ML19329D488

Requests FSAR & FSAR Amends

ML19329D488
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	03/16/1973
From:	Stebbins E AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML19329D482	List: ML19329D481 ML19329D485 ML19329D488
References
NUDOCS 8003090114
Download: ML19329D488 (1)

Text

.

^

T

' "' ~~~~- m 2 l%k ILQmg 140 Pubhc Square Cleveland. Ohio 44114. l~clephonc 731 088u,

-~

m

'e.

j

\\_

l Atemic Fr. orgy Commission DOCKEI: 50-3h6 Washington, D. C., 205h5 Gentlemen:

In reading the file of material en the Davis-Eesse !!uclear Power Plant, we note that Toledo F4ison has filed the Final Safety Analysis Report.

Will you please furnish us with a ecpy of the Final Safety Analysis Repert, and any further amendments thereto, as they beccme available.

Very truly yours,

)

. i' yd

>.h/An Evelyn ebbins, Chairman CITI2 IS FOR CLEAN AIR & WATER 705 amwcod P.d.

Rocky River, Ohio, hhll6 r

y p'

=.

/*

a 5

I 5 /e

'u

[Y D** %.. Q ~ sy., t he W -**

4 8

g E=wwa rp6 Mocoo6 o

M..,,,,

p 1 LL.A 8003090lI

• ~ M.

. CYM;im.n nin

3: -

e'.

I THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS P00R QUAUTY P L

'JAN

~31972 w ;.

a wu

.m.

L.

x & w n~ q "y w mw e,

x hr.m;ww w,5da v's x

8

't te1 vg 5

')p' 4

.?

(f.

Jerome... r *,C Kalur,'Esq..,g,'

1..

~

-t 4 *

• a Jamtsoni Ulrf ch,',Burkhal ter T....,.. <

~

s,..

~

.....,. n..

.3

, & Hesser.

s.

1425 Nattonal', City Bank, Building ' ^,

Cleveland,3..hio.44.114

,,u.

1ntt,n.._.

O

,1

.,a w-

~.

.n

-.sw

.,,s

.. -. a.... %..

, ~ m.,. >^ In the, Matter:of.The. Toledo Edfson Company and Thelt. A s, e n..

s.

.v v..

-; y w t.

L" $ ~.C W Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company.g.:' ';C17,'

..p 7, I, Q.,..D, avis..,B. esse Nuclear. Power Station L,36g,C', i;]..),y.

.gv z.

. Docket No; 50-346 % ~^ '~..,

V.a: u ;a (mg s

o. ?-

e q ; M p., y g. n r t P"f C C* CU" DJ NC O GTe [.. N EMNtdD p/,;

. 8U "'qe. s? Jag.t,g, j3g 3 gmg 7,.dmnetbc stur e.o 2.:t.

4s

.,a u.. 3 m,4 m.

a a.% %

n,

<4..

+ %

q, sm 9,,,

This is in,,esponse'to yourJ1etter"of; Deceder 8,'.1971, regarding the.

T r

y2.

Canudssion'sLDetermination not ~to' suspend constructfon activittesPat.

f

~

the: Davis-Besse..Nucl Station pend.ing comp.let, tori o.f the 'ongot.ag~ ~

,i s

IE,FA.e..n.,virn.m.nta.l,s,.e.ar J'omer.:

W.-e 4 g.'4 4 Qp,. ow of th. at~t.f,ac111ty.,..c,u.efuse nmeet,y-J ame re,.yt

.~

m~. g i

--<.x-. m'm#

uu o

u

- -N ff t

. fiap1j fg R

^."ada pourtlettar you stated tin.4 Nf6

- hp 4 3 M -u*4m*

m FC t on beh'alf of your,s,*w., clients coalition for' %

g

.s Wtd ~5afia Nuclear, Power And.. LIFE ypu destru tointer an objection.to the Can/ 1 p

?

