Text

Chapter 2 of AR Nuclear 1 PSAR, Site & Environ. Includes Revisions 1-18
	ML19329E135
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	11/24/1967
From:	; ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	;
References
	NUDOCS 8005300712
	Download: ML19329E135 (22)
	v • d • e

M 4

+

W

'e gg*

,,, w (A

mm CM 2 :ks M5 00O)

~~

8005 300 7/k M

t

TAELE OF CO? CENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 2

SITE & ENVIRONMENT 2 -1

- 2.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION 2-1 2.2 SITE & ADJACENT AREAS 2-1 2.2.1 LOCATION 2 -1 2.2.2 LAND OWNERSHIP 2 -1 2.2 3 VICINITY 2-1 2.2.4 RESIDENT POPULATION 2-2 2.2 5 PART-TIE POPULATION 2 -2 2.2.6 LAND USE 2-2 2.2 7 FUTURE POPULATION AliD LAND USE 2-3 23 METEOROLOGY 2-3 2.4 SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY 2-4 2.,".

GROUND-WATER HYDROLOGY 2-5 2.6 GEOLOGY 2-5 27 SEISMOLOGY 2-5 0066 M

2-1

i LIST OF FIGURES (at rear of section)

FIGURES TITLE 2-1 COUNTIES WITHIN 50-MILE RADIUS

~2-2 PLOT PIAN AND SITE BOUNDARY 2 OENERAL APIA MAP 2-4 POPUIATION CENTER DISTANCES WITHIN 100 MILES 2-5 ESTIMATED POPUIATION DISTRIBUTION (1967-2012)

FROM 0-5 MILE RADII.

2-6 ESTIMATED IOWIATION DISTRIBUTION (1967-2012)

FROM 5-20 MILE RADII.

2-7 ESTIl&TED POPUIATION DISTRIBUTION (1967-2012)

FROM 20 MILE MILE RADII.

2-8 ESTIMATED TRANSIENT POWIATION WITHIN A FIVE-MILE RADIUS (1%7-2012) 2-8E POPUIATION DISTRIBUTION BY CUMUIATIVE DISTANCE FROM REACTOR 2-9 IANDUSE(PASTURED / CULTIVATED)WITHINA50-MILERADIUS 2-10 DAIRY ANIMALS WITHIN A 50-MIII RADIUS 2-11 DATA ON RESERVOIRS AND IAKES WITHDI A 50-MILE RADIUS 2-12 AIRLINE ROUTES IN VICINITY OF RUSSELLVILLE 17 0067 2-11 5-4-70 Supplement No. 17

.2.

SITE AND EWIRONMENT 2.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Data are presented in this section as a basis for the selection of design criteria for the Russellville Nuclear Unit and to determine the adequacy of concepts for controlling routine and accidental' release of radioactive eff-luents to the environment. A series of studies (meteorology, surface water hydrology, ground water hydrology, geology, seismology, population and~1and use) have been conducted.

The site is located in Pope County, Arkansas, about six miles West North-West from Russellville.

Cooling water for Russellville Nuclear Unit will be drawn from and returned to Dardanelle Reservoir.

The exclusion area around the reactor will have a minimum radius of 0.65 mile.

There will be seven population centers with pro,jected population of 25,000 or more in the year 2012 within a 100-mile radius of the site.

The structures will be founded on rock and the foundation material presents no problem in design or construction.

2.2 SITE AND ADJACENT AREAS 2.2.1 LOCATION The 1972 Nuclear Unit Plant site is located in Southwestern Pope County, Arkansas, as shown in Figure 2-1; the site is at latitude 35 -18'-42" N.

and longitude 93 -130-15" W.

2.2.2 LAND OWNERSHIP k

The property within a 0.65 mile radius of the nuclear station will be controlled to the extent necessary by Arkansas Power & Light Company. This area includes certain portions of the bed and banks of Dardanelle Reservoir which are owned by the United States. An easement will be obtained which will entitle the Company to exclude all persons from these areas during periods of emergency.

The property boundary, (shown in Figure 2-2), will be posted and a perimeter fence will be erected around the immediate station area.

2.2.3

-VICIrfITY The plant site is located two miles South-East from the village of London, on a peninsula formed by the Dardanelle Reservoir.

The reservoir is part of the " Multiple-Purpose Improvement Plan for the Arkansas River" and includes the Arkansas River and the former Illinois Bayou. The area of the reservoir is 36,600 acres; its normal pool elevation (338 feet) is controlled down-stream by the Dardanelle Lock & Dam No.10 on the Arkansas River.

'g Figure 2-3 shows the general geographical and. topographical features within a WO-mile-radius of the site.

2-1 0068

F 2.2.4

RESIDENT POPUIATION

,x Figure' 2-4 shows-population centers within a 100-mile radius of the site.

Little' Rock,' Arkansas, located 57 miles Southeast of the site, had a 1960 population of 128,929 The nearest population center, Hot Springs, Arkansas, is 55 miles South of the site and had a 1960 population of 37,286.

Figures 2-53.2-6 and.2-7 provide a detailed analysis of popuhtion distribution within a 50-mile radius of the site. Figure 2-5 shows the currently estimated (1967) and the projected estimated (year 2012) population distribution _ in 16 directional sectors-centered on the site within five-mile radius. Figures 2-6 and 2-7 show similar popuhtion distributions for 10 and 20 mile radii and for 30, 40 and 50 mile radii respectively.-

-The 1960 census showed mostly decreasing population in this area from 1950 to 1960. According to the " Arkansas River Region Comprehensive Development Plan 1980" (prepared by Associated Planners, Inc. for the Arkansas Planning Cormis-sion), this trend reversed and the population increased from 1960 to 1%5

- The 1967 population projection is a linear extrapolation of the 1960-1965 trend based on the. data of the " Arkansas River Region Comprehensive Develop-ment Plan 1980." In some peripheral areas, which are not covered by the Development Plan, linear projections were used from the 1950 and 1960 census, if the-population increased.

