ML19329B761
| ML19329B761 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 08/17/1978 |
| From: | Haass W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Stolz J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8002060777 | |
| Download: ML19329B761 (2) | |
Text
_.....
. ; 2 y - ----,. ____.
O g k e -h 50 - 3 M DLSTRIBUTION:
Docket File QAB Projects QAB Chron. File g 171978 DJSkovholt, DPM RCDeYoung, DPM h
JConway, QAB FAllenspach, QAB Docket No. 50-346 JGilray, QAB RMcDermott, QAB BBelke, QAB MEMORANDUM FOR:
John F. Stol::, Chief, Light Water Reactors Branch No.1, Division of Project Management FROM:
Walter P. Haass, Chief, Quality Assurance Branch, Division of Project Management
SUBJECT:
FIRE PROTECTION REVIEW: DAVIS BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 1 - QUALITY ASSURANCE BRANCH Applicant: Toledo Edison Company Licensing Stage: Fire Protection Review Responsible Branch: LWR #1 Project Manager:
L. Engle Review Status: Q-l's Complete The Quality Assurance Branch has evaluated Sections A-1 (Personnel) and C (Quality Assurance Program) of Table 4-1 of the Toledo Edison Company's " Fire Hazard Analysis Report," Revision 1. for the Davis Besse Station, submitted with the Roe /Boyd letter da ted January 11, 1978.
A request for additional infomation relative to these sections is enclosed.
Of@nel signed by:
J..W. Gilray Walter P. Haass, Chief Quality Assurance Branch Division of Project Management
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Infomation cc w/ enclosure:
L. Engle, LWR #1 D. Vassallo, LWR
~
P. Matthewr, DSS I\\~~
V. Leung DSS h
\\.m DPM:QAB DPM:QAB M.h A)hQgg hPM:fABO wn,
knway:gt FAllenspa} [)Gilray kcDM[t' WPHaass
/ h/78 8// 7/78 8//]/78 8/h)78 8//7/78 o,,,
mc-mm. h y 800206077 7
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
~
DAVIS BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNI". N0.1 1.
The Quality Assurance (QA) program for fire protect'r, should be under the management control of the QA organization This control consists of (1) formulating or verifying that a fire protection QA program incorporates sJitable requirements and is acceptable to management responsible for fire protection and (2) verifying the' effectiveness of the QA program for fire protection through review, surveillance, and audit. Revise your submittal contained in Revision 1 to the Fire Hazard Analysis Report for the Davis Besse Station to clarify that the QA program for fire protection is under the management control of QA, or provide.an alternative position for the staff's evaluation.
2.
Mr. Vassallo's letter of August 29, 1977 on fire protection provides supplemental guidance on QA. Modify your submittal contained in Revision 1 to the Fire Hazard Analysis Report for the Davis Besse Station to be responsive to the latest supplemental guidance on QA for fire protection or provide an alternative for the staff's evaluation. We note that if the fire protection QA program criteria are met as part of the QA program (Chapter 17 of FSAR) which meets Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, it is not necessary to submit a detailed description for NRC review.
f 3.
Your description in Section A, Table 4-1, of you" submittal relative to your compliance with the " Guidelines" in Appendix A to BTP 9.5-1 1,
'i does not provide adequate infonnation on your fire protection organi-zation for us to complete our review. Therefore, please provide the following information:
a.
Describe the upper level offsite management position (s) that has the overall responsibility and the direct responsibility for the formulation, implementation, and assessment of the i
effectiveness of the fire protection program.
i l
b.
Describe the onsite managcment position that has overall l
responsibility for the fire protection program.
c.
Describe the reporting chain for the Fire Marshal.
d.
Describe the responsibility of your " shift" Fire Captain relative to that of the shift Foreman for activities that might affect safety-related equipment, systems, or components.
i I
. _. a t. __.. _ -
..