ML19327B377
| ML19327B377 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 10/20/1989 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19327B376 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-382-89-26, NUDOCS 8910310068 | |
| Download: ML19327B377 (1) | |
Text
?
rb.
o 7
yg; i
q.
g.
^o
!.3 P
APPENDIX A p-NOTICE OF VIOLATION j
Louisiana Power & Light Company Docket:' 50-382 b.
'Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 Operating License:
NPF-38 During an NRC inspection conducted September 1-31, 1989, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
The violation involved a failure to provide an adequate procedure for performing ASME Section XI surveillance testing on the high pressure and low pressure safety injection pumps.
In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CrR Part 2, Appendix C (1989), the violation is listed below:
Inadequate Procedure e
Technical Specification 6.8.1.c requires, in part, that written procedures shall be established and maintained for surveillance and test activities on safety related equipment.
Technical Specification 4.0.5 requires, in part, that inservice testing of ASME Class 2 pumps shall be performed in accordance with Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.
IWP-3500 of Section XI, requires minimum stabilization run times for testing of pumps.
Contrary to the above, Procedure OP-903-030, Revision 6, " Safety Injection Pump Operability Verification" established to implement the above requirements was inadequate in that it did not require minimum stabilization run times for testing of pumps.
This is a Severity Level IV violation.
(Supplement I)(50-382/8926-01)
' Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Louisiana Power & Light Company is
.hereby required to submit to this office, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including:
(1) the reason for the violation if admitted..(2) the corrective steps which have been taken and the'results achieved, (3) the corrective steps I
which will be taken to avoid further, violations,'and (4) the date when full compliance will,be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
I' i'
T Dated al Arlington, Texas, this @ d day of d 4ft.1989 I '
O
.i