If the population decreased between 1950 and 1960, the 1960 census data were used without adjustment.

The 2012 projection is taken from the Arkansas River Region Report (Volume I -

Section B) and prepared by Industria.1 Research and Extension Center, College of Business Administration, University of Arkansas. The increase used in the 1967 - 2012 projection is an average of the high and low estimates of this report.

2.2. 5 -

PART-TDIE POPUIATION It is expected that the Dardanelle Reservoir will be a major contributing factor to part-time _ population within c five-mile radius. The recreational activities offered by the reservoir su:h as boating, fishin5, camping, etc.,

will increase the population of the area during the summer months. It is anticipated that the 75 miles (approximately) of thereline of the Dardanelle Reservoir and Arkansas River will be developed, and weekend or holiday popu-lation will increase. Figure 2-8 shows estimated transient population within five miles of the plant site.

2.2.6 IAND USE Figure 2-9 shows the area of land in square miles that is pastured and cul-tivated within a 50-mile radius of the site. The land use it shown in 16 directional sectors centered on the site and within 5, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 mile radii.

The -land data were based on the 1964 United States Census of Agriculture

' Preliminary Report for Arkansas.

0069 2,

e

, -(-

n-

i Figure 2-10 shows-the number of dairy nimals, by counties, that will be gra::ing within'a 50-mile redius of the-site. These figures are also from f

1964 Preliminary Report for Arkansas.

Figure 2-11 lists lakes and reservoirs within a 50-mile radius from the site.

- There is no major airport with a control tower within 50 miles of the plant 6

site. The closest airports are the Russellville Municipal Airport (8 miles),

Clarksville Municipal Airport (15 miles) and Petit Jean Airport (22 miles).

There are two low altitude ;1rways near by, as shown in Figure 2-12.

This airway, whose centerline is about five miles east of the plant site, has one or two scheduled commercial low altitude turbo-prop flights daily.

The centerline of airway V 7hN is two miles scuth of the plant site. This is an alternate route of V 74, which is the main route between Fort Smith and Little Rock, 20 miles south of the plant. V 74N carries very light unscheduled i

traffic only.

The closest high altitude (jet) airway is Route J6-14/279 about 30 miles south of the plant site.

2.2.7 FUTURE POPULATION AND IAND USE The future estimated population for the Year 2012 is shown in Figures 2-5, 2-6 and 2-7 Section 2.2.4 describes the population distribution and projections.

2.3 METEOROLOGY The meteorology and the diffusion climatology of the Russellville site have been evaluated to provide a basis for estimating the effects of release of waste gas, estimates of exposure from a postulated accident, and design criteria for storm protection. A summary of the method and the results fcllow.

The climate of the Arkansas River valley in the region of the site is pri-marily continental in character.

The Boston Mountains, with elevations up to 2700 feet and oriented generally east-west on the north side of the valley, have an influence on the annual precipitation. The annual precipitation on the south slope is of the order of 2-4 inches greater than in the valley.

Within the valley, in an east-west direction, the climatology is homogeneous.

Directly to the south, hills range up to 3000 feet.

Snowfall in the region is of mall consequence in winter.

Summer heat is observed to be frequently in-tensified in the river valley.

l TWO-HOUR MODEL From ten years of. climatological data from Fort Smith and Little Rock, eight months were identified as having the highest frequency of calm, and the high-est frequency of poor diffusion conditions (Turner category 6 and 7). The lowest average wind speed during periods of Turner 6 and 7 from these eight months was 1 meter per second (mps), including the calms as 0.

Thus, the 2-hour model is assumed to be two hours of Pasquill category F, with an un-directional wind of 1 mps, inclu hourly X/q-is equal to 1.8 x 10 gng calms. -For the 2-hour model, the average 2

i sec/m3atthesiteboundary.

0070 2-3 N

m s

d*

TWENTY-FOUR HOUR =MODEL O.

/

The twenty-four hour model was derived from a review of individual days in the eight months of highest frequency of calmsi described above.

The four days selected all exhibited Turner 7 category,' persistent all night long. These days were composited by hourly averaging for wind speed.and vector analysis for wind direction.

The results show that the'model day consists of five hours of Pas-quill F of 1.0 mps wind speed, all with the same wind direction. For the twe four hour model, the sum of the X/Q, for the indicated periods,.is 10.2 x 10 gty-sec/m3,atthesitebou Thus, the average hourly X/Q for the twenty-four hourmodelis4.3x.10-gdary.-sec/m3, THIRTY-DAY MODEL Based on the' highest frequency of calm surface winds.(10 years of data), the highest number.of Turner 6 and 7 categories (2 years of average monthly data),-

and the highest frequency of afternoon inversion under 500 meters (2 years),

it was shown-that the month of October has most adverse diffusion climatology.

To approximate the most adverse period of the year, the months of August, September and October of 1963 and 1964 vere selected. An analysis of Turner categories, performed on average hourly data, shows that for the greatest uni-direct,ional unit dose, there was a Pasquill category F with an average wind speed of 2 mps,.for 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months during a typical day of the 30-day model month.