P 7 f,; = alssfea'#'DeterufnattoCdated,Mo'vember 3D ~~.;1973.pfchW 'publishd fat.%

F ic

!W RWstatied"liW Je. ster,se b.ces6er;'4.";197,13I36'f.R.'23172)TJou~Ta'1 sit x..Q f theToderetJtegt TG 1 thatJnitsirulast16mi'6.& thatligeTdfd;ir# lpg.mcer ce 15ectfiin YTof/@s.&e.d 7wa tte mot;,1 stand 3cCro."qmest.a ne'ar4 ' am W

iSk30 E'

1a'Isccordnace tss a3.aiw dMyO f 7" ttfsig 'cmas

' la'alhetfirf tles'Jat' th Se

%WWL

@m%,de.1bieliG.OisN' 'an toJcontfnee,*

M Peiser g wgsin'atta& @gFMS p

,,,;7 -

,m,U ZMhWEsa.@g%p@

t=7 wety 9

C i

fi p;

w

_ ' isid

tie.

en a

r

~

k

- mae

-. 71-i.Wh

~

-,. r. e

~Q97et'at1 T t Tet e1 3cese an :

t n

t hQMour,1etter.ef,newese#w@s%' req % ee(vQpwm4?

ive6m>eena&

tuy (ve cegsfu444M ps r is.as71' yes ues thatme;g

( g@f.thei'Devis-Besse nuclear Power Staties' befo easiderettaalto the1rtens stated te en attached'vegainst'for suspenstesy% '

t My.s

%gspecifleClalectlan1ElefEMppendiz~3,3f.10 CFR PartL50ithe'detarednat g w Q t wpys7. "

nW.w&9actiftytV,,yropering our'Deterstnettaa un'andeEseerf. filertitsi p

r n, e,.g. <;., nn

. ~f 4 n

n w w.

M g.,, u 4, m,;.

w ' p u 9,. y,;n -i n /e m, m 3. w a: n,

, f. y q

3 ypgkw

.,a a.n L w a,q n..

w r s k.e-p w

y eu n 1,..

u ys w ^w "y y~~~ ~~~ "y nm

%m m 9

e e

ega m ngein u em-y.,

mm pg._.m; ( ; ' w} g %,

.g Q g%. g.G;g;tf g y g.{,

9

% ]Qy,'^'M i

s qw),3 72g > w w a. m. pygg

~ q Wemg q;

w-w a,3.m, g e no

%,_qe-m u_.u..

m.

ww a; %

m.aw.

~.g up 3-

.w,

C'ORL.nlLM2.4%:>L%2WNWM^n2?%

..w.htMhMd &.' ly%~?qice A '**M.4>-

I. M OSIS M.9-SS) M SW K + +M

. ; e tA s.r-

ennames arru

teso aram

• 4W;. is"m

, y%i d'/

2@%M 8003090109

.F 7

t Jerome S. Kalur, Esq. JAN 3 1972 these views into consideration.as reflected in the document entitled y~"

" Discussion and Findings by the Division of Reactor Licensing, U. S.

Atomic Energy Commission, Relating to the Consideration of Suspension Pending NEPA Environmental Review of the Construction Pemit for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station" dated November 30,1971, which set forth.the basis.for, the:Detemination not to suspend construction of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station.

u$ wh4 La h

' J :q

.This Detemination was not intended to be the final action by the Com-mission in those cases where interested members of the public were in disagreement with that Detemination. LAs_specified in'the Detamination, a mechanism is provided for; interested. members of.the public, such as

.,s your clients may be. considered with. respect to-the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, to request a~public hearing and to present evidence to

.< ~ ^

a presiding officer ~ on matters, itith' reference to Section~ E.2 of Appendix

- C

.D of 10,CFR Part 50, alleged to warrant ' detemination other than that a

N made by the Director of Regulation. On the basis of.the evidentiary.

k record;of such a heari1n..the. presiding.officericould independentlyg reachtan61nitiil.detem ation as to whether the Detaminationtef the

'E ',.

Director of Regulation.wastappmpriatemThis initial decision by.them

!y-presidismofficer.would.;othcoursachelsub,iect to further review by -

.the Commission before any Detemination would become finair 2

A h-

~ MW1'etisr; v6a stated that ce MQlf cf ye cliert;s CuGfrion for M.C D la, your.xletter.of;Novemberil9,d 971 hyou rstated your'. desire: Mat ysu'be - -

~ informed quickly/asjte.ourudetamination regarding!.the Davis-8 esse:d %

V7 ' V:

M M "NuclearsPower,Statio,n: construction, activities!so.thatnif necessiry.c - e,. ',

%C fyou:could availseerself<of thelhearingiopportunsty;providedain:

w@[g t

Section~ "

j p % D E:sf w$.gtien 5pendixWcdCaccord vithstbattreguestda copy uns transelttadi.te you me:Novembera30 (19714 'together witharcopyMi DF $M. m asa =i.su. w r.s.die

,.armd:t.rehe. swr e w@ M hyt%eep' M, %9seitptriUdYdiqMrdi&Mb %(S Nirt@ffadi. #Uach*Of WMM4I.dWE. Js40mSJrlt4Me)DeterlE Raticereflovember,30L1973cais$EtoeM@iz?

