ML19326B644
| ML19326B644 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 06/11/1975 |
| From: | ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19326B643 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8004160416 | |
| Download: ML19326B644 (3) | |
Text
_
.g o
y.)....
.t O
\\
/
1.
Non-Routine, Non-Radiological Envi n'amental Report No. 50-313/75-33 u'
2.
Report Date: June 11, 1975 3.
Occurrence Date:
June 5, 1975 4.
Facility:
Arkansas Nuclear One-Unit 1 Russellville, Arkansas 5.
Identification of Occurrence:
Chemical concentration of chloride _ increased across the plant in excess.of Environmental. Technical Specification limits.
6.
Conditions Prior to Occurrence:
Steady-State Power X
Reactor Power 2388 Wth Hot Standby Net Output w781 We Cold Shutdown Percent of Full Power y **
Refueling Shutdown Load Changes During Routine Power Operation p
Routine Startup Operation Routine Shutdown Operation Other (specify) 7.
Description of Occurrence:
~:
Samples taken from point 20 and the discharge canal on June 2, 1975, indi-cate that the chloride concentration was higher in the discharge canal than at point 20 by 138 mg/1. Environmente.1 Technical Specification limit is 25 mg/1. Analysis performed on sample for chloride 6/5/75.
6 i
a u u 410:E b-o
l p
4. * * - -
i
N Non-Routine, Non-Radiological Enviros.nental Report No. 50-313/75-33 8.
Designation of Apparent Cause of ' ccurrer.ce:
O Design Procedure Manufacture Unusual Service Condition Including Environmental Installation /
Construction Component Failure Operator other (specify)
Samples were taken when four circulating w'ater pumps were operating.
,i Chemical discharges were being made.
d
=e 9.
Analysis of Occurrence:
The Illinois Bayou is fed by and generally maintained as a clean body of water in' comparison to the discharge embayment containing muddy waters from the Arkansas River.
e e
4 I
J e
Q 9
a 4
\\-
n
' ~ '. ' *. -,
O Non-Routine, Non-Radiological Environmental Report No.
50-313/75-33 10.
Corrective Action:
We are reviewing our ETS chemical limits with the Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology.
It has been determined that there is no basis for many of our ETS chemical discharge limits and that our water sampling and testing program does not verify that we are meeting or are not meeting conditions of our. permit to discharge into the Arkansas Rive.r or the conditions of the Arkansas Water Quality Standards, Regula-tion Number 2.
4
~
11.
Failure Data:
The circumstances of this report are similar to those reported in Non-Routine, N0n-Radiological Eraironmental Reports No. 50-313/75-23 through 50-313/75-32.
5 4
8
~;
~!
b v
D
, i, w e eer-+--
wr e*
w--
e w
,e
--~er r---,--w,-*-,--
e e