ML19326B179
| ML19326B179 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 02/10/1971 |
| From: | Thomas Ashley HOUSE OF REP. |
| To: | US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003060973 | |
| Download: ML19326B179 (3) | |
Text
l e
o g
1 I
FROM CONTROL-NUMBER'
"* + F. ' r FrLE LOCATION--
D* b M
- [
1~
(
DATE OF 70CUMENT
. TION-COMPLETION DE ADLINE 4-
.,e 10 ACTION PROCES$ LNG D AIES PREPAREFOR SIGNATURE OF Acknowledged Chairm an
~A ~
l M
1 Internen Report Director of Regulation,
1 *.,
Finot DESCRIPilON N
h Or1 1aol C Copy C 01her 9
Tsene ey lar en amery F. membe, m.m., m, eMe, se amply ser edesseure of mer. ed
{
ehe norte-asses reser Psame and e geestses - thee ans.
- ^'
l the seed Beesh ases d11 ese he inn a some that og be eseeMesed sessie Beesming Ltr to be ressmeed d t ree,emme 23044 REFERRED TO DATE 15 NOTiFICAfiON TO THE JCAE I
RECOMMEND ED 7
_ sellivan f/astaan 2/17/7e i
l Cys seee, Anns PSE ( S 346)
'D&. L f(,,
YSentPDg 00 NOT DETACH THIS Copy DIRECTOR OF REGULATION Form HQ 32 (6-70)
COMMUNIC AfiONS CONTROL USA EC 0
a1db 8003060 9 7 3 u-
... n.
. w r
s
..s
. ~ '
f e
t s'
i
. t I
]
i l
i i
HOUSE OF REPRESENTAT3VES, tl.S.
WASHINGTON. D.C.
February 10, 1971
,196 l
f 1
i l
s.
l 1
l The attached cc:=unication is sub-l mitted for your consideration, and j
to ask that the request made therein i
j be co= plied with, if possible.
L i
If you will adviso =e of your action in this =atter and have the letter returned to me with your
. reply, I will appreciate it.
e i
[.
t M.
(
C O
I On Very truly yours, i
Thomas Ludlow Ashley I
i M.C.
8 1
Ohio - 9th m.,
I 4
i O
V #-
Timt
w
. s:s.. e de.
4..
a s
s
~
H2NRY P.
D RAF.E. M. D.
umsvenoiry Manicas, stos.
l t
asas was, anac= ore svaust
,3 r
Totsoo, oMao - 43eo7 l
January 29,1 71 4
~
\\
Representative Thomas Ludlow Ashley House of Representatives Rayburn 3uilding
/
Washington D. C.
I i
i Dear Representative Ashley.
i 1
Thank you very =uch for your reply in regard to our letter of concern about the Davis Bessie Power Plant.
l 1
I read Mr. Davis' reply with interest and while it I
j assures us that the Blison Co=pany has no interest in
-our land, and this was of no concern, we are still not l
. assured our Sand 32ach area vill not be in a cone that l
l may be considered unsafe for habitation.
The letter from Fr. Davis, i' you will note, says only 8
that the Blison Company isn't interested in our land and I'm sure they are not.
It certainly would not be nee-essary for their construction, but the safety factor may make it essential for this area to be vacated and we would like some assurance about this possibility, prior to the t
Blison Company constructing the plant.
I Unless we can be sure that this is going to be a safe area
[
in which to live we are opposed to the construction of g
such a plant, j
Si cerely, l
- 84W
'l g
Henry P Drako, M. D.
l HPD/b1f i
i i
e 9,
e n
lI q
sJ
^
.n.
.