ML19326B185

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on Encl Undated Memorandum of Understanding Between Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co & City of Cleveland Per ASLB 760920 Order Directing Parties to Consider Impact of Intended Acquisition.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML19326B185
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse, Perry  Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 10/12/1976
From: Goldberg J, Lessy R, Vogler B
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 8003060979
Download: ML19326B185 (16)


Text

_ - _ -

u.c. NucLEAn nEcutATonv r vuissioN DocxET NUMYE "O" MM M oon 195 JN/20) / 4901995 NRC DISTRIBUTION rOn PART 50 DOCKET MATERIAL iUdIfGTRANCRIPTS oATE or DocuuENT FROM: SECRETARY, NRC

/M*M" 7d TO:

WASilINGTON, D.C.

DATE RECElVED 10-19-14 OLETrEn ONOTOnlZED PROP INPUT FORM N'uMDER OF COPIES RECEIVED

,h C onlGIN AL O UNC L ASSIFIE D Ocorv NO LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL REC'D ylEARING TRANSCRIQATED fp-/g.74 WITl! HEARING TRANSCRIPT.....

PAGE IO TIIRU

/J 5 CILIN.I.E?m.0R

/.d$

'. \\

4 c.:...,

iv

..\\

.' ]i y' C j'[.3 2 ; ;

PLANT NAME: 0$ Wig gggge

f. g.3

... k I' ~

Perry l 4 3,

~'

o,

,(N

. e. /

FOR ACTION /INFORMATION BEL (0 M i

m-

-- a

~ ^~

h murer ms:.cru IEMeLe DE!{ISE

___ _SALEMAN INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION I

i i

s l

1

.e esime 6

EX TEllNAL D10111100 TION CONT flOL NUMl!CR

M

__.M61 T- ' ~

I :19_024c4o,_

- ~ ~ ~ '

ur a

e-Ni,c. n.,,is ip,n) _

/

<\\s

/\\ \\

'b q

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA "um i NUCLEAR RECULATOPY COMMISS!^"

ll-h gg { ).> dO r

gig..

-S')

BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD, o-In the Matter of

)

/g / 2,

=

THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY and NR Docket Mos. 50 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLCMINATING )

50-500A COMPANY

)

50-501A (Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station.

)

Units 1, 2 & 3)

)

)

THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING )

NRC Docket Nos. 50-440A COMPANY, ET AL.

)

50-441A (Perry Nuclear Power Plant,

)

Units 1 & 2)

)

COMMENTS OF NRC STAFF ON UNDATED MEMORANDUM 0F UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CEI AND THE CITY OF CLEVELAND By Order dated September 20, 1976, this Board directed the parties to consider the ' impact of the intended acquisition of the Cleveland municipal electric system by the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (as evidenced by the Memorandum of Understanding attached hereto) on the parties' Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

Although an undated Memorandum of Understanding between CEI and the City has been executed, the Memorandum constitutes little more than an Option agreement in that CEI's offer to purchase MECP does not constitute a firm offer until authorized by the Board of Directors of CEI (see para. 8 of Memorandum). Likewise, the City's agreement to sell MELP is subject to the,k,ss approval and authorization by the It is the Staff's understanding,in Council of the City of Clev:

a.

8 2

addition, that if the City Council approves the sale, municipal law provides the mechanism for a direct referendum in the City of Cleveland concerning the sale.

Last, inasmuch as the Memorandum was executed in connection with the settlement of a private antitrust action before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, it is also subject to the prior approval of the District Court.

These con-ditions and circumstances, in Staff's view, may well prevent or substan-tially delay the consummation of the acquisition.

The recently-concluded evidentiary hearing clearly established that the acquisition of NELP has long been a CEI corporate goal and that CEI deliberately denied MELP the benefits of coordinated operation and develo'pnent in order to force the sale of MELP to CEI.

