ML19326C849

Forwards Responses to Questions in NRC Re Proposed ETS Submitted on 750708

ML19326C849
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	09/26/1975
From:	Cavanaugh W ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	Boyd R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8004280776
Download: ML19326C849 (8)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:'g 7n.,, u - a - c -e..-x n-w.=-=-

m; p.q,, "

pz,3 ~ 1..,i o e ? i. cr, 2T iq /t '{ W j wcf c {cl} }3 a-li 0 e F L P L s' H e 0 4 t 11.' ** %.\\ tJ=&.1 0 . a- = w wu 'I w

g..,

C 29 ARK ANS AS POWE A & LIGHT COMPANY %,, 2* = ?S@ W7 w e., a s eu.. 4Na sva evs. uw vte acc-an ca~sso 72=oa. ison ava -.au

5 ;g

- p 7 x:a l Septenber 26, 197,5 M.4' r.n. i

+M;it.&3 W.'

fu G. -!.q Wcy.

7f3EJ qi $p[if Qj IHIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS POOR QUAUTY PAGES u ,f Mr. R. ~f.oyd, Acting Director e-Rp Division of Reactor I.icensing, 12 5 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Conission ',i - ~ K.u hi n gt on, D. C. 20555 Ar'.ansas Power b Light Congisay y{:+3Sg

Subject:

r g@$gj -Arkansas Suelear Onc-Unit 1 gy'.q3 t' ' Docket :;o. 50-313 s

f. i-.;g-t s.,s3 License No. DPR-51 T.nvironcental Technical Specifications _

,4tj@]

Dear !". keyd :

('gfha + -:.c-A .e Attuehed find resoonses to those questions contained in Mr. P.. J. Youngbloods .wiS#I letter of M gust "5,1975 concerning our pmposed Environmental 'lechnical h;h Speci fics: ions as submitted on July, 3, 1975. Your prompt review of these USVj h3 %a[Ag responses and consents and/or approval ' 'equested. b.r s +. u g TA Ve ' truly yours, { l.V / f./ n 1,; /. L._./~~m i J liilliam Cavana' ugh III /.' g-yd ~ maager, Nuclear Services ird33 j%)$9 c::r Mif$i r 2 Ehe VP! y F-

w. M

-- a r $se ww n d wn n. wh I b m, s c. p p-r ?r cx E x, m .tj,b- < P E*Wd M.. 0 ' T * = **

• v s N o. m v u s i c as o w N g o 3.

tweg gha ree m ess ee M'OOLE 90tJ f H u rativet s a y o r gu L aWd g=:u s E,e n.n.~+,,,.r,-~w,..,,w.ammnr,.mzwa,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.u,,,,,,,,.r,,,,,,,,,,,,,,8,,,,0,,,0,_4.,,2,.,,8,,,0,,,2,, yd, ... ~ W

y,,. ......... _m um ,,.m. -.m s. %w: h,.:z g '(S;# w.: n . :.95t:.; . !pO;A. sv 1. QUESTIO.'i Mr-yco y.s; 'Mp Provide su:=arles of the data collected ursuant to ETS 3.3; 4.1.1.a(1), 4.1.1.a (4), and 4.1.1.a(5). WO.) 'M,% t;:ps

• vg R RESPOSSE 2.gl..,414 h.fA ign9.5 Data taken pursuant to ETS 3.3, 4.1.1.a(1), 4.1.1.a(4) and 4.1.1.a(5) isy i$pM.f from Januaty '1975 through May 1975 is sum,rized below,

