ML19326D408

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Topical Rept Evaluation of BAW-10007,Revision 1 & BAW-10029, Control Rod Drive Mechanism Test Program. Repts Acceptable,Provided Ref Limited to Mechanism Operating Characteristics & Svc Life Confirmation
ML19326D408
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 01/22/1973
From:
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:
Shared Package
ML19326D403 List:
References
NUDOCS 8006110423
Download: ML19326D408 (2)


Text

3 4

TOPICAL REPORT EVALUATION Report Identification: BAW-10007, Rev. 1; BAW-10029 Report

Title:

Control Rod Drive Mcchanism Test Program Report Dates: June 1971 and January 1972 Originating Organi=ation: Babcock & Wilcox Reviewed By: Mcchanical Engineering Branch, AEC Directorate of Licensing November 1972

SUMMARY

OF TOPICAL REPORT:

Centrol rod drive mechanism tests were carried out under operating coolant flow, temperature, pressure and water chemistry conditions and varying the equipment alignment from optimum to the maximum amount of misalignment expected with the most adverse combination of design tol-erances.

In addition, a test was completed to ' confirm the motor's ability to provide for forced insertion in the event of a stuck rod.

Life testing was carried out under the misalignment conditions and duplicating the stroke, travel and reactor trips expected during 20 years of service life. Trip times, deacceleration rates and component wear were measured in conjunction with the life tests, and insertion force was measured under the stuck rod conditions. All test results were judged to comply with the performance criteria specified and were considered satisfactory.

SUMMARY

OF REGULATORY EVALUATION:

We have reviewed the subject reports and find that the three specific versions of a basic roller nut drive mechanism designated "A'.', "B" and "C" by B & W cxhibit satisfactory trip, wear, acceleration, and fcrced insertion characteristics in operation. However, the reports are considered acceptable only if the provisions stated below in the regu-latory position are satisfied.

Pressure boundary design criteria and stress limits except for the OBE and DBE under various operating conditions are not presented for the type "A" mechanism. Zere period ground accelerations of 0.25 g horizontal and 0.3 g vertical equivalent static accelerations were used for seismic analysis. Type "C" components are designed and manufactured to the Class A vessel requirements of Section III.

How-ever, specific stress limits for emergency and faulted operating conditions, and the seismic design input loadingsare not specified.

The design critoria used for the design of type "B" mechanisms which are hybridi cd version of types "A" and "C" mechanisms are also not described.

9 6

8 I

8006110 47-.3

e i

2-TOPICAL REPORT EVALUATION REGULATORY POSITION:

The subject reports provide a satisfactory basis for accepting the operating performance of B & W control rod drive mechanisms Type "A",

"B", or "C" an'd may be referenced in future case applications provided that:

(a) the purpose of reference is limited to only mechanism operating characteristics and (b) the analytical methods, criteria and stress limits used in the design of the mechar. isms and (c) life testing or equivalent procedures are used to confirm service life beyond the 20 years demonstrated by the test program are submitted..

Items (a), (b) and (c) must be avaluated on a case-by-case basis.

e O

e S

u O

g d.

'