ML19329C756
| ML19329C756 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 01/11/1974 |
| From: | Stello V US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Moore V US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8002190874 | |
| Download: ML19329C756 (2) | |
Text
.
%rlfot h. 3 a.;.
Docket No. 50-346 Voss A. Moore Assistant Director for L'dR's Group 2. L RESPONSE TO STN! CARD REVIE'd ASSIGE1ENT - DAVIS-BESSE TiUCLEAR P0',iER STATIO.'1, REVIEW CF FSAR CHAPTERS 13 i 14 Applicant: Toledo Edison Cxpany Licensing Stage: CL 3rancn & Project !!anager Requesting Assistance:
lwr 2-3. I. A. Peltier Tecnnical Review Brancn Involved: L:053 Requested Completion Date: January 1974 Review Status: Q2 The attacned report contains information requests and/or position state.ments relative to our review of the suoject SAM for transmittal to the applicant in accordance with the review schedule. The applicant recognizes that the following infomation requests, foraarded January 13, 1973, are still outstanding:
13.l.3.2 (resume for fiftn Shift Forecan only),13.7 (submission of tne Industrial Security Plan), and 14.1 (test sequence schedule for preoperational, startup, and power ascension tests).
%n,1 mmy w n,a;,
Victor Stello, Jr., Assistant Director for Reactor Safety Directorate of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
S. Hanauer J. Hendrie A. Giambusso W. Mcdonald S. Varga A. Schwencer I. A. Peltier R. H. Hous t.sn C. R. Van Niel DISTRIBUTION: Docket, L Rdg., 0SB Rdg., Elva Leins
\\
l' L:GS8 L:QSO. M-L;^/j%
l P.:,r 4 iL-omer*
__CRVanhTe1:Io Kahoustor. _. m iiu v
s v===>
1// /74 1/7/74 1/... / 74
/
- amo, l
,,,,, m,in. m m ca.o
- a c=*
a***'
8 0 02190 S?f
._.. ~ _ _ _ _
m m
i
)
j Davis-Casse Cuclear Po.ter Station Docket No. 50-345 i
i s
13.0 Ccnduct of Operations Information Requests 1.
Has an arrangement in writing been reached wi th the Ottawa County l
Sr.2ri f f's Depart.ren t?
If so, provida a copy in Appendix C of tha i
2.
Do each cf the Shif t Foremen hava a high schoci diploma or equivalent as required by AliSI NTS.l?
I i
j 3.
':ill a written chartar be provided for the Cem;any Nucl23r Review l
Soard as required by A:lCI MIG.7, Section 4.2?
Position Statement i
c.
Tha ans,ier to part C of Quastion 13.3.5 is unacceptable. Offsite support groups should be at least alerted when a Sita Emargency occurs.
i 1
If the Site Emergency shoul<1 then degrade into an Of fsite Emarg+ncy, the alerted offsita scopert ircups would be 'cetter grapared to irmediately provide an i measures required to protect the public, favise Section 2.2.2 0 : the Emergency Plan to includa such nocification.
I 1
I t
s
)
i 1
i r
l
.,r--..
_ - ~.,.,.-
-1 e