.r. g Sa.ple Intako Canal Discharge Canal wb rwa so $ Max. 475 Max. 507 [hh"IM Conduativity (urho) Avg. 258.15 Avg. 262 Min. 158 Min. 160 ~ s. I M. 112 Max. 122 L _..-;Y'i Chloride (C1-)(cg/1) Avg. 43.69 Avg. 44.15 'NT d Min. 15 Min. 15 l' 1Lu. 40 Ru. 35 Ei74% Sulfate (50 )(ug/1) Avg. 21.07 Avg. 21.23 Ni Min. 15 Min. 12 k@ o 5 .y @d@Y Max. 60 Max. 50 i Turbidity (JTU) Avg. 36 Avg. 35.38 Hin. S !!in.15 WE hdYh Ru. 260 Max. 264 TGS Total Dissolved Solids Avg. 170.3B Avg. 203.62 SDB (ng/1) Min. 44 Min. 108 YN Max. 3.5 Max. 3.5 N SP ate (ng/1) Avg. 2.64 Avg. 2.52 ., ; } h Min. 2.0 Hin 1.8 Hax. 8.3 Max. 7.5 - j Silicate (510 )(=g/1) Avg. 5.74 Avg. 6.32 i Min. 4.3 Min. 4.1 C7 t._i_ w, Ru. 0.009 Ru. 0.007 SJij (N H;)(ng/1) Avg. <0.0036 Avg. <0,n036 M 3 Min. <0.002 Min. <0.002 C W Max. 0.13 Ru. 0.155 s N Coron (ag/1) Avg. 0.114 Avg. 0.103 ss Min. 0.05 Min. 0.06 ?

• j ku. 0.656 Max. 0.704 w

L., '2 5h*3.! Ircn (ag/1) Avg. 0.464 Avg. 0.469 Min. 0.182 Min. 0.248 4 _ N) m _. -Y vj ~. 1 W,**G) I,o IO bb~ k hb

• N t. Ill' *! t: Ult i t u nn y t;I;;,It;IIt tilm fil:t W;tr ilit;iltiltitpilillt ritiltsI n stII:I tt!IllsIt tis ts itstf(It!!!;ttf olt t tills!ilil.li l!!!!lli'lillitlit:lllIlltlllIlll;lif tillllllliti!)itit:!\\!!; ttilllin!:tlli 'ti;ju nign,.gi!!

w R W ..tr#.c.s~wtmy wem ms'W q w"u,=en W W W r.~.f m ?nw:., _ _c31 ; M.E.~..-. w 42 .2

• b J,f }.? @-: W =' y.v ~ a F S.;.t. h h =.,m.r. a % rx.;;..m y w <* W p w v W i" y

y g whvuq*sret u ur. w.:M.4 m c $ e ,9 o d II b i m-41 A.Pii

1. M -4

'j 32. r p %. h j Hax. 4.02 Max. 0.013 iM % y .w.~ s... Copper (wf1) Avg. 0.00696 Avg. 0.0057 h'- Hin. 0.002 Min. 0.0023 g$.gj fug{ n} Max. 0.35 Max. 0.9 hNj

d 3

Amonia (NL)(ng/1) Avg. <0.345 Avg. <0.358 10g@N f Hin. <0.1 Min. <0.1 US } $khf [ Max. 0.03 Max. 0.2 $y.3 Q [ ninganese (cg/1) Avg. <0.034 Avg. <0.037 !$d Min. <0.01 Hin. 0.009 pj, 1. J.i Mi [ .shx. 13. 6 Max. 13.6 $NO e 0xygsn (0,)(:sg/1) Avg. 11.36 AvC. I1.35 c.. Hin. 3.3 Min. 7.3 {g 1.'ax. 113 Pa x. 124 .s y lydro.;cn (H) Avg. 70.08 Avg. 71.19 . p$f I Hin. 40 Nin. 33 , TM 2. Ouotion 7 y I 8 P:evide a copy of Arkansas Departnent of Pollutics Control and Ecology's %'.cg Regulation No. 2. Sun =arize pertinent sanpling and reporting requirc-1 F cents applicable to A W 1. i'. [ PasPON53 g.m h-Attached find three (3) copies of Arkansas Kater Quality standards, i h.fj g Regulation No. 2, as aconded (Septerber 1973) as issued by the. Arkansas f Department of Pollution Control 4 Ecology (ADPCSE). Tnose " sampling O f and reporting requirenents" as eay be applicabic to Arkansas Nuclear g E One-Unit' l (ANO-1) are shcwn as specific standards on pages 4 through

d. M 10 and are delineated belev.

