - .
t Dif A '.10 0 G /P A H r #4 0.
e $4 C V. 7. 4 H OJLC r N O. 3 2. Fi!.FO tti C D. Is Y 'DATC 2 5. U tseO.isT ION CONCU Siu L NG4.
-n/r;.,./ , W/<,[,7(I . W ,N
' ' " " ' ~
l2 ~ ~ ~ " - "'"' -~--
Spoc. 07220-C-230 07220 I
ir en ui.3C.nerieN .. inu loc A riON Ts. v'A.r.liii.Tef'~~7 toATC --
CEncrotn Placements Ac Shown in Item 19
-- ,.3;>g4;f t
i 2. s N I R C V. pesost c? *eese s weema se *=.5
_. C 8t l A L N U M U C R 9. ST ARTul SYSTEM NO. 3 5{ llCPLALCMI.NT PART NO.
i e= o st er c ome s=e c e **.e rese#Clt A*.iC OH UCle NO. 10. Q C FICLO INS!*CCT40N PLA N t40. I E. Ia r s's. A cr.M C N T SC H I A L NO.
II/A As Shown in Item 11t _11/A 9 7. 50V ff C C CiNTR ACTOft/ LOC ATION St.ASMC C VCS avve.o.sasom.eecrea este CODC Concrete supplied by Champion, Inc. .
II/A _ , iv r.u O NO -
o nour c io = A r Cin AL succuve,On
. nO U'un 2 .N .r n UCi ION S: (g uout C 10. tLo CNG NcCn.NG Y
NCsNrOHettNG CONDIT80N'(1) : Concreto placement ITo. CC.(582-25,a - Pour llo._h - on_QC-C2 form for Concrete Placcuant record Rn the field, ticket #116h5 chowed 8 c.y. of A-2 mix.Coing_.into the__ pour with en entrained air content of _2.8%. The allouab1 raica as chown in Spec. C-230, Para. 9 1.5 is 3 - 6. Tho .three following loads - tickets #116h6,116h7 & 116h8 voro placed without tecting. The inspection plan for thic pour is lio. C-231-13 (2) Concreto piaccment ITo. A(578.67)alb - pour lio. 8 d 3p,cpfiction Plan C-231 on field placement form QC-C2 tichot no. 11757 shows 8 c.y. of A2 mix being placed with an on-trained air content of 6.1%, maximum .allouable is 6.0%. (cco item 1 above) (cont'd chcot 2) t%
- 21. FsCLD D8SPOSITION HCSULTSe C FICLD DISI OSITION OFICLD RCCOMMCND ATION/5tOUTC TO PitOJCCT ENG6NCC644NG J.
Procedures for placing _concreto have been reiterated to all placing engineers. Particular phintostrcopodweretcctingprocedurocandthefactthatnospecificationrelaxationis alloued for lean backfill concrete.
b t cylinder reculta for the placements mentioned in the nonconformanco aro as follows:
hJnt'drheet2)
R2. LNG 4N C C HlNG Dl5FOSIT IO N -
- 23. ENGIN E ERING 06SPOSIT 40N f1C5 ULT S I
- i. v )
p. . O FF P 151974
} GECHTEL POWER CORP.
n T. 4W'.# %w
.w.,
l f I Y _
l t; sg oC7:3N CN ANCE REQUIRCD CHO *
-- un.,
O vCs. SCC ATT Acuco. ... .... e. ..e...... ...
'0 2 A w s N 3 R CV. DCN _
enem _E- c N_ _ -
.o
.a.nen nu.5LReL_1 i.u ce_2_cr_2_
NONCONFORMT,NCE REPORT (CONT *D) -
Eteni 19 cont'd) $$ - shows 8 c.y. each of A-1 mix __on_ticletn 3)__Q.oncrote_ placement No. CC($8_2._Ola_- pourjio.15 - Inspection t PlanjlC-231-t 231 chova an I.1035 &_#11836 placed with an_out of cpec. entrained air con en _ _ ,
The folleging h)_Concreto placement No. A(573)a -- pour No.17 (Sco Itcs -- on
- 1) _ field _ p A signed statement at the c,y. load of A-2 mix ticket No.1187h was placed wit 1187$ were placed without testing. The uo loads 3 c.y. -on ticket 11873 and 1$ c.y. on ticket l t & placement would bring the air down into spec. rance. _
>ott
- of the sheet states that a 2% air loss betucon_p anto validate this. Research shoucd there is no documented dt _
- tatomont_docc..no.t. reforen.ce_ documented _ correlation _ a a_ __ 8_c y. of A-2 in_ro_ cord of testing _for air _1_ocs in transit.19 on plant and field vlacement forms QC-C-2 shows that ting.- _
($) Concrete, placement No. CC($_8jQa_-' pour d air No.of 6.8% 8 c.y. was placed on ticket No.11882 without te _
mix on ticket No.11881 was placed with an entraine 231-71.
_T_hn Insy_cetion Plan No. is C- -_
N_
A(573 0)a CC($85)a (Ite'm_20 cont'd) CC($82.0)a CCU82.25)a A($J8.67)a No test cylinders _.
2630 2031 'h091 . " c, " ag3 7 Day Ave. 2093 3910 5095 3hh'0 3185 507$_
and mix same as A(573)a 28 Day Ave. 0 6530 _ _
$j5 h125 90' Day Ave._ _ __
00 psi.
_All con _ crete li.sted__in loan backfill,___2__0 -.
_ Eic14_r.p.pammends_"uae_aq_is" .
. [jn .. w. 3 ' t z-8-7 4 _
b D; notes actual ticket in question.
'EN, 1gb,oe2.i< N, h h h
m_ -
(
l l .~ * -% - ^-
- Qp;g- - ... . ~ . ,
..n.n.-
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT l
Q,,,, _g ,,,a_ - - - . . _ - - . . - . - _ _ - -
_. . . . _ , .- . .- ~.- . -l[^ 7 4 2/3 "' " "5'"
, ~ - -
3 D M m#s eg 1*e*A N T N O. I N cv. 7. Pfe OJECT NO 3 2. e *0 H I E D ta t ,
3 DATE 7'%. DsSPOLET ION Cosecule HE NC C Speb,. . C-230 l2 07220
"~~' "~' " ' '- # '/^
- .b
. 8 F C M t.s t Cse t* T sO N ,1 . vpLau A) CD ety 7 '
Cfncrate Placement Concrete Placement A(57h)a ( /J$gla N/p h 43Y I REV.
, 1 _1sd f-2d'7d **
- 1. M H 90L NuMiscit 9. $T AR tup 5V574;M NO. REPLACLMcNT H T NO. Pap =g F *E******"*
.f..e n__ _. .-: - , %, E6@,
i l ,,
- 1 3i ? yi ' - . . . . ... s...
i PuHCH A7C 00f DCie NO. le QC F8CLD $NSPECTION PLAN NO. t oi.. REPL ACEML NT sENS A L NO. , .l h , [ -f g " f, g,. s *
'/') .Y C.-231-11 jA 'S *""#
N/_A __, ,
'= * ** ***l[ ,
- b. C J NT H ACTO N/ LOC AT40N It.AsME O vcs '7souncc .__,_m. v _
lChamoion,Inc.-OnSitePlant * ' ' '
.TrM 8 NO N/A sa Ou t sNa[8 N sT H uC TIONs @ f 40uT E TO F 8CLD ENGtNEE.54 tNG O aouTc To marc'+i^i surcavison
( , - m ,- .i. m w - , ..<,
- p. 5 '
,' ,u l-*
lie. N rNCs NPOaMiNo CONo TION l Concrete placement No. A(57h)a made on 9-24-73, 3 c.y. of out-of-spec. D-2 , p O._,,.. 2 I
[, 77,El!T GIf71N j 3
l concrote van _ylaced. This mix has a rejection limit of klr" of slump and .
the cub.iect mix had a slump of 6k". '
ofCifff'
. FUWU. CON sy ">sq Pi? _ _ ..
ai. rictO oisPOs T.ON ncsubTs.
- 22. O ric'o o'5eos'Tio" Gric'o acco==cNo^Tioniaours to rao'ccv cNciacca'No
\ll placing engineers have been reinstructed in proper testing procedures. Concrete that is to ba tested will not be placed in the forms until all tests are completed and test results are satisfactory. Test results for placement A(574)a are as followr:
Average 7 Day = 4735 Average 28 Day = 6260 Continued on Sheet 2 M. e NccaiNo oisPOs T ON . 2 3. cNo NacHiNo oisPOsiriON nesui.Ts.
Based on test results (given in item 20) for the cylinders representing this placement.
this concrete more than adequately meets the strength requirements of a D-2 mix (5000 psi 0 90 days). 11 enc e, engineering recommends use-as-is. //// ?[^!/>'V
. G,4/I %.A.4 as, maam unmn mwana nx"unau -
2.s ocrisN CN ANGs acaviHmo O no O n ". c "- " " ~~ ~ /* v ' *. 4 t/11/74 '-
O v es. see ATv ACNsO. .. ....
o........ s ..,, <
CQAWBNO R c Ve oCN ___
e.,g
- autoso. aaeesesescrom RcV. A n o.
f Pc C.
.~- i 2 .
5_ . .
c _ . , > -
- u. _
u
~ .' >
N* '
.. - i' .
. T)t-g-
2 r
o 2
e c
a r.
3 d
)
e c
D a l
T' p N _ s O .. _
d C_
(
_ r a
T, .
_. y R_ _
c O_
P d i E ., e u b u
R n c.
i E_.
C t
n 2
2 f- .
- w N . C o 2_ /2 _
g A_
M, g n q'S R. n i i t 4 O ,. r F, n e e 1
~
o _
N c s _
n e a
O_
C i
c r
p 5
c _
N __ n O E.
e r
2, fy _
N _. _
t c s
, L I.
C k
i e r _
_, r j
o d i
e n h w f .
- _. P_
o l
y
- a. _
J .
T. .
c_
e f t
R u
o t
o_
s U.A Q
9
/
n e 1 _
_ o s_ .
i r t
a O u n L o i I. _
d 5 _
n L f_ n -
_ e f n m
_ m = o n
_ m y e n
_o c
e p
D a c u _
_ R 0_ e r n d
d v n _
_ e i 9_. a -
.. e q c e m - -
. r' F a r o c r_
a,.20 l c_
v s a._ e r
- f. A t .
, . l d _
u
_. l s e M
- t. . e i . .
F .
R_ l- L
~
,l3,f$50
. .. . a.
NONCONfORMANCE REPORT l ' O.' *- * ' .' 1 ._ 53
--.--,----- n.o..cos. .onconcou n.-ce jo.1.
. n m.n.ura ni =0 .c v. .1. euo,ccr uO. .
.....2.u....ou g .,.
Technical Spoc. 72 Q-C-230.I_.2_.
.. . u n. c uir. .o n
.. .n.
......._1220
. 0 c a .O u SaryW.J.nd11
. v 3 p..T. n
'o-# L1-29-7h s o.Tc
'j ' " ' " " " " ' *"
bM.jng.concreteaggregate On-Site Bat _ch.. Plant h;hyiXJ__t aT no.
!/'2E ' nEv.
[
d..k $. ua.
(
---n a
1[3]6[1C
. c c a a t. w uu n t a .. sTanTur svsTcu no. . n c .t.a ci.u t.n r e i
.fi H/A .. _. .H/A H/A_. (1 I ....
t u : enai.c Ounn.n nO. s a. Oc Fnet.o ensrecT,On es.sn uO.
~
- u. ouen.ncem uT sen,ss nO. } h. ...... y ,e .Q. . , , 2. Lt. *""
?!/
7220--C-230 U/A U/A f),,,,,',,,,,'",,, , , _ ,', f"
. cuar eacTOssi.Oc47 Ou si. uE_o yc5 i1.sounce , ,,,,
Cha.mpion, Inc. _ Iron Mountai.n.., Michi 6.an iT c = 0 uO Subcontracto,rt. Cham - ~
-n , Inc.
- e. uo vi e.t. .w .i nuci eon:. g nOuTE TO e scLO encenctninc 0 aour' To aa'=a'ai surrav'soa
- 3. uC NCT N FO R MIP4G CO NDITION e
. On January 22,197h 165.05 tons of Ib" concrete aggreptes delivered to the On-S.i_te Batch Plant was out of gradation specifications.
C. 21. Fl[LD DISPOSITsON H ESul.TSs
@ FecLo ossrostTION QFIER.D nCCOMMEND ATlON/HOuTC TO PPOJECT ENGINCERING I
l 1. lb" concrete aggregate delivered 1-22-74 han been rejected. The 1 1/2" Concrete l 'Phe n".gregateS_arn tn hn romnvnd f'rnm nito- .W .d l - 2 9.14- a_ggregate was removed from l C eb,. . m-w '
si.te on January 31, 1974.
l /J t.u. ll.r d. 2- C 14-l
- 2 3. ENGINEER 8HC DISPOSITION RC$ ULT $s 4 talNI.E N SNC OSSPOSIT BON l2. .
l
{
1 -
l l
l
" *^**'^**'
- 24. .z ocsign cwaucc "" d'"' O no
- '"'" * " ^ * * * ' ' ' - "" "' "
$' "," ~ '" ' "
O YES.SEE ATTACHEOs ,,,.... oc r ... 7 / , ,,,g 174 AWIN 3 R E V. DCN
^
b .
.a REV. A D O.
t ez c. __
ac<>=
gm
%m
e e
n __
G N NONCONFORMANCE REPORT OP 2 1 54 Rev. 1
.~?. R ePO R T ED n v s as. oisPOs T.ON CONCUR 2cNCE 7 w-iiaiPARv NO. iREv. v.PROnCrNO.
6' 4' O M M ,q hATzM.: ~~"' "'"'
j p."'"
_Sp :cd220-C-n1 I2 7220 S. IT EM LOC A TION / ATCo BY I
I DATE'
_TJRg "B" Cadueld Siceve Outer Primary Shie)d Wall fjg y$ . f_ P L A C E M E rd f PA R
]M/O[
? " " b'" # Rt ***M/
f.r h h uca. .kli #. **'= .
v2% AL NUMBER 9. ST A R TUP S YSTEM NO. . I 7% D" W) *U4 ' * "'/~. ,. .JZ w , . i .' ' _, ".}
f pg I . .,
- 16. R EPLACEM ENT SEftl AL *40. g
...g.7.j....
d ; */ [ / ( (,'. /
]p, .d .,*r. ..y PURCH AI E ORDER NO. iO. CC clELD INSPECTION PLA N NO. *"=
- ~ a c e - = * * = = -= -n 7220-C-52 C-55-12 1,og #323 NA ' 7'
. em N T o.~iT O Rii.O C A T iO N ii.AsME o yEs i1.sOUnCE ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, [ ,,,,
7 Ininnd Ryerson ir em Ok NO Construction
- 8. CAUTING INST R UCT 40NSt @ ROUTC TO rICLo ENGINEERlNG C ROUTC TO M ATERS AL SUPERVISOR There are no 9 '8CE NFO RMING CO NDITION: Cadweld sleeve number 2D1B was rejected due to excessive. voids and porosity.
_pIsradures__in Soce. 7220-C-111. Rev. 2_to rsmove_a_cLycp. -
e lacm _e Cadweld sleeves on the thickened liner plate.
J
~
l 1 i mi. r:ELo ossPOs TION REsVLvs.
e- Or Eto oisPos TION gr CLo RcCOMMEN avion /ROu rE TO PROsECT rNG NEcniNG .)
7 Cadueld number 2D1B was rejected by the field engineer and so noted in column #11 of the A It is also shown as a rejcet on the Cadweld status drawings and on
_ h.C. Form (Cadweld).
the elceve itself. Spec. 722'0-C-111 is being revised to include removing and replacing
_Cadueld niceyns on_ thickened lincr_ plate. 'Io._ slat _q._no_sleev_c__has been removed _ and no 0.A. Bulletin No. 14 to the NOAM. pane
_iceve will be__ removed until a nrocedure exists. 23. ENGINCERING OtsPOS8 TION RCSULTse i
2 2. E NGlNEE RING UtSPO58T10N Cadweld sleev>#2Q1B shall be removed and replaced in accordance with Specification ' '
7220-C-111, as revised by SCN C-111-4001 dated February 13, 1974. We 1. ave been advised that QAM Bulletin #14 is being rescinded. This NCR should not be volded.
RI:': . ,. .a Meh4
. , = . d d-
"" "~"~~ " " " " " " "
as is OEsiGN CN ANGe vicousiec ONO O.ca..
O vEs.sEc arraCHEo. .. .... _
R EV. DCN-CR AWIN g CV. A D D. em.emm v.s.r= a t -v w C PI C. .. is._r.._,su--~~,. w e---- -- w _
i \ \ ) '
1_ .
_ m;3 v
e
~~
e mo c.
K 4
=. j e
5_ .
_ d - t .
o u
l e
S i ;
- o .
c F . ,
u.
. ' - t [
t r *
- e '
}
~
o L T. -
p - . .
- . ,. "s e I R
'- u. ,
e c
~
2 n -
s a
- o m
r -.
y a. - '
o 2 f n
e o c c n n o
N =~
a e
r
) i g u n q
) i e D r r
'T . e e t
N _ n o - ~
O . ig n C m~
._ n do
( T-T E_
R O
t c 1 9
w - v P e .
k R.n E
. r oj c o h*
) n w
E C
N _. T n A
_ o P
e.
_i l
B
}w'
/
h M -
d R
O t_
u e o i R f fi F i o
/n L
N t O o n C i. de t
. l O
N-N d
a i n s e e m c '<
m n o a c t
?
C- ,
e sn m )
- ,/ -
i R_ :
/
t _
d i
c c
r i
G- -
i c "
E ~
. e I_
0 h d .
- e 2_ tt_ d k a i
- - c h o o
l B
Jv s e
_ e b r_ t n a R t Ci 1 t s_
a s -
g 2 a
p h i
h t
=
~~
_ p '
- ona s .
r dg n -
r L_
f a e ~_
r m ^
,t a p o m ^
n c a e .
gh rf 7, =
a o.
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ' " * " " 3
-, Of e-ar* -e srs - _ .
- 2. C R Aw spaO/P AR Y NO. 3 RCV. 7. PnOJCCT NO. 4 2. n I'Po rt T C D DATC 2 5. O SSPO18T ION CON CU P H CN CC L.Shi.Vely " -""' " m- m--
FSK-C-12 & C-109 q l6 7220 11/28/7h - - --
"' " " l
- 3. 4 T C w LCZ C D PP '*"> N S. 87 C r4 E.O C A TIO N . Th y A1.tf* A T '.D CY f [ I DATC
!7-VN Earth:ork Zone 1 & 2 0. Licted Dikes dh' . f f d 3 Fa ce. C f * ** L3 t ar.**e e m ...e
- d. L C R iG 8. F4 U M U C f 4 9. ST A FI T U f' S Y ST C M N O. is 4. n C PL A Ct's,.C N T P#wSP f N O.
'HCV.
UA NA I HA Y I .,o.... ....
PuttCN ASC O H DCit NO. 16. QC F ar LD $NSPCCTsON *t.AN NO.Q 21Q I C. n t f*L A C C M C N T CE R I A t. NO.