For the t ical-day in the 30-day model, the sum of the X/Q is equal to 3.6 x 10-sec/m after summation over the 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months of the typical day, at the site boundary. ~ Thirty of such days would comprise the 30-day model.' Thus, the averagehourlyX/Qforthe30-daymodelis15x10-5sec/m3 The' conclusions'in regard to diffusion climatology of this site are: (a) that-no adverse features of the diffusion climatology were found in the study, and (b) that the results of the diffusion analysis of available data provide a sound basis to use in the prelim 4=7 engineering desigt of a nuclear power reactor.

An on-site meteorology program is under way to measure wind speed, wind direc-tion and temperature. These data will be used later to confirm initial esti-mates of site dispersion factors.

The-design criteria for the Class 1 structures will include design loads for tornadoes.

Refer to Appendix 2A for Meteorology.

!2.4 SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY.

In connection with the safety aspects of the proposed nuclear power plant, sur-face water investigations were made, mese included the source and dependabil-ity of the cooling water. supply, magnitu3s of possible floods and possible

~ failure of upstream dams.

-The plant will require 1700 cfs cooling water.

mis water will b'e taken from 6

the Illinois Bayou ~embayment, which is located east of the plant. The

. discharge will flow into the Dardanelle Reservoir west of the plant.

No-2-4 007.1-c4 2-8-68 7-11-68.

Amendment No. 1 Supplement No. 6

I i

water for industrial or potable purposes is taken downstream of the plant to 6

- 4 the Mississippi River.

.]

? '.*

'The' minimum pool elevation is 336 feet.

The highest experienced flood occurred in 1943, with a peak flow of 683,000 cfs.. The levels along the river channel in this area are generally designed for flow of 830,000 cfs.

'lhe Dardanelle Dam is designed to hold a water level no higher than 338 feet to discharge 900,000 cfs..The maximum probable flood level was computed by the Corps of Engineers as 1,500,000 efs with 358 feet flood level. Failure of Ozark Dam during a maximum probable flood would result in a maximum 361 foot water level at the site. Nom-

?

inal plant grade elevation will be 353 and ground floor elevation for the build-ings will be 354. During a mavimm probable flood the plant will be shut down.

- All Class I structures are designed to resist this flood and all Class I equip-ment is either located above elevation 361 feet or protected from flooding by s

. the Class I structures. (Access to the plant would be by boat and/or helicopter.)

The minimum daily average flow computed by the Corps of Engineers during the driest critical month of the year is 4,000 cfs.

Refer to Appendix 2B for a detailed report on Surface Water Hydrologr.

k s

1.;

?

\\',.

0072

i.,

2-4a 7-11-68 Supplement No. 6 g

-I m

l 2.5 GROIND WATER HYDROIOGY The site is located on compact clayey soil overlying dense shale bedrock and adjacent to the Dardanelle Reservoir. This clayey overburden is generally im-permeable and hence ground water is not available. Ground Ater is available in the bedrock fracture systems.

It is confined water which flows toward the reservoir under a relatively flat gradient.

Water discharged at the surface and ponded vill percolate very slowly downward

\\1 through the clayey soil overburden while migrating toward the reservoir. The p

clayey soils at the site vill react with any disolved radionuclides and in-hibit their migration.

t The proximity of the site to the Dardanelle Reservoir will not adversely affect g

construction conditions. Domestic wells obtain supplies from confined water in e

bedrock, thus infiltration from the surface is not a problem.

Refer to Appendix 2-C for a detailed report on Ground Water Hydrology.

2.6 GE0IDGY The recent exploration program which included core, auger, and wash-bore holes in addition to geologic mapping, a geophysical survey, and testing program were sufficient to delineate the foundation conditions relative to construction of the proposed plant. The exploration and testing program enabled construc-tion design criteria to be formulated.

d Critical structures will utilize the underlying Pennsylvanian McAlester for-mation shale bedrock as foundation material. Other structures may be placed i

on the overlying clayey material. These materials are adequate for properly designed structures and should present no unusual construction problems.

Refer to Appendix 2-D for a detailed report on Geology.

2.7 SEISMOIOGY Uo active or recent faulting has been mapped in the area of the proposed site.

The London and Prairie View faults located five and six miles, respectively, from the site are the closest known faults.

The proposed reactor structures will utilize the shale bedrock as a foundation.

This rock has good strength properties and will result in no amplification of ground motion from an earthquake.

The area is not seismically active; however, the effects of earthquakes from distant sources will be experienced at the site. The New Madrid earthquake of 1811-1812, the epicenters of which were located about 220 miles north-east of the site, is the type which vill be felt at the site. The maximum epicentral in-tensity for this event was estimated at XII which probably decreased to about VI in the area of the site.

Therefore, because of the above described site conditions and seismic history of the area, the maximum probable intensity of VII is assigned to the site.

pg 2-5 00?3

This value is consid;r:d consarvativa and corresponds to a d sign spectrum of 0.10 g for plant design with a factor of 0.20 g for safe shutdown.

T Refer to Appendix 2-E for a detailed report on Seismology.

2.8 Dardanelle Lock and Dam Dardanelle Lock and Dam form the Dardanelle Reservoir which provides cooling

{,

water for the Plant. An investigation was performed to determine if this structure would withstand the " Maximum Earthquake" of 0.2g without losing its functional integrity. This investigation included a stability and structural analysis of the following components:

a.

Non-Overflow Section.

b.

Generator Section.

c.

Overflow Section.

d.

Lock Gates and Tainter Gates.

e.

Lock Walls.

f.

Earthfill Section.

The investigation indicated that the " Maximum Earthquake" could cause some distrecs and limited damage but the dam would not lose its functional integ-rity and the nomal control of pool level would not be interrupted.

Refer to Appendix 2-F for " Safety Investigation Report Dardanelle Lock and Dam".