? (a) Terperature - Tecperature incres.se is covered by ETS 2.1.2 and ,h^ vill not be affected by this ETS amendment. y ?P L wid T (b) color'- No sa:pling is requirod, nor is it deened plausible that i gi color will be altered by the operation of N;01. [. N. w.y 4 (c) Turbidity - Distinctly visible turbidity inemase has not occurred g -end is not expected to occur. Increase in turbidity from intako 54.6 to dischar20 is neaningless as two bodies of water are beino, $iy 4 sacpled (i.e., Illinois Bayou, Arkansas River). Any increase is ipy@.j expected to be the result of large particles in the intake being g h broken up in the circulating water systen before discharge, -(d)- Taste and Odor - No surpling is required. Tne usaso of the water swd m( precludes any acasurabic change in its taste or odor. g-{-4j i Med. 3 g:9 k, h.y>dk w I .h ' bMW) i : Rii" S. J f fs$d f ? & h-N'ill!!:lat::':il:'!!';*ll;G:il;;l ll;lHitil!I*itY5 lilittlilll!!!Illl!!illllllllllllllilllllillil!lllllllllllllllll!!!!!ll!lllitilllillitfitnlill!Dfulfl?ltl!Il!!!iillhulilllll!:111HI!Hl!!!Ill:llillillililll! Illrosentueel

.e 9?.', -

y,- w- ~ -w. n wn.. pi;.b;~: (e) Solids, Ficating 1htrrial, and D posits - Floating solids, fcan, ijK{? p-or scun wi11 not be of a persistent nature. Foa!: nay be pro-3~ L duced at the di ;;harge flupe as a result of chlorination. but tnis l#y.-3 9 will remain within our discharge' canal and will definitely not be

4., :J persistent. Floating solids :.ay be focnd as a result of fish

[6.s 1. grinding, but the EPA and ADPCSE have indicated confincrent within & dj g the ertaynent will result in no vicistion. Wis is also not con-sidered to be of a persistent nature. ~ M..@] g .M 4 p-- ~x:

n,

c.. (f) Oil and Grease - No sampling. is required unt u 7/1/77 per NPDES Per-7'id h

~ di, mit No. AR0001392. Any oil and grease discharged will be the result MW

~ of wasta through turbine bailding floor drains and will be in ex-M, g, ?, '. w'.-.- treocly scall quantities so as to be undetectable in the dischargo i.I4. ;.:; G n g.,

canal, g+-J i.g

g. %.

rn e-(g) pH - Samling of the waste tanks before discharge (per NPDES Q,1 :Q y;. Pemit No. AP0001392) covers this iten after 7/1/77. No probicm s-di tj$, in ncoting the Arkansas Rem 1ation No. 2 limits of 6.0 to 9.0 Q:~ wy 6M o m, standard units is anticipated.. oH will be monitored prior to re-9En F345: ^ lease to ensuro cocpliance utth this regulation. $$iY N$ - gc .w- %.c s@m::Qhiu' ' (h) Dissolved Oxygen - This sarepling is being carried out by the University of Arkansas at !.ittic Rock and will not be affected [W S i% by this ETS acendment. $E n%b qin y-;:; w (i) Radioactivity - Radioactive discharges are covered by ETS 2.4 and M Q ETS 4.2 and will not be affected by this amend ent. p-gG @JL %L? ter.21: (j) Bacteria - Samling of the Sanitary Swage Discharge (per NPDSS MWE gln f emit No. AR0001392) covers this iten. fifj2 G [M.w > me=n m um v (k) Toxic Substances - Sanpling of the waste tanks (per NPDES Pomit h,h h No. AR0001392) will indicate whether any toxic substances will be g)j jup discharged as a result of Icakage into the waste systes fron ih. Qf. isolated systens (ICW3, etc.) and will be corrected, gp. g $F@ $re.W: (1) Mineral Quality - Sa=pling of wasto tanks, and ::sintaining free M$ bc available chlorine concentration per tiPDES Pcmit No. AR0001392 Wt will satisr.y this concem, W En.

g+y gg u

ve tj km.>.,

(W (n) Nutrients - Phosphato treat:mnt will not be utill:ed in plant P$Q by7 other than in laundry wastes. Calculations have shown that the WM DE A w:e g.. naxieun concentration of phosphate dischar;;c tron the plant from w (ps this laundry syston is well within ADPC6E liriits. No suppliny. @yh (fR will be done based on these calculations and NPDES Permit No. isp AR0001392. 25 @ $t D.E.m@A dK i r.m 3. W.STI O i %3 k$$ h~.2 h .? Provide a copy of your National Pollutant Discharge Pernit No. AR00u1392. MMi pga Sur=2ari:e pertinent sacpling and reporting require = ants of the per=it. Qj gjjjj .nre.A w. t,,M.I [A@q '7 3 $ht Sf hlfhy M.c..E.. h. 5 ..w r M:1