C-2_1.o nev._2 18,28,24, A32,.11,.33_and 34 nA - - ~ " ' ' " " * " ' * * - " -
1 C :; r4T R ACT OR / LOC ATIC H 19.ASMC C VCS 17. SOU F:CC
,C C
Cenonic Const. Co. South Haven, Michican nC. K) NO Sub-Contractor - . . , _ - -
9 9. NDUTir4G IN ST s4 UCTIONS: O nOUTC 70 ract.D CNGINLCldlNG C HOUTC TO M A L it I A S. SU PC R V 8SO R lb. NONCLf4FOff MING CONDITIONt ,
Spoc. C-210-Rev. ? section 12.b.1 statec in part "The water content during co=paction chall not be _qore than 2 percentage points below optinum__co_i_s_ture content and shall not be more then 2 percentar e pointo
_ abo.ve opt._imum m_oi. c...tu_r..e_.c_o.nt_en.t. . . . "
Cc strary to the above, cocpaction tect records indicate that material with out-of-specification moisture content was placed as chown in the following lict:
a s. O "c' o o'5"o5"'c" Er'c'o "ccc - aca oar'o"'"ou'r c 'o rao'cc' c"c'a t c"'"c - - -
2 ' ric'o o'5"o 5' 'o a "' 5vt.75'
. . . . _ _ _ . . . . . . . . . _ _ ...= _
_As_per IO13EEC_10h_date.d_ Hon __7,_1973, the op_timum_moicture._c_on t ta _rnnge was relaxe d
._* to_2%. dry _to_%:ct_oruone_2_ mg_terial in t: 9 Bullock Creek area and the other selected
_nrsno of the dike as cpecified by__the Bechtel reprecentative. The following data from M nek_19_.h_9JLg.one_2_;a.t_g.r_ial___and._yi_ thin _2% dry __to__$% vet of optimum. _
It is listed _
.CP!.'Tptply_fpyg.mjpct entdncerint 'o evaluation to EEDC-10h 2 2. t re s.s tat.L N e re t, u tt.t 9:.I f SU N .
- 23. CNGINCCl4tNC DeSrOSITION us.St's.TS:
B
"'""'"'^'""'""'"'"" ~ ' ~ ~ " '~~'"'"
- 23. es ut ter.N CH AN'.c sis.u usu s.u ONO o..'-'".
O YES. SCC ATTACHEDs . . . . . - oc messensene o..,
En AWit .@ # cV* DCN t er c. . , I f" V. .__ A O D. ._.
_ _ __ ___ __ m .- m m._m. .w. .. e m s nu . au. a ._ .. e 6. s , . w . 6. ..
D .
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (CONT'D) .. rn e 2c,_5, u. ec, no gg
-~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
TEST UO. DATE STATI0'T. FLH7. CgiENT . _ _ ~MOIST.URE -OPISErri' ~~~ ~~ NO.CURVE ~ - -RIGh'k,ORLEff North Plant Dike don 8 1 9 .12 .73 7 + 32 6_10 10_. tl __ 71 COP _2R 215' R Uo Action Taken 9 12-73 8_+_93 610 9._6 12 _6 COL 12 215 '_._R_ No Action Taken 3 ~
14 9-11-73 10 + 50 4
612 6.8 11.8 COB 2 200' L 5 9-115-73 9 + 50 612 6.6 11.8 Con 2 250' L .
8 9-18:73 9 + 19 61_0 h.5 7.1 COP _2R 238' L 9 9.-18 73 6 + 52 610 13.0 10 3 COD-1 9.2' R 12 14 + 09 608 10.0 7.! COL-11 80' R Reworked-Ho Retest
_9-25_.73 6 + 08 609 1h.2 9.h COD-8 10$' R Reworked-No Retes't 13 9-25-13 '
9 + 08 17.2 9.h- COD-8 200' R Raworked-No Retcat '
ik 9-25-73 612 1< 9--25-33 4 + 10 609 12,1 8. 6 C0r- 2 80' R Roworked-no Retest 19 8 + 59 611 15 9 11.2 COD--5 82' R 9--25-.73 20.7 10.8 COL-15 212' R Material Replaced-No Retest 23 10-06-73 8 + 92 613 2 14 10-06.--73 6 + 90 613 21;.0 10_.8 COL-15 212' R MaterialReplaced-JoRotest 18.3 1h 7 COD-7 92' R Ho Retest 29 10-0.8.-73 h + 25 613 1R_ . 10._12-73 1 + 00 61.5 6.,9 __2 14 COD-8 50' L 16 1.0-17 73 8 + 82 6_1_5 15 2 10. 8 COL-M h0' R 37 ' 1.0-172.73 7 + 82 6M 1h.2 10.8 COL-15 h0' R 6152 1Lh 10.8 COL-15 110' R Rcworked Arca-Ho Retest 18 10:19=73 8 3__99 9 + 52 615 17.3' 10.8 COL-15 110' R Ho Retest 19 10-19-33 40 10-19--71 8 + 49 615 15 2 10.8 .
COL-15 210' R 3 + 00 617.- 13 8 11.2 COD-h 150' R Reworked Area 141 10.-211 .73 62lt COD-2 Q, 11 6 10-21-73 5 8 + 03 19 5 16.h s h7 10-25-73 6 + 03- 621 10.0 7.h COL-11 70' R h6__._.10-25-7 3.__ 6 .+ 03 621- 12.6_ .9 15 con-8 150' R.
h + 00 6 214 14 COD,-5 20' R Rctccted Not lL'cced-Sec 03 51 g o8-73 ,
P _
-s- : : w3:3-nmr _ a 4 3 2- r- - m s.. .a
-r s; : r . . t .--:- .- .
fETTYVL
~
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (CONT'D)
~
i.nce 3 or. 5_ is. nca no. 55' HOISTulu:;
'~0FTIMdiT"~~CUllVE--
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - -
IIGHT 'OR LEFf TEST 110. DATE STATION ELEY. CO(ITENT MOIS.T.URE IIQ. Q (03 8-53 11-08-73 h + 00 623 18.3 11.2 COD-5 20' R 59 11-10-73 5 + 00 62h 16.5 11.8 Con-2 20' L Moisture Too Rich 63 11-1073 13 + 0.0 623 1Lu3 10 3 COD-1 200' R lio' Action Until Spring 6 11 11-1_3--73 G + 5.0 6.2. 2 10.5 8._0 ? $0' L " Start Up" West Plant Dike J0D 1- 1 9-11-73 $ + 30 60 h.8 12.0 COB 1 80' R lio Retest 2 9-11-73 3 + 85 61,0 h.7 12.0 C03 1 80' R ITo Retest 1 9-1_1-]_3 2 + 'LO 610 6.0 12.0 COB 1 80' R Roworked Area-No Retest 11; 10-24:73 3 + 52 62h 13 7 11_.2 .
COD-5 75' R 16 11-08-73 5 + 00 633 ' 10 3 8.0 COD-11 25' R of choulder North East Dike (OD 7-35 9-12-73 27 + 00 608 10 3 7.h COL 11 ?
h6 9-25-73 33 + 00 616 1;t.5 16.1, C0D 2 10' R Roworkea-Rotestca(seebelg 11 7 9r25-73 31 + 00 616 19.6 12.7 . COB _3 10' R Roworked-Rotected 58 10-0273 2.8 + 151 612 20.1 16.it .
C0D_2 85' R
- 61) 10-11-7.3 32 + 00 61h 18.3 1h.2 COL 8 90' R 69 10-12-73 31 + 00 616 21.0 12.7 COU,._3 12' R Retoot-Sec WOD 7-h7
__7el; 10,20-73 28 + 00 617 23 0 20 5 C0D 6 10' R
~
78 11-114 -73 30 f ,00 622 16 3 11.2 COD-5 10' R 80 11--13-73 31 + 00 616 17.1* 12.6 COD 12 20' R Rotest of h7 / 69 (failed) m h h
- e '*b'"e e e +S bGMI9W 'E e =* M 8
- b* *W N** mew '# b *$** ** ? k' yep #G Gr II* d PS @ *==**P' 9
- ee e= II
c .
e ALOCE' 20 Cob %J1WrD __
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (CONT'D), i.emeh_or_5._ et
. _.. _ ___ . _ .. _.- - _ . _ ._ _._ _ _ _ __ . .. u co n o,~'l_. _ . .
__ SE3T_E0_. ZOI.TE MOI _ST_URE 0017 TENT ___0PTV4UM MOISTUP.E DIFFIRDICE FR0_I.4 OPTIMUM %_CQUMTIOli WOD8-9 '
_ 2 13,0 WOD3-12 2 10 3 +2 7 01 6 10.0 74
+2.6 100.2 l
WOD8--13 2 114 . 2 9.4 1
I +h.8 97.7 -
WOD8-19 2 15.9 11.2, +1.
5 7 l
L _V0D8-29 2 96.0 18 3 14.7 .
+3.6 99.6
'WO5S._-36 2 15._2 10._6 +1.4. h 0 2 U0DB-37 1.03 2 Th.2 10.8 +3.h WD8-ho 2 301.9 15.2 10.8
+h.h 100.It
_._WOD3-h1 2 13.3 ~.
11.2 +2.6
! WOD8-17 2 100.2 4 10.o 't.h
+2.6 33.h WOD8-h8 2 12.6 9 . 14 +3 2 wop 3-59 100.0 2 16 5 11.8 +4.7 WOD8-.61 2 102 4 11 .3 4
10 3 40 J_6.8 -
1 y0D1.-14 2_
I" 13 7 % 2.,
o
+2 5 99,._3 I_WoD7-35 2 10 3 7.h.
+2 3 9,L.1 WoD7-h6 2 19 5 16.h. +3 1 98.h WOD7-58 2 20. 1 16.h +3 7
_.WoD7-61; 2 96._2_
1.8 3 1h 2_ +14 .1 W OD7.7h 2 95 3 23._0 20 5
+2$ 9 6_.,6 On the remainder of teots tho fiol'd cubmita tho following nupplemental_ data for Project Engineering revie
_v,0D8-1 10 4
,_ _2 7.1' +3 3,_ _ _. 84 9 . . .
von 023 2 96 12.6 -3 0 WOD8% ._, 103 3
__._ . 1 _ d.8 soni!-5
,11.g -5.0 100 7 1 66 -
11.8 m> -5.2 101.1 .
~
,fl0CK_20_CONTIhTED NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (CONT'D) s. race 4 or T i.. uca no._54
___ TEST _HO. EONE MOISTORE CONTDIT OPTIMUM MOISTURE LIFEERE: ICE FROM OPTIIM4 %_C_0P2ACT.ICII UDD8 8 9 h.5 7.1 -2,6 97_7
___WOD8 1 h 9 17.2 9.4 +L3 86.3 WOD315 2 12.1 6.6 +3.4 9h-9 W0D8 23
. 2 20.7 l_0.. 8 +9.9 9h.9
_ WODS 9h 9 91! . 0 10. 8_ +13 2 100.R WOD.8_.32 1 6.S 9.h -25 95 7 WOD8-38 9 19.h 10.8 28.6 95.9 w'_0D8-39 2 17.t3 10J +6 5 93 6 WOD8-h6 1 19J 16.h +3 1 97.8 UO_D8-51; 1 111 . 6 11.2 +3.h 97,.h U0D8-55 1 18.3 11.2 +7.1 0.5 WOD.8_- $h 1 10.5 8.0 +2.5 100.5 WODl-1 1 h.3 1R 0 -7.2 94.9
_ _WOD1-2 1 h.7 3.2.0 -7 3 87 WOD1-3 1 5.0 12.0 -7.0 9_37
___ Wom-16 1 10 3 8. 0_ +2 3 99.6 WOD7-h7 2 19 6 . 12.7 +6 9 87 3 .
WOD]-jj 2 21.0 12.7 +8.3 93._3 UOD7-78 9 16.3 11.9 +3.1 9.7.3
_ WOD7-80 .2 17.1 _. 12.6 . +h.5 93 9
> If nococcary, field roc _ommando evaluation of affect,cd_in--p1dco, matorial bo dono_at_tho_oame timo_that__oyaluation of arctw affectud by NCH 0-26 nro conducted. . . . . ._
. --_..._._.. ~_.. _. -. W .:.!
- 2 $b.. l d~1 b
'Bechtel Associatc ProfessionaFCork k'
- :. 6,c-=:7~e. -
Inter-office Memorandum d"#I~8 M N
.BEBC - 104 '
Nut 7sar v .Y ', ~ ,
x
/^'t Date November 7, 1973
- TA) E. E. Felton .
P. A. Martinez From
. tire, Midland Plant Uni.s 1 & 2 -
Job No. 7220 Engineering og Earthwork Moisture Content s File: C-210, C-208, 0274 Ann Arbor .,,
cosato J. H. Allen '
i.
J. C. Hink .
R. L. Rixford L. F. Wilcox Refcrdnce:' a) FCR-C-18 dated November 2, 1973 .
In response to your FCR (ref, a) and based on labor $. tory test data, compaction data, l and location of the material being placed, specification C-210 can be -
relaxed with the following stipulations:
The optitum moisture content range can be specified as 2% dry to 5% wet of optimum provided that if the coisture content exceeds 2% wet of optimum the fill shall be placed with a compactive effort equal to at least 95%This of the Bechtel codified proctor test result (20,000 footThis pounds ef fort).
also applies only to
/~T ' will be donc at no additional, cost '.c
(,,,) Bechtcl. zone 2 caterial which is placed in t:he Sulloch Creek area a Bechtel representative. The moicture areas of, the dike as specified by thcontrol cpecifications originally wri zone 1 catorial. That is, zene 1 catcrial nust be placed within a toisture content range of 2% dry to 2% wet.
The above change in allowable range of optinua coisture content for the zone 2 caterial may result in more than four passes of coopection equipment.
However, as pointed out above, this additional effort will not be at the
~
expense of Bechtel since it is being donc to allow construction to continue and give the ' contractor, the best utilization of his equipment and peopic, e i:: 7' r ~, ~/ , m.2- e
- , ir .
.a .. t.'*'.i .
. /.
P. A. Hartinez 434,..,) :. ' ?hl g./
,,[
U .' ; ;' . . .. 7h RLR/rc , ,
. z ' e!
/%. .
! )
LJ '
. 1 1
If-il jim 1 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ' ' "^] y
. " [f m ;?c'- ~
r,,st
- --~
fi .L A . .. .,< , A .. , NOr ,:7,;6,aias:-- F- -
I o n.o s,.Os.1.ON cO,.CuMotNce i -
IM/13,16,15,16 Spec.C-39; 5_ 7220 n, 7fNhr,7,'.m?y.
,y, /, f , i f f 7,,y, - :- " n 2- - n - - .-2 = m
- 4. IT E M LOC A T ION V A R. su ATEU GY I DATE e * ~*- ~ ~ ~ -- -
- 3. eTCM DEsE sasPl EON e Roinforcing Steel Pocoyville Siding I Y l ', . . I . ,.[t, b 's' '/- 7Y I R E N.
[rh/[d/ ,h [.n_ e 3-6-) / e.va
. C. CLw s A L ed uuut sa s. sY Afe) ul* S Y S TEM NO. ' / ft- LPL A CLMON T 8 A BS T NO. [r-earev ree a o a /t.sas sai s I i N/A N/A . ;, ll/A I ....
- n. cusCNasE ORoER NO. . .. O C r ELo NsrEcTiON ,LAN No. is. RErL ACc=ENT sER AL NO. ,,,
.). , [ t, ,f/. ..,,
_f,(( , ,, I ,.t. j g - f /. Jcj
_7220-39-AC Rev. 3
- 4. CE NT H A C TO H/ LOC A TION 0- 39-10 g s . A s p.e E
- Q YLs H. SOURCE N/A //* *" *" "l'[* ,,,,.
CODE Inland- Ryerson/_ Chic _ ago2 Illinois-
.Tcu D NO Suppli_er_ . --- -- -,-
0 3. 849uT INo IM sT R UCTION$s Q route TO FIELO ENC 8NEEfilNG O HouTE TO M ATERI AL suPEHVasOR 9 7e. NM PdCC N FO Se MIf 4 G CONDIT SON:
Technical specification 7220-C-32, Rev. 5, Section 7.h states in part. " Plane of cut shall not deviate from the 'equare' more than 1/8 inch." Contrary to the above, a certain amount of reinforcing steel received in on M. R. R. AE0-h6 does not conform to the above tolerance.
21, Tags onplied.
- 20. 29. FIELD DisPOstTION REsuLTss
-Q raELD DesPOstTION Orac'o accouacao^T'o"/ ROUTE TO PROJECT ENCiNEERING Bar ends to be Cadwelded which are out of square more than ll8 inch will be reworked _ W,w23- a,a / , sp A c c ,$, W -
prior to Cadwelding to correct the excessive deviation by saw cutting or flame cutting /. , c;fera 470,.1/<.<,- ( s. n.w m ns trovided' for in Section 10.10.1 of Specification 7220-C-231, Rev h. Ord/2n r.<p,. S n: e,sive m 0, *':Y Te$ I'./A,f7 h . .
Zy;xe:iep 14 w A c n iir y 7,:
~,
4 /o r? <" /2 W"e.7' zh/N '
"U. .in N EER uso OiseOsiTiON 23. eNoiNCERiNo osseos TeON RCsuLTs'.
i o,".""'"'"""'" -
a1is oE: cN CNANoc REOuiR' O NO
'* "' " ^ ' ' " ' ^ ' '5" ' " ' " * ^ % "' ',
r v- r A ey O yEs.sEE 4TT4CwKo. .. .. . .......... -
. . . i
.uvaonease eassacroa o.va p C V. A D O.
,s r E_C.. _ _ . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ . - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
t so" s-t g . = t = g si g
V ~
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ' ' " ^ *' '*^**'**'
@/ -
cr _1 Tl
p t,2. p r lDATC 2b. D8SPOSIT80N CONCUR RENCE E7 (Rev-5) 7220 '$Qben _J.17oleslagle f2_L4 /74
_ Brin [, Bars
- c. v E RI A L NuMDCR Siding Area - Dov
- 9. ST A N TUP SYSTEM NO.
[_d /Zdb' S S. R E PL A C EMENT PAR T NO.
! Z/7/79
- /[/b N he-[e ha'o E"on C T Ph* * "5 6"# * "
7- } 1
- 'C l bEV.
_l{;St No._75P682 s
Non-App.
s o. QC r8E LO INSPECTION PLAN NO.
Non-App. I c- . ,w',..... , .... ,
- __Q-3 9_ C-39-10 ""
Non.-ADP. [' "" * * " '"'" '[
.. Cs NT R ACTORitOC ATiON ii.AsME ' 7. sO u RC E O VES '
CODE Inicnd Ryerso_n,_ Chicago iT E u a NO Construction _
0 8. ROUT BMG INSTR UCT80N$s h ROUTC TO rIELD ENGlNECHlNG O aourc 'o ~^'En. At suPcRvisOR 9 3. NSNCOM PO R MING CONDITION:
The elongation test on sample test bar for heat No. 75P682 failed at 3.8% (Spec. 7% Min.) . Two bars were cut at random (Part 13: 3 of 7: Mk. 3 & Part 131_5 of 7: tk. 17A) from heat 75P682 for retest and both pieces ,
failed; Mk. 3 at 6.1%, and Mk. 17A at 4.2%. This is in violation of Spec. 7220-C-39; Ref. ASTM-A615-72 (Elongation test for #13SmC Ipde 60 rdnLqrsinn.sh'111 be Min. 7%) (Unit #2 top steel-layer #1 and #2) z e. O rtELD DesPOsario" Or'c'o atcomacaD AT.ONiROU1E TO PROJECT ENGiHEERiNG mi. PiEtD DisPCs TION RCsutTs.
