ML19327B518

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 70-0371/89-05 on 890911-15.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plan & Implementing Procedures,Program Audit,Records & Repts,Testing & Maint & Physical Barriers
ML19327B518
Person / Time
Site: 07000371
Issue date: 10/17/1989
From: Della Ratta A, Keimig R, Galen Smith
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML19327B517 List:
References
70-0371-89-05, 70-371-89-5, NUDOCS 8911010019
Download: ML19327B518 (8)


Text

mn-

..c 5

11 1

N'

.:e*

.M; o

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I

. Report No.. 70-371/89-05

+

Docket No.

70-37}

l License No; 'SNM-368 i

Licensee: UNC,'Incor) orated-X

. UNC Naval

)roducts 4

67 Sandy Desert Road

...U, Uncasv111e, Connecticut 06382 f

Facility Name: 'UNC Naval Prod cts 2

Inspection At:. Uncasv111e, Connecticut

~<

S Inspection Conducted:

Septeniber 11-15, 1989 Type of. Inspection:' Routine Physical Security l

(

}

s

. Inspectors:

/ */it / M m

. 'C. Smith, Safeguarc,s Specialist

/ date s,

.i sSY

/c -/c <FP A. Della Rattdy Safeguards Auditor date Approved by:

2/-

/c _ /7-sp i

R. R. Ktimig, Chief, Safeguards Section date Division of-Radiation Safety and Safeguards Inspection Summary: Unannounced Physical Security Inspectior, on September 11-15,1989 (Report No. 70-371/89-05)

Areas Inspected:

Plan and Implementing Procedures; Management Effectiveness; Organization; Program Audit; Records and Reports; Testing and Maintenance; Locks,. Kays and Combinations; Physical Darriers - Protected Areas; Physical Barriers - Material' Access Areas; Security System Power Supply; Lighting;

. Compensatory Measures; Assessment Aids; Access Control (Personnel, Packages n,

kf.10gCK0700o17g 19 89101e i

.C 2

+

PDC

gy q

+,

?. r c;,,

a r

'f!.

>I'

'f) 9 and Vehicles); Detection: Aids (Protected and liatorial Access Areas); Alarm 7Jtations; Communications Personnel Training and Qualifications; Authorization for Access to National Security Information (NSI)-and Restricted Data-(RD);

and Physical. Protection and Safeguarding of NSI and RD.

Results:: The licensee was.in compliance with NRC requirements _in the areas intpected.

r s

'g 3

l k

I 6

r

[

.--w

< -,<- ~

w

p-._

,q,.-

~.

L F

9.

l' DETAILS G

1.

Key persons Contacted L'

R. Gregg, Director, Tecnnical Services

' T. Collopy. Nuclear Material Control Manager (Acting Director, Technical Services)

  • R. Gigliotti, Director of Security f"

R. Ormeno, Security Operations'Supervisur R. Jason, Security Training Officer J. Brady, Plant Services Manager

.N. Kornacki, Security Administrator K. Nurmi, Security Shift Supervisor B.. Gibson, Security Shif t Supervisor E. Ezzel, Security Shift Supeevisar C. Bowler, Security Shift Supervisor B. Taft, Security Shift Supervisor 4

'J. Watson, Security Shift. Supervisor i

The inspectors also interviewed employees of the licensee's contract security organization.

  • present at the exit interview 2.

Security Plan and Implementing Procedures The inspectors reviewed the T.icensee's NRC-aoproved security plan (the Plan) and implemer, ting-proceduros and confirmed that the procedures were consistent with the Pitn commit..nents and were adequate to meet applicable regulatory requirement.

l 3.

. Management Effectivenen The inspectors found. hat licensee management is involved in the

!ec.:rity program and continues to be supportive of program requirements.

This involvement and support.was evident from the progress being made on security program hardware upgrace:; and the continuing efforts to increase the r, umber of contract security force members through an aggressive recruiting program.

C.