0074

[

2-6 2-8-68 Amendment No. 1

i COUNTIES g

WITHIN A

50-MILE RADIUS

\\

S

.L...O, j

-~

NEWTON L

\\..

PRANKU N JOHNSON Pops VAN BUR g

\\

l

' A g

C ONWAY

{$

gu l

E mesAmT6AN

[

PAULKNER

4

,\\

..L.

puLASKB j

GAMLAND MONTGOMERY

)

Figure 2 -l 4

0075

f t

i 20 : @. ). : i*.*"

f,,

\\/ (.1p,.c.c.,e

}

s g

j' m ', a :.: p.3.d.: 2N 19 I

,,..cV.-}i[:?...DM, f /

't l

Q., Q.

t y?

p -

--n--

in

\\ts w ~pA. d,' i,h,s s

vo

,.

d l

}

w I

Hill y

' e, q 4 ',e y ^. " ~. Ym -

i N1

,,f

/

f,-

s

= -- - -- - n ia.,

- c.~

s....

M.n a,/

Ja cea t

i.

(f'{ g i

' L.

s.. 3

~_~g r

s3 N.,

, t.,

i

,,s c

v.

m t

g L..os 5,ps - W s

,1.,,4 o

g "s

js

'\\

s e,s s

, /,.

~~ %s 3." " s*

i g

,o j

x ss

L,y /s

% :t 3,.

g N

M'/

v f

s-a e

's.,

s v

!29 e

t. -

}

g

e. -,!

{~N*N(30d_.'3

(

. N :.l ~.

3

' fb n<

t..

xf- _

. sn s.

xN s,,,,, 4 ;

' r ' --..-J s-s, a

s s

. N ' '- '

,.2 p ::e..N,, k b

Rota d b'

'N. MoubtA Roun",

M w'L~ 'hj['$'e h / s+

's 9 \\h]

x

's

-f

'x

/,.

N.

A..;. M. ; :A a 'T m s

r m

x s

p gV m

s., u

'N s!

b.

N c

_\\

s

'%N c 34..,

4

'\\

s 7

o s,

s,

\\

\\.

'. f 2 s

,2 A

'<r,[S 'N N,

', $1 N

t,

'o

'4~^'%

s ss : -

q s,p

).

)s b s't \\.;s. g g

M

QA Q. ',,. fegg

+

)N ',,

4

'N Y 8 N \\

3 pa i

T' s

.~

Y !,,

s s

x 1

', s N

k 'r

'p

(

i'-lj o'

\\

'\\

' ' 3N

';': s f i

g 8fs 1

x

. A l

j

~ -.'

,....\\,... "[,'. 4 f':~.y s.

1 ai 4.' M t

z 4

r,.%

~., s :-s - ;;

6

, o:,

i i

s si

%,1\\

y'/

1 f*

s I'

y l-h',

1

.)

/-

5 k'

[f.Ih':..'

9-t I

00'76 i

e

?

J

~

.b, \\

[*Q bl g'

w c.

s (gJ [..

s y

t 4

N

'1 bS m.

MA, /Q b

.y

~

Q g x,

/m

_.m 4~

'g

~[ ',

':v7 w'i

/: %

'4

' %)

3 q%3

- ' N v..

s.

e q

9 yi 45

,w>%

w A<

(iq,,,h, \\. ', -

u i

m

.i L

Q. ji,A Jp g

+

b r- ( 1', p. b,,' *g n je

^y m7 s.

g s

2 2a

. b,,q

-2 4

? - vc% ty""1, c.' - Y}, "s%

~

sw q y-a )O'-, 22: -

. \\, =..._re:.

.. ) ['

J.. ' i \\,,,

. '"J[' /' ['\\l:y-

~,:c'=e.

'] -

... _.. 3

^

%= y (.

4 g

\\

~'g. 4.,-

_Li o.

f_. -.... u, i

\\q.-

9, x

..i

=...,.c... a, -.

Wm W

p,,.

i,,.

~ 1, %,j _, p 2

,9

.y;bf..x 6d N.

[.

=,. -

p! ~)ty' f 37 m-j

~ op j

" v6

. \\.,

. y #: n y% jf.

j e*

k. M '$c 'r. -

m..

- y., )J ;,. @ # N,,

_p.,

%L p

n Y-

\\

(

M

~ T.

N/, 4 w -f < A.,Q " "

) ' T~ i w fi d q{. y :y 8-.

j; www & (

f m":n gn\\;v

?

1 n

C:

,pf g.

j' s n

p'.-

.p l W r_ 5. ~....q&.4/f y [

Q:s L

\\

q'

..p j

i 1' 4,,,, u.,~

4.;. Gy,c t,

..p--/--.

v -. 7_

,,s-c.

f' r. p.WJ

.h

.g.

.\\-.

s

\\~

c' w

s 1-M

i 1 &.. N :.

s.

{

s' 0

e

,f

e. ~~, p.

i N ;... Q

- R

,3,W 3

3 i-~~y p

.,a,.. w.

wst j.w L.. r y 1<

a

^ :e

,~

CR

, [%Qj..... _4,_ _ g..

N [

pm pm &

h _...<.~ ___ %sy.

.._.a_ q \\-

---~.4'.,__

SITE B6UNDARY pq

{

.{

3 y

/

l

/,h i

rio. 2-2 hknL Aa 5

)

8-15 68 0077 re.

r SUPPLEMEHT UO. 7 i

1 l

\\

eavar,cas a ner

g LI'ITLE HOCH j

[s}r i

K-f c-L

_.-_. s,i

,_ t 3

y 4;7 k:

)

t

_t s-m O

gm t

5 a

m r

. -c i

+

t,

.a4q t,

3 i

7 o

t_

t.,_._ -

x,,

7_ y.,

g,_..

s.