Thus, the possible sa?e of MELP to CEI arises in the context of a situation inconsistent with the antitrust laws. Without appropriate antitrust relief as recommended in Staff's Proposed Findings, the City must choose between having their system acquired or continuing to struggle against CEI's abuse of its dominant position. Thus, a timely decision by the Board ordering appropriate relief would make available to 'the City a meaningful alternative to the Hobson's choice between continued operation, without the benefits of coordinated operation and development and access to essen,tial resources, and acquisition by CEI.

m.,

r-f If the acquisition is however consummated in the interim, Painesville will become the last surviving entity in CEI's area, and Staff's Proposed Findings (and suggested relief) with respect to Painesville will become of paramount importance.

Respectfully submitted

$ sys + W Y, l l

Benjamin H. Vogler

- j Assistant Director i

Antitrust Division, OELD

^D

.Roy P Counse/ Lessy, Jr.V 'j l for NRC Staff ll

(

_J ck R. Goldberg C unsel for NRC Staff Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 12th day of October 1976.

O 9

9 O

O

~-

t Between DIE. CITY OF CLEVELMID And DIE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPM.'Y MIEREAS, the City of Cleveland (hereinaf ter " City") and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (hereinafter "CEI") are the Plaintiff and a Defendant, respeccively, in an antitrust action now pending before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, being Civil hetionNo.C75-560onthedocketofsaidcourt;and WHEREAS, the City and CEI are also engaged in numerous other icgsl

^ and administrative actions with claims and counterclaims being made by each of the contending partics; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the con =enecment of said litigation, the City and CEI have conducted various negotiations with respect to the resolution of.the aforementioned litigation, including the sale of part or all of the

, facilities of the Municipal Electric Light Plant (hereinafter "MELP"),

owned by the City; and WHEREAS, as a result of the foregoing, the Administration of the City and the management of CEI have reached an agreement in principal with l

respect to the sale of HELP to CEI; NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the City, through its t

l l

Hayor on behalf of the Administrar. ion of the City of Cleveland, and CEI, I

l through its. President on behalf of the management of CEI, that:

l 1.

As consideration of the sale, transfer and conveyance to CEI of the assets of MELP described in Paragraph 2 hereof, CEI shall* pay to the City the sum of $158,500,000, payable as follows:

i g

(a)

$38,500,000 shall be paid in cash to the City at.the closing of this trannaccion; and (b) The balance of $120,000,000 to be paid to the

  • City at the rate of $4,000,000 per annum, adequately secured, payable en the last day of cach year, commencing December 31, 1977.

2.

The City shall transfer and convey to CEI all property, plant and equipment of MELP, including land, set forth as 1

assets in the December 31, 1975 balance sheet cf FELP, excluding cash on deposit in the City. Treasury, which includes operating funds, sinking funds and encumberdd bond funds, as agreed upon by R. W. Beck. & Company and Gilbert Associates, Inc. (consultants to th'a City and CEI, respec.tively), subject to the following terms and conditions:

N-(a) MELP shall guarantee that its gross accounts receivable shall be not less than $3,500,000.

(b) The net book value of all other current assets of MELP shall be not less than ninety percent (90%)

'of the net book value as of December 31, 1975, provided that any of said current assets which L

shall have been incorporated in or become a part l

of the property, plant and equipment transferred hereunder shall not be deemed to diminish the value of current assets. The unaudited book value as of December 31, 1975 for all other current assets was rrtfallsva:

3 Current Assets Unbilled & Accrued Receivables

$ 847,696 Accrued Interest Receivable 45,370 Stores !!aterials & Supplies

$3,080,655 14ss Reserve for Obsolesence 394,021 2,686,634 57,796 Prepaid Expense Undistributed Work Orders 216,268 (c) The book valus of the property, plant and equipment of I'ILP at the date of transfer shall be not icss than $52,513,196, the book value of such property, plant and equipment as of December 31, 1975, adjusted fo'r normal depreciation and normal additions and retirements.

(d) MELP shall guarantee that the gross unencumbered funds reserved for plant expansion as shown in bond construction accounts on December 31, 1975 shall not be less than $984,570, unless reduced by expenditures or certification of funds for property, piant and equipment after January r, 1976.