+><

$m?~. gg;;' -N 'b.W.'

w. w

-L;t M >t, wg. ./. k.m a'lltt/1/7lllittflHistt:.*f./Ni'*/'/l//? f':!/Hi'lillillf!!!?ifff!!!/illfil!!NUu//iffilill!/jlll?/f!ill!Unl?!!/UlGil'UffUl/I!Ulifi!!/ll?ifllllilllllllill.7!illifirrirlifili fo rHiltoni':'lerni o!!a !I* ilio *m ir vsel

W awt9N %g5 W,9577 W= 45" 2 E7^'R T, C # M :R%Q7 MP W M $ M d 4 } f @ ? W B ;i W f W F K* W :MDl%. #e.ii#W.., ~ HS WJ5..:G. .. M.6.w.3...%..,-4... a Ns.yr%.W W. W %..-.E W P D il u ~ ...: s ..n..,= a.:, g., ~ p M.h p.-:s i:ys.d EWh,l

s. c.

j ~ RESPONSE @ii'$m l wm w= 2.g Dree (3) copies of National Pollutant Discharge EliJination Syste:::

• $hM i

(hTDES) Pernit No. AR0001392. are ;tached. Dose "sarpling and !1: Eld reporting" requirements are sn--urised below. M[h cupts CIP.CU1.\\T1.NG MATER SYSTEM hy Ed3X 1. Ficw - a3/ day (mn) - at point where once through cooling wate:-. yy[g ed previously monitored effluents discharge to the canal. Daily gg average and d:sily naxicua limits are 1140 ND sad 1145 HGD, SMM l respectively. Mode of sample is continuous recording. hig $9M 2. Tecperature will be ncasured at the point where the once through %T2d cooling water and previously monitored effluents discharge to LMT the canal. The daily average and daily ;-mWw 11.'aits are 40.6C gg (105F) and.43.3C (110F), respectively, naasured and recorded the continuou3ly. g u..e 3. Free available chlorine will be neasured at the point where the 8 f _ @@ [ once through cooling water and previously nonitored effluents I discharge to the canal, ne daily average and daily naximum limits are 0.2 ag/l and 0.S ndl for a two hour period per day, M respectively. Crab sagles are to be taken weekly. L 432_ m '4.STE SYSTEMS l$h ,.1 p 1. F1w - m3/ day (HGD) - will be =easured at the point whero low voluna i78 waste water is discharged prior to nixing with any other waste ((pM i He flow will be estinated and based on a daily average. water. t a 2. Oil and Grease are littited by Arkansas State Regulation No. 2 until t J.i 7/1/77. On 7/1/77 this effluent will be limited to a daily averago I dE and daily naninua concentration of 15 ag/l and 20 ng/1, respec-hi@d tively on the basis of onc grab sanoic por week frc:s the low-level gNy wasta discharge prior to mixing with any other waste water. 4 4 6 3. Tot::1 Suspended Solids are li=ited by the Arkansas Stato Rogulation [Q".. No. 2 until 7/1/77 at which time NPDES Permit No. AR0001392 will limit the d.tily average and daily naxacun concentration to 30 ng/l I4 and 100 mg/1, respectively. Sampling will be by grab sa=ple once 1 per week fron the low-volum waste discharge prior to mixin2 with , ih any otner waste water. ~- %} J s .1 pH will be licited by Arkansas Regulation No. 2 until 7/1/77 when h.. i 1 NPDES Per it No. AR0001392 statss that pil shall not be less than g' 6.0 standard units and not greater than D.0 standard units and shall

• =d bc :onitored once per ucek by grab sample.. Le pil will be measured i

at the point where low-voltcee waste water is discharged prior to gM nixing wi th any other waste s trean. It shquid be noted that Reg-yd ulation No. '2 and the NPDES Pett: tit are consistent on this itca. hay iidL WBk1 S'm fCa

