ML19329C701
| ML19329C701 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 10/14/1971 |
| From: | Charnoff G, Hauser D, Henry L TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
| To: | US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19329C702 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8002180197 | |
| Download: ML19329C701 (2) | |
Text
'
w 00CKU NUMBER i
ER00. & UI1L, FAC. 50-%6S UIIITED STATES OF A" ERICA ATOMIC EITERGY COMMISSION A N '8T M T
'WD In the Matter of
)
)
THE TOLEDO EDISOIT COM"rIIY and
)
THE CLEVELAIID ELECTRIC ILLUMIIIATIITG)
Docket Iio. 50-346 COMPA!iY
)
b
/$"/y'- ff' Davis-3 esse Nuclear Power Station
)
SEPARATE AI!S'IER OF THE TOLEDO EDIS0!! COMPA:TY TO PETITI0I! TO I: ITER 7E:IE OF TEE CITY OF CLEVELAI!D AND TO AMEI!DME:IT TO PETITICII TO I:!TERVINE OF THE CITY OF CLEVELA!D On July 6, 1971, the Cdty of Cleveland, Ohio (Petitioner) filed a " Petition to Inter'rene" requesting a grant of intervention and that the Atonic Energy Connission (Connission) hold a hearing on antitrust considerations associated with the activity authorized under construction permit No. CPPR 80 uthorizing construction of the Davis-Besse Nucles-.%wer Station (Davis-3 esse) by The Toledo Edison Compe-/ (Tr.;) and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating T-upa-/ (CEI).
3y a letter dated July 9, 19,71, the Attorney General, pur-suant to Section 103 (c). of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, cdvised the Con =ission that an antitrust hearing would not be required in this pr.oceeding.
8002180 /7 7 1
/>7
?,"
t Subsequently, the Petitioner filed an amendment to its Petition to Intervene dated July 27, 1971.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 3ection 2.102 (d) of the Commission's 1
" Rules sf Practice", the Attorney General's advice wab published j
in the Federal Register the lth day of~ September, 1971.
i i
1 l
Davis-Besse is and is to be owned by TZ and CEI as tenants in common, each owning separately undivided interests in the respective percentages of 52 1/25 and h7 1/2%.
~
i Petitioner's Petition to Intervene and the Amendment there-to contain no allegations vi.atsoever of any facts involving activities of TE under any license from this Com=ission which would or could create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the antitrust laws.
WHEREFORE The Toledo Edison Company respectfully requests 4
that said intervention be denied and dismissed as to it as a matter of law and without hearing.
4 Respectfull;r submitted, I lf
,Al l Nl$) \\ M ck u i Gerald Charnoff f _M M Donald H. Hauser / Leslie Henry / Dated: October 14, 1971 ' Counsel for The Toledo Edison Ccmpany i ? i ..}}