(e) If upon audit as hereafter provided, the gross accounts receivabic to be transferred to CEI are less than $3,500,000, or if the net book value of all other current assets is icss than ninety percent,(90%) of net book value as of December 31, 1975, as adjusted pursuant to Section 2 (b) hereof, or if the gross unencumbered funds reserved for plant expansion as shown in bond construction accounts on December 31, j

1975, is les's than $984,570, unicas reduced by expendi-tures or certification of funds for property, plant

and equipment after January 1, 1976, or if the book value of the property, plant and equipment of MELP at the date of transfer is Icss than $52,51',.t96,

~

the book value of such property, plant and equipment as o'f December 31, 1975, adjusted for normal deprecia-tion and normal additions and retirements, a deduction iktheamountofsaiddeficiencyshallbemadefrom CEI's initial cash payment of $38,500,000 at the time of closing.

3.

IfCENatitssolediscretiondeterminestodisposeofany interest in real property bordering upon Lake Erie (hereinafter "lakefront land") transferred by the City at the closing of this transaction, CEI shall, before dis' posing of its interest in said lakefront land to any other person or entity, notify the Mayor of the City in writing of its intent to dispese of its interest in said lakefront property and offer to the City s

the opportunity to repurchase said. interest in land at its then appraised value.

If the City is interested in the repur-chase.of said interest in lakefront property, it shall so notify the President of CEI in wr'iting within thirty (30) days of the teceipt of said notice from CEI.

The repurchase price

~

shall be established by a recognized real estatc appraiser mutually agreed upon by the City and CEI. Said interest in lakefront property may be repurchased at said appraised price by the City.

D e

.O

~ ~ '

  • ~

4.

CEI agrees to employ not icss than eighty (80) qualified HELP employees, who shall be designated by CEI within seven (7) days from the date of the passage of a ratifying ordinance by Council and employed by CEI at the time of the closing of this transaction, it being understood that any employees of MELP in

.an occupation coming within the purview of CEI's collective bargaining agreement shall, as a condition of their employment 1

t by CEI, joir. Local 270 UWA for collective bargaining purposes.

If any HELP coployee designated by CEI declines employment, CEI shal5. be' obligated to hire another MELP employee in his or her

~

w stead, the tenor of this Pa'ragraph 4 being that upon the consummation of this transaction, CEI shall have employed not less than eighty (80) MELP employees.

5. "The City agrecs that it shali pay to CEI from the down

. payment specified in Paragraph 1. (a) hereof, all moneys owing to CEI, except a sum not to exceed $10,000,000, which may be withheld and paid to CEI upon the following terms and conditions:

The City shall pay to CEI any balance owing to l

CEI over a period of thirty (30) years, or during such

" lesser period as the City shall determine, with interest on the unpaid balance of prinip. ara interest computed annually at three-quarte:y 'A's pf the Cleveland Trust I

Company prime rate as of January 1 of cach yea'r, commencing January 1, 1977.

In no event shall the City be required to pay interest in excess of a rate of eight perpnt (8%)

per annum.

- _ =

Tac p'rincipal amount owing to CEI shall be amortized by eq'ual annual paynents up to a maximum of thirty (30) years. Larger principal payme..ts may

, ba~ made by the City at any time, and payments of interest owed by the City may be deferred by the

. City at its sole diacretion for the initial period

~

. of.five (5) years, provided that ultimate payments of such deferred interest must be made in a manner which insures equal amortization of the deferred interest payments over the remaining years of the City's obligation to CEI. The first payment by the City pursuant to this paragraph' 5 shall be made on December 31, 1977, with subsequent payments to be

~

made on the last day of each succeeding year.

6.. Prior to the date of the transfer of the assets of the Division of Light and Power to the Company, the City will have

~,.

conducted at its expense a certified audit of the assets of the Division of Light and Power by the public accounting firm of Peat-Marwick-Mitchell & Co.