1

[.

,~

t

. i r n w.,

.g

=

.n.

._ u.-

r

,.a

-s s

3..

w% -u_.,

..,.____,......------T.t.

=

p T.

vI !

,i- ~_?

s_

in J, r

/,s_

~

.av s a

g__,.

o y.

.~

n. _

t

.t - %r 9w-y e/; -

y-t _.

._ t

.. n. a,

t.

\\

t

.L.,.,

J.,

x<.

t s

a m

m ic g, a _.s -

.s m

~-

1 T

s

,t

.=,

a.

1

.a f

.. _, ' ~

z,e N

N t

t

.v

_t

~.t e s u;

x__

2

. 2,

~~

,, '. _.. d-.

i f n - MA

' > J E i $.-

s, -4.._

..m.

r-e.**^..

{ tinef i

em

-e Y

y n

n n

a

.e t N;_

' p.n?'

y.1' A,.--!.,';

/_

i4 J

I j c} mlgf{.l;cAf. N

.T _

7

~.rmg

x.._

~.

2 1

.- 37; g-

g.

p_;3 t

i a.

s y

r V

Q_

,;k &.. " ' " ~.

,f.

? j.D '~~

'~.

4 J* - -

,,.w,.--.-

c. -

i g:,

r, x ;

t 3

-k =

r n

,t t-s *'

'p

,o a

f e

w.

C,

w..._-.e 1

= =-.

.2_.5%.._.

0078 v'

.a.m.e.=_=*

I' I

n

,_ -.4,,

7 t

7

)_i m

d t

1

.1 fr' "

'~

p.,

- 3 y y--

.1

[

/

t

<c i

f, C'.

'l.

'l

'f.j,.

f 77 t

oJ 1.. -; -.

% o t

c 1

~

p a,

~

v

- ~,.

'I

' 5,,,

7 -

Ih 3-

,, J ',

b

^

,.s

, C'.

~}{g "

=

/

r

>Le 4'

/

3 t

$~

W

~

t

\\ T.,,ll I

._ g 2 7- ' Q I ~ 'l-f 1

t 4

t-

,,(-

t

.o

'r

\\\\

m t

u t

s

-.w T~

t

-u_

-}

I T

\\.

t T

3..

.eJ

'.m:.

x.m._--.f./

h-1-

m

].

]

3'-

g y

1 v

/

n t

7 4+ [

hdd k

~'

Jr 2

r 2

i y

T t

1 t

l J

t

-L -

t

(

t-

'. ;j' i,' g tp--l y t

Q x

f-I-

t t

t T

s t

[.

q s

1

.\\.-

Jll-J

=

~'

.-b-.

g~

=

+-

~-

~.

e j

/

L2

. C'_.

l

~

k $ '., w W,..L ; O h__l 9c-Q,4-~

e T

ku

~-

-g=

p

~p c-g m _ --

i N4)

GENERAL AREA MAP 0079 1

Figure 2-3

9 POPULATION CENTERS WITHIN A IOO-MILE RADIUS N

00 MLES SS

+e FAYETTVLLE (26279) g

'N e.

g

's

.g FORT

'N T6'd,'5ft)" J 8,, MILES

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

M i

N ;., - a Ns f

s, 4w N O

., JACKSONVILLE a g

\\p

's, ' ' -

% o8,078) 4 g

g;h 7,

M NORTH UTTLE ROCK ig s

N (6tAIO) g 7

$j\\ 128,929)

UTTLE RO CO kJ i

SPRNGS (37,286)

N\\eN*

E4 BLUFF 6

SS4

,00 m,tts cpt S

U80 g

Figure 2-4 t

i i

1967 c-5 MILES N

N 14

'4 a'

's

'JA iP g[*

}v s 2* eie, *!*+4*e % #

G 8'

e 4' 4 z, e

'b",, kgS\\s, #

.i,

/

o/o ei. =i-

->..ie.

. ei...

$\\*

o/o

'Y h

hj s 4, 0

+

g *'

SLt :

A*

8 3

1 ee

=, 4

's g

e4.f 8

iY 8

t ko p

s

iu 3

4 151

e4 9,,

ao S

TOTAL POPU PERSONS /SG 3

TOTAL P O PU LATIO N IS C U M U LATIVE FROM THE CENTER.

0081 l

i W

i acia 0-5 MILES N

N 20 U

4

a 4 58 O $ 9 4 e&[*

4ss 5

/

s/,8/4 +s Sh

'o$'

c$ g 2 e J u19 e,p}Yo,s., 4,

olo 3

ee ele Ols Dl2 2l31 olo ele s S

$ 3

$ N m

"I

,\\*

9 o/o i

g g **\\,

g\\e Mggge g/g h 8

66 4

g

,p

q5

s

/

s S

n 5,

4 9

s' 4

++

260 8e4 53 s

,e s

y,ay ESTIMATED

, mits POPULATION DISTRIBUTION C ISS7-EO!E 3 0082 X

Figure 2-5 i

i i

1967 5-20 MILES N

g$

Ng 10

+

sg g

($

,o 3

l

78 4.{% ?? Q e. $\\"*

s sk a

p a

g n

=

~

'*p se. [/R 4 E

S%

t.1 f

2.

4 2*

.+

s 2;;>

e s

TOTAL PI PERSONS 0083 l }

W

9

'I 2 012 5-20 IVIILES N

No.