The following reinforcing items are rejected and are to be placed in a hold area pending removal either by vendor or scrap.* (1) Part 13; Pane 3 of 7; F&. 3; ik. 4A (2) Part 13; Page 5 of 7; Mk.18; Mk.17A; Mk. 30 (3) Part 13; Page 6 of 7; Mk. 37Adik. 43A, Mk. 8, Mk. 3A (4) Part 14: Pane 2 of 3: Mk. 56 and (5) Part 16: Pane 3 of 7: Mk. 21. Mk. 23: Mk.
24A; Mk. 25; Mk. 26A: Nk. 3 (lk //.Y}f:/// f/7/7u /?/hif /[H,hiffh Ef 8 GIN EC N 0NG DILP'OSITION ' ' ' '
/
- 23. ENGaHECRING DISPOSITION RE5uLTS:
/
2s. as DC$lGN CH ANCC HCQulHCO @No 26. R EJECTED M ATCRI AL Dl3PO5tTION 2 7. QC ACCCPT A NCC Oa ,".....o u " " " " - "
O TEs. ste aTT4CNCo. ,,_,.. 1 o ........ ,,,,
ER AWING REV. DCN -
, av reso.eas e an s., sto. on,,
W E V. ADO.
_EPCC. m. _ . . _ _ . . _ _ . . . . _
.__ ._ ._..___.___..._my.m__
a.-, ..- -_. _ -
l 'JS3 3 8 _ Oc' y g ,. . ,
"f ~
' " ^ " ' ' **"""'"'
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT or . . 1 . .. ._ 50
- j. ,, ,,oort
- 5. o r.co .1 o u c o u c u u ui.ua.c..,,g
, . . ,. . . . , -. . . u crois u.u i.. ._ . .v ,
s o.. .u. .. y, uv uo. .. ...
i n e v. 1. rnoacc r uo.
4 f' Ce,., /: ik . I 2/13/74 m== __ e - - -
.e n. x/Z
_. spi:0 C-111 I Midland, Mich., 7220 -' -- - - - -
_ _ . . . _. - . . _ s _3. _. ,
v in e s is . f oAnt ---
-- -/
- s. st a.m ut senirs ion
__d" Q:ntainment Liner Plates
- s. ii tu toca s ione Paint Building & Storage Yd.
.. sranv oi. sysrum no I /g-
_ . /u on..ccus.u . . r uo.
l2.-/3 j ' _
j ac .
d., h /. ,
-o,7 .u..-4.~..c 4
.,.J , ..;; , r.l I
..u.
- a. suci a s. u u u ni.a H.A. 1 02-12-U1 to S1-15 "U1, Seam Veli U.A.
,, ),C ,.,m ,,.< /'/. .r -2}3 3,;p.,
.', j
~
... u c i iu.o mmcrio n n..n ,.o. . .. u. ri.a u.ui ni ._i.u i. no. ,,.
seu..< n sc osinti, no. s C-111-10 H. A. , "' P " "g' "
_1h A.
csun;4Cro nstoc Avio n si.A uc 0 vc5 ir Souacc
- _____s -
coac Contraction irEm ..,
N.A. ..L_"4 no .
o nouicio=^ n a...ura...vison ic. ou rinc ma nuciion5. [3 uour u vo i .u.o cus.ini.o uini, "All liner plates wolds it. neuesuronumo CoNDifiOH- S ecification 7220-C-111 Rev.3_ paragraph 9.2 stipulates that:
n%11 ha nubjncied to the following eatinati.ons..__The_rq[qrenced_ occtions are contained in the ASME Codo. Proposed Paragrapid._2,3 1 refers to Section CC-5521.1 and paragraph 9.2,
- Scction .III . Division.219.73,_.unleos,othendge_noted," -
Contrary _to .the.jtboyg,_3.radiographie. reports, _#27, #30 ~ an.d #31,, r.how r .r : t .1 ; : . i,
_3J._ refers ..to _.Se c tion _IX- 3300_o f that_c ode . XG.l Rev.0.[dee;;s not encompass ASIG Code
___innp.c_c_ tion.. specification to be C.-111. Rev. 3 Paragraphs 9.2.31 and 9.2.3.2 RT- No tags applied.
Pronoced Section III Div. 2. 2i. FiCLD Di:erOstTiON HEsuLTsa
- 23. QF Ei.D DisPOsifiCN OFiEL.D HCCOMMEND ATioN/HouTC TO PeioJECY ENGiNEcR NG O f / P D_e n /.: -
Senion 9. 2. 3_of 7220-C-111, Rev. 3, has not been implemented. ~0ierefore, the applicable __
.w r -r.-....*.+ d,J , .@ .' .-W racctions of 7220-C-111. Rev. 2 apply. Impicmentation is covered by TWX 3198, BEBC-199,
_uhich uithdrew implementation _of_C-111,_Rev. 'Lfor_.two_vecks Also,..the_frequcacy and 4F , >,' _
'y ~
- I 5'.
N. .< -' , . : / ~<~( . .- o I- u interpretarinn_rnquiro-onen spelled _one nn thn X-ray Rep urs Wern in err n , since they LA 4[,A c .. -'-/'.' 4f-real ly adhere to Rev. 2 requirements.
ONO 4 2. /4 '
as. chomccamc o scosition ncsui vsi a.. E cinEannuc oisros: Tion e
24.or,6csiGN CH ANCC REQuiHED Owo
" " * " " " " " " " " " S7" . ,$, , " ~~ 3. 71727/</2U _ J. $.7de.e
[ac seeds-ame ,
says O vzs. SCC ATTACHED. ,,g angs DCN Aufmossuso sees,scrom magg nEV.
Oi4 AVs:NG ADO.
REV. ._.____.__ _ _._. ___ __. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . oc, sPCC. _
- __-___-__s_________ _______________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
q, **.n*
.,,g e
- >h wuiclrAnu no.
cr: . ~ ~
NONCONI:ORMANCl2 HEPOHT
-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' - - ' "^' .' V o,
J.' q. ;., / .
t i n e vT E'enba c c r ho. ' l Q) i 12: wii ,. oisrT,o u v - -- ~~-'~~ 7i 5 o AV7 -' n. un.ross i sou co ns.uunt act.
hPFC 7?20-0-111._._ - l2 7220 e-_
\ 's M ut se.es arl asste
- a. 4 5 t M a.uc A e au ra i a\
(3,.e_ . (( d,. c,d_ . 12/.1.3/7h
-*v_...- -
_ _ . .m"- ' ' ' " ' ' "'
i gi3 A e i n ::'
,/ IDATC -
16 ---
Erre_ lib".cadwnld n1onvnn
_Outor. primary _chield wall ['tg j [ 'M l2 I.7 7 '
LHI A L NuMUCH
- 9. ET AH1ur SYSTEM NO.
i a rL Abr.M cMT PART NO fM i[igt i o.o 0 g t
I 'REV. roseson st e r 6aa a a.ene a
?. A. . .. . . . . __. N . A , _ . .. . r i east no. Aa cune n no. . _ .
... oC , n i.o su sr CT son c . A u no. . . . . .. N . A . _ . _
. 6. urri. Aci.Mi.nT scu A no.
,s
. , . g. . . . .
T220-c-52. _.
D NTQ ACTEE/ LOC ATeoN c-65-12Jos323.c-55-13 It.AsME Los32h N A._
y
~ " ' " " " ' " " * "
- 2. 4_X, .
'7 [
l CODE
[] YEs 9 7. source
[nland Ryercon . ,,,, _ .T c M n no ""'"**'"'"'"***
s.ourinu .~ nuCiions, Construction nuouTe To rict.o cuc.ucco.uc o nou rc To M Arcu. Ai.surcavison .
H C NC3NF4RM8NG CoND4TroNs ,
Cadweld_mleeve numbers _B2A-7D,_K2A-7]h N2A:6A_E2A34 52A-1B. and E2A-hB q.y., hnnn vnji.n tna .
L h rn nvn nn proceduren in apecification_7220-C--111,. Rev.2_to remove and_ _ _
pp_1_aca cadvold slooves on the thickened liner plate, e
g recLo nascos Tion Oe'e'o acco=urao^ Tion /aouTz To raceccv saa'acca'ac ai ris'o o'seosivion acsu'Ts>
I 1 Mn- c-1 1 1-/.001 pro.viden procedures for remnving_rlic_caducid siceves_itom the thickened l FM G or ree r ru ,.mw c 1er pinte. Specification .7220-C-111_.Bev. 3- incimles_pInvininns for reucldine cabeld N.,7. . - c ,, , .. p , . . .. ,. . 3 ,,<
ieves en the thickened liner plate. Removal and replacement _of_.the_cas!ws:Id sleeves will +- -m > ~ ^4 r -.' 4' x' <! - " 'e r
.pe.rfnrmnd ncenrdfne en rho prnvinionn nf Project Engineering's_aforementicand_approvod ow, 2 , .. m o s ,f r c ,, . 9 -
rentn.
f ac a a.asuc ossrosarion $s4. i.N ibt<>sY~ Pl] N7$ -w
- r t r ~~ er'e
n/ /Prv I i
- 23. encancenino ossrosiTion assutTs, .,(2.. ,
g,' ~
- ,4 L ME233N CHANcC REQu8Rc0 CHO 24. RIRcCTED M ATEfil AL DisroSITaoN O a s'waa 'a sw*m*a 2 7. oC. ACCEPT A N CS O vcs, sec ATvACueo. ' ,, .. . -
o . ... . , ~. . : <,6 A 6%, ,o, A/ .n WBNG ;, R E V. DCN . . ...... ,,,,
avinomez.oaNSPECTG, e
. RC- A D D.
-u 2 -____-- _m7.----- _;---.- ---.-__,.- _ - --- - --^ -- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _
\ \ f. !.
1i!Ti
! i\l i l Jl I \ i\ )
1-M= _
a h a> ss .
B A
b
/
~m_$; 'd 2 e_
m e ___ d m_
z _
a_____
n_
. l
_ 0 I
d
- e s
v '
- r w
e e - -
-6 2 .
c a . .
e _ -
= l .
B
Y -
Ud.ff _ ~
A' NONCONFORMANCE REPORT enem. -asammrar: ser ---
- _ _ . - - - . - - usuarse _
Or_ f_2 dd)dlI'f s*/ (>0
- k. C f*si ts tN G gP A R Y NO. tREV. T. PROJECT NO. 12. st EPO R TED DY DATE 25. DISPOSITION CONCURRENCE 7220-C-616 !4 7220 /)'.k.< A/W " " " " " " " '
~ ~ "!'.
- 6. s T Es.:T:s C R iP'TiO N e. ITEM LOC ATsON (ei 'Is tKTED Ry DATc E ' /l h,
_.3..g.1/f/f/
~
LSump,, Liner Plate
- i. t Enu2L Nuu ut R Reacter Bldg. #2 Base Mat
,, sr An tup sysTEu NO.
c)_'q(( -
is '. ji LAcEuCNr PANT NOA
- ([i,!l2l'/,'/d...y?./,._ ,
' -c.
.e so
'f
-i r f
..i.
j REv.
__.NA NA _, __
M (/ i -,.,.....m. ..,. , ...
. PUGCN A2E ORDER NO. 10. QC FifiLO INSPECTION PLA N NO. 16. HE PL AC EMENT SE R S A L NO.
pp f t,{# [j~ "'"J . f . ""I(f
~ *"*
^
7220-C-50A C-111-7h NA
/[ o .a=N U n f S:uth rn Boiler & Tank Works Inc., Memphis, Tony. *,E an._63_NO _
Supplier
. C.OutlNG $N51 R uCTIONS: HOuTE TO F IFLO ENGINCCHING O nOuvr. TO m ATER Au surERvisOR E *3 NCCN FO RMING CONDITION:
! During installation of the sump _,, it was fou td that the centerline of the drain in t.ne bottom of thn sump liner plate in Reactor Bldg. #2 was fabricated 6" North of the sump centerline in lieu of 6" Sotith of the
_.__ sump centerline as shown..on Ikg..._7.220-C--616_Rev. 4, _ Sump..will._be_. removed from_ containment _f.2_and_ stored.in_ weld area adjacent containment fL _pending rework.
- 23. @ FIELD OtSFOSITION Or'c'o asCommeaoat'oa/a >uvo To reo'rc' cac'areaino Zi . r'<'o oisPositica a tsusi
~/JcreA.'1iC T/ O ar7 @
eliair.p._shall_be, accomp.11shed in__accordance witl} Project. Engineering's, approved .
. s Sp:cification 7220-C-111 and its appendixes. See the attached 7220-FSK C-93 Revr'O
~ ~
for detailo. l',N l pL2j.>//t' l j { h. . k > l1.f/ 1 :r- .
i'
- 02. L f4C f NEC f48NG Da$POEITIO N M !
dix 1,./
2 3. ENGi*d EE RING OISPO30 TION R f"SG4 T!.t l
- ""*""^"'^"**"'"" U"""'"~""" - * ^ * * ' " ' ^ " *
- ac. as utsiGN cH AN'Gc utouenLu ONO O.<-
O v Es. sCE aTv4CnEO.
3G AWIN 2 REV. OCN
...............n.. .... .
Y'c_---__--r-_--r-______'_*t-_-___---_-_^""'
_ ~_7 _
- - ~ ~
- - - ~ ' - - - ~ ~ - - - - * - - - " ~ ~ - ~
i l -l \ I I l l.\ l l \ l ,1 l l \ 1 ,
- 3,
. y, c
0 6__.
o.
n a
4 c n
- u. .
e
- a. . /,
e i 2
?
r
/u-
, o
? / .
e .
c . ,
t a n r.
s i t
o D1 'u -
e H ~ c -
l p f:
r.
N m
c o .b &
b( E
~
)
D R. !
T N
O C.
N o?c /. ;
C
(
t o b *i T &v
~
R r .
l- & -
O o p Y l' -
P i m E r p u !
V R s_ d -
E 2 o_
t . /k. -
C n
N o i
'i .
A N _$, / *!
l M e R
t t ._ W b l n e s y CA O e r l p Q a-F m c a F p N n n Yq P i o O a c r_
C t g p N n p O o_ n A c i N r n u i o e
p t o_,
a t_
l p r o .
r i . . .
e r '
i n n l d e
p t m e u l .
s p m
l o l c a.
t_ e c b n_
l i_ l t
o a .
h p
o _
t .
. R. .
J, - -
C. -
0 H a 1 2 '
. n 0, - .
ngv .
gL . 6.
tI .
-g .
7,
,) - ..
,c .
l'-0" w, 4 '- 6" 4 SUMP d
SLEEVE EXIST .
-~~-
.r--
- - - .... . LOC ATI O N
'.i RELCCATE AS U; ,r -- - - , -- -- - ~l
.- - SHOWN (ROTATE
' ~'
l 'f ,I, / 1 i 180c A5dbi SUMP (,)
\
/
l i '/
i \l I Q ^L !
' 7 i 3 CUT LINE(WELO .
=
il ii i .' d' c ',, '1i i LINE C l 1 -
I I 1
ii v y iI, I I
~
- 4. SUMP i, t i
- 1 6 ~~1
- s. .-
7 l
l i l' I i i t.t h, a. . . L. I TO. P s i , 'r' s la
.,1 . - r.
- . c. .
til plDE
-e : 9i 1 f ';
m' II i.
I I
l
/ [-N N..
\\ , 3._
i 1 o4c p %IDiys B
.o 5
T 1 tt ,-
. i i ,v I
r"" NEW LCw ATiON i
I y, I c.v.l. .s _g. c L . c . c.c.
y i
p .,y --- - - -- i"l , ,, . .
L. __ _ _. _ _ _ _ _. J IC %a. p-V IG G Lc.. AX I.,.-
(=hg
.- - a a c_
r .
.4 L _ 9- _ ..9.. ,
m -
to ~
Of' TIO N A L 3 R A D.
CLT LINE AT CORNEP.S PLA N NOTE: C.uT, R3T ATE , R.EP,M R. 4 wELO tW Ac.c.c;m!c2 MT14 SPUC- .
ffG y/3j E R fP F9f?.?%
h'-) f e .- Y. 1 (.- I I l .
1 w-f3 J o z..s f a. w., w..:avud -
.. 7 . . .- n v. w s.
e Icsi u.c.s. inri. 7/
.. l wTe dis ,r_.
j - -
,s is
~ ;< Ls. ?f.; g E:'E t rn.P u:,v atti i:.. 7.bEC .:.y.' ,pf..j : d.o*
ER C u 1
t,%. .-iTEL I-O% Rf- -
t.il.$yw
.. ~, ..; h u .g: a ;,.
M!.f.. A...D .PL AN ;. .I i 2
('/
. e i . e Md GfQ)j j :] c,3$. ,H I' $.3 ;kgi:
'--, L_,- 2 ) . . _ .
SI.EF's. E !~:E LOC AT!ON
' *).-
JOh .f,9. . . . .,_
. _, .r: n../ ! ? In _.3 ; 0. ___ _ .. . .. -..
'7 '*; ; %, I T- , : -, _ i<- O ,r: g
bh A'
pi j * '
- Ef]hhl M di1.i b E.b ti e rel.s Em[ils
,, OhlKii.8 t-' p. p. c.:a y m 7 a:. r.9 \'9 s . .n k .
. .g q~.n -
s
.e l: . ,.
C ? G e , Dr.J
-@7a ..!/g.gL' u. El Ea
?\ D, Q % . iiT WEfl W.0.Oh5 % kh W
[lldd
'd k19$is$d Ilihd,dD 0 $dlik, 4,- 6
- 4. SUMP l,- O,,
< w '
e EXIST SLE EVE so~ - ' ' '
r: ~---~ - L0C ATI O N
' RELOC ATE AS
~~~
SHOWN (ROTATE n b.t _ 2 ~_ [ sEl i i 180 A50,UT SUMP 4.
I i ,G 3 i I ,f< N I
's
) 'i CUT LINE $ WELD A
d '
g
- I
' N-
, ' --[ #
I i LIN E l
iI'. 1 '
i v
I!, I I
& SUMP
'O .
i ,
(.)
e e
t
,j il i
l' 7-l i
i, i ,-- dl-c.s...-!Il APF ENDIX B (dlCE i
I I I "a i fI d- ' J- i g Ys ; 8 .
% CNEW LCC ATION
!I i ' '
- ! I 4 c'XICT SLF PVF-i y
- I y g_4 _ _ ._ _ _ _y'J 10" ON/lG"Q LEAK
- / t _'. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CHASt
'.I . ~ .
gll ...
. ,o ,
m, 9 = , ,9, . 7 4
OPTION AL 3 RAD. PLA N CL,T LINE AT CORNERS NOTE: cut, rot ATE , p epMR. 4
' WELD th! AC.C.c9.9AMCE MT14 $PE C C l %T E 2. t ej .
- D r.. E D l C HK. Ys.E.5. l A l . TV o BEC HTEL POWER C.Rf -
,U M!DLAND PL ANT 14 2
@4.([
UNIT. "-c SU M P to 01A.
SLEE\ E f:ELOCATION .
K. c 5. c._._. - .__. .__._._____ i .
lo tio ..At
5' -
"i , . . . . -
NONCON.cOllM ANCE IlEPOIIT ['y ' " ' ' " " " "
61 2e # AW4NG/PAfd f NO. [feb V F. 0 H OJt.C T NO. I 2 . 84 8'dH'3 L D at Y 1 DATC 25. 8 0 0'aPO?.E S IO N CONF 8 9 H H f NC C 7 '20-C;230
,, ['2 7220 , au t p JL ,if d "t-"""- -"**" 5- - " ' ' '
"N'Q'p--
. . . . . . .a . < N . . u N .. n m our A s ion , v g . . h ,. ., . . .,. , f ./ <
' ' g,pky(./
Cec nt User Test Off-Site Testing %uAik 7)
~/ f uQ . 2 Jg/g--
- 6. it c as t A L N U M BL et 9. 5T A H YteP S YSTEM NO. so I a. 3
-w o " -
- 88 * **'C u a / u CEMI.NT P4 (. 84 /O. l red. p. . k' **+ h' '"- c'a-L
, 3/= z 3 PuflCHt.$C 084 DE R NO. 8 0. QC FIELD INSPECTION PL A N NO. *
$ 4. file L A C OML N T GEH R A L NO. ( *
/ .