.hE**

W:."dd $.dMds:semvJcGEiE;MMMiM&nd:h6MOWiuM:MCM'MMOt&WC@tV CCMGMdGM?iCOumi i

c. SANITARY SDGC 'YSTDI L... - s ,u 1, $p, 800 will be nonitcred at the sanitary sewage outfall. The daily 7. avarag; li=Ltation will be 30 mg/l and the daily naxicus will be F 71 45 og/l based on a grab scapio of once per wech. vm n c ~, _ E 2. Total Suspended Solids will be nonitored at the sanitary sewer gi g cutfall. D2ily average and daily rmxiruca linitations are 30 ag/l 'l yi and 45 mg/1, respectively, based on a once per week grab sacpte. f]j 3 d e-3E 3. Fecal coliforn is limited to a daily average of 200 ng/100 ml and R }$ a 400 mg/100 :d calculated as a geometric nean. The sa:alc5 will y' W 2M be collected at the sanitary sewer outfall on a once per week i9.; grab sacple hasis. %s N 4. pH of the sanitary sewa;;e system is limited to not less than o.O N]5 N standard units and not 1reator than 9.0 standard units neasured ? N by once per week grab sacples at the sanitary sewer outfal' @M S t%: n.5 v CC.T.RA!. INI + yh n id?4 y 1. Floating solids or visible foan will not be discharged from any $i Q discharge point other than in trace soounts. A Records of all sarpling wil, be retained for at least three (3) years, e n.o d,- univss a longer retention tine is requested by the Regional Adminis-N5 trator or the State water pollution control agency. (Q M tW M Monitoring results vill be sur:=arized and provided to the EPA cvery W three (3) conths. g w %J H? Gm iT:1 4 QL"r.STION W 1.5 hTE d$.E Q, C1stify the runner in which you intend to apply the Environmental (sy t w-w Protectica Agency guidelines on chlorine discharges, i.e., will the Q condenser effluent not exceed 0,2 ng/l free availabic chlorino when b averaged o r the chlorination period? hnere vill the effluent be h[.3 ronitored fc. chlorine? .n e.- if RESPONSF. pf n 1 h(( The effluent will be sacpled at the end of the discharge fitme prior y[ m } to entering the discharge canal. M $5" Mi A daily average concentration of 0.2 ppm free availablo chlorino will W-ii; he maintained. The " daily average" concentration twans the arithnetic h [d average (weighted by flow value) of all daily determinations of con-7 iQ centration nade during a calendar nonth. Daily deteminations of @y j$ concentration rndc using a composite saplo shall be the concentntica i p of tne ccmosite sarple. hhen grab sa:ples are used, t.hc daily deter-

g h

=: nation of concentration shall be the aritheetic average (weighted 47 gg. ,by flow value) of all the satples collected during that calendar day. Tgj; p em y A daily naxirus concentration will be licited to 0.5 pps free avail- $fj$ g& anlo chlorine. The " daily ca.xintn" concentration reans the naxit:ua T M{4 concentration for any period of time during a calendar day. MR . ~ s* V%. D.,. g - [ y' hm yT \\;;&- 7.%% W EWA\\? N '.UY.SdWAY0YN Ni N NNdY N NO

w e M s,_a, s w..., v-+#. j r JFrg r r w:s. t-o dG. fy@b.? ~Sh... 5. etESTION v_m Mg 6 hSM d Describe changes. to your chlorination precedures, "if any, you intend hd$ S to ::ake.

rcFs

. ~. .ni:v-f* p "a. RESPONS"C MN J WITi. Wi.Y2d h";- Chlorination of both tunnels of the discharge flu =e will be instituted MQQ H. based on the results of the previous chlorination practice of chlorina- [%MQq $$9 tion practice of chlorinating only one tunnel at a time. Tne cross-- /M over line between the two lines before entering the condenser is an A [hy$ ca. cleven (11) foot diameter, five (5) foot long pipe. Because of the E dimensions of this pipe, chlorination of one side of the condenser kJ23 nW otfectively is not possible as the chlorinated portion of the circula- -e sw ting water f1:r.< is continuously diluted and split between the two h"];M% 8;(s V W tunnels. Glorination of both sides of the flune will cli=inate this iRM% problem and provide nore effective control of nicrobiological grcwth in $:8E~ b!.M BUR;) d$s the condenser. Since the average free available chlorine concentration of 0.2 pp:2 over a two hour period per day is the liaiting factor at the exit of the discharge flune to the discharge caaale no tidverse DM n W. ~ effects relative to this new procedure are conceivable.. NW.= r% n w B 6. QUEST 10.4 wa e Provido an assessnent of the envimanental inpact of the hig,her chlorine 'I L. mE M er. fluent releases requested. a I ' &} l@s.f a e