Security Organization The inspectors reviewed the area of security force manning and determined that progress is being made in resolving previous shortages as a result of the licensee's and contractor's aggressive recruitment program for security personnel. The ir.spectors noted that the amount of overtime being wot ked by security force members has been reduced as a result of l

i. hat progress. A significant factor in the shortaos is the length of time l'

necessary to obtsin U.S. Depzrtment of Energy (DCE) clearances for new b

c t.

s, :

V'L, 4

i members of the force. The inspectors noted thst there hai been a slight, but steady, decline in the clearance turn-around time. The licensee currently has. submitted applications, and is awaiting clearances, for'approximately 30 individuals.

The inspectors determined that the performance of the' security force has not been adversely affected by the 1

shortages.

-5.

Program Audits

.The inspectors reviewed the. security program audit that was in progress i-during the inspection. The inspectors determined that the scope of the audit was more comprehensive and better documented than it had been in the

'past.

The inspectors also determined that personnel.who were conducting the audit possessed security expertise, which was not always the case in the past. However, the audit was being conducted by management personnel employed by the security force contractor and the inspectors questioneo

'the independence of these auditors. The licensee stated that an independent consultant was scheduled to do this audit (and future audits),

but he did not receive-his clearance in time to meet the audit frequency requirement.

Since the secu;'ity force contractor's management personne' were'aiready cleared and possessed the requisite security expertise, they were bein.g used to conduct the audit. The inspectors' review disclosed that the persons conducting the audit had no day-to-day responsibilities for security force operations and that the draf t audit findings did not indicate any lack of objectivity as a result of the auditors' affiliation with the contractor. The finsi audit report, and disposition of its findings and recommendations, will be reviewed in a subsequent inspection.

6.

Recqds anu Report The inspectors reviewed the following records and reports generated since the last inspection:

protected area visitor access control register; duty logs; security incident reports; testing and maintenance records; and records of lock, key and combination changes. All records were found L

to be well-maintained and were completed in accordance with the Plan comit'nents and implementing procedures.

L 7.

Testinj and Maintenance The inspectors reviewed the testing and maintenance records and procedures for the intrusion detection system, metal detectors, explosives detectors, and assessment aids. No discrepancies were identified.

~-

L 8.

Locks, Keys, and Combinations The inspectors reviewed the instd lation, storage, rotation, and g

i associated records generated /.,ince the last inspection for all locks, l

keys and combinations. No deficiencies were identified.

[

,/

l i.'

, [

n m

?~

i F t 5

s 9.

Physical Barriers - Protected Areas The inspectors observed all physical barriers that form the protected area perimeter and found that the barriers were installed and maintained

.in accordance with the Plan and license conditions.

4 10.

Physical Barr'ers - Mattrial Access Areas The inspectors observed the interior and exterior barrier features of the i

Material Access Areas and found that they were in '.alled and maintained in 1

accordance with the Plan and license conditions.

11.

Security System Power Supply-

^

The inspectort reviewud the uninterruptable power supply system and determined that the..:em functioned and was maintained as committed to in the Plan.

The inspectors found that the system was tested under no-load conditions weekly. The inspectors also reviewed the documentation fer the annual full-load test that was conducted on Jul/ 29, '.989.

The documentation disc ased that the system's equipment oerformed as' required and all security systems operated properly.

The equipment is located in l

. controlled access areas within a material access area.

12.

Lighting The inspectors observed the lighting within the protected area and isoletion zones from 7:00 to S:30 p.m. on September 13, 1989. All areas were determined to be illuminated in excess of 0.2 foot candles, measured

?

horizontally at grc Jnd level in accordance with the Plan and NRC regulatory requirements.

The determination was made through ger.eral observations and measurements made with the licensee's calibrated light

meter, l

13.

Compensatory Measures v

The inspectors observed the implementation of compensatory measures being utilized in conjunction with an on going major construction project inside L

the protected area.

The compensatory measures were being implemented in conformance with Dlan commitments and implementing procedures.

14. Assessment Aids The inspectors observed the various methods of alarm a:sessment used by the licenr.ee and confirmed that they were in conformance with the Plan commitments and implementing procedures.

l I-

Q'*T qn

,?

