ML19329C802

Recommends That Util Be Requested to Amend Section 17.2 of FSAR to Comply W/Encl AEC Positions Re QA by 741014

ML19329C802
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	09/06/1974
From:	Vollmer R US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:	Schwencer A US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 8002190913
Download: ML19329C802 (2)

Text

f fS J o [mB D

Ib)flf5'j'II[3I' DISTRIBUTION Docket No. 50-346

! O j,l(0, l \\ !

!- 1t, Docket File l

'J QAB Reading SEP 6 '971 A. Sc.ntencer, Gief, PWR Project Branch 2-3, L 5

STAFF 10SITIONS: DAVIS EESSE NUCLEAR P0hTR STATICN, QUALITt ASSURANCE Plant Name:

Davis Besse Nuclear Power Staticn Licensing Stage:

CL Docket Number:

50-346 Responsible Branch and Project Manager:

LXR 2-3, I. Peltier Roquested Completion Date:

Septc=ber 6, 1974 Description of Response:

FSAR A*::endrent Review Status:

Awaiting Infor=ation We have reviewed the Toledo Edison Cc:apany (E) description of their Quality Assurance (QA) Program for Orcrations as presented in Amend:nent Number 22 in Section 17.2 of the FSAR for the Davis Eesse Nuclear Power Station. E did not include an acceptabic descriptica of a QA Program for Operations which satisfies all the rcquirements of Appendix B, 10 CFR Part 50. ne areas of deficiency are as noted in the enclosed Positicn Statement.

E should be requested to a:nend Secticn 17.2 of the FS.G for the Davis Besse Nucicar Power Staticn to satisfy the enclosed staff positions.

mis additicnal infon::ation is required by Cctcber 14, 1974 Richard !!. Vollmer, Chief Quality Assurance Branch Directorate of Licensing

Enclosure:

Position Statement j

cc: w/o enclosure A. Giambusso

'.' / '[

W. pennnald f

~

R. u s er n.

. m - u g (-j w/mclosurel J. Gilray

.g..

7......... g..

g g.....{,.Peltjer-Rgi ol)Jfery OmCE >

V. Mooro SC p W :bp

'JGilray 4.n=mdn*

'/pd....

....t D. Eisenhut s.........

%URNaest >

04TE >

kb...

Forta AEC-Sts IRev 9-53) AFCM 0240 eo

.es ie-stess.: eede s 8 g 21 QQ

i SEP 619N 41-1 41.0 CHAI.ITY A9:!!!W:E The Toledo Tdison Ce:vnv (TE) bm not adequately described their Quality Assurance (CA) Progran for Operations for the Davis Besse Nuclear Pcwer Staticn in Jerendment Ntc.ber 22, which revised Secticn 17.2 of the ESAP. Td is requested to mcnd Sectien 17.2 of the Fair for the Davis Ecsse Nuclear Power Station to satisfy the following staff positicns.

41.1(RSP)

We require TE to show the Station Review Ecard and the Ccmpany (17.2.1)

Nuclear P.evieu Doard en Figure 17-2 and indicate the reporting levels of both of these boards.

41.2(PSP)

We require TE to identify the manacen at position responsible (17.2.2.1) for the final review and approval of tne Davis l' esse QA Program and QA Manual.

41. 3(RSP)

We require TE to describe thode provisicas established for (17.2.2.1) certunicating to all responsibic organizaticns and individuals that quality policies, manuals, and procederes are mandatory requirenents which must be i;plemented and enforced.

41.4 0lSP)

We require TTi to de=cnstrate the framework for the irplementatien of (17.2) 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, by cross referencing each QA procedure in Table 17-4 to the criteria of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B.

41.5(P2P) 1le require Td to identify the individuals or groups respons! hie (17.2.2) for revieuing ar.d apprx im; prior to u -

those QA/QC doct:w:::

and procedures addreuM in Section 17.2.

41. 6 0'JP)

TE has not adequately described the independence requirementz (17.2.10) imposed on inrpection per m 'm1.

Je require TE to full'. de.. '.

the m.gendence rcqua uc.as L..poseu en those ir liv.h.uali o.

ren -

perfo1Tain; acceptance in0Ci'.cd or Verif5 Cation on Safety ' J I' 'C 2 activities asseciated

.it..)

uicc maintenance, mcdificati:ns,

repairs and identif:. 'le n Up pri2arily respCnSible for per cr.li this acecptance ir: pectic..

I l

g

\\c, &s I

i I

g~

I n

, i m

~ '

I, I I l

05,,

i i

s Ii l

.)

L^ s 1 1 a

s