CEI may retain at its own expense the public accounting firm of Price, Waterhouse & Co.

to make its own independent audit and to review any accounting records, working papers or other information pertaining to

. said audit or the results of said audit as nay be necessary to render its own opinion. Any differences shall be recon-i ciled by the respective independent public accountants as of January 10, 1977.

  • l l

7-s 7.

The terms of the present street lighting service contract between the City and CEI shall be extended as follows:

, (a) With respect to street lights presently serviced and maintained within the City by

-l CEI, the terms of the' present contract shall l

be extended through December 31, 1977.

(b) With respect to street lights presently serviced and maintained by MELP, the terms of the present street lighting contract between

~

i the City and CEI adjusted for size and type of w

fixtures where necessary shall be applicable through December 31, 1978.

--(c)

On and after January 1, 1979, all street lights within the city now serviced and main-tained by either CEI or MELP shall be controlled by the rates and conditions established in the street lighting service contract next negotiated by.the City and CEI effective on and af ter January 1, 1978.

It is further agreed that CEI shall provide electricity for sater pumping and all other City accounts at the lowest industrial

. rate where applicabic, otherwise, at the prevailing approved I

rate schedule for the particular use involved.

e e

8.,

The transaction contemplated by this Memorandum and the terms herein set forth shall be authorized.by the Board of Directors of CEI not later thaa 0-5,1976 and chall thereafter constitute a firm offer by CEI to the City of the terms and conditions hereof, which offer

. shall remain in effcet through a'nd including January 10, 1977. This transaction shall also be subject to authorization by the Council of the City not later than November 30, 1976.

9.

As a condition of the transfer of the assets by the City and the payment of money by CEI, as hereinabove described; the City will make provision for the discharge of what is now N

estimated to be $10,164,180, constituting principal and interest upon Mortgage Revenue Bonds of the City of Cleveland secured by the-Indenture of !!ortgage between the City of Cleve-land and the Union. Bank of Commerce Company, as Trustee, dated

~

October 1, '1948, and as supplemented by Supplemental Indentures s

~

of Mortgage dated October.1,1954, August 1,1960, and January 1, 1963, respectively. The City cay satisfy said lien and Mortgage at the time of the execution of the sale documents, either by naking direct payment to the Trustec of the prin,cipal and interest on said Bonds, or the City may, in its sole discretion, authorize and direct CEI to make payment, on the City's behalf, to said Trustee or to an escrow agent designated by the City from e

the proceeds of the initial gross payment of $38,500,000, of an amount sufficient to sarirf M ac Trir.cipal and interest due and e4 g

e'

. ;9, owing upon said lien and !!ortgage. All benefits or savings resulting from the discharge of sai' :'at

.a ge Revenue Bonds, whether discharged directly by the City or from the initial gross payment, shall inure to the benefit of the City.

10. Contemporaneous with the closing of this trancaction, CEI and the City shall take all necessary steps to terminate with prejudice their participation in all litigation before either administrative agencies or courts of law and.to extinguish all money judgments or other claims or disputes between them arising as a consequence of the City's operation of MELP.
11. The transaction contemplated by this }!cmorandum of Understanding shall be closed on or before January 10, 1977, unless further extended by agreement of the parties.

C F CLc.* LA?O

/

iDM2 By

/ Itayor.

711E CLEVELAN ELECTRIC ILLU1!INATIliG COMPA!!Y l

!)

$f OY

_d Presiden l

l

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORETHEATOMICSAFETYANDLICENSIMGyyy,n In the Matter of

)

THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY and NRC Docket Nos. 50-346A THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING )

50-500A COMPANY

)

50-501A (Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station,

)

Units 1, 2 & 3)

)

)

THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING )

NRC Docket Nos. 50-440A COMPANY, ET AL.

