ML19326B227

Forwards from Doi Commenting on Facility Des.Ltr Not Expected to Affect ASLB Rulings.W/O Encl

ML19326B227
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	06/13/1973
From:	Davis F US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:	Farmakides J, Hand C, Shon F Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 8003061038
Download: ML19326B227 (2)

Text

______

O

~

.N-( 6 ~ _"p

.R.

j' D

M t' 4 U " U ' h.y~

m n

-y 3-7 w o-I r-oc aS.

d

~3

.L..

N; JUN 131973 J Ii Mr. John B. Farmakides Mr. Frederick J. Shen Atomic Safety and Licensing Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Board Panel e

U.S. Atomic Energy Commission U.S. Atomic Energy CommissioE Washington, D.C. 20545 Washington, D.C.

20545 Dr. Cadet H. Hand, Jr., Director Bodega Marine Laboratory University of California P.O. Box 247

.t, Bodega Bay, California 94923 r

In the Matter of The Toledo Edison Company

~

and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company y

i (Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station)

Docket No. 50-346

-P Gentlemen:

During the course of the special prehearing conference regarding the cap-tioned matter, held on May 22, 1973, there was some discussion (Tr. 27 -

l

30) cf a portion of the comuments from the Department of the Interior on an Environmental Statement issued by the regulatory staff regarding a nuclear power plant other than the Davis-Besse hellity. Some of this discussion related to the relevance of such comments to the Davis-Besse facility.

~J It has come to my attention that the Department of Interior submitted a letter containing a similar comment with respect to the Davis-Besse facility. I aan.

enclosing a copy of this letter, dated March 12, 1973 from W.W. Lyons, the~

Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Interior, to Daniel R. Muller, the Assistant Director for Environmental Projects Directorate of Licensing of the Com-mission, commenting upon the Draft Environmental Statement, related to the construction of the Davis-Besse facility, which was issued by the Commission in November,1972. Inasmuch as this letter was received after publication of the Final Environmental Statement (FES), it is not included in the FES.

OThe letter, of course, was sent to the Washington, D.C., and to the Port Clinton Public Document Roossa upon receipt. However, neither the Board

- p., p.. Ce; Lc cp p ;. 'e ;!7 };;. ; _ppli:d p ::p7 57 tff ::r- :!.

p 800306103 d

yr., --

.yWgg'~,.

%;;:;398 m a y,,g 7 m:::: y;,.qy;3 w;p a

i ;<,;

_ g;;

- ~3 w.; 3,4 y: s q;p,

ngyg

.aw _

-;,a pi

. A -9~

gya. ji pp 3. _.

m?

~

y _

r% L c

c 1

We do not believe that this letter affects the discussion on the record referred ~

to above, nor in anyway affects any of the Scard's rulings.

Sincerely,

S

~$'

6-5 Francis X. Davis Counsel for AEC Regulatory Staff f

Enclosure:

T l

3 ;v '

Ltr fm Dept. ofInterior, 03/12/73 DISTRIBUTION:

rf OGC Files cc w/ enclosure:

Gmturn Joseph F. Tubridy, Esq.

Reg. Central Dr. He.rry Foreman PDR LPDR Ms. Evelyn Stebbins LPDR Gerald Charnoff, Esq.

HShapar Atomic Safety and Licensing TEngelhardt 3

Appeal Board JScinto

,gQ Atomic Safety and Licerising MKarman

',"Myp /

Board Panel FDavis

].p jyc#p Mr. Frank W. Karas HFaulkner HThompson

f;

.?

Formal Files 1 '. AJ.

. ~._a g

.c 4

da..., h =

.. +.

+.

D g g,Dl.

-c c,ak-

~ ~.

"Fo) 73 ~T

~

3 Ob.

-3 l

^

[..h,,

OG omer >

FXD VI -

~

- ;f ~.

sunnac >.SCINT MAN O.#

DATr>.9.

Form AEC-518 (Rev. 9 53) AECMM40...

~.

v. s, covEnNRGENT PRINTING OFP!CE i 1970 0 405-344

'<g l

r

,e

t_-

l

- --