ML19326B117
| ML19326B117 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse, Perry  |
| Issue date: | 06/28/1978 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19326B110 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003060920 | |
| Download: ML19326B117 (4) | |
Text
_
O 9 R m p_
s-D o
N<
r w
5~]1
~
D 3
3
-. 4]
'JL ru 5 NOTICE OF VIOLATION v9 u
~~
~
gn-na Cleveland Electric Illuminating' Company Davis Besse Unit 1, 3d m
e-1 License No. NPF-3
'**T-
=~
p d
~~
N
~c Perry Units 1 a'nd 2
'CPPR-148 CPPR-149
$., o
~
[
i.
As a result of (a) an investigation of a request for enforcement
' J,
~
.n.w.
~
action by the City of Cleveland dated February 28,1978,(b)ananalysis, :.
. 7
?,.
.,e of, a transmission schedule filed by The Cleveland Electri.c Illuminating -
Company (CEI) on January 27, 1978 with the Federal Energy [ite'gulatory. 'K Comiss' ion, and (c) a review of 'CEI's answers dated March 27.71973 to t.Gi W'R,
x.
~ _,
_ JQ::u
~
.~
the Nuclear Regulatory Comission'(NRC) Staff's questionnaire dated
,'Q.;
7
.t;
.s 21, 1978, l
February "
it appears 'that CEI' has not complied with' ant [itrusth f [,
m.
h l n
- 3;. :
' e-
~
license condition No. 3 of.the subject license and construction permits; Q
7
., e' as set forth be. low.
, +.,:
g_
4 l
u Antitrust License Condition No. 3 reads ~as follows:
a mi ~
-e
, Q.
v c.
- "(3). Applicants shall engage in wheeling for and at the
_ &/
request of other entities in the CCCT:
i ^l i
a) of electric energy' from delivery points of Applicants.to theentity(ies);and,.
~
J b) of power generated by or available to the' dthU entity, 'as a result of its ownership or,entitlements*/ in generating facilities.
to delivery points of Applicants ' designated by the other entity., q,
- ~z
, ye
...y s'y q..
- a y.
3 "Entitiement" includes but is.not. limited to. power made 'available
.. ' ~ '
~ '+
to an entity pursuant to an exchange agreement.
G-ms; ;
- _-/,
/
. [.
3 l
.'a s n'\\
_)
^
g.
s g'
~i,7
,P
+
_;,x,-
~
1:.
x ; :,
^
~
f' ny l
V F-
~.
orr.c.
t
_ 8onoeoggp 7m
... mm....:
- ~
=
=.
,~"*C "* P8]S 78) NRCM 0240
, j.4 f ua s.'eovamm'u ant enamtme orrica. sete -sawas,. -
[
D
- M o n 1.
f
[f A
"Such wheelfng service's shall' be available with respect to any
' unused capacity on the transmission lines of Applicants, the use of which will not jeopardize Applicants' system.
In the event Applicants,
~ ^
must reduce wheeling services to'other entities due to lack of f.
capacity, such reduction shall not be effected unt11' reductions of.
- h-at least 5 percent have been madelin transmission capacity' allocations ~
to other Applicants in these proceedings and thereafter shall be.
4
- -made in proportion to reductions imposed upo.n other Applicants to f
'.thisproceeding.**/
~.
[,;Q ust '
2" Applicants shall make reasonable provisions for disclosed' transmission requirements of other entities in the' CCCT in planning. -7r-
- future transmission either individually or within the CAPC.0 grouping._
By " disclosed" is meant the giving of reasonable advance. notification
'4
.of future requirements by entities utilizing wheeling services to a;
.be made available by Applicants."
,J,' r.
r ge
,n:g g,
'~
~
.s.
7 3~
F
.6, W '-
Staf.f has concluded that the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company
" ' p.p i-
.~'^
f
,~ W.;
~(Licensee) has not reasonably complied'with this condition since Jarjuary,27n 3 1978 in thati
~
v W, * ># db p
n ;,
- z n
3
^; 4 L r s y
e s
(1) although antitrust license condition No. 3 requires provision of wheeling services on'a reasonable basis, the Li.cens'ee has proposed m,
g L
.J
..i such ' services only until some unknown future date ("the date of the'.