/

4 "L'

y oho

+5 io 3

\\

1 g,

g, 4 '::

g g

sk 4

3

$ a 3 0 E E 6 2 m

S i

ff! 87i

g 44 g

0 g,

3264 4

~. +

.s s

ESTIMATED

'fS' ^,vI[ts POPULATION f

DISTRIBUTION CISS7-20I23 0084 Figure 2-6

[

i 1967 20-50 MILES N

Q$

Ng 4378 40 Y

1912 4

4

P J.

D 4

a

4 sg - 9 is 43 53 4 %

/ g #" A 4

4 p

gu ga pp b

a A

4

+s s

e6 5

/e 22 b

4231 6404 i

13 04 99N s

TOTAL POPULA PERSONS /SG. I g

...mm...

,...mm m.....

-... ~,...

0085

"^

M s

x (l

2 012 20-50 MILES N

4 49 U

Sk lo.

I'

+

2373 4

Io h.> +

+

e$

og '"'/' 9 3,

' # g

8 2+

4^**

4

= i:

=

t$

I ek,

'S 1

a

'k#

h 6263 h O

44 19 4

sais S

ESTIMATED TION 3,c,g POPULATION DISTRIBUTION C1987 - 20123 0086 Figure 2 -7 i.

a f

)

iss7 O-5 MILES N

t4 0

't i

19 0

L 9

4*

2 I

'i' 4

n *s

\\

l#/e 0

Ek

%5 9 9

e

\\$

9

'O 1

f p

p

~n 3

alc 3

ele ele

=le als da B:~,m 2/.s 4/

k[2 O

g[0 4

@n%q g, #

te 9,.

p

g ge 4

Y 2

141

.+

158 a2 S

TOTAL POpuf PERSONS /SG q

O

.... m... e m......

e - e m

~.

... ~...

0087

/

s

2 012 0-5 MILES N

960 l

Ng N

h m

+

o L

/

e+

1 4

l&

1 45

%,a f ee 4

/s ##

s\\5 3

E a E S S N ele ISIR Q $

S 0 h t; m

t\\D 4

e*

t, 4

,p*g%*

%\\o%

73 i

/a 4

e/s g>

t

'a' %

4 0

h*

h h

kb 283 90 4

k ais S

ESTIMATED

~ ^ '. e" TRANSIENT mii POPULATION C 1967-2012 3 0088 W

Figure 2-8 3

I

IOPJIATICIT DISIRIBUTICII BY CUMUIATIVE DISTANCE FROM REACTOR DISTANCE FROM REACTOR 1967 2012 (Miles)

FERIRIiEIIT TRAIGIEIIT PERMAIIEIIT TRAliSIEIiT 1

105 151 178 307 2

678 334 1155 679 3

1220 617 2111 1246 4

2158 988 3709 1991 5

3738 1291 6501 2631 10 22993 34827 20 49233 72929 30 76650 116730 40 104870 156617 50 155483 237866 1967 POPUIATION OF RUSSELLVIIlE 11,154 1967 POPUIATION OF LONDOII 495 FIGURE 2-8a Supplement No. 9 8-30-68

o-5 MILES Ng, LAND USE IN SGUAF

@ N WITHIN A 50 MILE N

[g

~ PASTURED I

A o

9

,CU LTIVAT E D C.

g Y

C/o o\\o G

3 olo olo 11]

Q o\\*

/o ty i

of

[

1 eo E

- l&S 98 C U M U L ATIV E TOTALS BY SECTORS SECTOR RADIUS IN MILES 3

10 20 30 40 SD A

C P

G P

C A

C P

C SG. MI.

SG. Mt.

SG. MI.

N 12.5 0

18.4 0

71.6 6.7 k

NNW 15.4 0

56.6 0

55.6 0

56.6 0

92.0 8.9 NW 2.5 0

43.9 0

85.5 0

104.7 0

122.4 1.8 WNW O

O 17.7 0

71.7 24.5 153.9 34.1 180.5 34.1 W

9.5 0

23.7 0

82.4 9.8 123.6 16.7 212.1 16.7 WSW 3.8 0

3.8 0

12.6 0

40.0 0

71.8 O

SW O.3 0

9.1 0

33.5 0

60.9 0

75.1 0

SSW 5.2 0

17.0 0

31.7 0

42.7 0

67.3 1.8 S

4.3 0

24.9 0

26.9 0

44.6 3.5 SSE 6.6 0

41.4 0

56.1 0

73.8 3.5 SE 1.5

.2 36.8 4.9 56.4 7.8 90.6 13.3 99.4 13.3 ESE 4.3 0

36.8 14.7 46.6 73.4 80.8 107.6 11 6.3 142.8 E

1.5 0

13.3 0

62.3 0

137.4 0

252.4 O

ENE 8.8 0

47.1 3

61.9 3

75.6 4.4 102 13.2 NE 8.8

.75 35.3 6.7 35.3 6.7 46.3 6.7 81.7 15.5 NNE O

O 5.9 1.2 5.9 1.2 5.9 1.2 50.1 18.9 0000 s

5-50 MILES N

9 +I 4,

RE MILES 4

9 53.2 RADIUS 6.7 h

++

+

o o

o e

$to i

N o'

\\

syn t

's #

N

[,

ofo 84 A

spg

/o o$

{

y $

h y y

{

y o

u5 o y

o o

m o

o o

o oh

@o 4

o$

=\\

v $2 4.2 9g** 4#;#'

f"p A

ep f,

h 20 6 k N

}

Ml

,s h

k Sk9 2.o kr A

p r

r

+

++

b

~

'0

'Is LAND USE l

a e,4 WITHIN A s

50 MILE RADIUS 0091 Figure 2-9 1

r i

DAIRY ANIMALS WITHIN A

50-MILE RADIUS L

t i

MAOISON 0 MILE RActug 4ggg 3

SEARCY

./

NEW7DN SO43 1385 t

,CRAWPORO IEES FRANKLIN JOHNSON POPE VAN BURE 3454 1908 1933 R344

\\

I SITE C ONWAY LOCAN j

g[.

