ML19326C348
| ML19326C348 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 09/15/1975 |
| From: | Ziemann D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19326C339 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8004220894 | |
| Download: ML19326C348 (3) | |
Text
.--
.::-~
..=,
EE:52l
.= :;__ 2:
5=
?..
'&w i
.....m..
o
.._q UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY C05NISSION is fifll;
- s DOCKET NO. 50-313
~-
t.p ARKANSAS POWER AND LIGilT COMPANY NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF #!ENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE
~
Notice is hereby given that the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Connission s-(the Cor.a:tission) has issued Amendment No. 5 to Facility Operating License
{}:
No. PPR-51 issued to Arkansas Power and Light Company which retised
==
Technien1 Specifications for operation of the Arhansas Nuclear One -
I
- g
- p. ;......
Unit 1, located in Pope County, Arkansas. The n=endcent is effective d i:s as of its date of issuance.
G!
The amendment revises:
(1) the curves in Figures 2.1-2 and 2.3-2 "r.!
to tako credit for 100 effective full power days of fuel burnup, and (2) the curve in Figure 3.5.2-3 to conform with changes to Figure 2.3-2 described above.
The application for the amendment complics dith the: star ldards.'and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and F.
~E g
the Cor.aission's rules and regulations. The Connission has made appropriate finding;s as required by the Act and the Connission's rules and regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I, which are set forth in the license anendoent. Prior public notice of this a.nendrent is not required since b:-
the auende.ent does not involve a significant ha:ards consideration, w
- .= z Yk:
o->
I 8004220<
=
e >=.= wc w r
- s s a >-
AI Cj le s r.c., 9 5 3).t10' CM W woe. sover mu shv enmvino orrecca t e74.sas.tes
u.:
(....;..
p=
~ -.
~
,iR_
. =..
2-
+3
-Ei Es For further details with respect to this action, see (1) the 5
application for anendment dated July 29, 1975, (2) Amendment No. 5
"?
p is:
to License No. CPR-51, with Change No. 5, and (3) the Commission's related Safety Evaluation. All of these items are availabic for public inspcetion,at the Comission's Public Document Room, 1717 11 Street,
,; jj....
N. W., Washington, D. C. and at the Arkansas Polytechnic Co11 ego,
- =
Russellv1110, Arkansas 72801. A copy of items (2) and (3) may be obtained 99 r
upon request addressed to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Connission,
[-
Washington, D. C.
20555, Attention: Director, Division of Reactor Licensing.
- is' Lated at Bethesda, Maryland, this Oco3 V[ NL Y
f FOR Tile NUCLEAR REGULNIDRY CC;MISSICH ciral SiGUOu O_, u L* r;ter. ann p.
I)enniS J
[c,:
Dennis L. 'iecann, Chief Operating P.eacters Branch #2 Division of Reactor Licensing w
=-
I'"+
8 *"
5 ' N ' ? *"
- a *
- 4-
'C-a' P.n. 94 3) MO! C;O.
- w. e, novr%Here.T pamTma c r e scra t ota s s.t es
- +
e 7:. -
- =.
- 1...
7:V.':
+:
'ar act'aa-
A cu"'aca-MEMO ROUTE SLl'r S" 'a"$aut **-
Nrm ALC 93 (Rev. May 14,194th /. M 0240 Note and return.
For c ature.
For Inforfratio%
VOrth.mo and walt) imriALS RtwARKs H
The evaluation section of this SER is inadeauate to Dennis Ziemann support the conclusions reached.
It analyzes'only the instrument limits.
can The safety issue of concern is: why is it now safe tvaoperate this plant beyond 2R5 EFPD.
I assume that To mm..ns onio imriats the answer to that is because'vou have the new system.
This should be expressed specifically and a description of how the new system will function to make sure the an plant is safe should be provided. On this basis you can exclain how von raach the "no sicnificant ha7ards cettsiderations" conclusions".
This should be clearly ro m..n..no ueit) imriats described since zat least_on_the_ Surface there aopears to be a new accident (or new consequence)--that is a c^n steam 'line break bevond 225 EFPD.
L
/M/
n r'
L-rao u m....no on.o at arks
[/ '.,
Joseph cinfo Y"l V q/(b
/
o..
7494 9/3/75 I
uc cr en si:e roa acariom ac urs c,m mi c.
..s...,
e