W S E % sus ructign tactivities Athef Devis-Besse;NuclearfPdaser;2tation M

MsR sourselt @theJrocedyre teetdorth 19shthafAutenulmatice@4M ga.n 1

dfD

1. id@ c)l.9arlap6 Seschnequestst umst nedl3ed$p l

Q$

JyJasyJ14ter dste Ashich thaionsumissiemiassipallser MMg2 g b # 4P#14 a

a % g,y c4 seques).A -

., Asod cause! Asset'llorAdditionalittme:withhMkhe@Mr w.

WWepateWei.tC41J,t,1,in.ifMSefeMachserJweedhgM/F yg g g,,,

3gygy yqqg7

u. m m w % [y y, & w m W o w w g s.w y m prM'. M M IU8t*,81e M W cttac M@@K,AyC M

IMh

%,y;in r ghrt dad g&p

= c n teny2pe eu,,j%qg.,fy,m,p)"E,fr stfn sefaente,rese:5gt g g g theJdetsmetyt W M p n

hWt awns,rgt.

g M g. eurneteen ;g,,,Le n e m% e m e gu sa Tass mm r

' #pgp t r osC F jg A r q W r iDn x 1 "._ o WN& -

• am en w.% D gein h.,did. D mn ym.,

y. w m s

1. m.c pp l

,[

,11s7h M M LP94untzing - #,#@"

hENN WMd4 l_y Frrfm, $1;3-72 g g.ghWp QWW.

W 6t M a we"W (fAWran

~ am 3

~9hamn ABC ste par,s.55) ABCM asas fu~rg m eu s.r---

reissT sa sireca: sem-euum &&f yMnf ; 9'g' *AWMA l

• -rWMM3 WT b _S_l'f W M f M O M; M E.E E D O M N e M @ M E.c.

Jkde.:JKEAnM.R

)

I

.s,

F e

e Jerome S. Kalur, Esq.

-2 these ylews into consideration as re Atomic Energy Cocnissio

" Discussion and Findings b Relating d Pending NEPA Environmental Review of Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station" da forth the basis for the Determination' the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station!

g3 v e sm m

Th'is Determination was not intended mission in those cases where interes disagreement with that Deteris1 a mechantsu is pmvfded for intemste your clients may be considered with g Power Station..to request a "public he>

a presiding officer on matters, with 3 D'of.10'CFR Part 50. alleged to warran made by the Dimetor of Regulation.

record of suchs hearing the'pYesid i

~

. reach"an' initial deterw nation asito Director' of. Regulation was 'appmpriate

. Prusidfog officer.'would/ off colirsh.1be' t

the, Commission before any Deterisinati L

tn yg.Mtur ;w und tret.oa w

[

l lie'johfletter"of Noyes6eifjpp3971yy

'y ?,,..,11aforised"quicklyJ'asWourYdeterminat14

F O,M Nicla~ r! Power'5tation constructien acti e

t pA Myehtees10a'vaf17 ourself.ofJtherbsa~rfig Q

EM Apphadixit.Vla accWirtth'that'1 QA[.il :

Stttufwasitran~salttedet#:

t vanW es

[@t@g h@$fiS. DEN 1 h

a of'the'.?81 scission'innF adi " % decisms Tu ige yse g eysser O Gf.

q$c$

etsvits w.e t w n ses*hetitavstrysikselfr i;gura g;?Jah r

'y e m % geums Wtictu

ANf'

. Dr Y siq/3 ster

• saged iI

~

'Mari t

C;w@cobec'k.c muntz n r,Pra m % ~. %.,s.

e-t n

.p u

co w v

~

i M

.k N"3@%] $E: Team 10GCgt les :B

' I.

3

$ pfstM.HKShaperfs is6 MWy}, ' '

:tc!h hyM-te4 4166y@kNVarf1 TEEN ihayoy "

n %

g y l m Rowden pities 5

(Mg ve.. w m 4..

ew

a... n..- n m,..n y.

a

, scow wp Y

? ' : DGC&W

%+?:S R:'DR 2 9

E&

EEngelhy,Pm4 flg:SNas gg4 ggg

, hf w _Wsh a * : WW LMunti gg.;@g 6 1; 3 9 2 @ y Mggg.?

g3gM

-1 M&d%' AbMQin:t L e m W.k

'_ ' ?& Sk&j;&L;)

-~