.[

~_

t I.

L 6

15. Access Control - Personnel and Packages-s.

The inspectors reviewed t'ie persoi.nel and package access control procedures 'and determined them to be as comitted to in the Plan. The inspectors noted minimum delays while observing personnel access processing during the peak traffic periods at shift changes. The inspectors noted that, in accordance with the Plan and regulatory-requirements, 100% of all personnel and packages entering the protected area were searched prior to entry.

16. Access Control - Vehicles The inspectors reviewed-the vehicle access control procedures and determined that they were as committed to in the Plan. This determination was made by observing vehicles being processed through the main and contractor access control points.
17. Deteccion Aids - Protected Area The f.ispectors observed operability-tests of 100% of the perimeter intrusion detection system and performance tests of selected zones on September 12 and 13, 1989. Tlie test results confirmed that the system performed'ir. accordance with regulatory requirements and applicable license conditions.
18. _ Detection Aids - Material Access Areas The' inspectors observed the licensee conduct tests of selected Material Access Area alarmed portals on September 12-13, 1989. The alarms functioned properly and were in conformance with the Plan commitments and implementing procedures.
19. Alarm Stationr.

The inspectors confimed that the Central Alarm Station (CAS) arid Secondary Alarm Station (SAS) operators were performing their duties in confomance w'th commitments in the Plan and implementing procedures.

20. Communications The inspectors monitored radio voice transmissions between the CAS and SAS operators, and other members of the security organiza+. ion and observed tests of offsite communications equipment. The inspectors confirmed that equipment " d alarm station operators' performance were in accordance with the Plan commitments and implementing procedures.

GQ m

i l

Q y

}

aa 7

l

21. Persennel Training and Qualification The inspect'rs reviewed the licensee's Training and Qualifiestion Piar, i

'(T&QP) ane.ts implementation. The inspectors identified the following:

i 1.

There were several discrepant.ies in the documentation of training relative to the date that the training was received and, in several cases, the instructor who conducted the training.did not sign the documentation to indicate that the training had been received.

The insr:ctors. interviewed a majority of the involved trainees and j

tne instructor and determined that the documentation discrepancies were administrative in nature.

The licensee committed to strengthen the administ ative controls to preclude tnis type of discrepancy from recurring.

(I.~-i 89-05-01) l 2.

The leston plans being used were not standardized and lacked sufficient details to assure that all aspects of the subjects identified in the T&QP were being completely and consistertly covered by all instructors.

The lack of fornial lesson plans was discussed by the inspectors with

' licensee management. The licensee stated formal lesson plans would be developed for the subjects identified in the T&QP. The formal lesson plans, when developed, will be reviewed by the inspectors.

(IFI 89-05-02)

22. Authorization for Access to National Security Information (NSI) and J

Restricted Data (RD)

~

The inspectors. examined the licensee's reogram for granting access to NSI and ilD. 1he program was determined to be in compliance with the requirements of 10 CFD. 25.

Al' access tecords were proper 1v completed and terminations were handled as specified by the regulation.

23.

Physir:al' Prutection Facility Approval and Safeguarding of National Security information (NSI) and Restricted Data (RO)

The insoectors reviewed the licensee's facility approval and determined that it was documented in a letter from the NRC and was implemented by an NRC-appvoved facility security plan. The inspectors determined that classifieci materials were being safeguarded as rquired by 10 CFR 95. No discrepancies were noted.

6 4

p q..

Er L.

L y

l,; c.; Q. ;o;

\\.

f' 8

l c

3 jc

~24.

Exit Interview The ' inspectors met with licensee representatives indicated in paragraph I' at the conclusion of the inspection on-September 15, 1989, and summarized the scope and findings.of the inspection.

The inspectors also confirmed the commitments made by the licensaa during the inspection, as oocumented

i. ^

in this report.

At. no time during the inspection was written material provided to the.

?

l icerisee.

r e'

6 A

L t

l.

L l

\\ '.

1:+

l.

1'

~

+