RESPONSE

p[dc4h MD: Literature has revealed the following data concerning envireresental 'k (ti$ T i= pact to fish (cor en to Lake Dardanelle) and aquatic organisus due l to free available chlorine in receiving waters:

I yE9 h$

e Mf6 @hh b5lS l Chlorine con-Exposure time Type of Re.tarks !teforence fdf bE l centration in Organism M-L%B ng/l (ppa) ~ (591 A 0.15 to 0.12 12 to 16 days cary 25% killed 1,2 di @&f-r Lt 0.3 2 hours ninnows no effect 3 n -hhff. @FM 9 M 2.0 48 hourr. green sunfish no taortality 4 Q x m~ 0.1S .96 hours Chlore11a 30% killed 5 hd kkh Pyrenoldosa f Ep$ n. wz.:z 0.12 96 hours Chlore11a 80'. killed 5 hh h pyrenoidos a

ng@R)j

%si ' Q Cf84 as e $M M.O $g!@: $ew e k 5li.l M:s W GMf/4 NO: t.?til!!llliti!!!!Holill'HHIHitillfillilHllHil/GilHl'lHulHilfliHHHinflillinH!i!UllifillflHHlilillil!!!Ullfill/UllHilllll/Hilfulfillfl!!HillifilllliHiliHilllfulHHilll!/l!Hillain l 7

/ m. $Il m W tu 'Iha occurrenca cf fish-kills in and around the chlorinated effluent !:$f f(( is ntt expectcd at Arkansas Nuclear Ono. "Iho thren (3) hour residence ,'e. n (: time of tho discharg2 in tha erbaynent, prior to mixing with the. lake, f'N hor: ensures that no free available chlorino will exist in the = sin strea=.

J Also, the fish in the receiving waters, since they are not captive, will OJ Wi;E avoid any arca where irritation will occur. If there are any fish with-Q

--in the area of naxican chlorine residual, the amount of time for the y;, R$ fish to swin to an arca of no irritaticrris expected to be no nore than C: Ifg a few ninutes. ~!herefore, it is c1carly felt that no " hills" as a resuit ~5 hy of chlorine residual will occur. The presence of 0.2 ppa free chlorinc M9 is not expected to reduce the algae population.5 Jg. g @M , it gib W." ) Q1orination of wastewater discharges have proven to be beneficial-ls$: ;: f to the habitat of aquatic life. This procedure, in fact, has improved $F M stroan biology of the receiving water in that no.har:s was done to N.1 - NN aquatic life and one or :mre new aquatic species nay appear after in - f{ig i $th' itiation of the chlorination procedure. Such a esse on record was pgi reported by the Texas state Department of !!calth in 1970. 6 .g $f ux.n h $ ;e ncrd.C CS3 fD -s , 1' -i M-p;a [N I 1. Southgate, D.A., "Troat::ent and Disposal of Industrial Waste Water." [fth Dept. of. Scientific and Ind. Res.,11. H. Stationety Office (1948). [Jgj d t are s, i.w 2. Ebeling, Dr. G., Mhe Influence of Sewage Chlorination on Strean;s g Q' Containing Fish, Recent P.esults of Inycstigations of the Results of

fgG, yf the Effect of Cellulose Factory Wastes on Fish." 7cwage Works Jour.

Mi Efyd 4, 198 (1932). .k/ 3., Schant, G. G., " Fish Catastrophes During Drought." Jour. A. W. W. A. 49 31, 771 (1939). S!k %9 s%@e V2 kC ty.h* 4. Pannikkar, B. M., " Low Concentrations of Calcina liypochlorite as a g 3.g Fish and Tadpole Poison Applicable for lise in Partly Drained Ponds ich nmi and Other S=all Bodies of Water." Progressive Fish Culturist 22,117 l% @F (1960). [36 (p{h Eb 5. Xott, et.al, Water Quality Critoria Dua Eook Vol. 3. UPA Research gg and Monitoring (1971), p.A-28. j g$

bnI, M

-eg-6. hhite, G. C., Handbook of Chlorination for Potabic Nater. h*aste- [fb water, Cooling hster, industrial Processes, and Swir:ning Pools, h% ,,'g Van Nostrand Reinh61d Company, Sex York (1972) p. 455 Kiiji W a m, e N m v: an-W m.r M m e = u e - a - - = = - a m - m m m .~ P}}