ML19326C852
| ML19326C852 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 09/27/1973 |
| From: | Bernero R US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8004280779 | |
| Download: ML19326C852 (3) | |
Text
a a-hek&
ste t 7 *D Tills DOCUMEtlT C0tlTAINS POOR QUAUTY PAGES ooCKET No.: 50-313 y
APPLICANT: ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANT FACILITY: ARKANSAS NUCLEAF.ONE, UNIT 1
SUMMARY
OF ACRS SUBCom(IITEE AND FULL ColefIITEE MEETINGS SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING The ACRS Subcomittee meeting on Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1 (ANO-1) was held in Washington, D. C. on July 26, 1973. The agenda was providad by the ACRS staff in a July 19, 1973 memorandum which is enclosed. The Sub-comunittee meeting followed the agenda; the following were some of the specific items of discussion:
1.
Communications Systems Dr. Moeller noted that the staff required an operational test of the ANO-1 in-plant consunication system for its utility under accident conditions, but accepted its classification as a category 2 system.
The ensuing disc tasion covered the requirements for cournunications in-plant and off-site during emergency situations.
2.
Operational Experience w
Dr. Isbin pursued a line of questioning with the applicant, the architect-engineer, and the steam supplier on the specific administra-tive methods they use to feed operational experience back into the design and construction work.
3.
Diesal Peaking The ANO-1 request to use the energency diesel generators for peaking servics was discussed in some detail. The staff position, forbidding such use, and requirf 4g removal of the attendant special power connection provisions was explained.
4.
Reactor Building Crane Dr. Ishin asked if the reactor building crane was imune to single i
failure. Be was told that it had not been analyzed as such; he did not pursue the_ question.
8064 ho 277
1
. Sumary of ACRS Subcontaittee and Full Comittee Meetings 5.
Loose Parts Monitoring _
The loose parts and vibration monitoring system for ANO-1 was discussed 6.
ECCS f.e.
The small break analysis was discussed at some length.
~
7.
Emergency Procedures _
There was extenaive discussion and questioning about post-accident d
emergency proceduras; the emphasis was on off-site conditions an 1
evacuation.
FULL C01c{ITTEE MEETING _
The ACRS Full Comittee meeting on ANO-1 was held the evening of Augus The ANO-1 No agenda was furnished by the ACRS.
1973, in Washington, D. C.
&W seating was held ir+ ediately after the ACRS meetings As a result, the ANO-1 meeting was 2/3, ANO-1, and Three Mile Island 1).The following were some of the specific items very brief; less than 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />.
discussed:
1.
New Madrid Earthquake _
Dr. Okrent asked if there was recent minor seismic activity in Arkansas which could be related to New Madrid. The applicant indicated no knowledge of such -activity.
2.
Diesel Peaking Dr. Stratton argued whether the use of diesels for peaking service might be good for testing purposes.
3.
Emergency Procedures Dr. Okreat pursued a line of questioning about staff review of instru-i ments to monitor the course of major accidents, particdarly within i
Be expressed dissatisfaction with the apparer.,
the reactor building.
scope and depth of the staft.eview.
i
. Suvasry of ACRS Subcom:sittee and Full Comittee Meeting ACRS Letter _
The resulting ACRS letter on ANO-1 is enclosed.
Orignat Signed by
@rt M. Berrieto R. H. Bernero, Preb et Mansger Pressurized Water Reactors Branch 4 Directorate of Licensing r.nclosures:
1.
Mcto ACRS subcomittee Meeting Agenda, dtd 7/19/73 2.
ACRS Ltr to Chairman Ray, dtd 8/14/73 DISTRIBUTION:
EC PDR
,ocal PDR ocket File L Rdg File RP Rdg File PWR-4 Rdg File RCDeYoung ASchwencer R0 (3)
TR BCs TR ads RP ads RP BCs RMBernero FJMiraglia EGoulbourne DKartalia RFrahy, ACRS (16)
Jllendrie WR-4
.x.7 2 omet >
.,y RMBernero:cjr sumut >
-~
DATE >
......I..--
' * * * * " * * * ~ ' " *
- Foran AEC-Ste (Rev.9-53) AECM 0240
~1