ML19329C700

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
AEC Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Petition to Intervene of City of Cleveland,Oh
ML19329C700
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse 
Issue date: 10/20/1971
From: Liedquist R
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 8002180196
Download: ML19329C700 (2)


Text

.__ _

/

'q, mau t,umn

/7 "jp,,3 w

soo. a uut. nc. se m+

c

~

GCT 221971 "T-CI 1

M

-d llITED STATES OF AMERICA gg * $.1

{6;\\

'onn er en iTOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION t.u r

'm$

/

N,

/5 k/g4i]to,(\\

p g

g BEFORE THE CC"!!ISSI0il

.c In the Matter of

)

y N ij(f h

)

Docket fio. 50-346p p' 0072 71973, 3 THE TOLEDO [ DIS 0!! C0i' pally and

)

THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATIf4G ).

UtJ=icaan COMPAilY

)

/ f-R '//,

f**8 ^

)

8u%

(Davis-Besse iluclear Pcwcr Station) )

y e

GTICU OF AEC REG'JLATORY STAFF FOR EXTEi'STON CF TI"E TO A.' W T R 'ITITICN TO I';TER'iENE OF THE CITY OF CLE'/ ELAND. CHIO Cn Jal_. E. 1971 the Pitj of Cleveland, Ohio, (petitioner) filed a "i'e t. 'a en to In'.arfaie" und a rcquest for a hearing on the ontitrust aspr t3 of tile application panding in the captioned c.atter.

On July 27, IT'l. pr.i tionar fi!cd an "knendment to Petition to Intervene" in v:hich i t arcsen t.ed information to supple:nent its request of July 5,1971.

In an_..ers filed July 19 and August 6,1971, the staff roccinmended that consideration of petitioner's requests be held in abeyance until publica-tion of the At'.crr.ey General's cntitrust advisory letter pursuant to 10CFR52.102cftheCam:nission's"RulesofPractice"andtheelapseof the subsequan'. pericd for filing petitions to intervene and requests fcr an antitrust hearing.

On Septeater 4,197i, the Ccnmission published the Attorney General's advisory letter concerning the pending application in the Federal Register, together with a notice providing thirty days within which interested parties might file petitior.s to intervene and requests for an antitrust hearing.

,4 8007 iso g

~. s By letter to regulatory staff counsel dated Octcot-r 4,197i, at;tiener stipulated that both the staff and applicant might have fif teen.ijs within which to respond to the petition to interver,c e.s amended.

Pursuant to CFR 52.7111, the staff requests the C;rmission te e2. tend tne tin:e for filing an answer to the City of Clevelarj': pcti tion for leave to intervene, as amended, to and including Novemoi.c 5, 1971.

In r.upport cf tra ce,uest, the s taf f st.h:li ts the fcilcuing:

(.)

The st af f ius rcasen to believe tha t actions

.e t-an by the peti tioner and aoplicant, Cleveland Elec:r c ' il L.i:.a t,:. L. :-

i p;ry,.ithin the next t..o. seeks c:ay have.i. iter

.1 l a ri nc or. the s taf f's posi tion regarding the need #cr an :.n _i.rus t u.ci y in g

tne ma tter.

(b) Ccusal for the applicants ar.d the peti t:;nar nave inisc~.cc '.ne staff th t they do not cbject to this re;ucct for an e>:ter,sion of time.

Respectfully submitteJ

  • /

f.

/

Robert E. cienqu t

An ti tru - C m.

"1

^

Datec at Bethesda, Maryland, this 20th day of Cctober,1971.