, =.-
7220-C-208 m nA a"- '
' CS ATO ACT CHf LCC ATION 83.ALME O vcs i'sou"cc
__mm_.
" ' "-" - "~"" f j _
Unitcd States Testing Co., Hoboken, New Jersey iTc " gg NO United States Testing _
e 8. DGU TING ONST f# UCT sot 4 5s Q ROUTE TO FsELD ENG0NCCH8NG O ao c To = ^ vt Ma'su eN visOn -
9 9. N % NCO N 6 0 Fs MIPeG CON DsTION:
. When perforning User Test for cement;,___U.S. Testing has performed Gillmore time of set test ASTM C-266. ASTM C-150-72, Table 2, Footnote e states:
_ "The, purchaser should spec 1,fy_t.he type of setting-tice trs t.. req uired- Tn < ime_he_does notso_specify,_or in_ casa of clispute _the requirementa_of the Vicat _ Test _only
. l .
- shall.. govern."
se. O raca o un'oscrioa Gract o accoaucaoarioaiaourc 'o eaostcv caciacoac ai ric'o oiseosersoa arsu'is' All cement user tests are conforming _to ASTM C-150-72. There has been no failures or disputes _regarding settinn-time. Field recommends use as is.
FCR f5_9 has been initiated to amend Spec. 7220-C-230, Paragraph 7.1 to designate ASTM N "'A E- 8 4-'# -
&l }?
C- 19La s_me th o d_o f_d e te rmi n i n g_ time _o f_s et - -
L)M
- N G 4H E:7.H SNG nthPOSIT SOP 4 , 2 3. ENGIN CCfs tNG DsEPOSeT sO N H ESULT$ t Engineering concurs that the alternative Gillmore Needle method is an adequate method
- for time of Setting test; since all tests met requirements of Table 2, ASTM C-150-72, l Engincering recommends to "use as is" all cement and user tests performed to date.
In the future, the Vicat Needle method should be used. No amendment to C-230 is required, since footnote e already requir$s the Vicat Method (AS1H C-191). gf/d l[d 7/2V!h, z.,.1$ DCSIG N CH ANCC R EQulH CD \/ 21. R EJCCTED M ATE *RI A L CISPOSITION O a n.'w'a 'f tv m6 a 27 c AccEe Cc /
O v Es.sc : ATTACNCDs
. a.c-.. g g fTA ,L c~'-:-/M/yi.
aaneansas oc &moenresa '
' o[t a DR AWING -
REV. DCN -
, aufwossoase nsescvoa 4avs E P h C. R EV. .40 0
i
- j x- !-
~
,l,.
131
- s. .
i c..
. .f... . , s. .
. , .e.
- \;e o e e a * ..)
. . 4,
- .s e
0 9
0
. .g . ,, .
8
.- l .W ..
Y 4
< I .'
3
'. s .
g ,.h.O l .s ' - ,
e , M .
(%
- l~a f a
. # &* I
] i i l' Ll;l E.
m' i >; I ; , 1 2.
. - L 'L. >
c mg a-f; a
h.
g .
~{wL '
A u
4, as.
,si
.'l.
1.i ;: *!. i^ %. -
I g* I *, . . t w[$ () 1. ~/ s [. ,
a Q
- 6. [,.. ; * %A :* i -
L., %< (t $' 3 - * .
.e*-
- ,y a - ; ',
- I r 'f u ,4
'{* , C. .
},3 f. .
Y t ,. . ,*. y g*
It u , j b d' s-i
'$-f u-M' . . ,. I is.
- ?.
i .t s i v C -- T- rs
- i;, l.;
1 ee ee g f.
- 5 'o *f O
La C i 'I*,,.*jJ., . { sq; t
. . :."; . ..4{, <. l* ,
'l. .e-. g: e.
'V t-L C'
L: ,%*
ta t.1
,?) ;
I '
p s.
=
s :..'*. ' f,; . O -
w er. : C. -i g ju . @.a:$ p.
- E a
t..aes
- .8 : r.. . o.
- e 4Je b o i( - .R- U V a, w
r.
...,...e f3 j i a:
6' E C . r 9, s . - - ;
e1 <1E ,--}*
- ,.: s'l' o- .,i , j. - e ::-
U, :
a j .:
Cs. . .
-}g-
- l.= -
S
- ul
- s. u.F .d i
.L,u. -3 .:
i
- ?
- v. 1 c, c- .
.i-a j c: . e4 a w 8"-I . .
y, a y ,y .O
- %e M C ==-; ;
\ * >
b.
t c.\,
- s lq.*
e Of G I C *:1 \'.t sa e
6; "e -
t *=i u f2 I*
,, *:1 . .4 c s.* , .: 3 }'
- j.,,s. ( .S.M ,p' , C **29 4' t-t .- te U O C'J r~. W' k
l, JI I 4, D ed.4-
. 3 (g) { ; p eIt* t.*;. l,l O0 64 fi b 4
(. lO -
4
- uO ' o M' f;.L ,
i r
.-._.-.-s r; ' e ci 4 .u c- u ha -
- wioh* st c cf IA . C5 ra o ' u j ~.sA . . J
- 4* M t u n % ;* [*
gj . IJ
,%;* CJ I
. f< . - .a ti *I > 6t O t." r. ;,s y
,O '
(. ; e -
w ,'. o , ,4
}-
t
- a3 blu H ,D e
-t ,
C CJ ( L. :,y
, 64 i
. - yv, gg t d ieV M,7b" ::
2 c) j '3 Og 01
(- (2
'*d ,a 4
'u. '
./ .-4 ,
FJ . 41 4 *r1 lO l
., v ) I 1 i
e t
r ; tg.yt d. ,
.t j'r u
9 c,J. 8 -l .v:lo .4 a.g o-S. ; *i
- g; ,pr ,i 3, a ; g ,d o N o p
J. g f ,- s. : 5 !- .g l g: N . I ;Q- 3i !.3 i > . ,.' : 4, t. ,
. :- 14- t. =
,c,., . . .t . !
4 ,e.' C' (\e
.3 ; : y u:, : o c, :
--! .. iu lueo a I
!c Ji e l- U gt 41 t. e s', O u Y
.s ;.C
.., - = ,u em '< n , .:' }, ::e o,. .a -:t 3* c. a I o:. (*>ls : 1 c y'
.M" ' s:J 62
'l u (
- I II ** 4J I f. U e c. e9 s. a
- H .,i p;. gi e }n
<<, , .u ;, t 1 e D- w.: e u
o 4;,
$ .1 f,.
{
- ,4
- j3 W : ,.,
. C.! ',;l'
.[ *#es
.T * !
.~ g s. ,)
r.
4J s l ,
g, ,
- I
.: a::,)If3
- W j[ h.~;*. .N . .g;.:; w.3 -
t cg S.I . r p ..c a ;c' I [
w l o. v.'
. .; N; v - Q-,g.
. et.. cr tu o .
. .a ,c.o , c ;a 2.. s ps"/ :
8 ll. (o att.*al c- : t'u.j cv., ,. ' - , ' u 3 { }
,y e :.
i, ) 3 . ., . g. t o u
. k3 s
<< y .:
- e 1 u 3 s
=
,g i
4.y r ,.
c,a a u c. E., ?:
.a 4g 1 l
o,
.:; i,,u-M c a ! o e o l. .-s, c:
5 -
t c(. (. ++ ',I w) .f . p l- i- a t-r:
L-t 3 . c. e r .) t -
o
- is
- . I c t :4. ew; t's jees :
..t
-I (
>t'I a.1 (C C1 h N- s' a. r; p ) :-e Isr - 4 E c= . l.
oi 'O C, ,
-u! ei q ui o r: r 4.j,s. C-T.r:-G
- a
.- c.: i-ci N
.* :: (
ug t J
'-l ').= l : u ,,' '
l:
c, ,
- -4 t' c!
a u
o.
s- ; -
r- c, t
- f. - ,,. . O 3,
c*
o e '* (* I i": 9 u n e .;; , ;
r
(
c.; < IU re *
- cC. O - ;p'- lg p 8 ca o ti .
- c'm M.l g.. p I s.
r t.tf $-
J e O .*
- ( U E :;
lo wl.
4J. O Ui . <~ * !
. 'w. y l l .*-# si g
i dI ;4 l s.] .
a- : 1: of c: s4 N I .n3 '
ta. [ 1.-a "f e 1
- 8., ,,6 ? s. g t; ; .8 c p '
.el :: - . i i (,, a.s i, e si 8
c s.. Nj e l i .,e o- . 3 o .i r. 3 t -. - r g o o .e M
%. s'i 9- -
R- c tt - 5.~ 4-j o W 'ufu
- f o ' u {~ *!e p .a ;v o sd a.' c., y 4 s- -
- c. o u> - - - -
g o :r a.
- . o,= or c. n o. 't !, ct'*j be) u -
- o e op t,
C5
- O .;
- u
- , w t -
s.
a #;. g u u ::.
a ei
- o , el .
.g C.:
u .
.g .6.
ueu e
.4 u o g
. 'f
.- t :~ Wo I ,[a '
! (r ' 4: 0 I o '
.c ,3 h :q .U, l $ 8'S * ;s r C *I I C '# "% i s5 I c.( mi l *;*) u $
'- : k (.>. O r. j N . 4 - c. 14 *ri i ).
,p <
4
}u ca' O h .n: , o D g :-- I hs ! U O ' 6 et ;!s . d *: : f 9
- N IJ O O es:s e,3 Ci o 3 :- ee u ot u r .I
- 40r i
- u. ;,Cae,.. a a- w: . - cI u t2 ' *, .
9+-} a o u u V
."5*
a t.:
e% r , ! =c p' s.; p., .a . o
. . ca . 4a ;.:.I - I'.'
. o
.,s* .u r: e*>
c: .A L e' c.
Hj E-.I t-c .i t(
s~
o f> - .%
- f. A
.i O u
U c3 rs =<
o c e. tr o c u.
I I g.o wp .c E' I oD f
4 14 j4 l2 s.d 2 ca. 'd - C; 8' 4** *? .:- Q :: e-t u 4 0 c) e) ,
et.: . -
og ga , f::! r 1N c; 4
g p *,
O, C
4/ *:Ll
- t. ! &
E. .
- a*..
uju ci 4J8 ce
- 1 o
W h
n:
u sh
. u N, i- ( .: I 4- ** 45 1': .
- 4 l:
24 ,;'
C3 i.~.
C es 4 4-: ~
<>. *
- u
- 9. -
t l/; r.
u t t.2,a
- c. .c. } l;;; l r.o ' vow t:t a
. y >
g
= es d C . s *, g a pl o e Se . i O a
% & g a t c3 c:
g p
o O
I t.A t.J.
t" 4
t : ,
(- v..
s .; 'i b.
j , ul 6.
r; t *< at4O c l' I
u!, , gc,! ;,. c
= ;-- -: c. t c g gi
- t '.j .
n e,
e H*
t --
- . I '.'.
l . , M:g,g
-l .u p, c:
O 3
e " ,
C .3 G i L'* -
s ar.
o i .;
.s4 3 ae & 6*.! f. hf u !I Us WI 3
e *gM l M rs '
i D e. ,ts.j ,:. .;-
g *: 1 .
-* . O
, ;- ,'- Z t, gs O,, ;,r s . ) g .] e,4 .{ g u s:- c-l C us1 u M . f- ' ! c)
.r',
6.:
'u) >
< c ..d a - ss t .
- .6 o
- 'l c.
- d t" 3 %.*
, .r-
- . e.
It r.
a u; s1
~a cl p
ft l wP1. :J H uO u *
- 3 t f..
.v r-t
- .
- 41' r c
c..;'. r :;>
.f r !
c:
- , 4, e g 4..
- 1. 4% c.g c.:
,2 ..
,W,,--. . . gv w i ou rC i
- u a ir =
a -
Ni 'l .c.,
t., g.
'[ u i i .. . a h., . u
.c.i o' <
x .
c > I. c 8* y-g u' r 4a e6 : .m,4. .. i o U l 3
' c; (S.
.. a. ~
N i
.c,
<>>.a.
7.,. 3l: iw a.t <. . o ,t...,-. . .; o t
- a v.s c-o
- ' e4; L i r> t*
- c. 4 ::
d.
u o .a e c r< f, o z f
. c i:e,ot.c g :o el '
b.. **q ., ..o. .c t .c u ,
, e .r. m; 6' <. 1 :..r..;
.. <o,< .
3, . w - u .:
e u, -
l lu i > $IN, u ,=,? A$ e-bq 'O 1 it M,w "a
_n na o u. v. , : ..
. .;a. .. , m _. ._ m
. I
. I, e
00
,,g. a g . i,.** * '
/ . v.,; PA NONCONFORh1ANCE REPORT **'**"""
. "^"'.
UA w. G,r As T No. i u [v. 1. Pn OsCCT NO.
. OP -
62 32 ..EPouiEo y 'o 2s. o.5 Ou riON CO N Cu w R Er.C E Sp c. 7220-C-230 l2 7220
. i s ai c t a n .P i .O N 34 LO L.A b ATCiM4% - " ~ ~ Y" ' ' - "5"
y -~ "'
.. n tM loc A riON n ..} A s i n i7v I OATc -- s Liquid Admixture for Concrete Mit e A L N LAM taE H Concrete Placed to Date
- 9. 5T ANTur EYSTEM NO. .
$' f CPL A EL'MLNT P AR T NO L/ !Z /'/ 7-/ ,,/m [,('
3 HEV. .nd___.f,-4p*h74
_NA.
l I et; W *
- a 8 '*
y PUNCH AiC O ft DC R NO, I _ _ NA NA / l d:> s u,,,,, Z h;uchu .
h-i 2-;? / - 74 n o. QC eELO INSPECTION PLAN NO. 14. MEPt. ACEM Et47 SERI A L NO. (,/ - *
/ ,f ,
3 /..*g/7, 22r.;. .= = Q .-.
na -
LON TR A CTO 8eJLOC ATeON ni ur ....
I t. A MC Q YES t7.SouMCC * ==
Champion, Inc. On-Site Batch Plant iTru S e.O Engin,c,cr,ing _ ____
- a. seO uveN4. s Nu n uct :Ouss g nouTE TO FIELD ENGIN EEHINc 0 nouTc TO M ATEui L SuPCavisOn
- p. Pe 2 NCC N # OH M ANG CO N DtTION:
All controlled concrete placed to date has had liquid admixtures that contain_Cillor_ide_s.
sp c. 7220-C-230. Paragraphs 7.4.2 and 7.4.3 states _ admixtures (air entraini_ng_And water reducinn) shall contain no chirrid!s.
- Q r scla DeSPOSITION @FICLD HECOMMENDATION/HOuTE TO PROJECT ENGlHECHaNG
_ _ _ _ _ 21. FIELD OtSPOSBTSON RESULTSs IOM from P.A. Martinez to E.E. Felton dated May 31_,_19_73_ approves materials used at_the tie of_p.ro. ject shutdoun. Letters from Master Builders, dated December 14 __1373 states:
'...MB-HC contributes no chloride to concrete through its use. i.e.._less__than SPPM by vl ight of cement..." "... chloride is not an added ingredient in the manufacture of this "3-UC..." "That ME-VR standard is free of chloride inasmuch as it contributes chloride in EMGINE CHING 085 POSITION 2 3. ENGIN EE RING 0 85POSITIO N R ESULTSs Engineering reviewed this ma tter and_ on 2L]!i/74 unproreLECR-C-54; revised _Sp.ec - 9 J ~' C-/M 4 c' r, z & < ?<>
7220-C-230 to Rev. 3 specifying the requirements of ASTM Standards: and wrote IOM- _2/2i/79 e'. : A
- 31. C. Hink to K. Wiedner - explainipR the snecification clunge. Engineering reenmmonan u m an is. Nrk 2/2//N
- l. 03 CEStG N CH ANG E RECiutHED 28 JLCTEu PA % T ERIAS. DILPOSITION D aarvaavasuee'ea.' 2 7. OC ACCEeTAN CE ./
O-)
ES. SEE ATT ACHEDs ,,,,,,,,
Docese ;'
,g g ,,g,,
j_.! ff, /. f } h C/
f q
=AwsNs nEv. DCN va l .)
} (, ,C[ 4/ (*G -fwQ _ avenon.aso suseacrea mais D E C. R e V. ADO,
~~
~ ~ ~ ^ ~ -
~~ ' - - ~ ~
F5-> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ________-____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - -~-~~~~~- -- _- - _ --'-
~~-
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (CONT'D) . . u c c _2___o r__2__ n. n co no._.__6.2
_.~,..m_____....--,.._...._.-., . . . . , _ . . , , , _ _ _ _ _ , _ . _ _.-
_ Cont. from Panc 1. Block 20 (Field Recommendation / Route to Project Engineering).___ _ _ _ _ ___
_fn_;; mount _cqual to about 6 PPM by weight of cement in the concrete." Paragrap_h 7.3 of 7220-C-230 states water used f"r nixing concrete "shall not contain more than 250 parts per million of chlorides as C1." Therefore, if the specifi-c:::ticn for mixing water._nllows,250_PP{1, the minute amounts of chlorides contained in the admixtures can be considered inn ^cuous and Field _re. commends use as is. FCR No. 54 has been initiated to change the chloride specification.
b% U). l N 2 84 ~7 4
- GD7 .-
- e. .
.** . ( '; .,'
1 QC-G 3-3 ;
OCCOO-O - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
. . _ . . ..e.
(
....s. . . . . . , < . . . . . -...:...... .-
..cp ~..
~
c...
.,. . r . w. .. am. ~ . . . . , .~ .
' fm ) ' s.., ! ./. ..;.~'-
?. ... ,. . .. . - - - fJONCCMFOi'.r.1AMCE RE.00lYi
- ' " ^ " ' "'" "
av R. ,. . . . ...
- 3. Dif A Wa rs Os.*.uf T N O.
-m- -,.... ..... % .
S fl C V.
- 7. PJ6 04 t C T f eO.
.w c w .
. m .v.
. .- . _ . u m.:: :.r.ar.: r,
_ - . . .... O .-.-
., 33 7,10. 0 8 (C D p V g D AY et J 3. C l 3*'G 461 t o n CO *s c e s *t es t fi*C i.e.ne. 7.t20-c-23o l2 7220 Iba.&._K...M.,--t IC H-M -~
. 2.. .,4 o r.e,. ... .. .re, .eu.ou . . , v.... < e n .2 i oArc ~l'l - ' Gli n D ~i'p-L,1. quid Mnixture for Concreto Concreta P.in <'d to Data ...t T.DdMA' .. !A./!"7- I 7-/
. c. s s: e's A L. N u .i u s rs 3. sr A.rrup sv3 Tera no. '
5/ 88 P! D ' * * * */ 8 8
- e. n' n .
!/ j.. s.Acc esHY FANT 940 n -
( l58CV. .e 2.M]M C,- p.6: MM-M 2
.. ,u e.cu A u m.m u ,.o. . .. c c , ,uo ..w : c < n n .u ,, ,;o. . .. n.u u c c m.m ec,n A u no.