5904 SEE STI PAULKNER a'a-YELL 1793 RERRY f

479 I

SCOTT N

g puLASKI f

1854 I

OARLANO 1458 5 ALIN E

~

~~

1434 MONTOOMERY g

sol

\\~

00n2 Figure 2-10 i-

I

\\

4 DATA ON RESERVOIRS AND LAKES WIT (IENIIG! SURFACE AREA e

)

Distance No.

Reservoir-Lake (River)

Owner / Agency (miles)

Direction 1

Dardanelle Res (Arkansas R)

Corps of Engineers O

S-WNW 0

2 Lake Atkins (Horsehead Branch)

Game and Fish 17 ESE n.a.

25 ESE 3

Fish Lake (Point Removal Canal) 4 Lake Overcup (Overcup Creek)

Game and Fish 29 ESE 5

Beaver Fork L (Beaver Fork R)

City cf Conway 47 ESE 6

Harris Brake L (Fourch La Fave R)

Game and Fish 34 SE

'l Big Maumelle L (Maumelle R)

Little Rock Water District 48 SE 8

Gibson Lake (Mill Creek)

Fish and Wildlife 13 SSE 9

Winona Lake (Alum Fork Cr)

Little Rock Water District 40 SSE 10 Nimrod Res (Fourch La Fave R)

Corps of Engineers 24 S

i 11 Lake Ouachita (Ouachita R)

Corps of Engineers 50 S

12 Cove Lake (Cove Creek)

U. S. Forrest Service 23 WSW 13 Blue Mountain R (Petit Jean Cr)

Corps of Engineers 30 WSW n.a.

24 WNW 14 Hartman L (Old Arkansas R) 15 Ozark Res (ArkansasR)

Corps of Engineers 33 WNW 16 Horsehead L (Horsehead Cr)

Game and Fish 29 NW 17 Lake Ludwig (Spada Creek)

City of Clarksville 20 NW 18 Russellville Reservoir (Illinois Bayou)Russellville Water Co.

5*

NE Notes j

1 F-Flood Control, P-Power, N-Navigation, W-Water Supply, FW-Fish and Wildlife, R-Recreation:

2 At Elevation 338 Feet 3

At Elevation 336 Feet

Upstream distanj 4

At Bottom of Power Pool Level WaterCompanysj 5

State of Arkansas Game and Fish Commission 6

n.a. - information not available 7

Safe Yield j

)8 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 9

At the Conservation Pool Level 0093 10 Uhder Construction B

a O

i jDi A 50-MILE RADIUS loo ACRES)

Dead Storage Discharge Surface Area TotagStorage Surface

3. Volume YeplyAve.

Purpose (acres)

(lo ac-ft)

_(aeres)

(10 ac_ft)

(10 ac_ftfy,)

N 2

3 42o.8 28, m N,P 34,300 486.2 31,000 W

752 15 n.a.

n.a.

120 n.a.

n.a.

W 1,025 18 5 n.a.

n.a.

W 71o n.a.

n.a.

W 1,26o 20 n.a.

n.a.

W 8,850 196 5 n.a.

n.a.

93 I' FW 480 n.a.

n.a.

n a.

n.a.

w,P 1,170 41.8 I

n.a.

28.1 F

18,300 336 3,55o 29 632 9

9 F,P,W 48,300 2,768 20,900 865 1,670 R

166 2

n.a.

F 11,000 258 2,910 24.6 9 413 n.a.

227 n.a.

n.a.

N,P,R lo,600 148.4 8, Boo 129 25,000 W

loo 3

n.a.

w 24o 6

13o 1

o.95 w

n.a.

358 6

g to RESERV01R & LAKE DATA ti n WITHIN A50 MILERADIUS RUSSELLVILLE NUCLEAR STATION 0094 W

Figure 2-11 i

i I

I e

Q h

., ' \\,"

/

,,1)-_

3

,.s a

~'

c

_,w(Tb ~' g(' p' &,'

W~h>of j.

~

7 J -J so.o

-3

't

~i gmuitwan !

='

SP

.~

' M, m,,J

, w'y ; e y,.g,.

v n.o

s. 3 a.3

... 4

~_

g. ;

q

....z w "y ;. v, r.

)

-.~,,

=

n

..,_,g... -

s n,\\,

m..

9 "*'{#'~_ w 3

,.c.,,,..,

y

.~

2 4

,~

i Aa..r

' a.(~s,. c,,

n...

..,......s m

e > ~.-.,,c 3

e y

ms

-g aso

.... sm u'

s pm

... m.

n

[

-a s y...' i

(),, f M E' \\

'._,..a.0

, n....,_... A =.

1 r

vm.

c...

m

-:*r6

. c-

%e n

9(-r,;g m

,..j.....

J :;p:mqp l

&r y

t a N;.,

,-s b[- % yL.,

e 1

o _ ~%

~.....

t r

g ? N'%'*

r i-

s.,.

.=.. -

,en, w-

,..__. e c.......

myp r.....n

~.....

p e

s,, w Q,,,

- w..

'?s'L' 3,...a),;..l.x MGMi' p w I, 7 r. e " d,.. - m In. q w>

g't g

T ho'*k i

O

_y A,

,,4 tes f-QC ns- &

8 :ggs..sig

')

J

,Q_

W g

'!"4, J

%s

~T5

-,1 G s.

}

c Y

A"

%u p

.~

s 5

's

/

g

}

3,

[

~Yl kh"'ki$?4.

