ML19329C989

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Motion for Leave to File Applicants' Joint Brief Supporting Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML19329C989
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse, Perry  Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 08/30/1976
From: Reynolds W, Zahler R
CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE, TOLEDO EDISON CO.
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML19329C990 List:
References
NUDOCS 8002240008
Download: ML19329C989 (6)
v • d • e


Text

-_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

s UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the Matter of ) .-

THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY and )

THE CLEVELAND E ~RIC ILLUMINATING ) Docket No. 50-346A

~

COMPANY )

(Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, )

. Unit 1) )

)

THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING )

COMPANY, ET AL. ) Docket Nos. 50-440A (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, ) 50-441A Units 1 and 2) )

)

THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY, ET AL. )

(Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, ) Docket Nos. 50-5004 Units 2 and 3) ) 50-501A APPLICANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

1. Pursuant to Section 2.730 of the Commission's Rules of Practice, Applicants hereby request leave to file the accom-panying " Applicants' Joint Brief In Support Of Their Proposed Findings Of Fact And Conclusions Of Law." Such a supporting brief is contemplated by Section 2.754 (a) of the Commission's Rules and is essential to an understanding of the legal and factual analysis sustaining Applicants' Proposed Findings and Conclusions.
2. At the close of the hearing, the Chairman directed all parties to limit their Proposed Findings and Conclusions to a specific number of pages -- 250 pages for Applicants 8002 24o eo? iv

+

. (Tr. 126 8 5-8 6) . Applicants were able to meet this limitation only by framing their ultimate fact and legal statements without inclusion of the essential record evaluation and legal analysis sustaining Applicants' positions. For this reason, a supporting brief explaining ~our view of the evidence which was accumulated during this seven-month hearing, and ana'lyzing that evidence in light of the applicable legal principles and relevant case law, was deemed imperative in order to apprise this Board fully of the state of the record.

I 3. The undersigned counsel had fully anticipated that the page limit imposed on Proposed Findings And Conclusions would not permit Applicants to treat adequately the matters in contro-versy and the numerous allegations thereunder (Tr. 12685-88). ,

After voicing his concern, the following exchange took place (Tr. 1268 8-8 9 ) :

[MR. REYNOLDS]: I guess the way to proceed isoto come back with a re-quest for leave of the Board to file a brief that includes extra pages, if indeed it looks like that's going to be necessary.

[ CHAIRMAN RIGLER] : I agree.

4. Based on that understanding, and the Commission's Rules permitting the filing of briefs.in support of Proposed -

Findings And Conclusions, Applicants.have diligently and care-fully prepared the accompanying brief. We ask that this Board grant Applicants leave to file their Joint Supporting Brief. We

- believe_it will aid this Board immeasurably in reaching the correct decision in this proceeding.

Respectfully submitted, SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE

, )l ^

By: (vI c . h %.s v( c~_i.-

.- D ;

Wm. Bradford Reynolds Robert E. Zahler Counsel for Applicants i

r i l

'l 1

i Dated: August 30, 1976

-. . _ _ __ \

t UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the Matter of ) ,

)

THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY and )

THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING ) Docket No. 50-346A COMPANY )

(Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, )

Unit 1) ) .

)

THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING )

COMPANY, ET AL. ) Docket Nos. 50-400A

- (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, ) 50-401A Units 1 and 2) )

)

THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY, ET AL. )

(Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, ) Docket Nos. 50-500A Units 2 and 3) ) 50-501A CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the for6 going

" Applicants' Motion For Leave To File" were served upon each of the persons listed on the attached Service List, by hand delivering a copy to those in the Washington, D.C.

Srea and by mailing a copy, postage prepaid, to all others, a.1 on this 30th day of August, 1976.

SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE By: A k sh  ;

Wm. Bradford Reynolds i l Counsel for the Applicants l

l l

l l

l l

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the Matter of )

)

THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY and )

THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING ) Docket No. 50-346A COMPANY )

(Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, )

Unit 1) )

)

THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING )

COMPANY, ET AL. ) Docket Nos. 50-440A (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, ) 50-441A Units 1 and 2) )

)

THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY, ET AL. )

(Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, ) Docket Nos. 50-500A Units 2 and 3) ) 50-501A SERVICE LIST Douglas V. Rigler, Esq. Docketing & Service Section Chairman, Atomic Safety and Office of the Secretary Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Foley, Lardner, Hollabaugh Washington, D. C. 20555 and Jacobs -

Chanin Building - Suite 206 Joseph,Rutberg, Esq.

Office of the Executive Legal Director )

Ivan W. Smith, Esq. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission )

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Washington, D. C. 20555 l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l Washington, D. C. 20555 Joseph J. Saunders, Esq. '

Antitrust' Division John M. Frysiak, Esq. Department of Justice Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Washington, D. C. 20530 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Steven M. Charno, Esq.

Melvin G. Berger, Esq.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Janet R. Urban, Esq.

Board Panel Antitrust Division U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Department of Justice Washington, D. C. 20555 P. O. Box 7513 Washington, D. C. 20044 l

l I

w

l 1

1 Reuben Goldberg, Esq. Thomas J. Munsch, Esq.

David C. Hjelmfelt, Esq. General Attorney Michael D. Oldak, Esq. Duquesne Light Company Goldberg, Fieldman & Hjelmfelt 435 Sixth Avenue Suite 550. Pittsburgh, PA 15219 1700 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. _ _ , _ _ , ______ _

Washington, D. C. 20006 David McNeil Olds, Esc.

Vincent.C._Campanella, Esq. ~

Reed Smith Shaw & McClay Director of Law Union Trust Building Robert D. Hart, Esq. Box 2009 1st Assistant Director of Law Pittsburgh, PA 15230 City of Cleveland 213 City Hall Lee A. Rau, Esq.

Cleveland, Ohio 44114 Joseph A. Rieser, Jr., Esq.

Reed Smith Shaw & McGlay Frank R. Clokey, Esq. ..S u i.t e 9 0 0 Special Assistant 1150 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.

Attorney General Washington, D. C. 20036 Room 219 Towne House Apartments Edward A. Matto, Esq.

Harrisburg, PA 17105 Richard M. Firestone, Esq.

Karen H. Adkins, Esq.

h ghh' bee $siabe)'Jr.,Esq.

WSllamJ. Kerner, Esq Antitrust Section 30 E. Broad Street, 15th Floor The Cleveland Electric Columbus, Ohio 43215 Illuminating Company 55 Public Square Christopher R. Schraff, Esq.

Cleveland, Ohio 44101

- ~~ ^

Assistant Attorney General

~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 7 Environmental Law Section

, i 361 E. Broad Street, 8th Floor Michael M. Briley, Esq. Columbus, Ohio 43215 Roger P. Klee, Esq.

Paul M. Smart, Esq. James R. Edgerly, Esq.

Fuller, Henry, Hodge & Snyder Secretary and General Counsel P. O. Box 2088 Pennsylvania Power Company Toledo, Ohio 43603 One East Washington Street l New Castle, PA 16103 Russell J. Spetrino, Esq.

Thomas A. Kayuha, Esq. John Lansdale, Esq.

Ohio Edison Company Cox, Langford & Brown 47 North Main Street 21 Dupont Circle, N.W.

Akron, Ohio 44308 Washington, D. C. 20036 Terence H. Benbow, Esq. Alan P. Buchmann, Esq.

A. Edward Grashof, Esq. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey Steven A. Berger, Esq. 1800 Union Commerce Building

~~ Steven B. Peri, Esq. Cleveland, Ohio 44115 Winthrop.,_ Stim _ son _, Putnam

& Roberts 40 Wall Street ._

New York, New York 10005

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19329C989&oldid=2359273"