-~. m .
~.e...... . ....< g-
. . n.:.*
g g 3 ,. ,y.- .. ,ur, .,...
.au .s ..o,... ..
- s. cu ri t u Adr o n;6c en eo u
. s i .coo A us e hvss i i. r,ms:iC e r
v,.
. .l .
..n o.n uu, s o n n
_C.h...' . 3. * .'.n .. .. .I. n. c. . . . C a .S i_t.e E. a t c.h. ..P.3. .o t_...--
~ -. . . . . ..e.r. s.e.. . O u.n. . . . . . "a- 6 m. . i.n it , -
_. a w -
. ~ , . ~ . ~
I t. SeOU T88.4 ste f.idCT tO N %e . d t.OU T E 'fC FlJ t.3 Cle C te.rNitlN G Q e s O b r .; 70 e4 A t e: e' es A L. Su z e4 v at.0 64 9 9. NCf. .O re! C t M8 pdc Cu te DevlO P.s
. - _. . All c.on trolled . one n ?.a d,..e - r. ..d.. t. .o.~ d..a t. .a.h. m b n_i.. M.. q. u f..<j.
e&. f nnm... thg_gtnr 1 f,n..cb.l.a. r.i d. .1. _
S o *! c. . 7220-C-230,, Parcqr tes 7.4.2_q.d _7,fd,,qtpr.ey_-df.if Wrefn. (p.f r_entin.Nf,ntend_wger,.ylar'ucing)
_ o . nho11._e.tMain.no chlori.8ca. .. n r . . .,. ,,, a,. . ._ . u ,. . _~ _.... . = --
_. ,/. i.,.......
.' i E ... L.U. e H, q-h.i .!p..[ #
3
- t. . . p', ( i ,. y n : ,.;
. q [ .
4 Q, irs.o nscouunoxvioruncu re to c:sonct cr oi u.cnn c
. s e. O . ic o on.rosiveou_ _ _ u. rn:i.o oi:.<o: ron ne:m si 10}! f'ro , P. A. Ihrtine ! to E. E. F.al ton darnd }hy_.3.1. 3 19J.3 a..n.p.ito_v..e..n._v. a.r. Pdi.18. .p. e.d .n.g_thp ties of project chutdemi. T.ntters fren Mwent' nuildern, datna De.c.a a.pr.1.4..s _19]) ne,ntcot '
1-
" . .!T-UC centrib'ites no chlorido to conerate thmigli i t s tute.. _taae , ,Jpf i._t;hnn.jiyP){_hv ucinht u of ec ".nt. . ." ". . . chloride la not nn nddad inf.,radient in tl.c_n_ c_uf.n.c..e.u. .ra.of this --
If".-FC.. ." "Ihat HP,-di standard is free of chkride inner..uch as it contributes chloride in
. ss. cne.u :e n eno one-o us.ou n. cucarac our s vsvo:.orsen nesas r:
, Engineerine rovirmd :l i.9_g.itter t ami t'n 1/.M/J.4._p.pgirmi_ECR .C-W..t.evf W Mpee. A U' - ? : -* - ade2 7220-C-230 to Rev. 3 specifying the req.uirc:r.er.ts of tsnt Standardn.* aJd unf.t_I@- _?. :'c 's /U/7" J. C. Uf nk to K. triodnce - c;$n_111DJ.03_Ih9._SPcnification_ char.c.._ Ergineering_r.cco:manda use an 10. . /f8_ We'/*'V *-
sa.es cesic n enAes' esta uiNece 1,,o as. istes:Cyca sA A7CittAt * $ PC f.4 TIO N Q e. Nm8etosee,,sasa s I. CC,ACC C P T A N C C .
, nun. < . ,7 , , , .
_ ____ m _
n luu <> I s . ,\ \*
mg u, 9ol
. l a. I's t z.
,. c, :. o.
l 1
- f. .
)
\!
.t.
g i o u w i . I I g q -
4 u; .c o
cc.
c e; T f ! l 8 *
.f -- . sg u u v - i.
, s.
%d u. .
m '% S S
- c) W c, d' u
,o' c * *
.I I <ri vi le i 1
- l cal . c . e i i
! v' o r; we i ! I i !
[ 6.l E. u < ! s./ j . .
3 )
[ ,r <>. u i _, f g ,
N uj W o'.O og .
g l l . . .
m.3
. 8 '
4 0 o J, .
l l e 6
p O
p U
ul p.
ue
- h l l -l
. . ')r Nl, n
n A as al *v . i I
- t .
l JI L, N) 64 N: , s ! *
. I w Og a u, 48. g l . I .
4 hl sw o '
Il i : i l
< u O. i. * * "
s 6 C 8'
- c ~8 j}, d";' =
- {.
j e
- m W g
l u
F, u.\ v. e:
usQgT - 1
- I I i g
. 4:1 '
-. . [
C1 ' u O !
l g W)l' C .c * *
! /
C C u I l [.
o u
!' s, t l
. m. o t a, i s ; l. ,
s 1
- m mg eq t e g
~< b w, a c i -
[ l cL*
^
W .C l u, e l el e - .=i
- s i
! .i .
- l bh c. C. .O -t c '
- s .e .
. 1 i
2 -r , ce .c u - ul '
. y
- b s
- j G- U l C 0, O\ w . I L t.
.b .* a u . t
- r.
- w U
-) v. - ,
- 8 c wc o .u I .
i p l, u:
- a e , a, c c' u a .I i e
i !
.l
- c. o .
i , . I -
te we w w ,, I ;
--9. . : ,r ~
1 i
nl e _ut w u. . - . I ! . i o n .. l .
- . I D I
,"**h.
" r_ _.j .f)
.a i c. , u, I .. :
O% e. -
1.a C ,. '
- 3 3
} e
.* C.
5 U CJ l te ng or * . - -
- l I 8 , .3 . . e
^
Q) . C, c'
{-! a! Oj ui ci; ul ca -"!
- . 2 .d.- I
- r
- =u I g
a ; ;
p: I ut sp i . I t l .
.t t
- - I .a; rp u; u,; a 3 l l
,. . ! e e c- cf n ,
l !
g ; , a , .
v e a.:, n :: . .=.
r, ; rsi l . . a,... , .,,,, y: -
.,, , a .
- 8 , *-- .r..
- p. ;. j.. u! l -
t.;. , . ?
- gu* 3l ,
. . . . ~ . I l. , . .
AI I Os- wC* O b **
.'_.'.,..' t . I i 6 !
8 N p; nl
--( t.O I '
s i l f s' v & *s. ., j , *,is.:.:.h . . .l
-- h l .ec er * *
' ut o:
1 I -l :
u:'. cu, .p .
- I l
' ..t.., -: - .t , . ) .i i l ;
as ,
=
s
- u :. . .=. :
. .c~o: . :
o < u. v: a. .t , -
al. wu; i- m c. .
I
, I .
1
{i uj I
m p ql l t o
C. .$..g.
T. O ul eh
,, 1 : Cs I l a
- i l
I. 8 g;6 } CV - - . -
- 4 '
o u. I - ---- .
I f -
i fUL *3 -Q C. g Zl .
v '
M ;;; .
O.'".* j g g
l l 1 .
g l
Ii t .'.t ==. uc,. c.
a 4s A i t,-
g l' -
I I '
eq l g l'
. g
- t. . 1 l .
-a
- w ac o. .. l
- l. l s ,
7 6 F.l Ol m
- w. :t.
m ce ;
w*N .
[ e g 8
. I i ,
I %-t .~.:,2 O l' W[I 3l+ l 4 8 .
b *
- t. - 1 =>,
8 u t te uf
- o. [
- : l
, ;o
- l' ; .
se o m. c.1 j l o . ,. . .
,1 y
,,-- . .-e ., g ;
- c. - l cv,,
! e,' e s 4.l . -.d.iu-m, c.* *
- k 'c*- -a-
- 3
. .c cl -j o- .'3- . .- i o u:
is .c. h j .; : T,5 ! I i -
- i
- o. sa t a.i ei u x- ; i -
d- fe i:utol :it .*d '
- . 4 ,
l k! .e.:{...:.m 3, ' t ri ?-
3 ,,t. 3.
. g l' i
)
, l ,
'L) l .. ,at. ..m <
e P. . ,
~; '
- l .
. I .- :
- 1% ciun c.a, .oi. 4
- T : 4 ,
, . . sa
-*) s
.' p i
l U " u si '
- c. n.o .I r2 F o. ut ,n' } G ! cj s . . ;
gq e' l .3:11 l *' 8 -
n u 8 c .r -t 71 l * . ; ;1 ,. t- I c- ;;1 c
.-r.l .. .. ..- ;
- 8 '
I U , O h; o, .
.b' a
f 8 s
- l. *
- . 1
> v es< cs s.
r.y .
e t . a e
, w c a3 <.2 w a
<-4 i w xi .
o
. ~3.
.t
.J.4,.'.g.
l i i i
.=; . 3
-2.,.,
- .i.. . e ,c. ; .
- . i i ,
N l N u, c '
- I
.o c. o* ea; git
.j .
3 g <. w o' me . l t-
> ee e' I I g
.I t r-
. s .
E ^
v v f
a . . n s .
}
.E 1:0. [ .*.'. '. ~> -f f:.g . * .
.?- - DA7g s.,M. .. .//c/
9
. . - s
. . g
/m \
- U_',, '.. -
s.
Sf'ECIFICt3IoM CHl.uGE f*0TICC ,
- e k, sescinculou no.jr-n-r .=' m . ust _ B Dias .cid'vN
/. / /r */.
ed ._C />s'.'-- :r/ /r;>,.f2. W .ic _/2;/.e.- ".2:r'2
. 3. t; SPEOlP LCliTION TITLE 4'-- '
- c. >" --t
/ . t~ . ,.,%. . , ,. .
C. Cnewcz nsaussTcn ny .
VI;NC CLIE!!T C;G'R'G FI F.t ,0 ) NO:. TRACTOR ..
D, Caz.n;si>ntriasasv /?L&r/ / onc <?4 - S d? .
E. : unscar m on ce c e .cs . . - : , ;. . .- . . . ,
/ // Jjsc .e. /.
./ / /
8,::faja.cf syrc.ai.';.% rqtorat.:. c%' y an?" C[,4CKn. /.
/- fr j :
crumt)?N s .s r.;'J' Cn?"?/O ste C4 c2rr c;.M .
l
~
Z:d.hn.t 2 % a en h.V: 3 _cr:. reau.?.c/ c,r a rbu.in an .
. g/ ,//*/ / f ,, /* , /
. /' .
F C C/ f.*: 4.'.(l C y y O)* f-ll . y; ?x\ W '.L M .;.c#fr i & 1,J.'*.;C) :~.,
,*'c X' ~*p'f8 ,, -' .,:s.?;/ "i j'%' q;.Q. lr.';)4p . ,
f-
>\ p,.-~-s..* : ::~ . ' _.__ ,
- / ,..
')
v LQ':' F$8 2 51s74 y '
M, .. -T v ./ 4 . ,r,P POV/ ... R CORP. /;j r___'y , ,. [n . .. ' ' - ' ,
l
. BECH. TEL.C . . c0
_: r ' w:. c . . ' ,,'. ' . -
/ .
- C r',
~
~
UR s
x.
w]
~..
\
.. . s- i F. .
acAcon con Cni,::ce e/M c-d'a bww=</e/%4d on A sit 6' 'l 1
'..ptg:UQ,ihSara:/:/cyhp9/) . .
- ~
' * * ., - [* 4 .. ,
anovat, siennunts p-b ihbN ,
G. - .
. . g G w.iccadw secuTE1 En:IuEtnING -
GW
....,k....:.---..., A '. A vl. /-=- MM A --
a .. a u.. . ..w.
/l x /
a/ &' ~ l -rg w g1-s
- . /// . GROUP SUPEiWISOR %
{ -
. . ./! 'L.e
. )e
'Y-
\. /-.
- s - Cl!ECKER
- .i
- t .
i
^- .,)*,f ., s l
\
,/.h w
=.-'r,.'- .
- 4:,.,. ,: ] -
.Lw. '.' ; -.-s f. < -' * '.*/
5
~* O!;1G1::A*...( .
f
.. . /"
i H, 'II:CORPOR/=TED 11! SPEC. _
nuv. cacer suPu xtson --
unt:
r
,A
- p\
Ad:aixtures
~
7 .
, ,g, ,
\ .
Concrete chall contain a poz::olan, an air entrainine. c:,ent and a vnt.cr reducing uncat. No other cd..ixcure:: : hall be t.acd
,m unicos.outhoristd. Can r. vail .ble, :.dai:ctures n'..all En par-
- ch.ned and stored in 11cui:1 colutica.
(,v,) .
7.4.1 Poz=olanc .
Pozzolans chc11 ccaform to " Standard Epecification f.or g Fly A:.h av.d R:.2 or C.11cined 1:atural Poczoicns for use in Portler.d Cc .ent Concreto (I.S*fli C513-72) .
All po nolcas chall be unnpled and tested in accordence with "l'athods cf S.c r piinn and Testina, ?ly Ach" (Asni C311-68). Appro::iuaccly 15 s;ercent by ueii.it of poecolan vill be used to ropiccc cer.cnt in the :..ixes. Y.:a schcontrccter- .
chall cu':.::iit docu ents corcifying th.tt the porre;*0n to he -
furni::hed cceplica uith these Specificn:lonc. 'ac cc.. cat
. shall not be repl:coti by pozzola.1 if the pos:ol a fails to cc: ply uith ASTil CU10-72. .
7.4.2 Air natrt.inina Agent Air entraining a ent:r. shall conforn to "::pecification for
- 4. . ,@f
. .. . l_' . ~; .D .. Air 121tiainia.; .'.Cai:.ture-s for Ccacrate" (A5'.71 C250-69),
- N capabic of catraining 3-6 percent cir. - .
f.5 %
.y
.. . , . g . >f. .
o .:2
4 4 '- - !!anufacturer's certification shall 1,c :.ub:11tted stating
,i C [^} - _
i.?. .i= .,t that the air entrcining at,ent ec,nidraa uith AST.: C200-0 l /_j_'.
/,
3';4.ti.t h..... " .:., "
is cupnble of entraining' ~>-5 perecut air.
p ..f , .' </r
..s s 'fd' ./ The Subcontractor chall upteify by nr.ue, in his proposal, s.q *D. .e -.r.f. . , . ,. . /
the air entraining t. gen; he propasco to w;c.
%. 2.-. -
7.4.? I? ster Reduci.ng Agent ... .
- k'ater reducing and retarding, cnent chall confor
- s to the *
" Standard Specificatica for Cha:ical Ad.sixtures for Concrete" (Asr! C494-71), Type D.
m I"]
.M. ., %c , Manufseturer's certification chall be cub:nitted statin.3 Lg#
$ e tlat the vacer reducing cg.:ac ccalor=s ui:;h AS7:1 ,
FEB 2 5 i974 C494-71, Type n. , z...,s, ,
HTEL POWER CORP.
JOB 7.2 1 1
The Subcontractur che.11 ny.cify by n ne, in nic proposal, l the Unter reducing cgent he propocca tu use.
1 7.5 1:ortar Sand .
Mortar SLad chcIl confo n to the '.'f, pacification for AC ;regate for p)
(
w./
160oary F.ortar" (AST11 C144-70) .
. .. ~
4 h,Iie .s@" ;. t@@.3 l3 ;'7.7 i1 . e 3!; OfOt ,i i d.-
.;i'jj '1' I '
- .A bl*I=b.ji 'J dW.%g 8- s.'; . 't ;;-:i )J G. h '$ Q,p) s
~ - - . . .
W f~edh '"^""' "'"*"""
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Or 1 63 R. O ~f A EJ 8 NG /P ER T NO. SREV. T. PleOJECT NO. 12. R Ea'O H T E D n Y .. /* 2%. pl5PO5eY TON C,'sHCUte N ENC E lDATE
__ Spec,-.7220-C-lil !2 7220 d d'/ ?..< b ,Y',.. I 2/114/71s .
- 3. 4T F>de DESCRIPT sOf8 4. BTL M LOC AT eOH f DATE z' b A 8 af tp T E t) Be V L._ $" Containcent_ Liner Plate
- s. led d AL NUMDLft S torace.Jard._E _ g_f_f.gint_Ill.dg,\ f
- 9. ST A H T Us" S Y S T E M NO. l' (X
'f b 'REV.
jLna b be 0 2 n n <1 .3 ;_e $.*e 7 e=ose ([e acto e es rre 8
[ .~_ I l m w L PullCH ASE CliDER NO.
n.1.
- 30. OC FIELD INSPECTION SLAN N 0
. -l14.n.a.
REPl ACEMENT SEWI AL No.
n V
D~
U l C-M-16 U.
B. Ci N TR A CTO Hf LOC ATION t1.ASME O ve5 ". S O UCES A.. [
,' '","_*_" " 7
- _
.I UT IN S T 84 kJ C T B O N I f eO U T E L EL E T MAT 1 A l. E ELO R ' .
)B **ONCS N VO RMING CO N DITION t Papgraph 8.1J of specification /[f220-0-111 Rev. 2 states: " Sharp bends shall not be permitted unless provision has been made for them in the design. A sharp bend is defined as any local bend that deviates from design radius or a vertical straight edge by more than "
offset in 214" . . . " Contrary to the above, a bend located at 609' elev. is in excess of d measured by using a 21" level resting one end at 4
the highest point of the bend with the other end on a parallel plane to the flat plate surface and measuring at the w ie point between the plate and level. One Tag applied.
oe. griEi.o DiSPOsiriON OFIELD RECOMMEND ATION/ROUTC TO PROJECT ENGINEERING 11. FIELD DISPOSITlo,N R ESUI.TS:
'Thn finld will revoIUhe_ph;gp bend listed in block 19 in accordance with the repair
. procedure established in paragraph 31, appendix B, Specification 7220-0-111 Rev. 3 luis rewora wIll br dunu~vhun-the umbieni, uir i,cwyeuui,utu is venducivu to localised hoating of the liner ulate. _ , .
$_ r_ { a
_ b 9
- 22. CNGIN ECRING DISPCSITIO N , 23. ENGINEERING DISPOSITION RESULTSs dp d
2% 45 DES'l GN CN ANGE REQUIRED 2* "c'" " ^' 5" '^' a'5"o5'no
- D""""'*'"'' 27. OC ACCEPTANCc ONO U""
O vCS. SEE arvACNEo, . . . . . , _ _ ,
Mt.WIHelL REV. DCN avveeonessa sesseacrom ,,,,
?PEC. E V. ADD.
i c.y
l
_. y g
I
. g, 3 -
6_.
em.
n e a u
d 9
r 9
s 1 f
a R r
. 1 3
- 2 2
s2 g f .
D G
(
n
)
D i
t a
o c
b )
T N r o
f'.
O C
f J
( n T o i
R O
t a h P
E g p
//
R e E r C p N
A t
s f -
a -
O M
R l
- b. -
ff F d N n a
O s / .
['
C N e _
h O t _
N .
o a t c c
r c o a i r r p p
v d n . '
e m t
e t l n 0 p i 9 a t o p
f o c
n
+ e i n h h.
f m o_
n e
n i_
a t
n n i_. n n k i r w t
n o r wf u o s n s i
t r_
a c e
n i n, hm T P M - _
_ n.
n _ e a
e l l lll1
-T - . . , ...
l).'i'isp,0 t
NONCONFORMAtVCE REPORT
"^' ' /
'a~i.n a ns'i. iran
- ni PI-SR-1,2 IN "' ~""5ci A '
' i.
