ML19329D407

Reply of Toledo Edison Co & Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co to Requests of s Gannis.Requests Should Be Granted. Certificate of Svc Encl

ML19329D407
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	02/02/1973
From:	Charnoff G CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE, TOLEDO EDISON CO.
To:	US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 8003050994
Download: ML19329D407 (3)

Text

.

. -s

1. st-73 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

~

In the Matter of )

)

THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY, )

AND THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ) Docket No. 50-346 ILLUMINATING COMPANY )

)

(Davis-Besse Nuclear Power )

Station) )

REPLY OF THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY AND THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY TO REQUESTS OF STEVE GANNIS

1. On January 30, 1973, the Atomic Energy Commission ,

(" Commission") received a letter from Steve Gannis requesting

" official and absolute permission to intervene according to the law to make a statement" and requesting " permission to be-come a formal legal party" in the captioned proceeding.

2. As a petition for leave to intervene, the request meets none of the requirements of S2.714 of the Commission's Rules of Practice. The request fails to set forth contentions and fails to set forth the interest of Mr. Gannis in the pro-ceeding, how that interest may be affected by the result of the proceeding, and the facts and reasons why he should be permitted to intervene as required by 10 C.F.R. S2.714(b). In addition, Mr. Gannis has failed to supply the required supporting affidavit identifying the specific aspect or aspects of the subject matter soos ou ffy C

, . . . ~ -,

as to which intervention is sought and setting forth with particularity both.the facts pertaining to his interest and the basis for any contentions. Leave to intervene should therefore be denied.

3. The Toledo Edison Company and the Cleveland

./

Electric Illuminating Company would have no objection to Mr. Gannis' participation in the proceeding by means of limited appearance.

Respectfully submitted, SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE f\ ('

By k \( ,. \ ' . .

\i s.- ..-

Gerald Charnoff //

Counsel for Toledo Edison. Company and the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Dated: February 2, 1973

/

n-

n_

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION In the Matter of )

)

THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY, )

AND THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ) Docket No. 50-346 ILLUMINATING COMPANY )

)

(Davis-Besse, Nuclear Power )

Station) )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of " Reply of the Toledo Edison Company and the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company to Requests of Steve Gannis" were served upon the following, by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, this 2nd day of February, 1973:

Mr. Frank Karas, Chief (21) Martin Malsch, Esq. (6)

Public Proceedings Branch Office of General Counsel Office of the Secretary U. S. Atomic Energy Commission U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D. C. 20545 Washington, D. C. 20545 Atomic Safety and Licensing (1) Mr. Steve Gannis (1)

Board Panel 4254 Hickory Lane U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Warrensville Heights, Ohio 44128 Washington, D. C. 20545 f

h 1 L t.+ x

- -c Dennis Ardi l

Dated: February 2, 1973 )

I I

I