ML19326B234

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of PA Herrel Ltr Re Proposed Facility & Nuclear Plant Environ Impact.Discusses Nuclear Industry Safety Record & AEC Regulations Protecting Public Health & Safety
ML19326B234
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 02/13/1973
From: Anthony Giambusso
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To: Thomas Ashley
HOUSE OF REP.
Shared Package
ML19326B235 List:
References
NUDOCS 8003061045
Download: ML19326B234 (7)


Text

_ _ _ _ _

e-THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS

,g/ / d_1

~

POOR QUALITY PAGES

.y aceket ::o. 50-346 t

j

!!onorable Thoc;as Ludlow Ashley ficuse of itepresentatives Lear '!r. /.shley:

Thank you very nuc5 for the referral of 5.. Patricia A. !!crrel's l ettar concerning the Proposed L. avis-3 esse Nuclear Power Station.

ila ere pleast d to provide the follouir.g inieraation for your respo,;sa ta her questions about the safety anc envircre' ental ir racts of nuclear plants.

It nay be of interest to know that the nuclear industry has an inpressiva safety record.

President.sixon pointed this out in his i

Clean Energy Jcssage of last year in wi.icn he stated "... the saictv l

record of ci.'ilian power reactors in this country is extracrdinar;-

in the history of technological advances.

For nere than a quarter century--since the first nuclear encin reaction tent place--no renocr of the public has been injured by the failure of a reactor or a/ an i

accidental release of radicactivity." A copy of the Presidant's

~enage is enclosed.

I The industry's safety record is due in large part to the defense-i in-depth concept applied to the construction and operation of nuclear i

power plants. This involves nigh quality materials and worknanship, and safety systens designed both to prevent sericus accidents and to limit tne consequencas in tr.e small chance that tory eccur. T::a safety features built into reactors are redundant in riature ;;hich

.wans t:iat in the rrote event cae svste f:il: to fustion properly, one of the i;ackup syste.is would be activated.

i;ny arrlication for a construction nernit er cuerating licme is subjected to an intensive revici ny the ^tcaic Err;;y Comission

( A.E.C.) iu;ulatory Staff with tne protection of tic r@lic realth and safatv anJ the environ"ent as min consiunrations. A co.y of tha Safety Evaluation cnd a copy of tM raf t inviron;;ertai Statement for the Cavis-Cesse application rrepared by the uirectorate of Licensing (previously titled Civis'en of i:cacter Licensing) arc i

enclosed.

061NI Comy eq p$

8 gg

, v w/'

a

lionorable Thom JFO'LearyChairm as L. Ashley 0 Ob The A.E.

, DR of 1969 (C. is L

imp! EPA),requir d, u der the N i

EP-raental e

act of to perfom the against pos n

EP-Statenent. siblethe proposed plevaluation Envir A. G RP R onal Draft Stateaent risk As to the r

of o

environment as dant equir d by NEPA as Environnw ll as the publi e

e from otential e appropriate feder l

, w hav The final phaseavailable to the pStatc ental c

escribede isen e

After thes e

r quested co:.T1 e

t a

ublic. will State, a d local pemit will e

will sendbe pr par d byc b

Safety and We be public heariof evaluation n

s e

on are r e

to the A.E.C. ande agen Licensing Board understand any ismako limited app ngs held near theof co e

you a copy at l

to permit local u id the that time.

earances of The enclosed sues to bes ttled. expressing their citizens thesite b co by the Regulato docu i

e n

tw ments pres enty-five yearry Staff wnich positions cpocrtu it c

ent j

Ms. hope this infomatio earch, hasth tn fult and n

We s of res i

ol i

n t!errel's lett dev lo;y be evica r.ent and operatien e

i er, n is adequate to ugh enable you to ng experie l

r Sincerely, espond l

to l

i, Oridfalsigned a A. Giamhu l

y no A. Gia%usso, De En

1. closur es for r 1

Letter : dated Directorateeactor Projectsputy Dir l

2 Pr Messageesident Nixon'nuary 29,1973 of Licensing Ja ector i

I 3

DraftSafety Evaluati s Clean Energy 4

i l

Environmentalon Report i

Statement T

I

t e

f 1

  • Licensing Assi omet>

j

...... L

  • P-

..L:Ak,4r stant for follow sumut >

i 2...gh up action.

f rra AEC.M8(ReOA TE >

,,,,n3,,,1g Fo

.. D...P

v. 9-M..

,,_ _,,,,1er OCR JAECM....

0240

,,,,,,,,,,,2n,,, sso atseeE

!........,,, f,,,,

  • v s scaaw os$ch m

1972-4b6[99h.

DISTRIBUTI0ti:

f Docket File 1viron)

DR Reading i

L Reading EP-1 Reading EP-1 File

\\

RP Reading N.'

A. Giambusso

\\

D. Muller Docket No. 50-346 M. Malsch OCR (2)

G. Ertter, (DR 5274)

J. Cook, DR Honorable Thomas Ludlow Ashley House of Representatives

Dear Mr. Ashley:

Thank you very much for your letter concerning the pronos<

Nuclear Power Station and the safety of nuclear reactors.

You may be interested t'o know that the nuclear industry bd ive safety record.

President flixon pointed this out in h' Enercy Message of last year in which he stated "....the s.

of civilian power reactors in this countrv is extracrdine history of technological advancas.