- 2. o,t nue n s. y M"pi.~rF' rs o NocinoN concuanu
. Procedure specif.icat. ion
,0 3220 . .n. , /v u, f./,
.__& i..; c < 1i 2/.1.8/.m
=.= ; - ;.w -
- ..=7-- o .- - l - x-
. . . , ~ o co. . ,. .o n .
. . c n o c.1 o M ,.
_Idqu o . , t o ,, , . .
oy.c - -
- c. c.u.id Penetrant F.aterials _ Warehouse o Num..' " Developer-It A012 ' S ' ^ " ""* " 5 ' c " " - 7. / 2E 100 L /"- 'h/g"k' N,
_ Pen e tran t--hAlh9 , . . Cle ane r _3M013. . . 11/A ____
.)$""^"'"*^"'
' i cV-
'""""*f"""""""
a runcN4sc onocn No. II/A __ _ ___ _._ l
... oc r.Ei.o Nsecer.o N ei. N No. ic. u t. co cNr sc u.4i. No. ~ X-(^)g... g -
_,_L,,,....gg 2-27 79
~..-
.7220 F-6826 . ... .___.
- 3. con rnac t on,coc noN _H. R. L_Jh. 6___ .
. ._ _ ._ _. . . .. ._" So""c II/A c ,. .. . ...... ....
n..suc O vcs CODE .f, Ppgnaflux/Chicaco,,_Ill. . n u.i 0] Nc. ..,. Procurement _ _ _._ _
LI 9 5. HOUTING INSTn uCTIONs. _ _ ._
Q Hou1 E To v'acLo E.NGINccHING Q nouit 10 M ATons At. SUPEn veSOR 19 *d 3NCO N FoH MSNG CO NDIT40N Procedur_e_Spqc.if._ic.at_i_qn_PT--SR-1,2 Rev.0 paragraph _3E_1_,a sta1:es in_yart "C _er.tif.nd_._am.l_vses i ohn11 be obtained from the manuf_act.urer._for a3._1_11 quid. penetrant _ma_terials._used." Con _trary_to the above_.the P.O.
_did_no.t_ request pertified_analy.se_s_rer_orta. Certified analys,e_s reports are reauired for centrant-1 Alh9.
1
_A1 _e_wle_r_.3I!013,an_d developc_r-!;AQR
,__Qn.Lt art err. lied.
no. . nEi.o oiscosirio" Or'ct o acto"=cao^r'oa/nouTE ro enoscci cNG Nocn NG si. na.o oiscositioN nEsuus.
~s ; ,_.
- a. Magna_fl@ _(Seller)_say they have Certs in_ mail to BPC/ Midland today_2-18-7h. _,g1/ n,,[c.$_S r,n -
b.. P.O. is_a]po_being revised fomally_ to reflect th.e requirement. /.-; ; /j' k >' ' '
.. n t4 I iM y/*
t6~
c Please hand this NCR to Sr. Matl. Sovsr. G. S. Dexter in Receivine Area, pending /. (, . /v r l I
comoletion of action in (a) and (b) whereupon he will coordinate with QC for T f
// t reporting in Item 21. -r /N .'s. "I ?'// 7// i
. ENGin ecusNG on:.ros: Tion
- ma. ENGsNEERING DesPOstTION REsUI.Ts1 gt. 33 0EtiGN CH ANGC (ICQUtneD $ % '*M C No O Es. .. ... cN o. fe g, ,f O
- Ni--g cv. c-f ....
m e. ~. ....
) ___ _
. i,'W NONCONFORMANCE REPORT "^**' , '***""-
DMEJidi,Any NO. i a E v. 1.
n OTe c r N O.
. :. n c,Onv co .v .~ >oArc 23. O , ,c0 er.ON cONcuo.:Nc e.PEC-C 111 ! Midland _2220 d
^- " ' " ~ ~ "~*'
- 8. ITEM t OC ATION I
Ells /7h ~"[ " ~' l I in Liner Plate t17}Vr.A pvtn A Tc0 D Y7f
^
._ s1-15-Ul_tod2-12 m II.DATE9 3 'I'I ' /,/r/
c.taniAuNuu ca Fab E ilaing
.. Sr A n1ur SvSt EM NO. s L di' #-<'d b 9 f
.n.,i. A ce u E N r ,A = r cr- n c v. ....u.... o -...... ....
_ Panatration_lt 20 T. 11/A
- 5. PU84cH A SE OnDE R NO.
- 10. OC rtELD INSPCCTION PLAN NO.
_li/A ...,u ......... ....
9 6. H C PL A C1': MENT SERIAL NO.
n/A
.. CuN1n Acv0niLOCAr ON C-111- 10 _51.ll /A **"' ~ '* * "'
ii.ASMc cone 0 YES SOURCE
- '~
"f
~a~""'**
.I!/A . .. ... _ _.. . . 'r c u ClNO Construction 38 HOOT eNG $NSTetuCTeONSs gs4OUTE TO FRELD ENClHCEHING O a o u r' 'o = ^' c^' s uec a v'so a lJ. N3NCONFORM4NG CONDITION, SPECJ220-C--lll_Ilc.v. 's,_ b.ra gaph 7.1_7_qtates.; "All_hqles_in_line_r_. plat _e_not shosn qq the __ _
aesign drawings shall have prior approval by engineering." Contrary __to the above, tor _ch__. cut holes were made throur-h e
__._the_1_inpy_pla.t_.e_ for_a_yenetration_openir}g before it was discovered that layout was mislocated. (f) of these torch
.__nutn irt11 rnmnin in thn pintn nnnnnbly ni' tar rnlacated._ penetration in cut out.
-Noed-nnCinacring.::d.iaponition -to rapnN-torch-cutsr- N ' S'[ "
- 23. O "'c' o o'5cos'no" Qvic'o accoaacao^no"/aOure TO nO,Ecv ENciNcEn NG
/ 7 w~ . = - :$./
mi. r>ELo oi$ ,0$iriO N nc$uL15.
Rppair_hol.qs_ in_accordanc__e_ vith apy. roved remir contained in Sp_g_c_ification 7220-0-111 Rev. 1.
~
O# J - M '//
Kf ",1N CE HING olSPOSITIO N 2 3. CNGIN EE RING O tSPOSITIO N R CSQL75:
e it. 83 DCSIC N CN ANCE REQutR E * * ' ' ' ' * * ' * "^'*"'^' "
O NO 5 "
O vCS. =ct avrAcNco. . . _ , , , ,
U"""."**""~**
D.e-a 2 '- c ^ cc ="'^"c c tift AWING R E V. o _,_,
OCN _
awtaoneasees.s . cree mCPEC M c V. ADO.
- Bnta 3 ___ _ _ _ .,.. . -. _ ,- ___mo,,., , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _
y' _-- .-
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Or 1 66 32 AW8N3fPA RY NO. 8REV. 7. PR OJEC T N O. 8 2, N CPOFTE D BY 25. D &OrOSITIO N CO NCU H H ENCE C-52-1(1) !4' 7220 /j5MJ4,Y ~
!' @D AT Ci/73r - - - - -~" - " " - " - - -
ITEM DFSCRIPYtON e, IT EM LO C ATIO N "v AV.80 A T E D O Y f I DATE Thick *ned Liner Plate
> HSAL NUMUCR Field Storage Area
- 9. ST ARTUP SYSTCM NO.
N.(d'MMb
'I Ntt'LACEMENT PART NOI N2/1/f7 3 R C'V. noar cy rec 6n mas.ge en o.,e NA NA
/
NA V i I ...u..u.
'U N C N (.C3 C H DE R NO. 3 0. QC FIELD INSPtsCTtON PLAN NO. S G. R EPLACEMEN T SCRI AL NO.
7220-C-52 C-55-13 Lor: #12_h NA ' * * * " * " * * ' ' " ~ " " *""
L NYR A CTUR/ LOC AT 80N tI.ASMC O vos iv.cQuRCc COoc ^='~~a'"'""**'*" =^'=
Inland Rycrson Chicago, Illinois
_ __.iT C M ._ G No . _ ._ Vendor.__.___ .-
fe$UTING SNSTRUCT80NSa QROUTE TO FICLD ENG4NCEHING O nouTc To =^Tcas A'suPoavisoa NONCE NFORMING CONDITION
_ Assembly Mark #GI A of the sesenttry shin 1L. wall _ thickened lincr_plnte has a bou un to a mimm of 1/2" in the center of the pinte. Thin violnron rho rnlernnca_givnn in rhn AISC Manual.
- ne tag Ahplied.
O ra c'o o's'oso" gric'o accoaucao^T'on/NOuTE To rRO,uCT ENGiNECRiNG zi. FicLo oisros TION ResuLTs,
- bar_dcunin en he enduoldod nn tha nanomhly onn ann 41y ha najustea in rho cleeva ta hn lurb. 'Ihe how uill have no sinni ficant effect on our fit-up. The field recortnends that
,e anscchiv he accy c ted nn is.
N)%J %!n-4GINCC NING DISPOSIT8ON 2 3. ENGIN CERING OISPOSITIO N R ESU LT$t s
.15 DLLIGN CH ANCC 54CQUINCO NO
- o.c ..
O vcs see avrACNeo. .. .... _ . . . . . . . . .
>AW&N3 p C y, OCN
- e. C. F ". A D L..
%. .. , a. 6. : -
_._D-rwst - -. _ _ _ __ ___ -- . - _
' "^*"' '"*"""
I NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 1 1 OF 67 L p AwlNuiPAnT NO. iREv. 7. Pn OscCT NO. i z. u CPonT CO uv ' D AT c 23. Olsa OsiTION CONcunRcNCC C-615
!4 7220 (Q,ke. !2.-
^'c z./-74r**" "'"' " " " * ~ ""
TcM oc:C"'""
Electrical ' ' ' ' " ' * ^ " " Unit #2 1 -
P z qration Assembiv Ecus AL NuMbCR 2870-E1. 621'-6" & 617'-6"
- 9. ET A N TUP $YS TEM NO.
("[^t'5^""
- k. ;/ h[E Mif hT P A R T Ng'ghd ,/ l2-2 M Y 1 I.,lt [PL A
- s
'RCV. Pa 08 E 6 7 F 88 4 0 E '**,en s e. o.va
// / I I !?A NA 1 NA i ,,,,u , ,,,.. ... ....
'U 4 C H A *J E C R D C H N O. 9 0. QC FlELD INSPECTION PLAN NO. 16. RCPLACEMCNT SCRI AL NO.
I JJA C-111-9 NA
COOC iT E - EaNO Construction _ _ _ .
GGUTING INSTR UCTION58 @ ROUTE TO FIELD ENGINECftlNG O nou'c TO aarcal AL sus- nvisOR
, **#3NC?,N FO R MING CO NDITION S The above per.etration was installed at an azimuM1 of 286 -45'-10". instead of 287 as shotm on drarinn 7220-C-615. An nnnie of 00 -i4'-50" represents a horizontal measurement of 3 inches on'the liner plate surfr e.
~
%f n penetnttion 19 identified by Southern Boihr_aa R-11 3L.
hFIELD RECOMMEND ATlON/HOUTE TO PROJCCY ENGINEEfilNG 28. FIELD DISPOSITION HESULTSs O FIELD Di$ POSITION Tield recommends "use as is." ,, f ., .
?fIOhY b? -
/
- z,em, 4. -
. ENillNCCHING DISPOSITION 23. ENGlNCCRIAG DISPOSITION HCSULTS:
- "' *^"'^' ' " " " ' " " ""~~ " ~ '"'" *^**'****
i.Is eEssGN CH ANGE REQUSHED ' ONO O.e...
. O yEs. SCe ArrAcNEol .... . - e......... ....
R AWING ' HCV. OCH *
.wTat,.nen oon. esc,o. gay.
F C c. V. A D D.
. _ - - -- - - ~ - - - - - - - -m.---m.,.. . . . . . - - . . - . . - . -- ...s- ..
2 I" % T:~2 - S -7 } :.
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 'I I
' eF' " ' "Eu_ ' _ '
68 3 AWING P/ A R T NO. sREV. 7. PR OJ E CT N O. I RTF uY DATE 2 5. D15PO5tTIOt4 CONCU N N ENCL C-52-1(1)
- 3. BT EM flESC RIPTIO N
!4 7220
SPATE 3 av f / 3.
Thickene.d Liner Plate FieldJtprage_Aren g.1 8' t<- //r' pad *LCTeN /' ;/ *c e 2-
- 9a.a smes=a gee /;r oave i , ,
I lib IIA ! s r, ( s n .ps t a . // . o n u t.
S. CtJHCH ASC 084 DER NO. 10. QC FIELD 9NSPECTION PLAN NO. 9 6. REPLACEMENT SCHI AL NO. \ , [h,*k*i ],- 1 5 - l 7220-C-52 c-55-11 '
UA /)"#' ""* * * ""' (( '
O. Cj NYZ ACTO R/ LOC ATION 59.ASME O vEs '7 sovacz /_,,m_. = - _
Inland Ryerson Chicago, Illinois iTE M El _NO _ Vendor 3 8. R3UTBNG INST RUCTIONS: Q RO UT E TO FIE LD E N#a* lN E E R lNC. ] ItOUTE TO M AT ER f Al. 5UPE R VISO R 6 3. NONCO N FO R M 0NG CO NDITION: I Assembly !! ark #'s FIA & GlA of the secondary shield wall thickened . lincr_ p_ late _are incorrectly febricated. The assemblics are similar in shape and the problem was caused by_ingorrect in.terp.retation_of " opposite hand and noted". Specifically, the assemblies should have had their mark numbers interchanged nnd backing _strina pinend l
en thd opposite ends. This condition was discovered during_ installation. -
Two tao;a applied.
2 a. g r ELo oiseOs TiOa OF'E'o a cco"M zao^T'o a/ ROUT c TO PRO,ECT ENGiN EERiNG Zi. riEto oesPOsiTiON R EsULTsi
'Ihn assenblies shall be remarked (F1-A to be Gl-A & vice versa). The backing strip on the end of each assembly will be removed and a backing strip welded on the opposite end. This action will make the assemblics conform to requirements. Work will be performed according to Project Engineering's approved Specification 7220-C-ll1.
.2. E NGIN EE RING D15 POSIT 80N A%f ah>/M- 23. ENGlN EERING DISPOSITIO N R ESU LTSa
- 24. 8 3.DE$lGN CH ANG C H CQU8H ED h MO [] ere a e O ves.sEeArTACHEo. . . e, a . . . .......... o.,.
DRAWING REv. OCN' _
auvosomesso asespscro" ears REV. ADO.
(PEC ._..__u .. u -._._..,.m- . . _ _ _ . _ . _
mm. . . . _ _ _ _ - . _ - - . _ . . _ _
..,_n QC%
I Ate a gngge g g g ,m
__ U h!(M j'd _ ____ _ _ _ _ j __
g I f
E M.
i <
$ c I i S I l o
a hs.
iI i
.S N ss i L
N ii g y E
- t z'
O Y S y V h C wY l l
C" O 'M; ,% l!
o.
w n.
I N 5,
oi h %b NW
- n ,
i Il s!
gI
.G' I s.y i I
Ol ~% N, D O , .
O I Z C D I t t l t A 4
q *
%. L.
k .] *
&s s, _
Yv $
WT , j,'
t l u t l' o w,E '
{ }
4 s 1 J t (
)e 1
Y k s ,
I w '
q !'
e l
"^ *'"'*"'
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT c e _f_r..,- 69 GT.saLuo j acv. 7. Puose Cr No. 32. Poy o a v loArc p s. o n. . ..s, sir ion CoNCu n n LN C C 7220-Cj6A-5(1)6
- 3. 81 C %t O LsCn.PT sore i
7220
- s. STEM loc ATioN (g ,(14#)
83 V iz.m74 E
DATC
-- ~~- ---
-- - " l -)
Containment Liner Plate Containment Unit #2
-. '.._.O.t.80ATEoDY':./
+
-b. ,8.L/ 2 '. FI7
( .LL Rf AL NuMUER 9. ST ARTUP $YSTEM NO. 11. itLPL ACCMENT PART No. ~ ' R E V. ** ose < v * *E t o e s.a ema e = eava
_na. n.i. .on .i. '
! . . . . . . . . . . . e...
C. P.J st C H.*.5 C o n D E R NO. 9 0. o C r tE LD .NLPCCTeoN Pt A N No. 16. n EB 8 ACEMENT SCRI A L. No.
7220-C-50A N.A. U.A. ~ ~ " " ~ " " * * * * """
- s. C IdiGFT6n/i.oc Avion is.AsMc 0 vr$ ".counCe Southern Boiler & Tank Works, Me:nphis, Tenn 1cM ;i) No ,
Construction _ _
__ y __ _ ___ _ _ _
it. couru c insravCrioNs. g nourc vo rica.o CNciNcon No O ao u'c to a ave'^ ' 5urev'5o a -
S S. N Of4Cli fe t o t# MING CON D 87 bon s
_ Liner _ plate._assemblict.fgrJpit_g2_are to be opposite._ hand _t.o_those_of. Unit #1. Sp_ecificM1y.,_ edge of pl. ate is
_ bented three (~Q_ inches comterclockviscL.froc1 the_.conterline_of_erec11on_CQlW4LS pp_ Unit #1 (as.hiqEq.U2:oc_the i'icide) .and should_bc_ located _three (3)_inchen clockwice.fron._the_conterline_of_. erection _colunns on TMi t #2_(_an viewed _fron_1he_inaideb Liner _ plate _assemblictspplied_by_So.u.thern_Entler_an<i_'LanirJorks for_ Unit #2 have the -
edge of plate located three (3)_. inches counterclockwice_from_the_conterline of erection columns.
2 e. O riCi.o ui:. ositio H gr Ci.o ucCoMMcND AvioNincurC 2o Pnosi.Cr CNc.NeeniNc ai. ricto c,isPos rioN uuvi.rs:
4't-folDfing-9.omplq'e_e. d-penetra. tion-assembl.ieo-are-instal. led-CO--llr --50u-leeo-than--the t
-.e zi;u th ihoyn-on-the-decie,n-drawingo :-Southern-Boilet'Huners-R-20-L,-R-12-Ir,-R-1-3-L,
-enl-R-E-L. Field-recor.Jaende--to-uee-these-aeeunbl-ies 2'ac-is u, h=.eining-penetmtrion-aosemb4-ica .ti:1 be--redimcnoiened to - compensato-.fm4e-shop
-febricut, ion-orrore (Continued on pace 2 of 2) .
~&T s ffAp,;qv/p/t,.s- 2-22-7 9-t.NCIN CC H NG D10PC58T 80N / .
- 23. CNG IN EERiNG DiSPoSBT.O N H E$ui.Tsa
.e
- 22. e3 DLOlGH Cil ANCC IELQUSHt.D **"'""^""'^'"'r"5"'"" a - . -- = = - uw av.oCACCcerANCC O No D.e-..
O YES $CC ATTACNCOs ,, g m y , , , ,
^
Cpt AWlNM REV. OCH avre.ea.es.es emmes cvee ..,.
f.g 3* g". HCV. ._
ADO. _,
a, .
- . m.
umi g p ... .,3
l i
! l l 1 l 1 1 l l l 1 ) 1l \ \ l4 y
4
- f. h
_ t u
3 r
e c
d: .
u a o .
h e
t t
d h :. .
n e
n -.-
a o .
h i -
t s n
s e
. s c e i 2._r o
l d
e r
k 0
2 h e e '
- b ..
c l
9 N.
n 2 l
- i 0, -
3.