. ~. 7 :q..
f.
_. ?
?
final dedsion of NRC" on the question of. validity of condition No. 3).
L.
.. I
=.
.. ;. ! > =f. '
Conditioning' wheeling on such a basis is unreasonable and tantamount to
' ' ~
- g. x
~
N
<i '. ; $:
. v.
~
1w' a refusal to wheel.
y e
(
.~
'n.
a -
~.;
'C5
'OQ4-4 L'
/- -
'M ((:p' l.
j
- / The objective of this requirement is'to rirevent. the preempt' ion ob ' $l r Eunused capacity on the' lines of one Applicant by other Applicants ', '
~
1 "or. bylentities the transmitting Applicant deeves noncompetitive.1 7 ~ J A TCompe,titiv'eTentities"are to~ be allowed opportunity ~to ' develop bulk cCQl
~
. power services bptions even if:this Tresults' in' reallocation'off M
,7'u _
g CAPC0 '(Central Area. Power ' Coordination Group) transmission' channels.
M T sThis ' relief is required in ' order, to avoid prolongation of Lthe /;
6'. *
~
~
' effects of Applicants' 11 legally sustained dominance.
- Q
,_w i
~.
i
- =4
~
LAppendix"A 3 1}
l
..,,,,y
e
.
r G.
- fc."
, c.; x h
- ~..'
s ~
- p
,,y.".
-~
s
. gg g
.,t s
L NRC PORM OIs 39 70 }m dyn
,j'A brhdrrmtrr7rnr mcumrn d/mse M
^ J m + p
'f-- <. _ _,,
l
,e 1
m m'
D D
cwa e
s y
i i
en! D A
'. {-
y w,
- CCCT" with the expectation that upon request such services shall be l
provided in a timely manner, the Licensee tias proposed such services '
oril'y upon condition khat the Licensee file separate supplemental schedules' -
for each tra saction.- Conditioning wheeling on such a basis is unreasonable '
~
^
and tantamount to a rei'usal to ' wheel.
^' ~
- ~
q c
~ b h/
1
-~
The five Licensee-proposed conditions to wheeling listed above, individu' ally r.
~.
and in concert, constitute unreasonable conditions tantam6'unt to a'
/ $[ -
refusal" to' wheel in violakion of antitrust license condition No. 3.
t. '.
g 1
[-
s z.
ft 2
~
~,
>M^'
This Notice of Violation.is sent to Cleveland Electric Illuminating
,,;. A e
r tompany pursuant to the provisions of 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules.of i
... p 3
m Practice," Part 2, Title 10. Code of Regulations. The Cleveland Electric Company is hereby required to submit to this Office, wit'hin twenty (20),
days of its receip of this notice, a written statement or eicplanation t
', ^
3
=
in reply, including for the above item of noncompliance; (1) admission' i
'oi dental.of the alleged item of noncompliance; (2) the reason for the'
=s 4
item of noncompliance if admitted; (3) the corrective ste;s which have
..j;;ns
\\
i y
y been taken and the resul's achieved; (4) the corrective steps which will
~
t be taken to' avoid further noncompliance; and (5) the date when full
[
.3.
, g
-e..
1 ;2 compliarice will.be' achieved.
^
.E' D
'(
'.. O,,
r i
},...
v.;.f.
,c k'l *., ; s,,
-lO Ll,
' a_ -
, :;. ~ q j'>.
e s
(,,$ s c,,[ {
5 M7 5"
. ],(
~
' [1.
si s v.
i',.
pj
(
e
~
e.
51 4 d4 "orrics >
sunwaus h'
' cava >
~L g
5
^
+
s
- 318 (9 76) NRCM 0240
- _ ~. N u,s. o'ovannu,s'mv. painnum opric., a, i,,,.,,ja.,,,,._x
,, c g,. ;
.,j--
NRC FORM 4,- _
7" np._
= i
.~
.