For more than a cticrt-since the first nuclear chain reaction took place -- nn r i

the public has been injured by the failure of a reactor c:

}

accidental release of radio act. city." A copy of the Pre message is enclosed for your infornation.

The industry's safety record is due in large part to the e in-depth concept applied to the construction and oneratfor power plants. This involves hich quality natorials and wc and safety systems designed both to prevent serieur accis limit the consequences in the small chance that they cccus safety features built into reactor:: tre redundant in natut that in the remote event one system fails to function prcr of the backup systems would be actinted.

Any application for a construction permit or operating li; subjected to an intensive review by the Atenic Eneroy Corr (A.E.C.) Regulatory Staff with the protection of the pt.bli and safety and the environment as nain censiderationc.

A Safety Evaluation and a copy of the Draft Environmntal St the Davis-Besse application prepared by the Directorate of (previously titled Division of Reactor Licensing) are enci your review.

t l

OFFICE >

SURNAME >

DATE >....

l

Honorable Thomas L. Ashley.

The A.E.C. is 4 required, under 'the 11ational Environmental Policy of 1969 (NEPA), to perfom the evaluation of the potential envi mental impact of the proposed plant and balance the benefits de against possible risk to the environment as described in the Dra S tatement. As required by NEPA, we have requested coments on t Draft Statement from appropriate Federal, State, and local Agenc -

as well as the public. After these corments are received, a Fin -

Environmental Statement will be prepared by the A.E.C. and made available to the public. We will send you a copy at that time.

final phase of evaluation of continuation of the construction oeq will be public hearings held near the site by the Atomic Safety 9 Licensing Board to pennit local citizens the opportunity to make limited appearances expressing their positions and to fully under any issues to be settled.

The enclosed documents present the detailed review and evaluation the Regulatory Staff which has only been possible through twenty-years of research, development and operating experience.

He thank you for your interest and hope that the infomation prov; adequately answers your concerns.

Sincerely, i

f 1

l A. Gimbusso, Deputy Director for Reactor Projects Directorate of Licensing

Enclosures:

As stated omca>...Ep,.l...L....

..,.ADEP

..DD.R P...

G.Knighton:mh _ _ _

DMuller AGiambusso OCR sumwe>

om > 2/6/Z3......

. 2/_ l.7.3.....

... 2L...H3........ 2L.../D.......

Forma AEC-318 (Rev. 9 53) AECM 0240 e u s oost=sve%r m.%%NG orect 1972-466-963

"[#

UNITED STATES yM' ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

' I ' \\ Jr. *.b, 4 WASm NGTON. O.C.

20545 f

Docket No. 50-346 Honorable Thomas Ludlow Ashley House of Representatives

Dear Mr. Ashley:

i

'\\

i Thank you verysmuch for your letter concerning the proposed Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station and the safety of nuclear reactors.

.f+

\\

.Yett may be icteresT671 to know that the nuclear industry has an impress-ive safety record.

President Nixon pointed this out in his Clean Energy Message of last' year in which he stated "....the safety record of civilian power reactors in this country is extraordinary in the history of technological advances.

For more than a quarter-century ---

since the first nuclear chain reaction took place -- no member of the public has been injured by the failure of a reactor or tsy an accidental release of radio activity." A copy of the President's message is enclosed,fer your w~mHm N

The industry's safety record is due in large part to the defense-in-depth concept applied to the construction and operation of nuclear power plants.

This involves high quality materials and workmanship, and safety systems designed both to prevent serious accidents and to limit the consequences in the small chance that they occur.

The safety features built into reactors are redundant in nature which means that in the remote event one system fails to function properly, one of the backup systems would be activated.

\\

Any application for a construction permit or operating license is subjected to an intensive review by the Atomic Energy Commission (A.E.C.) Regulatory Staff with the protection of the public health and safety and the environment as main considerations.'. A copy of the Safety Evaluation and a copy of the Draft Environmental Statement for the Davis-Besse application prepared by the Directorate of Licensing

^

(previously titled Division of Reactor Licensing) are enclosed,fe:

y^U r -@ N.

T l

l

?

Honorable Thomas L. Ashley i The A.E.C. is ' required, under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), to perform the evaluation of the potentiai environ-mental impact of the proposed plant and balance the benefits derived against possible risk to the environment as described in the Draft Statement.

As required by NEPA, we have requested coments on this Draft Statement from appropriate Federal, State, and local Agencies as well as the public. After these comments are received, a Final Environmental Statement will be prepared by the A.E.C. and made available to the public.

We will send you a copy at that time. The final phase of evaluation of continuation of the construction permit will be public hearings held near the site by the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board to permit local citizens the opportunity to make limited appearances expressing their positions and to fully understand any issues to be settled.

The enclosed documents present the detailed review and evaluation by the Regulatory Staff which has only been possible through twenty-five years of research, development and operating experience.

We-thank-you for-your-interest-and-hope ~that-the-information-provided adequately answers-your concerns.

Sincerely,

.I A. Giambusso, Deputy Director for Reactor Projects Directorate of Licensing

Enclosures:

As stated l

%my e %

1 9.%-J h C

e E*

t 3 w e 4 -r u af w *w

Ac% FM cd n&

6<. M s A f mm

/

b -bo M b

n 2 4. wk fU b

n Jn y ~ y 4 Eql x

m===

m

& pn~

a-

/fn #-h 2

axy&,

, xLw,

\\

\\

\\

m l

,