0 w 0
s s
e f _v .
i i /. .
t a
l b
m f .
)
D h
t e
s s
T h a N t u n L O
C i r i o / .
(
s t ,f -
T a . a -
R L r .
O n 0 t . .
a 2 e , .
n P -
E t R e . .
R a p
/
)
E d d
n g 4-C e a n / -
N l i E A
M R
l t
a s
n L
2 1
R i
n a
m e
//, l .
O i R .
F . .
N e s .
O r o . .
a N C "s .
N s r i .
O e e .
i l s N l i a b o " . -
m B r .
e s o s n e r .
s r i r .
a e l e _
h b n t m n .
o u e o i o s i -
t S s t .
a a a -
r c t : e i e s s r n g e b e n h a p i d a e r_
w t
e p s o f
n
) t u hs d e d_.
u i
e n
l p
m i o l n
g t o
s h
t e _ _
t n
c e d n r --
o g d_ e o -
c n e m f
( i w
h m o e
. o t_ c t -
0 2
l l
a e a r q _
~ o c_ n kc f d a -
e_ o m. l p o e m l h_ h i o
, B T s F c . %
-- _1--
Jf.
. Bechte Power Corporation Inter-office Themorandum 6b ,7 7/4--
O 5,f/_h$f E. E. Felton Date February 6, 1974 p' /4 -' toef i
- ect Management Corrective Action rrom W. F. Ifolub Report MCAR-1 l of Quality Ai:surance .
res to W. E. Ferriss At Ann Arbor ,.
D. L. Johnson -
M. M. Krout P. A. Martines.
J. T. Marvin E. Rumbauch J. Southard As identified in the IRAM, Section Five, Ho.10 (4.3), you are beins identified as the action addressee in the resolution of the identified discrepancy.
Theactionaddresseeisresponsiblefordeterminingthecausear$d the action necessary to remedy the condition and preclude Oformulatin5 recurrence.
W' '
s Yht(
t u
' W. F. Holub UFH:jf .
ID Ho, WHL-2-7h-14 . .
M]O g M%FfB
, )
Ed3 FEB G1974 BECHTEL 30D POWER 7;*20 CORP.
k% -
i
' w.l j
I
4 MCAR1 .
REPORT NO. 5 _, _,_
O NO.
DATE _. February 5,1974 _
OB 10.... 7220 _
)* 7RIPTlON (including seferences): ,
Liitcd on the attached page is the sucr.ary description of Audit Findings r:culting from the Audit of Erico Products (Cadwcld components supplicr) .
It:1a A & B must be resolved prior to concrete placerte'nt over affected Cadwelds.
- RECOMMENDED ACTION (Optional) c) Determine the safety impl'ications associated with the work perforced to date.
(Consulp Project Engineering) .
b) Provide a recommendation as to the reportability of this discrepancy to the AEC. (Consult Project Engineering) c) Provide corrective action to prevent recurrence in the form of timely cudit scheduling (Procurement Inspection).
X CONSTRUCTION QA MANAGEMENT REFERRED TO [ ENGINEERING ISSUED BY __\}. _ .
[7 .
Project QA En;ineer Date
, )
REPORTABLE DISCREPANCY NOTIFIE D CLIENT _..._ .. . . . Date I
' YES
@ NO 8 Foject f.4anager Data til CAUSE .
.r .
CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN AUTHORIZED BY- Date DM RIQUTION:
r, r" ,:.. .., FORMAL REPORT TO CLIENT (if Section in Apphes)
- Date M .;*l a M .a ...e m
- e. : , .m .....
"' *'f ,Q'i',",',*/;,C ,*",',';,"f,',, .CORRECTIVG ACTION IMPLEMENTED c......m.....It....
, , ... e o c c . ... . .. , ,,. *
.%5;'""*'
c . VERIFIED.BY. .
Proiect GA Cnginear U*
< D.screte in eruce prov.ded and altsch refe,ence docurn:nt.
+- .. . .
/N . ', MCAR #5
- \v 1
. ATIACllME!H A
~
Da January 31~, 1974 Dechtel Personnel conducted a audit of ERICO Products Inc. at their Cleveland, Ohio Plant. ERICO is the supplier of the Cadwelding Components being used for the Midland Project.
- Three Audit Findings resulted from this audit and are a,t described:
AUDIT fit:DIt:G NO. 1
.=
ERICO's control of measuring and test equipment is not being properly implemented. There are no historical records to verify calibration of equipment or a formal program to provide imple-mentation. Also, gages are not properly tagged to provide an acceptable method for recall.
AUDIT FINDI!!G NO. 2 The documentation supporting ERICO's cleaning process was incomplete and unacceptable.
AUDIT FI!! DING NO. 3
'It was noted that ERICO was not filling in their Nonconformance Reports to the extent they describe in their procedure.
\ \, ,
W. F. Holub ,
s s . ..
WFH:mmp e
S e
6 .
S .
. 'J 4 . .
3 . .
e
-~y e,=r s vsy-,a ,. .+ ,m1 -
$v-we-
G,,, g,q }m g.
.UALITY ASSURANCE PROGrs 4
~
PROJI:CT AUDIT REPURT 44 r /, / 6/
[ ')
J a m e F4 No. Midland - 7220
~
Audit No. D'b 1&2 Audit Date Febrt ary 20-21, 197h f Unit No.
.' '?ype of Audit Construction Auditor Holub/Richcrdson
' O rga nizations ~ Audited Quality Control Construction J. Connolly E. Felton Individuals Con: ..te d T. Valencano A. Albert
- De.scription 'of Audit (Agenda) -
a lionconfor.ning naterials, parts or conponents b Receipt inspection ,
o Storage inspection
,~ d Handling, storage and shipping procedures (b
1
'x
. .Smmary of Deficiencies Noted and Corrective Date '
Re sponsibility Action Commitments (QAF /!) (See Attached) Committed 1 Receiving Inspecticn Plans J. Connolly 3/08/74 2)) Disposition of Ilonconfornance Report llo. 50 E. Felton/
J. Connolly 3/08/74
- 3) Project Engineering approval of Ilonconfornanae 1To. 60 '
E.Felton/ '3/08/7h J. Connolly Distribution: -
b t
(']roject Manager PQAE's Signature *
$- N i p CAA Supervisor 1)rniert Eny,incer 1)roject Supe rintenelent Date
~ ~
,l VI - 5 Attachment B
'=
QUAL.lTY AllDIT Fil:Diis . ._. A Psbruary 20, 197h i
T,~z . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . .
g,,,. . . . . . . .
Midland 7220 Construction .e =
Holub/ Richardson Receiving Inspection J. Connolly
.... m ............................ . . . . . . . .
.'.lald Inspection Manual Procedure G-5, Rev. O Para. 331 "R::criving Inspection shall be initiated by the QCE upon notification that material pr equipment has arrived at the desi6nated receiving area. This inspection shall be carri d out in accordance with the Field Receiving Inspection Plan for the specific cat rial or eqY p=ent .
i being received."
.my. to the above, on 2/20/7h, the QCE was performing the receiving inspection
, c.:ction for reinforcing steel, 7220-C-39, Rev. 5 with the Master Receiving Inspection Plan and not the Field Receiving Inspection Plan. The Master Plan does not provide
'theg cific inspection detail needed to, adequately perform the fanction.
\ i M/
7.'T.'. . . , . .
Innpect the material, referenced above, by using the detailed Field Receiving Inspoetion Plan and provide response to show action taken to prevent recurrence.
x......m........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- 3/7h J. Connolly
,r..m meu......
The material was reinspected using the proper field inspection plan.
A training session was held on February 20, 1974 covering the proper use '
spection plans.
...m ....r..,.,...............,s....
't b( #
+
e . _ . ~ ,.... . ...
= - .
,k
-( __.h .
1__ - . . _- - -
_ _ _ - .. . an , -u -m
@AU: AUDIT RUDING . . . f.P Fabruary 20,197h a
& & 6 e. . e.
.x
^
........... w . .. .. s....
Conctruction 0 ~.- .. . . J.
. . .. .C.a. .n.n olly
-h rr 7220. . . . . . . . . . . . .
'19, h5,h8 construction 'W. Holub/G. Richard:sn
, n:: r. . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . , . .
1 Precedure G-3, Rev. $
h.6.2 The Project Field Engineer's authority to make dispositions of nonconfornances shall be subject to the requirements of h.6.1 and the following: Revork, Repair, Reject, Use as Is.
, App. B-20 The Field Engineer making the disposition cr reco=cendation shall sigi
. and dat,e at the end of tho' statement.
App. B-25 The disposition shall be checked by the 'dispositioning organization...
1 lic following was noted on NCR No. 50, Rev.1.
1 3
Tha disposition stated in Block 20 dosa not meet.the requirements stated in No.
ab;.va. No clear disposition is stated.
m o
' , Field Engineer making the disposition did not sign and date at the end of the cittitement in Block 20.
,, Thi disposition has not been checked in Block 25 .
= .ia m . ,.. ~
13 D:ttraine the correct disposition and indicate in Block 20 and 25 and then route the NCR in accordance with FD1 Procedure G-3, Rev. 5 .
L Hava the dispositioning Field Engineer sign and date in Block 20.
!/08/7h F. E. Felton/J. Connolly u.e.<..u.. .....
e Fi:1d reco=mendation was indicated as "use as is" and the NCR was sent to Project Engineering on February 21, 1974 L Thk Field Engineer making the reco=cendat' ion signed the NCR.
I s _ - +. . o ...
21/74 Eq.M. Wi.i..... .W.t."Q W .e yac.e c m.' .
7 mim' t .h. ,;ue . R=d:. 1 _ M/_ ._ ._- E~IXY _
_ . T_ R _- M _ ' P .
g kUbbliY AUDI Fli.'D!S . . . .
-h - (3)
Fabruary 20, 197*.
' .T.7 . . . ,p n . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
g , ,,,. .......
!i.d.l.e.Ta
.. 7220' conntruetion O . .. - V._
...... H.n.L..u.b /G . Rich a_My 1 Quality Control Files J. Connolly
' r a ... ........... ............... ........
_. . G-3. Rev 6
- 1. b6.2b; repair; requires approval by the Project Engineer prior to implementation.
- 2. App. B-20; Used approved repair procedure: The standard procedure and the authority fcr using it shall be referenced in this block.
6 . .. .
- v4
'; Dunber 20 of NCR-60 indicates a disposition of repair. This l'OR has not been
'>d
... to the Project Engineer for approval. The repair being acconplished is beyond
.a scope of Specification 7220-C-111, Rev. 3, Appendix B, therefore, a disposition of 'usy approved repair procedure" is not appropriate.
(
G J.Lc this NCR to the Project Engineer for approval prior to implenentation of this
.luposition.
]
1 l
l
. .. . ... ...... ... l
-/'8/7h E. E. Felton/J. Connolly !
J..n u.r... ,... - '
ha criginal NCR disposition was incorrect. The field disposition was reevaluated and it tas d;t:rmined that the correct disposition was rework. The NCR was chan s d to reflect (his disposition and the NCR was then processed in accordance with FIM Procedurc G-3, tev $3 l
( .
s ,,'
I i .:._..~ . . . . . ...,...W.,." . . , ,
'~ ~ ~ ~
-r ~7 -~ T -
- - - . , = .
W. **
fA c,, g g._g._. e_ b2VN__
- _4 w _ w. ,_
_' _ _ _ _ _ 2m.w
Page 1 cf 2
^
QUALITY ASSURANCE DISCREPANCY REPORT- 3 QAD IDENT. NO.
(OA DAILY LOG SUPPL.EMENT) JOB NO. 7220 gg3 4 ISSUE DATE ,
l l
. 2/05/7h 1 PROJECTIDEPTJSELL,ER 2 POINT OF oniGIN @ FIELD 5 QAD PREPARED BY Midland - 7220 0 OFFICE G. Richardson G DAILY LOG DATE 7 CHECKLIST ITEM 8 WHERE FOUND 9 DILCUSSED WITH 2/05/74' 25 Document Control Area J. Dean 10 CONTROLLING oCCUMENT,LECTION, PARAGRAPH ETC FDI G-2, Appendix A, QCI!M - PSP Eh - k.2.2.7 11 OUOTATION
' FD1 G-2, Appendix A "The folloking ' instructions are provided as a guide for preparing, maintaining and processing the Field Change !
Request Log and Status Book, QC-1 FCR." )
l l
l l
l 4
' 7 DISC.1EPANCY CESCRIPTION g g g, gg g ggg g g bormQ'C-1FCR.
Block No. 3: In seven cases the field engineer printed his name rather than signing it.
Block No. h: FCR C-h6 does not show a description of the existing condition and (
requested field change. '
Block No. 5: Revision numbers of drawings and specifications are not being entered.
This was noted c.1 14 entries on a spot check.
Block No. 6: The word field is being entered in this block rather than the design originator, This was noted on all entries..
j Block No. 8: FCR C-49 was transmitted on 1/25/7h. A copy of this FCR was not available, j S:e Attached Sheet 13 RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION
- 1. Correct the existing FCR logs to conform to the instruction.
- 2. Hold a training session for the responsible engineers and document controllers to assure the proper use of this form.
14 SCHEDULED COMPLETION DhTE IS RESPONSIBILITY FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION 2-22-7h E. E. Felton l 13' CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN l
l I 17 DATE COMPLETED 18,SUOMITTED BY RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY 19 CORHECTIVE ACTION VERtFIED BY QAE , DATE FIGURE 7.36 t
h
- 4 ;
e QADR 001 12 DISCREP.UTCYDESCRIPTIO:7(Cont'd.)
. Block No. 9: The date the reply was received is not being recorded. This block is being used for other reauks.
Block No. 13: The disposition of the FOR (approved or dis-approved) is not being recorded. The letters "Eag" are being entered into this block.
e e
l l
l l
l 1
. 1 a _ . _ . . . _ - _ _ . - - , - . . . ~
T' ** '
3 oAo iceNT.No.
QUALITY ASSURANCE DISCREPANCY REPOnf 002 (OA DAILY LOG SUPPLEMENT) JOB NO. 7220
~
- 4 ISSUE DATE
$ 2/05/74
@ FIELD 5,OAD PREPARED BY 1 PROJECT /DEPTJSELLER 2 POINT OF ORIGIN Midland - 7220 0 OFFICE G. Richardson 9 DISCUSSED WITH
- t. DAILY LOG DATE 7 CHECKLIST ITEM 8 WHERE FOUND Document Control Area J. Dean 2/0$/74 19 10 CONTROLLING DOCUMENT,SECTION, PARAGRAPH.ETC FIM G-2, Appendix B 11 QUOTATION
'1, Block 1: " Enter the number of pages involved".. . , "If during processing additional sheets are required, revise the no. of pages."
- 2. Block 6: "If venior, identify by name and address."
3 Block 8: "Use additiorial FCR for=s as necessary. . . ."~
12 DISCREPANCY CESCRIPTION l )
- 1. FCR's C-10, C-13, C-15 do not indicate the proper number of pages.
- 2. FCR C-34 does not include the vendor's address.
3 FCR forms'were not used for continuation sheets on FCR's C-2, C-7 and C-15 13 RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION 1.- Correct discrepancies on the noted FCR's and review the remaining for adherence to the procedures.
- 2. Train the responsible engineers in the use of this form.
14 SCHEDULED COMPLETION D TE 15 RESPCNSIBILITY FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION 2-22-7h E. E. Felton 16 CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN 17 DATE COMPLETED 18 SUBMITTED DY RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY DATE 13 CORRECTIVE ACTION VERIFIED BY QAE FIGURE 7 3:5 L
3 OAD IDENT. NO.
. QUALITY ASSUKANCE DISCREPANCY REPG..f 003 (OA DAILt LOG SUPPLEMENT) JOB NO. 7220 4 ISSUE DATE h.1 PROJECT / DEPT./ SELLER 7 POINT OF OR8'JIN @ FIELD 2/05/7h 5 OAD PHEPARED BY 0 OFFICE G. Richardson Midland - 7220 9 DISCUSSED WITH 8 WHERE FOUND t> OAILY LOG DATE i CHECKLIST ITEM Docucant Control Area J. Dean-k 2/05/7h 16 1
0 CONTROLLING DOCUMENT,SECTION, PARAGRAPH,ETC (CSM,SP/ PSP #h-32.h II OUOTATION 3 2.h.3 6"The document . cont::oller is responsible for maintenance of an FSK log."
I.
I
? DISCREPANCY DESCRIPTION I b. The revision numbers for many field sketches are not shown on the FSK log. f Examples are FSK Nos. C-3, Rev.1; C-9, Rev.1; C-12, Rev.0; C-13, Rev.1; C-18, Rev.1; C-23, Rev. 2; C-25, Rev. 2; C-68, Rev. O.
- 2. Incorrect revision numbers for the following field sketches were noted en the ,
FSK log. FSK lios. M-6, Rev. 3 (Rev. 2 cn log); E-7 and E-8 both are Rev.1 with tj Rev. O indicated on the log. - !
So=e l 3
Revision numbers are not being consistently used on field sketches. !
drawings do not have revision numbers assigned. I l
13 RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION
- 1. Review and update the F3K log to indicate the latest revisions.
- 2. Issue instructions for maintaining the FSK log and to control the numbering cystem to be used. ~
IS RESPONSIBILITY FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION l 14 SCHEDULEO COMPLETION DATE 2-22-7h E. E. Felton 10 CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN*
17 DATE COMPLETED 18 SUBMITTED BY RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY - !
DATE 19 CORRECTIVE ACTION VERIFIED BY QAE FIGURE ? :f.
r
G yfLfL
. . QUALITY ASSURANCE DISCREPANCYNA REPORToAD IOLNT. No.
' (OA DAILY LOG SUPPLE /AENT) JOB NO. 7220 00h 4 ISSUE DATE 9* . .
2/06/7h 5 QAO PREPARED BY 5 PRosECT/DEPTJSELLER 2 PotNT OF ORIGIN @ FIELO O onice G. Richardson Midland - 7220 S WHERE FCUND 9 OISCUSSED WITH 6 DAILY LOG DATE 7 CHECKLIST ITEM 12 Testing Laboratory K. Radacacher 2/06/7h .
10 CONTROLLING DOCUMENT,SECTION, PARAGRAPH.ETC U. S. Testing Company - QA Manual Rev.1, Para.13 11 CUoTATION b * ..
13 1 " Equipment used'in the inspection and test 'servir.es provided to Bechtel shall be calibrated..."
13 2 "The equipment requiring calibration will be identified along with the required calibration cycle."
13 3 "When equipment is.found out of calibration, an evaluation of previcus inspection and test results sha]1 be made and documented."
OlSCREPANCY DESCRIPTION The following equip =ent is being uced by U. S. Testing for measuring and testing and has not been controlled and calibrated.
- 1. One set of calipers used to measure the diameter of concrete cylinders.
'2. The elongation punch and guage used to determine the elongation of reinforcing steel. (Serial IIo. of the guage is S.O. 113091) 13 RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION Control and calibrate the equipment.
Evaluate tests resC ta to date and document this if the equipment is found to be out of calibration.
14 SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE 15 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION 2-22-7h J. Conno117 <'fl.C2A/<.2
! Csi- 7 r c-16 CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN The calipers and punch have been com' pared to a ' calibrated scale traceable
{ )
to U.S. Bureau of Standards. They were found to be within allowable tolerance.
