ML19329B163

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Criteria for Class IE Conduit to Amplify Note 9 of FSAR Figure 8-20A.Supercedes Criteria in Util to NRC
ML19329B163
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse 
Issue date: 02/07/1977
From: Roe L
TOLEDO EDISON CO.
To: Stolz J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
205, NUDOCS 8001300733
Download: ML19329B163 (3)


Text

NflC PC.,u 195 N

U.s. NUCLEAn KEGULATOPY *

' MISSION DOCKET NUM ER c.a ss SO - 3 '/ 6 NRC DISTRIBUTION ron PART 50 DOCKET MATERIAL FROM:

DATE OF CCC Toledo Edison Co MEfT,yy TO: Mr J F Stol 7'

Toledo, Ohio L E Roe

/

oATE RECEIVED SCITTER O NoToRizEo Pron isruT FORM NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED 20miciNAL

' EUNC LAS$17 t E D

- m Copy one signed

~

DESCRIPTION ENCLOSU RE Ltr transmitting info concerning open item with regard to electrical separation criteria

~

2p

-(

PLANT NAME:

Davis Besse dl SAFETY FOR ACTION /INFORMATION cm7 Tun 2-11-77 ehf

/ ASSIGNED AD:

W s s o //O A M MTr_N7n A n.

/ BRANCH CHIEFr Sfolf RDAMeti f'MTTP.

E m /<

PROJECT MANAGER:

/ PROJECT MANAGER:

/ LIC. ASST. :

ME//en LIC. ASST.

I I

I INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION t

2/

REC FTTF J

SYSTEMS SAFETY l i PLANT SYSTEMS SITE SAFETT &

f

/ NRC PDR HEINEMAN l/l TEDESCO ENVTRO ANALYSTS j

.Z/.I&E/M SCHROEDER

/

BENAROYA~ -

DENTON & MUT T eP

/ OELD

/

YlTNAM i

GOSSICK & STAFF ENGINEERING

/

IPPOLITO ENVIRO TECH; -

MIPC MACARRY KTRKWOOD-ERNST CASE-

/

KNICHT

. BALLARD I

HANAUER

/

SIHWEIL l

OPERATING REACTORS i SPANGLER HARLESS

/

PAWLICKI STELLO

! SITE TECH.

PROJECT MANAGEMENT REACTOR SAFETY OPERATING TECH.

/

GAMMILL (7)

BOYD

/

ROSS l

EISENHUT STEPP P. COLLINS

/

NOVAK I

SHA0 HULMAN HOUSTON

/

ROSZTOCZY BAER PETERSON

/

CHECK BITTLER SITE ANALYSIS MELTZ CRIMES

/

VOLLMER HELTEMES AT & I

/

BUNCH i

SKOVHOLT SALTZMAN

/

J. COLLINS i

RUTBERG

/

KREGER I

EXTERN AL DISTRIBUTION CONTROL NUMBER I

/ LPDR: W C /#,1fo**. O M NAT. IAB:

BROOKHAVEN MAT TAR.

/ TIC:

REG V.IE ULRIKSON (ORNL) y/g

/ NSIC:

LA PDR 4

ASLB:

CONSULTANIS: __

[k)

/ ACRS /(o CTS H4E MN6/ SEbT // 5 dM

/f M/"/ / 7 7 Of m-m

_a i

e

_ _ _. __ pg 0 g ag g_p_y g N C x ~, E,.....

ee m

- &<., ~

/

~

~

h, TOLEDO A

EDISON

g ~. 7 b

Docket No. 50-346 r-i'

--:)

v..c. am.n LCWELL E. RcE r

January 31, 1977

~

- j7>

c......

m eiass-en42 Serial No. 205 y.x y

n.

-m

~

s C)(.,.

1 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulations A

H.

Attn:

Mr. John F. Stolz, Chief Light Water Reactors Branch No. 1

\\

MU., ' h U

y Division of Project Management

\\c

cJ*Y'?c,. " Q, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

,r *

/

. \\g/

Washington, D.C.

2055S Q. <%, y'

Dear Mr. Stolz:

J

~

One remaining open item concerning electrical separation criteria (SER Outstanding Item 15) for the Davis-Besse Unit 1, is the criteria for conduit separation. During discussions in October and November, 1975 with the NRC staff, we stated that s 1-inch separation between conduit carrying redundant essential class IE circuits had not been a criteria during the construction of the station.

Io impose such a criteria at this time would require rework, including removal and reinstallation in a number of cases, i,ased on a physical review and field check of conduit installation. This resulted in my letter, Serial No. 157, of November 23, 1976.

The tests and analysis program committed to by us in my November 23, 1976 letter has been completed and the results have shown that in most situa-tions and combinations of circuits, physical separation of conduit carrying redundant essential class IE circuits is not necessary. A copy of a proprietary preliminary report of the extensive test program conducted at Franklin Institute Research Laboratories was given to Mr. Szukiewicz of the NRC staff during a meeting on January 14, 1977.

Based on the results of this test and analysis program, separation criteria for class IE conduit has been established which assures that (1) any failure or occurrence in a class IE conduit will not degrade a redundant essential class IE circuit in sdjacent class IE conduits, (2) a failure or occurrence in a non-class IE conduit will not degrade redundant essential class IE circuits in adjacent class IE conduits.

The criteria established are as follows:

1.

Conduits carrying control, instrumentation, or power cable (where the power cable is limited to 480 volt or lower and No. 12 AWG or smaller) are allowed to touch each other.

]

THE TCLECO ECISCN CCMPANY EDISCN PLAZA 300 MACE,CN AVENUE TOLECO CHO 43552

i a

Mr. John F. Stolz Page 2 Japuary 31, 1977

  • 2.

Conduit carrying essential class IE 4.16 KV power cables or 480 volt load center power cables will have a 1-inch minimum separation from conduits carrying class IE circuits of a redundant channel.

3.

Conduit carrying non-essential 13.8 KV, 4.16 KV, or 480 vole load center power cables that bridge conduits carrying essential class IE circuits of redundant channels will be separated from conduit carrying circuits of the redundant channel to give a minimum separation of 1 inch.

4.

Conduit carrying essential class IE power cable of 480 volt or lower voltage with conductor size larger than number 12 AWG, and not covered by 2. above, will meet the following criteria:

a.

Will have a minimum of 1/8-inch separation from the surface of any conduit crossing above which centaina an essential class IE circuit of the redundant channel, b.

Are allowed to touch conduits containing an essential class IE circuit of the redundant channel when installed in a horizontal, side-by-side configuration.

c.

Will have a minimum separation of 1 inch from conduits containing an essential class IE circuit of the redundant channel mounted directly above and running parallel.

5.

Conduit carrying non-essential power cable of 480 volt or lower voltage with conductor size larger thcn number 12 AWG, and not covered by 3. above, that bridge conduits carrying essential class IE circuits of redundant channels will be treated as in 4. a., b. and c. for proper separation from the redundant channel.

This above listed criteria is to apply to, and amplify Note No. 9 shown in Figure 8-20A of the Final Safety Analysis Report and supersedes the criteria contained in my letter, Serial No. 157, of November 23, 1976.

We trust that this will completely close SER Outstanding Item 15 concern-ing conduit separation.

Yours very truly, Lowell E. Roe LER.r

.-