\\

o y4 o

_., y y _

4M Ws L

l Q s-.

7 J.m -'

gs.,

77,,,,,,,

b 6 L. \\.%

hq q

w%g.7g*&g,J pr'4 ' j&f&.

,l' f

.r-b'i' K c.

a

~

9 d.,,

A M 4f

~

+ n ut....s

,.?

ha

. ~- f. 2,(7 a g

"7 *[.f2o Eff N

's g sis jdio bd i

["

s s1 q e "f~/

.d

7 FIGURE 2-12

~ i'd8' 5

!g?l'

8at.a ' e AIRLINE ROUTES

'a

~

,Y.

,4

'hys-Pl'f f'

.,67,,~Pl

m srmas E j M_.

d;-E

.i..

IN VICINITY OF

~ i < = ' l%

1%

p2 T ~o,-

u nov =~ A h

./.

RUSSELLVlLLE Qmp J

L T

s s

e

='

P %

m

.L

[

c e

1 c

g

~'

5,

[

'I o

~

m.

o, =.

\\

Ma

/

~

f s.

ok i'c N

y,f-4 C bkn

/Jeae

~,

s ooss

\\

+5

a d

1 a rv j

s gu v) v Cts son h

9d,.,%,

prOi d H c.!,

i t

i i

N

/

,y

% y a.s,..

i

\\

a p'

_(

o.,,,,,,..-

,. ~. ( s.,..s...,

( F'1 r...~,

i g

0 p.

,,,,,,.g 0

T f

h cd' c~,

c_

t a

t.i.

g l

' cm., a o..

o..,,,,

s>...

a e

c

\\

9

..,.; d,

c.s -

[*m Q*"~

^

&?

j

\\

)

r' i

.v r

e

(

~

s

. ~ ~ s,m,

c..

r 3(

M~q a

~

( h

^

re 2 6 t'2.MJ 3

)

oc<aan-u 6

.. n s

m n

t.

e

< i.

/

\\

[e

(

ri a

'Q i

p}

Q ~(

j

/

\\

. ~,

"" /

0.Q,/

\\

' ' ~ ~

c

'm e,.,

y;g.yg h

^

cr

3

~-6 b=h

)-~

'/,,

M

- ~ l,/ _

~.s e

t i

/,,/

l','

3 o

/

s 6 r a,,.,.,., f, ilu\\ rt, I,..C.i'=.

l u,

i ' ' ',

' ' 'g' ' '.<>',t i.-

n

I 4

e, q,(I I

I N,,.. -, n.I Mj 1-.' '.j 2

ini,I s.e.,e.

I I

"P-a 8,4 C# '

y,+',.

-.rt.-- JV's~

,,,,,, fic. V. A.

us.u_

d

m. w.

r

< w sNgw

.A

,,e n,,

,,.,tn C,o, g

~

w t i u

~ g ts o un Cns =3

~.m.v an i

- e 'N

( %..

,.., 3. y

'p

' g,.

g,8y,o, a,...

l t-

,e 1

~

t.m,

q.

', w nrw a

\\I "o

6

.n.

.p

{,

,lV

,3 s

t

)

SCB14s04 AA

-,. _. m,ggg s

g c^'$ " u "

W8 L2 I

O r >>

s b'q(v,".

90ff o#'

g 'W, w

4:@

O~g

~

'4 t L ',

~

o g,,

,t y

u.. z

\\

~

A 22n

,.c "

M ~ +. y

,,u,y y

-.s \\

L11TLE R c--

V 4-

Qlsa,

, ii.Ztus ras 24 t'

'N no o i eso

,ggg"'"i' A

in snufs,'evs.

K j x

q 07V z

e O.

.1 n 272.

v-

'a

~'

\\

t e

tt

(,,

k

^ ' FttiCHE m

j

\\

s e00 16 er' GARRETT 32d 8

4-i set 10 uTTsAKT sT Q "Eh[

\\

..'\\

,/

- 'w'

,j(9 3.G.T a.c.*-

F e by City)

.5 s

o E-S

.A I

[ AC.

p.9,0, 6

O ne AD48 5.h >.

V0E n

4 70 w, X

,,, g_.,

H7

:IR E '

t,, tg oc,,,

a.

I" H87 W

M/

'{230 '{3 ' ~

$TIITTCAef

N A

.nore - Will Ch t9 IJ t'*.'

314 L A f

CAPPS 6._

~

9*

p{p s

,ga g4,,

1 g~,..

m

)

eso s

' W rlshtpVIH.

h 239 20

,,"W AAA I

3 (Dt0W '..

\\. "

h a

3

'E t

wtint CO

. ~...-

' %e

~~*---T.)---=--

,, t, O - Aa a, c.no..

imCit i

y S..an. '

-I

-

o s.a,

7

t=O (C.

HENDERSON (Pvt y - ' ' ' ' '/h 270 2

[

\\

220

'73 Iii'

,,' ', i 3,,

e

9 i:

I i1,i I.

Ii 92 p i i*

r-iii u

i i

1

' ()

f 2.,

"y'g

.N.11 s

f g

/

V e3 s~-

CD..

i

. ~,

.,O [ ?

ntisettson cert)

~-

f 203 26 m he i

~

N e.dfi.id -

7 p

g m.op femene.oe c,

/

w

.,c i, Toc.. 3

---O s

@t E

ass

/

ni a

~ ns.

etvins o mascu "3"ww p,N..f4,,

A f

)

f~..si..

j

[

/

y, L_s

[,p t

15-

'V 6w_

\\\\w e-2, 3

1

,-w.

M 009G t

ML19329E135

Text

Navigation menu

Search