17 DATE COMPLETED 18 SUOMI,TTED DY (IESPONSjDLE AUTHORi?Y
'3 /' / ~ * / f #sv //' S (? /[Ard $p T /7 [(3AJND.'/ v
- D AT E, j ,
19 CORHECTIVE ACTION VERfFIEQ GY OAE - /
f
.s
.j, ,
. r ! .,, . .
o , s . _. ;. /- .,
-/ FIGUllE 7.33
r 3 QAD IOENT.NO.
CUAUTY ASSURANCE DISCREPANCY REPod ogg (2A DAILY LOG SUPPLEMENT) JOB NO. 7220
- 4 ISSUE DATE .
2-13-7h 5 OAD PREPARED 8Y 2 POINT OF ORIGIN QFIELD 1 PROJECT /DEPTJSELLER O OFFICE G. Richardson Midland 7220 9 DISCUSSED WITH 8 VdHERE FOUND 6 DAILY LOG DATE 7 CHECKLIST ITEM Liner plate fab. area J. Stocks 2-13-7h N/A 10 CO'4TROLLt' G DOCUMENT,Sr.C. TION, PAR AGRAPH.ETC SPEC. 7220-0-111, Rav. 3, and W EC-1, Rev. 10 11 OUOT ATION SPEC. 7220-0-111, sectior 7.h. "The - - - - and disbursal of velding filler material shall be in acccrdance with the "Bechtel Corp welding standard WEC-1, Rev. 10".
V EC-1, Rev. 10, secthn 6.5 "Desaged electrodes shall be placed in vaste bins and recoved from the work area."
12 DISCREPAt4CY DESCRIPTION i I Discarded covered electrsde stubs and damaged rods (7018) were found on the ground behind the exray lab.
This problem has been previously identified on 12-13-73, 12-24-73 and 2-6-74 13 RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION Remove all discarded filler materials from the work area.
- Hold an Indoctrination / training session on the requirments of the procedures and importance of filler material control.
15 RESPONSIDILITY FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION 14 SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE 2-22-7h E.E. Felton 16 CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN 17 DATE COMPLETED 18,SUDMITTED BY RESPONS10LE AUT140RITY DATE 19 CORRECTIVE ACTION VERIFIED BY OAE FIGURE 7 3d
. . QUAL.lTY. ASSURANCE DISCREPANCY REPO'RT 3 QAD IDENT. No.
(QA DAILY L'DG SUPPLEMENT) JOB. NO. 7220 006 4 ISSUE DATE 2/25/7h 1 PROJECT /DEPTJSELLER 2 POINT OF ORIGIN @ FIELD 5 QAD PREPAF.ED BY Midland ,7220 Construction O OFFICE G. Richardson 6 DAILY LOG DAT E 7 CHECKLIST ITEM S basHERE FOUND 9 DISCUSSEO WITH 2/22/7h Quality Control Files / Field Operations J. Connolly/R. Grot i 10 CON 7 ROLLING DOCUMENT.SECTION, PAR AGRAPH.ETC .
FIM Procedure G-3, Rev. 5 11 QUOT ATION 4.6 b: Dispositions provided by the Project Engineer or Project Field Engineer shall require concurrence from the PFQCE prior to implementation.
h.6.2b: Repair; requires approval by the PE prior to implementation.
h.7.1: After the disposition has been made, the NCR shall be returned to the PFQCE for entry in the log book.
h.7 2: After logging, the PFQCE shall route the NCR to the person responsible for implementation.
DISCREPANCY DESCRIPTION Contrary'to the above, the Type B cadweld sleeves described in NCR No. 59 were removed from the thickened liner plate prior to a disposition being cade by the Project Field Engineer and/or the Project Engineer and concurred with by the PFQCE.
i 13 RECOMMENCED CORRECTIVE ACTION
,1. J. Connolly - Retag the affected items.
- 2. E. Felton - Obtain the necessary dispositions prior to further work being done on the affected items.
- 3. J. Connolly - After the NCR has been dispositioned, reinspect to assure the work was perfo n ta in nccord'nca with the r14 e 7n n i +.i n., . (%a a + + , n k n -i ehnn+T
, 14 SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE 15 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION 3/01/7h ' E. Felton/J. Connolly 16 CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN 17 DATE COMPLETED 18 SUDMITTED OY RESPONSIDLE AUTHORITY 19 CORilECTIVE ACTION VERIFIED DY OAE DATE FIGURE 7 JU
. 1
- e e, !
i i
, s .
7.
j
.l t .' Block 13 - (Cont'd.) QADR Ho, 006
- 3. If the work was not performed in accordance with the dispositions, ' issue another NCR.
~
- 14. .E. Felton/J. - Connolly - Instruct the Field Engineers and ~
.QC Engineers on the importance of obtaining approval of dispositions prior to implementing the dispositions.
i
- l l
\
G O
O e
b D
Q 8 e e
e O
e O O J
e e e
- A e
4 4 8 e W
% D e S
e
--- y -
C. S. Kcalcy
. I Projt -
Hidinnd Plants H. W. Slag r g p<,- iry
',. 7.'C. Co:ke *
, g,a pg;7 Yilo Title Subject Fila Nonconfo m ncn venn m
. Nonconformance No 0F-2 _
Prepared by N Mh6s Data Mb
~
G _ nco FoY R ee Report,is i Euca t'o:
~
Project Superintendedt- Revieved'by @ '.2" .d h A Date N>/7/73 Action Ecquired by Datf 1/4/74
, Peply Required by Date 12/17I73 wh.,o in rennon=ibic for correction action. _
Nonconfcmance Description and Supporting Details:
- 1) Appendix B, Rh.. O to specification 7220-C-111 was reportedly used for inspection cf liner p* ate Tsurface imperfection before it was approved for use. See tie t 12tter from T. C. Cooke to G. S. Keeley for supporting data.
- 2) A copy of' the' above appendix was available at the site and there was no indication as to its approval status.
- 3) On November 28,1973 (af ter the above items occurred) Appendix B was finally iscued as an approved portion of the specification. ,
s 1
AIC Reportable Yes No See Procedure 9 - Reporting of Deficiencies to AII:
Ju:C Notified on 12/6/73 by G. S. Keal evMethod Verbal .
Reccc= ended Corrective JLetion (If Approprinte): All inspection activities performed I b a the approved procedure was received must be reviewed for acceptability cn procedure cust be implemented to assure all safety related future work in 2 under approved procedures * ~
A ;racd Upon Corrective Action: 1) Conduct a final inspection of plates prior to coating ar requalification. 2) Notify Document Controller of procedure to follow in receiving documents of this nature. 3) Documents'for transmittal to the site are to have their tv.m indicated at the point of origin. . .
. .. setive Action Approved by JIDotcon 'Date 2-5-74 of QC C QA @
e m eetive Action Taten: 1) A hold . point for. inspection and requalification will be placed on the C-110 (Coat,ing) inapection plan- (
Reference:
EE?elton to TCCooko letter BCCC 110). 2) Document Controller notified of, procedure in writ'ing. .
(
Reference:
EEFelton' to JLCorley letter BCCC 115). 3) Documents will have status -
indicated.when sent. (
Reference:
'PAMartines ICM dated 1-3-74, File 0294, 0456)
. . . - l Under g Cause of Nonconfor=an'ce: ImpropercontrolexcrbisedonSpecificationC-111, App nd B (preliminary). Also, communication difficulties between Bechtel construction and inipection personnel.
\, -
II*cFformance Tmpicmented and Closure Confir=cd by b( M b Date M7/7f U . .
. t
. , 9 12 N n .g .
Attactoent 8_1 _ , _ _. _ [] _. ,
l
, Fi? 16.6 my'fo3 Routa Tag
- Ist... Date- _. JanuIry 16. 19 /6
- 'e ~
. cHilovell . CQHil .s '
Proj:ct. Hidlend WEKrslcr (IN!fl .pr L CSKeeley File Title Cot!SumCG FW2f
.m' (d)WTHolubHidland Files 16.6Nonconformance No QF-3 -"
Tdi:2 lionconiomancsWFt la isEuEd-to:
g ggg
- Reviewed byfM[fr[d.,s Date Id./t-f Beebtel Quality control Action Rc(bred by Da[ February 18. 1974 Reply Required by Date Jan'uary 28, 1974
[
wh2 is resnonsible for correction action.
Nonconforace Description and Supporting Details: ,
See Attachment ,
Am Reportable "Yes No X See Procedure 9 - Reporting of Deficiencica to AE -
AEC Notified on by Hethod tecx=: ended ' Corrective Action (If Appropriate):
l l Review all existing NCR's for implementation of proper tagging.
- 2. Instruct Quality Control personnel in proper tagging procedures.
Agreed Upon Corrective Action:
s
- _ of QC O 9A O Corrective Action Approved by D te
/
Corrective Action Taken:
- 1. All open NCRs were reviewed for proper tagging on January 22, 23, and' dh,197i4
- 2. A Qunlity Control training session on the implementation of FIM Procedure G-3, Rev. c5, including tagging has been held. See attached minutes of January h, 1974 and January 25, 197h.
Underlying Ccuse of Nonconformance: . ,
The comp 1'e fevision of FIM'Gy (Received 12-28-73), including increased tagging requirements, took a period of time to implement.
[//) v Date %[#4[7#
f:nconformance Impic=cnted and Closure Confimed by
- g 12/4ft3 Attachment 8-l ____. .,
.M ,
~
, . l
. }, . .
. J:nucry 16, 1974 Hidland Project .
s . QF-3 Rev. 5 of FIP G-3 which was received by the PFQCE on 12-31-73 requires. tagging each piece of a nonconforming item. ,
January 2, 1974 l I
Approximately one quarter of the assemblies with Type B sleeves were tagged. ,
Jansury 7, 1974 ,
H. W. Slager discussed tagging of the Type B cadweld assemblies with i
. *7, G. Tucker and J. I. Dotson. At thi_s time it was stated that it was
- pchtels policy to tag all nonconforining items. 'Z. G. Tucker said he vauld contact J. Connolly on the subje,ct. ;
January 10, 1974 Tagging of the Type B cadweld sleeve assemblies still not complete.
January 11, 1974 s .
Tagging of all assemblies with. Type B cadweld sleeves completed.
This series of events indicates that a problem exists in the timely implamentation of NCR procedures as described in FIP G-3.
Y e
A
- CJ I
. k e
16 ,6 7
Wpy To: Routa D :
Is8u3 DatgJununty 10, 19/a S"J!owtli . CQHillo Proj:st.Midlend tecler INS 1 gtr 711e titleNonconformance aeports C.. '," " I'Y
- Cons::mtis Pcwer on contrnetor ( AE-Constructor)
" dIhh*h .
Fi Midland 16.6 Nonconformance No OF-4_ (Construction) 2his lionconfor=ance Repors la issuea~tos g g44 Reviewed by((MMb _ Date //d/g Action Rehed by Dat8ebruary 14, 19_74 Bechtel Project Superintende.nt who in Tenpensible for currEdtion action. _
Nonconfor=ance Deccriptien and Supporting Details: ,
Welding of liner plate leak chase was not being done according to the veld procedure referenced in Specification C-111, Rev. 2. Leak chase was being welded over a welded section of replacement plate on liner pinte S1-1-U2 on 1-9-74 A worker was o'aserved knocking the coating off a 7018 electrodd. The veldar, (BM-34) then prepared to use the rod as a manually fed filler rod, f eeding the rod into the are created by the electrode in the cicetrode holder. Thio method is not part of weld procedure F1-A-C-Lh on which the welder was qualified and which is to be used en liner plate.
AEC Reportable Yes O No O see Procedure 9 - Reportins of Deficiencies to AEC AEC Notified on by Method Reccr ended Corrective Action (If Approprinte):
The Bechtel Senior Field Welding Engineer st'opped the man's welding and had the 4
' slugged" weld removed and repaired. Further corrective action needs to be taken by r"b2EEmTw6d&T,00cch Bechtel to preclude reffeurrence. It is reco= mended that corrective action include increased surveillance of liner i
plate activities by supervisory personnel.
Agreed upon corrective action: Same as. corrective action taken Corrective Action Approved by (/ A. M Date of QC O cA Corrective Action Taken: (see "Recomended Corrective Action" above, for corrective action taken as of 1-16-74). Welders have been re-instructed as to application of -
proper welder techniques specified by Specification C-111. Bechtel Power Corporation supervisory personnel will survey the work on liner plate on an increased frequency during the f abrication process.
Underlying Cance of Nonconfomance: .
Insufficient understanding of weld requirements by velder.
i .
INonconformance I=plemented and Closure Confirmed by
- Date 2-/9 7h i
l
( l L
12 pin .
V~
' Copy Tof *' 1 2 16.6 Routa To: ,,,,,
Issui. Data 1-25-74 SHHow 11.
CQllills [ Pr j:st Mfoinnd CSK : ley HWS1cg r j WEKersler (last) CCDSUm25PDWIT Tile Title nnnynnrny,,ng, so, n n t e .1 a:
eb.//CM Contractor (AE-Constructor)'
Nonconfomance No 0F-5 (Construction)
'fdis Y5ned.Ifomance Eeport'is iscucTto: ~ -
ared by(([M Date P 2~
E. E. Felton Reviewed by MMMb Date //n-/7-Bechtel Project Superintendent s Action Requ -ired by DatEeWuary 22, 197_4 Reply Required by Datere$ruary8,1974 who is Tesponsible for correction action.
Nonecafor=ance Description and Supporting Detailc: M he as dg m h not being conducted in accorddnce with the controlling documents. On January 3, 1974, cnd January 4,1974, a test pressure of 90 PSI was observed on leak chase of plates on
' the west jig. Specification C-lli calls for pressurization to 80 PSI. Regulatory puide 1.19, which was in effect through a TUX dated December 26, 1973, from P. A.
Martinez to E. E. Felton, calls for pressurization to the containment design pressure (67 PSI). .
ADC Reportable Yes O No B See Procedure 9 - Reverting of Deficiencies to AEC AEC Notified on by Method R:ecc= ended Corrective Action (If Appropriate):
1). Provide assurance that all tests q cnduc,ted to date are valid and that the pressure used in the instance above was i st detrimental to the plate 2) Clarify the requirements of the specification (i.e., set l Agreed Upon Corrective Action: a pressure range for the test) '
- 1) Provide asserance that 90 psi is not detrimental to the plate.
- 2) Set a pressure range for the test.
)
Corrective Action Approved by N.A* h,[
1 Date of QC O qa t
t' 1 Corrective Action Taken: 1) Testing to 90 psi when 80 psi is required by specification l
is actually greater assurance of leak free weld. It is not prob:.Slc that any detri- -
ncut could occur that would not be detected and therefore rejecteo 2) Because of this nonconformance, FCR-C-53 has been issued. Project Engineering has originated SCN-C-111-4004 which specifies a test pressure of from 80 to 90 psi. This SCN is cxpected to be released before February 22, 1974.
. 1 Underlying Cause of*Nonconformance:
1 Insufficient detail contained in Specification C-111.
INonconfomance Implc=cnted and Closure Confirmed by ~ M M Date -2o < , / !
12/4/73 ,
e e, .
yf 16.6 Myy Tot Routo t;: .
IssuD D2t3- Februcry 6, 1974
' ell ,. ,CQHills Projr. t. Hidhnd 1 & 2 EVSing:r (100t) iley 21:r , g pygg File Title _ Nonconf orcance Reports
-0< on Contrneter (AE-Conotructor)
(_)3 .
Nonconfor=ance No QF-7 (Construction)
.his
. nonconiomance iteport is issuca ro: . Pr d by MMMM DataM--
Revieved by[MMdk
- Datar:d./y
- EEFolton p- /<
B;chtel Project Superintendent Action Betaired b;r DCiMarch 6.1974 Reply Required by Date February 20, 1974
.vho _is resjonsible for corredtion action.
Nonconformance Descriptica and Supporting Details:
Unern' trolled weld rod was found in an area where liner plate welding was in process. On 2-4-74, during walkthrough surveillance of the paint / sandblast building, several covered electrodes were observed nenttered about the building floor cad in the " dolly" rails. The weld rod was apparitntly .lef t by the building subcontractor. The problem vu. identified to the Bechtel Senior Field Welding Engineer on 2-4-7.4. This same problem was identified previously by Consumers Power QA personnel.in.a daily log
- b. ted 12-24-73. Subsequent.clern-up .and . departure f rom the site rf_ the subcontractor.
rer>ulted in that- item being closed.- Recurrence of the probica resulted in the issuance of this NCR. -
AE Reportabie Yes O Ho See Procedure 9 - Reporting of Deficiencies to Am .
AEC Notified on by Method Recem-r nded Corrective Action (If Ayu v1winte):
{ [) Clean up uncontrolled rod in the area.
- 2) Take action necessary to ' preclude recurrer.ce. .
Agreed Upon Corrective Action:
- 1) 'Cican up uncontrolled rod in the area.
- 2) Have Bechtel Pouer Corporation supervisory personnel incrence surveillance oftheareatoprecluderecurrenge.
of QC Ccrrective Action Approved by N.A. L Date QA y_ .
Corrective Action Taken: ,
- 1) Uncontrolled. rod has been cicaned up and removed from the' paint / sandblast building area.
- 2) Bechtel Power Corporation supervisory personnel have been instructed to surveil the area' additionally to preclude recurrence of this problem.
b Underlying Cauce of Fonconformance:
Insufficient understanding of the importance of segregation of uncontrolled weld rod materials.
lHonconfomenc'e Implemented and Clocure Confirmed by ~ Date 3- 6-7#-
l l l-
~
l
\
uNn . .
u a .
W* --
. 4.w Routo Tat '
Ist , Dat.e 19 Frbruary 1974 iHHowell CQHills l Proj st Hidicnd
- Ste
- 1Sy' ' t HWSICger T.Ke:cler (lrt) ggng:ggg pgggt Ne Me m 'a nn cnne m enc
'IDotcon (A-v Enne m enM /enne. w e kni_
ila -"idland 16.6 Monconfor- nee No _ or_n 2 iron:oniorrcace aeport. la inuuuaTwo hwd by bM O 9b DM-m W <
JPConnolly Reviewed by @M Bechtel Project Field Quality Date_ M/
Contr.11 Engineer Actics Re ed by Date f*[0 Msrch 1974 Reply Required by Date 28 Februcry 1974
_.v53 is resy:nsible for correi: tion action. _
Nonconfor=ance Description and Dupporting Details:
1.) spehtel QC has ynapproved Champion QA manual in their file. (2) The only approved copy of a Cha:spion QA manual is marked " void" (3) Letter BEBC-50 from PA Hartinez to EEFelton !
dated 9-13-73 states that Chanpion in required to assign one of their onsite peracnnel the !
responsibility for assuring adequate QA/QC program iniplementation and that he must be reacenably f ree of presoures of' production. The can currently casigned this responsibility the plaat nupervisor, obviously does not meet this criterion. (4) The Chcnpion QA manual r.?.f: rences ACl and ASTH codes and/or revisions which are not in accord with Specification
." 23 0.
)
ADC Reportable Yes O noO see Proceaure 9 - Resortins of Deficiencies to Am Am notified on by Method R:cccisended Corrective Actica (If Appropriate):
(1) Obtain approved copy of manual and see tha Champion also has an approved copy on site (2) Enforce BEEC-50 requiremento
(
orrect the manual ACI and ASTM code references. (4) Review other subcontractor QA <
gegp8dtn'dii dl.ar:situstion Cia does not exist. t l
. Corrective Action Approved by Date of QC O 9A Corrcetive Action Taktn:
t <
Und;rlying Cause of Nonconformance: , ,
l v -
i es j' '
l 12/4/73 - .
.8 ,g%
n