ML19329D349
| ML19329D349 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse, Perry  |
| Issue date: | 02/25/1976 |
| From: | Duncan W DUNCAN, BROWN, WEINBERG & PALMER |
| To: | Reynolds W SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003050945 | |
| Download: ML19329D349 (3) | |
Text
'
.,/47W CfH~d 7tCattl Mtunf f$$
bite?'
SUITC 777 WALL ACC L.OUNCAN
,8700 PCN NSYLVANIA AVCNQC, N. W.
CD AfeO WC NOC AG WASHINGTON, O. C. 20006
((*g *, y,3 jo3gpg FRCOR'CK D. PALMCR FRCOCRICK L. MILLCR, JR.
@ O2)296-4325 ISO NORTH LA SALLC Sf 4C CT JAY 84. WCf LL CHICAGO,ILLIhoss so60s TCLCX 09-7445 08WP WSH NN QI hff %
February.25, 1976 8
,oc,.
was g
z.
2 MAR 11976 > f l
9 e,.,. m #
w.. s w William Bradford Reynolds, Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge g4
$p 1800 "M" Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20036 Re:
Tn the Matt'cr of the Toledo Edison Company and the Cleveland Electric Ill.uminating ComAgutyretc.
NRC Docket Nos. Ma-;46A.,
50-500A, 50-501A, 50-440A, 50-441A.
'c. - Mr. Reynolds :
Some time ago, I cont. acted you regarding the subpoena issued oy fae Commission at the request of your clients to American Muni-i 11 I'c<cr-Ohio,'Inc. in the above-captioned proceedings.
On or about the return date of the subpoena,'I advised that
-lient, Mr. John C. Engle, President, AMP-Ohio, had made a ch of the files of AMP-Ohio to determine whether such no. Tent ser "il s coa._acd tatorial which might fall within the scope of the sul. ena.
Mr. 1..gle has forwarded the within-enclosed documents spon;c to the subpoena.
the time I contacted you, you were.in the process of moving st a t, our iirm's new offices at 1800 "M" Street, N.W., and you
.dv5. sed chat it was not then convenient to pick up the documents prot.uced for inspection.
For your. convenience and to ensure that our c.'.icnt has complied
. _ t). the terms and conditions of the subpoena, I am enu'.osing copics of L11 document s produced by Mr. Engle on behalf. of AMP-Ohio Opi reviewing the documents enclosed, you may conclude th e e
the docta.,cnts produced are technically bp> ond - the scope of the su'a-
..sh_ng to :coperate with the Commission's current investi-a-
e cn, Mr. Engic has provided everything which might conceivably soososo7yg
/'t
William Bradford Reynolds, quir'e Febru y n, n/o be cov2 red by the request.
With respect to your request for documentation of the " commit-cent' made by the Power Authority of the State of New York to pro-vide some 30,000 kilowatts of PASNY power to AMP-Ohio, perhaps I can cla'rify the matter for you and the other parties.
In this regard, competing applications were filed by AMP-Ohio, Allegheny Electric Cooperative in Petinsylvania and by the Public Service Board of the State of Vermont.
When AMP-Ohio discovered that C1cveland Electric' Illuminating Company was unwilling to voluntarily wheel PASNY power to the City of Cleveland, Ohio for the account of AMP-Ohio, AMP-Ohio and A11'egheny entered into an agreement which, in effect, merged the AMP-Ohio and Allegheny applications to PASNY.
once AMP-The Allegheny-AMP-Ohio Agreement contemplates that, Ohio secures the necessary whccling privileges, Allegheny will celcase, subject to approval of PASNY, so'mc 22.7 megawatts from the thirty megawatt allocation to AMP-Ohio.
In the meantime,
, Allegheny would have the use of the 30 megawatt allocation for its exclit.cive use.
Gince PASNY was advised of these developments.during the pen-e.1cy'of the applications, PASNY never ruled or passed upon AMP-S..i.'.
initisi application dventually, PASNY approved the Allegheny application while, tt th : s..e time, recognizing the existence of the Allegheny-AMP-ic.graem:nt.
Jhc Vermont Public Service Board filed a Complaint with the the Federal Power Commis-c 1 Pov e Commission requesting that
.d.N. se ;e entitled, State of Vermont Public C.:rvice Board v.
of the State of New York, F % Docket No. E-8746.
ic. Authw 1
13, 19,3, the Picsiding Administrative Law Judge issued
.kly ccision which af firms PASNY'-s allocation to Allegheny.
itial on Txc.ptiens have been filed by the parties in Docket No.
.3
'clo
.-67 t 5 anc tr.c case is new pending b^ fore the Commission.
You may fina the Initial Decision of *.he Administrative Law
-iul e in Docket No. E-8746 instructive,and I am 6nclosing a copy I'r our files and information.
I particularly invite your atten-to the discussion appearing at pp. 19-21 regardi.'
de inte-cl o:
us s of AMP-Ohio. ~
D
~
l A "0[00tq.
~
--44um uraaford Reynvadsl Esquire
" age Three February 25, 197'6 If w subpoena,e can be of further assistance 'in complying w please let me know.
your Si
- re1y,
- p-w w-Wallace L. Duncan WLD:dep Enclosures Wf1iam n
?, Esquire All Parties
, Esquire
/
~
l 1
O9' O
6S S
gr 0 u&'tN'A 8
D ae o
-