)

50-441A

)

(Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 & 2)

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of COMMENTS OF NRC STAFF ON UNDATED MEMO-RANDUM 0F UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CEI AND THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, in the above-captioned proceeding have been served on the following by deposit in the United States mail, first class or air mail, or, as indicated by an asterisk, through deposit in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's internal mail system, this 12th day of October 1976:

Douglas V. Rigler, Esq.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Chairman, Atomic Safety and Board Panel Licensing Bcard U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Foley, Lardner, Hollabaugh Washington, D.C.

20555 and Jacobs 815 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.

Docketing and Service Section Washington, D.C.

20006 Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Ivan W. Smith, Esq.

Washington, D.C.

20555

  • Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Joseph J. Saunders, Esq.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Antitrust Divis. ion Department of Justice Washington, D.C.

20555 Washington, D.C.

20530 John M. Frysiak, Esq.

Atomic _ Safety and Licensing Steven M. Charno, Esq.

Board Melvin G. Berger, Esq.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Janet R. Urban, Esq.

P. O. Box 7513 Washington, D.C.

20555

20044 l

- Reuben Goldberg, Esq.

Terence H. Benbow, Esq.

David C. Hjelmfelt, Esq.

A. Edward Grashof, Esq.

Michael D. Oldak, Esq.

Steven A. Berger, Esq.

Goldberg, Fieldman & Hjelre elt Steven B. Peri, Esq.

1700 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts Suite 550 40 Wall Street Washington, D.C.

20006 New York, New York 10005 Vincent C. Campanella, Esq.

Thomas J. Munsch, Esq.

Director of Law General Attorney Robert D. Hart, Esq.

Duquesne Light Company 1st Assistant Director of Law 435 Sixth Avenue i

City of Cleveland Pittsburgh, Pa.

15219 213 City Hall Cleveland, Ohio 44114 David Olds, Esq.

Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay Gerald Charnoff, Esq.

Union Trust Building Wm. Bradford Reynolds, Esq.

Box 2009 Robert E. Zahler, Esq.

Pittsburgh, Pa.

15230 Jay H. Bernstein, Esq.

Shaw. Pittman, Potts &

Lee A. Rau, Esq.

Trowbridge Joseph A. Rieser, Jr., Esq.

1800 M Street, N.W.

Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay Washington, D.C.

20036 Madison Building - Rm. 404 115515th Street, N.W.

Frank R. Clokey, Esq.

Washington, D.C.

20005 Special Assistant Attorney General Edward A. Matto, Esq.

Room 219 Richard M. Firestone, Esq.

Towne House Apartments Karen H. Adkins, Esq.

Harrisburg, Pa.

17105 Antitrust Section 30 E. Broad Street,15th Floor Donald H. Hauser, Esq.

Columbus, Ohio 43215 Victor F. Greenslade, Jr., Esq.

William J. Kerner, Esq.

Christopher R. Schraff, Esq.

The Cleveland Electric Assistant Attorney General Illuminating Company Environmental Law Section 55 Public Square 361 E. Broad Street, 8th Floor Cleveland, Ohio 44101 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Michael M. Briley, Esq.

James R. Edgerly, Esq.

Roger P. Klee, Esq.

Secretary and General Counsel Fuller, Henry, Hodge & Snyder Pennsylvania Power Company P. O. Box 2088 One East Washington Street Toledo, Ohio 43604 New Castle, Pa.

16103 Russell J. Spetrino, Esq.

Paul M. Smart, Esq.

Thomas A. Kayuha, Esq.

Fuller, Henry, Hodge & Snyder Ohio Edisor. Company 300 Madison Avenue 47 North Main Street' Toledo, Ohio 43604 Akron, Ohio 44308 j

.. l John Lansdale, Esq.'

Jerome Saltzman, Chief Cox, Langford & Brown Antitrust and Indemnity Group 21 Oupont Circle, N.W.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20036 Washington, D.C.

20555

  • Alan P. Buchmann, Esq.

Squire, Sanders & Dempsey 1800 Union Commerce Building Cleveland, Ohio 44115 i

i b' A Lc J

~-

[dackR.Goldberg Counsel for NRC Staff i

t l

1 i

e g

-.,.