ML19326B108

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Protests Applicants' Request for Exemption to Permit Addl Facility Const Prior to Public Hearings
ML19326B108
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 01/18/1971
From: Bleicher B
COBURN, SMITH, ROHRBACHER & GIBSON
To: Price H
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML19326B106 List:
References
33, 710818, NUDOCS 8003060911
Download: ML19326B108 (2)


Text

'

. .. -m

" ' ^

LAW O FFICES O F CosoURN. SMITH. RoHRBACHER & GIBSoN r;tANn u. CosouRN LCLAN D M. NoTNAGEL (19 se) rcso A. sutTM 7'2' FLOO R TOLEDO TR U ST S U I LDI N G JosEPM A. YAGER 0962) vas:NON E.RoMReACHER cocERT w. GiesoN TOLEDO. OHIO 436o4  ;AM Es P. rALvEv Leuest s. JACossoN * " * * '

@CATRICE m. eLEICM ER AREA CooE 449 JANET e. ERsMtCK RADao s. CASLE ADDRESS' TELEPHON E 243-5252 rcANnt Loomis Co souRN" TOLEDO, o MIO DAvt O S. PHILIPPS M AxoLo r. REIN. s m. January 18, 1071 WALTE R w. R EC KLEsS Mr. Harold Price Director of Regulations Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D.C. 20545

Dear Mr. Price:

As intervenors, we are outraged at the request to the Atomic Energy Commission for exemption to construct additional portions of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant. It is not in the public interest to do so until the resolution of the inter-venors issues in the construction permit hearings. Our conten-tions relate directly to structures proposed to be built under exemption. The construction done under the first exemption has already prejudiced people's rights. Further construction under exemption would only enhance this prejudice. This exemption would render the hearing a mockery. To build structures that at the same time are under discussion in the hearings makes the procedure a sham. The large commitments of funds in construc-tion already done by the applicant are certainly going to preju-dice the Board's initial decision. A fair public hearing is im-possible if such exemptions are made. If the construction permit is denied, then.the public will bear the utilities loss in invest-ment of these monies. If this exemption is extended, the hear-ings will be a mere charade, a mockery of the public interest.

Sincerely, COBOURN, SMITH, ROHRBACHER

& GIBSON -

W,,

u. e f&[g ys. /) jJ. .AMO'/dW

/

/

Beatrice K. Bleicher Attorney for Living In a Finer Environment, Dr. Irwin I. Oster and l William E. Reany l BKB:VE:sh' u/2. 2^

M d d bii..dir.Si Mts-Dat* / /D / D 8008060 9// 6 mo j

t BKB

  • '.<ba.s  ;

COBOURN. SMITH. ROHRDACHER & GIDSON (f p;a %

'~

77.M FLOOR TOLEDO TRUS T BulLDING J { 4-I!! J t.P ~

TOLEDO. OHIO 43604

\,pp-s j

')'

e --

~ *

. ~

I Mr. Ilarold Price Director of Regulations Atomic Energy Commission ')

Washington, D.C. 20545 o

_ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ ___