ML19326A912

AEC Reply Brief to Intervenors Living in Finer Environ & WE Reamy 710222 Brief Re Implementation of 1969 Nepa.Life Proposed Conclusions of Law Should Be Rejected

ML19326A912
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	03/03/1971
From:	Wallig P US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 8003050808
Download: ML19326A912 (8)

Text

-..,.

' ~:. p ;

.+-s..m,...,..w

" f ? '*T 'C L..~; f % e Wl55

. a... ;. nw ; ;,, f fa. mly ahNWQ-5&-

• -fk 3 ^ yy*QQ,~, m.,-

n, ; o,.,., :

em

.e;..w. r><w~~.,. ++ e-a4y,y py e..y u,

,i-

., :s w..

m,m 4 a y*'*t 4j2.lia

m. %, ar 1.

M, _

e

~

'~

s p

ag,sw..v,.9Ja

e N/

i g

y w - c.m

,.1 gy

q. gm 77 3

.f6)

-- (@

n w. v.9 rgs:.,Q J@/Y

^

OI

" hlMKtiffAF.U; M WNOh!

capM

']

D

}t nuo.r.unt;ta m e d 6 D il

_m.

g/

m

,.A:

~

m

~

gy

.* 9 Sf 2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

~,

P iuewi

../ :.

S

'f y,.,,i cr#O

, ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

• C, gg

~

I

~,,,

4 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD W4 w

y.

u w.

,r au o

.d' 2 l 0 4,, [.,

2 -, -

2 s

'..s <- h Y'

"k 2

i'

')

~ ^ d-'8' M Q h m8?'. N

~ ~ ~

In the Matter of t.

THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY

)

DocketNo.50$,--

gif j

,~

+

^'

)

N l

THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING )

. m#

COMPANY

),

4,.

r.

c'

'i ^

i l

.r.

<.).

i

,; ; c.y ; y;L..,

I e-

, ~.;

,y (Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station). )

.. c 3..,(

n csw.,

. yc

. MGM

~-

AEC REGULATORY STAFF'S REPLY BRIEF TO INTERVENOR LIFE 'S RQW BRIEF REGARDING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL 3

POLICY ACT OF 1969

,'l QJ.,*j e'a J

' L'-

8;Q

r w; A..}. %.g.)

....a ? S Introduction

}'

..A y

<.a 4-On February 22, 1971, pursuant to the posthearing briefing schedule established by the presiding atomic safety and licen' sing board (board), j;;%Qsy.

intervenors Living In A Finer Environment (LIFE) and Willia c-M M

- D

.g ;f.b 3 1,.

p.

(hereinaf ter referred to as LIFE) filed a brief regarding the Conunis-dfyW

,. u. q r

Q'gW

sion's implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act of,1969 Jd ' dif

=

vWu At the same time. LIFE filed proposed conclusions of law' relating n

.J.

(NEPA).

M@%

m; ?,;

i a

to the same subject.'

' 6. w%7

'+;'

b y. 3, y K.. w%

.y ggy

.c

,y n

.tg

• 4*hm$

In its brief LIFE contends that the Commission has violated the provis "t

/P Q.

J.

o 4

..n.

of NEPA by not including as part of the evidentiary hearing on the applica-fl 2

+ q*,b W m

tion for a construction permit for' the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station

' N. 16

'g W 3. %

_~

2.

(facility) nonradiological en'tironmental considerations ~.

4 As a consequence,_,3 fSC'".

^

n.,.9,,; D,w 1

s q 4.

LIFE argues that, the issuance of any construction permit would be unlawful.

.K,'i

~.

V ?.Q: ;

More specifically LIFE contends that (1) the Commission's policy state-.C'yk@

i c,;TL

.a

~~

.t.

,, s. ;e q' 8 %y[g

p.

q,'

-z c -

's s

^

c g g, e.e s n

~

,8.0 0 3 s0~5 0 4.

4

?

v rvM,y w

L; ',.

.,l

<,,, L 37 a@%w

~

u

.+.. A p

.e "-

~ + '

%.g s L:yy

, ; yQ NQ:.G4 ij%

H.; y.,;.,Q @& 3 1W y ;..- o

_.c 9; m ;y W.g p 2.gyg g mm-

~

< y 1: x gc c-

• • • M ',.. a ~. a

.,.--a.._.

x m

. :c.. ; L

,. x

, :. v ~: n w M y a; W ^

%' y d ^*':*~~W%*T. *?;?':,W-:-W - :ei;.,iZM'42[m;).?.@f'lyn%-ky&% &

E v-w y, *=

Msp%,4,pg,A.M.pMy _,t,,,M.,;..g.;;.,

;,,;,,;;.,.sf"k p mmq _ g..h.,,,c

.s, s..-

n.q,,,m v.:- w g. s Q'c= T x v ~ n:u.c.c. m

~

. W +..

{

ps ?.w

. ;p pv,u.u 3 3,. s_N. mw.y;.

w' r.

v,~ 3:n-a,_

t

,.:-; L:

,c s

v...

jj w p,q..g7,s,i;.py,:*/

,.,r-7y,q ves y

. gw f

e

% ;r f' M.y

{

r.

~

m >3 N d h r-

$ g,0).

4

.,. c,

m

^

D

v....

m

. w: n.

o u 1,

.q.. F.f,e

+

r 2,

.~.:.

d O

' N'T m. ' w' * " i ' IM

O f

add

h... {,M,ud v

"3 :

-.ments implementing the provisions of NEPA with respect to facility..

J,5-g- - ;g*

.- y.m., g g

. ~. -

Licensing actions violate the provisions of NEPA and (2)' the Commission 91$.m. gM

. w; n &.,y @tO s.

.r.

y-4 failed to comply with'its own procedure for implementing NEPA in this L ' '3M',N

". 7

.]; a,.;a m gn proceeding.

bM,,.%.

t

~.C.p. n e q

'l, _

f '3. Q #-., h,D gl.

Discussion Q,

- g m

, N. s,x~

.fg,:

y~

7.

o,.

v In its brief LIFE interprets the provisions o f NEPA as requiring the

. y, y.

sm o

'A'

. L* @: v %s s

Connission in a facility licensing action such as that contemplated in

~+

e t4.

this proceeding to expand the issues for consideration in such a pro-

[

Tip.

-1. p'/.,.x.,

4 78 Y.

ceeding which are required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, a'ffD

~

(j 9

h p t. < p.

to include nonradiological envirorhental effects.

LIFE's citations to

. MgM;Qp?g; g.

qwn the legislative history of NEPA and to the Act itself do not support'"

17:;:(y%p$h.

TQ */ ;

g Oa such an interpretation. ' In fact, contrary to LIFE 's contention, ' there 7E:N*

'3;L $..

{;*

1

.v v

.rn,4 j

is no explicit requirement in NEPA that a Federal agency must hold.

~ ' Vz :.g!':

n i..

1 e..

... ;p- %

i evidentiary hearings on unquantified environmental amenities in con-

.[.

pf

.Q.4 G mp@4R nection with actions subject to NEPA. -

~,

y.S rs

. MQ m..a j.,g o

.r

.,. - 3g rWn *4 Section 101(b) of NEPA provides that, in order to carry out the policy,;sy?g, forth in the Act., it is the continuing ' responsibility o f the' Federal D. 4.9 x,,

a

, p,

.B.yy.

set

'QQQc Government to use all practicable means, consistent with other essentia14 71 q p

. TM

.~

+

> - y..G.ic..;,;,

considerations of national policy, to improve and coordinate Federal.. ;

. ~

~

(,,a n g plans, functions, programs, and resources toward certain stated ends, y gj.g Gg v m.; ~ ~ ;

A

~J ;

(..L.M.-:,:,Am

.y+

7.i.

v.>>*

. In section 102 of NEPA, the Congress authorizes and directs that, to the y..i MU 's, e r-sg qm fullest extent. possible, the policies, regula tions, and public laws of $e s yngMf5

a. <

A a, s, e)h ' In, e,;;m.

n.

.k s

n..

g

'8.e

-i..

h.

w

(

g

,h' 4,.*.

s.

- 4 m.

g F

g %,

.g f,

i',

4, a

y g

+ t.

+

i w.

w.w.g e

-c.

, e s.,o. ).,, Q

~,.,~..

m, t.,.

,.=.,-s.

A

. e.,, E;f-w;;,

,b t -. 9

,a.,

Y

.5,,

g, /

a g) q

• e*

e t

,4.

4.

..w, s

> Y f % ?

~A.

~l.,

'l-

Y "'I f 7',

s.

Q \\ ~ Y '?* I&p,*' fani.[h f

a

[.

w.

,_,..m.-

_T_s Y. *

.,: C:

4

,, ' u

• C ?_ '_ *S W'_

^

._r-e ---

• *

• W '*

m t

~%w-n *:'M,~l, K,,.i

<.,..=

a p-.cm e ss W ".' M_W.- A.5-4 _ = = _'

'T

f..._ r L.

W n

D..wm...-.;>.v,.Q' w. p-x,.e. r.., w%.~;;m:d_ w*M, c"~:&m..~ w.:m.~i w<. a o.~ n.."293$ % A.%.s.,a Q.~?

s..,:.::.~., ~ A

u. + :.=L wa

+'r..&u

• nG W-a

7......

= e.rc~ ~

M -s*

• *** & ~ * ~

M.

b- ~ y

~

~..

• • • "'~

,.y

a. ),,

r.y,;

av<

,;%. :l ' Q

r - ~ Q Q y *,*** f *v&a... %

.

Q%'

,....-oh s

o** -

• ' m.S&yn

, t.,

\\

n e

g-,

p. -

w #@gg D

D l.. n a

~

J b 1'

. U%c,

4-ir.

l. O p

Q

] $ '

'.j%.)

i

.~, i.r.

.sJ L

");

. _,d. ig,

ya theUnitedStatesshallbeinterprecedand'administeredinacc

. v.

I tx, s eg.

.,..~

with the policies set forth in the Act.', All Federal agenciesare to(/ k W jh k Wr

% h. m.,

_ - 1

.n c

..~

.. develop methods and procedures to give appropriate consideration to

.... [.

~._.

• , % j -:g s r.

_t

.t k,.y h,

unquantified environmental amenities along with economic and technical L&

M".-

, [s[~ >.wm T'

2

.; f? Th r

Further, all agencies' of the Federal Gover'nment are'CijMy;[Ij considerations.

f,.

required to include in every reconsnendation or report on

,.'*e e

y.

5 legislation and other major Federal actions significantly affecting the

-..d,. A. V 1/

. :1 +z.

quality of the human environment a detailed statement by the responsible

' j'k;~

~

- W official on certain specified environmental considerations. Prior to

' i[

the responsible Federal official is' 'N. D,.. e

- Q, W,,.-;r;%ny making the detailed statement, f

v y rkC%

+

~

required to consult with and obtain the comments of any Federal agency : we",pr4 '

. - +

. Z. 3 y,g y w

s.

s tw e which has jurisdiction by law or special expertise with respect 7

A m,

c2

.o, o

environmental impact. involved.

y j ';: yf i

3%

1

.w Copies of the detailed statement and the comments and views of the O'X. jaf t.

.p.,

m sk 5-appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies which are authorizedlo w,

~

1 :

r

. '. p QtAN develop and enforce environmental standards are 'to ' accompany the pro- '.f. 7U.$.

M f::y7d. W posal through the existing agency review processes.

\\

-. t

',5, s,v. 9:cy Qy.,-

y J

.*'i, 9

, u..; y. q c:

. w ypn 1

x. g gp s

,y The policy declared and the procedures required by NEPA were broadly

' W. Pif

../ m %

9

.a s

stated so that each agency could develop the methods and procedures

,j., @,;M7

] Q,.,!

a.

r. L*5*se

[ l

. s'

-).'.

nl n:

u.

t

~

As prcvided in Appendix D to 10 CFR Part 50, a " major Federal actioni ' di'@

significantly affecting the quality of the human environment" includes'

~

facility licensing actions of the Commission such as the issuance of a-

.g.1

~

Q4g.,

2 construction Permit for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Powcr StationL

_.i e * ^. P d,

a

.y s,

u,;

..7m.

~~

9 99 g

N'

[ '

9

's P

,2

'~

'y; ' :-':

k

,g

_s',

.L~

[ f,, y } '

l&i

- h, Q,,,.

1' 3

y-

- o

.s A p&g

+

.~

a. z.,g... mAv

.. - 5

t..,'..,'y" 1 -)

+

-[

[

l' '.k...m p'.' u u

.g '

, c.] g 9.M "y - > ~*j.

, p, p

, r, g

s.

4 W

a

'+

g{

-4 u q;,. y

,,.(. y ;e1 l

• t. J, f ' 7(.g g 1 e g y '

2 N

y p"

y

' ' g m-.jy

1. {*

{

)/

$ k '.!.(. S v'..m 7.

., s

,.{

r* '" - * ]...

^ ^

s

',f.,-

,. ~>

n

. 1 >

.. w

• wamme is Ges, _.__b_ _ _ _ '~a -,.,.f.w s i t,. i - ~

m T.+

,. " > zT" oyUDA Mi-f Ah...._,

ewv m*.<**1._ -.

w e;'. :w,i. w m n ~ As S,.

m,,..- g erm.

yc

__*:1

_ s# >

m~.:,m_ r. w--

a m

u...

T

~-a m

..,mJ.,c..

.:h::, :

v e-,p

+w,n M.v,m,e ~wm y. q w' m.n. w. p :-x m. c. m.c a, w-W~m y.W";v. y;;t.24eu. y-g,

_w =

1 nww

~.

s T:- -

.w u m w

-,e s

v~..

..a y::G F::;v7'- - ;f"~ T,CM'

• O"'u**?%Q-~.'- v.y;Q,*yg;g

~

'* ~

r-

1.. n m r

~..

^

f: }

T. '

i m****. ' t 32~g;Q,jj

^

~

(Q~}D) ' '

O

a qAm f_

• y7.plw

3. ;:'

U

... ~.w mTg.

m g.

n

~~'

L,.

eD L

..: g. a. m.w u

. 8.. m; O h:

ri

~ g

• mw g.'~g &g[

m

^

m

.necessary for implementing NEPA which would provide the best.

4

. m-W.M E!r

.%, y )n..p ?AA"&.;;b*M

.-.x

. " M M [ ?N, N..s p L.y s~

i,

integration with each agency's present procedure s.

s tE p-

s..

e t

'

• y g q. y..,A g;,W_

,, g. c.

.s se 4

4

.n n-v,%w$

u w

u

' q,s*'4 Also, contrary to the contentions of LIFE, Executive Order 11514 of Ff'

_2/

. n, e '6'-?:*p",,f *A.

9 March 5, 1970, and the Interim Cuidelines of the Council on Environ-Abgg 1,

,;e

j..

e 3]

M ;i-t "c @ j $ d y p mental Quality published on May 12, 1970, do not require the holding., '~Nn.g j

y,

- c,,r

% g)v.,u -

of evidentiary hearings with respect to actions subject to NEPA.

~ ?@3 f

fg.

.,..:,.f. gw n.

y.

} ?l- ( -[

O The Consnission's implementation of NEPA fully complies with all of the.l.pV.pe,%

Y n p ~-

.$ pe requirements of that statute.

en To implement the provisions of NEPA, the', - g g{

Commission first p'ublished Appendix D to _10 CFR Part 50 of'iti regula

~

-/ g 4.f

.w w

s..,7 w44, sw tions on April'2[1970.

On. June. 3, 1970, the Commission published....M, w!M _ #

wyq

%5 1

for comment proposed amendments to ppendix' D which pr vide' interim h

5l

. ;.c. x a..

... f....:

Y

w. % ':: m :2. h M 6:s M gg guidance.

Subsequently, on December 4,1970, the Commission published 7$##

T 'f,R, h.,

6/-

.D

~ d

.. y a new Appendix D to become effective January 3, l'171.

e.,r n

.e,

m.0;QE~

s 4

^ ~

Q N44 Under the June 3 proposed amendments to Appendix D, which were followed .1CQjQ W. 9.N M

k in this proceeNng, the Consnission required applicants for liced s

- u f..Y/

N,((y..,,. M.I -

(3 ig,,

, h. ' }.

s h~i,'

f,

.i

,,' '. n

7 " ^.

.;;:y.

2~.

.+

n

&thyW;;; '

5. w p.

2f-y

,. +..

9 1,9.~,7a.m

.~

i

+

-s.

1 35 F.R. 4247, March.7,.1970.

+., -c y 5dD

7. e, v z 4.%.m

+ -

i y,[q.6 gW e d,1 i.*Q M 71 3I

~,

'4 s

v 7

35 F.R. 7390.

N, i

m

, m g.n-y / Q }. ; lg-g*' I 4

1

,~. s 9 wf.9,an j

_.35 F.R. 5463.,

A'

- s

.o

, ~

ww'p 3.E.a :SMs.xiM

8 r

u m

,y

z '

• 3.:

' 3. -

c.

-w.vy, m,,

4 Sf,.

- g,y, Qy

., y./,

3

~~

^

U' 35 F.R. 8594..

'.' N

.. F ' i 1s; @

. > d,.... N M8 N.,

^

~*

.m e-

..m e d

' l ?.,$;'.,: f %:%w i l l.,

- (,~

~'

ye~

W y'n r 2; ~

N+W 35 F.R. 18469.."

,a._

5 ' T, #.. ' '. ~ '. ', '

s' n

"..?

CI..ith..",3f-

~

s CC

,,..m ~ Je.

,n, p

',dg.

1 f ** '

• • 5-

,} - ) -

'  ; 5'_.,.g*

m*- ffg e3*,4 Q." gan

.,s s

l^

, . + 9 + : % ' Q y?J y

A y

J./

4,

- :d #

~W.n,~

t y

e q f n.. f j --

s3.,-d.n.n.Mhd.h[hN'hN[3;d,hh[Ikh?hh h[,- Azgh;s.N_

a ;.

g m n./,

<y

-i-

+.,j

. W. g.

?N;-

e t y%

py.

s 11. '

lc.r"-NrMK l'7m-

=. ^

kM

'p,

,m -

s G

s.w s.w.a.

s w -

. e e r..-. g- ;.,4 4

n m.a..

.v

.n

(-[..

ew M dm-*

• 2 4 sh.4e.t es %ee : _.

,r--

enN.$ha.r. ^

_3.,

<* p.-I MFepsi, '

.T g _

g gaga,,ggu-n,- E a ; e

.7-

^""

&.4.p.x,_:. ',;yg.,y,;Q Q'ww.; ;;,,,;3 7 73;:g;p;-l4g y'

--*v,, q > st*

• _.;.

,:.~2Q.

..zs*,s..a, A.g..,p +,.;.+ ~ m

~~

p..:- p ;

s..se. >,p r.g :..#.w w _ e. g,;.3.g 4

,.. g

., e s.u%. z.; o.~,m,a,.m.

4

,. y n pw.4y,

,y; :

. ~,

,, u..

(.

, g,,s., y,g. v.. e% ig$

,,.,.s

. f. e,,

7

,1,Q

~--

O.

,' }.

. p, g 4, lfb y

t f.

- Qa..- %

m y m 0J _ -

m A T*Y6, n

n f.

~

D y

y T

i v v JL.

v iQlf n

e' e,

,y4-gg OY h

I

] jO.

1 3@E.a u

1. s 1

a w ~w

... a e.

s.

~

O % '~.i. l":.p n*,

k.. W submit an environmental report which was then circulated to the

/

7/

o T.IM,w, n:.g.;

,n y

appropriate Federal, State,'and local agencies. ~ Upon receipt of E Lsg w

• Md"k.t the comments of these agencies, the designee of the Director of v:m

, Lie.

.e

',. g* @,. %

Regulation prepared the detailed environmental statement.

In this Li t

J.,e.

proceeding this detailed statement and the applicants' environmental. s &5,; Q.g,y y

= ', jn;ws report covered those areas enumerated in NEPA. Both of these documents [. ". Q$..

were of fered as an exhibit in this hearing by the AEC regulatory staf f k

8/

4. ~..,.:b.

on December 10, 1970.

New Appendix D, effective January 3,1971, does

%gfi.:

m. m.A <.

v

]'N.y K

$ $h.e.,u not require any different procedure for proceedings pending at the time

• .".. 4

$A.

that the amended Appendix D wa's published.

L"

x. p}

v o.c y-.:,e w

w

.~

7-a

,. 6 3 p "f 3',p

,; my

?y -

New Appendix D does perinit a party td' raise as an issue in' those cases, ;;f e&gipe 9

Q qy e

+

in which the notice of hearing is published on or af ter March 4,1971, #y' eqny.,Jp sl, l..,

g g-

~, p.-

3 V

.~n.1 4. 4%.

the nonradiological environmental effects of a proposed activity. Using. w..R

~, u

~ < ;q March 4,1971, as a starting point for evidentiary hearings on unquantifiedO.t'..Yf.e*-

, y y

_jt-environmental amenities is not an abuse of the Commission's discretion..>'k.:...4D 4 y

^.

7.r

x. < *?

n; First, NEPA doe [.n,not explicitly require such evidentiary hearings.

c.

x_

n,q u.h h.

R v. ~

v, Second, as the Commission in the Statement of Consideration published '.,.4 e p'

?.[h][h

\\

1'

'I

^

~

with Appendix D stated:' ~

.' x ::.' 30

.m r.

.=

~

~

, y.n m.h m,-

~:

,',@ g g g.

.e

,;u.w.

.a.. y.a %.

.w

}

y ;e 7.7 r

i

~

., c o.,

4 In any event, in the June 3 proposed amendments to Appendix D the a f#,g

,O, Consnission recognized that some period of time may be required See

- - N_. t

^

. ' '.. (( Y.i$3W i.e before full compliance with the procedures themselves can be

) h-achieved..'

^

..., m w.4,,,

g.-;g

< wPrgdy

. m e

w.

y ww 8/

, ;~'.-

5

.m._O. p.%, w:

.,, u v

~

-a ;

6

'(.#.

't;-1,

c f, L{

Transcript.page 495.,

,1

, f.pps ;

4

~

~*.t e

. c -.);' g

}.se 4

s t

3 j,-

4 f

,~,iw ',

,.4.

,.[ ', I, f

'.', v 4

.*7,g;'y y

,4 3

s 1

-,,2

.* ',. ; y,C '

t.

e c

g 3 g,.m A y

Y w[* M k.

Y

- if(

~.f

• p,

- -[.,

• Y

-r *,,,.o \\.+.g.,m.

d

-- '.;'KQ.^..'. s..*i~..+,L..,,'i,+,

.}

-.- f i

J 4

t.. v g, g.g5 m

+,.e,;,

[ j,.. e n.,. e.,,,g, +, v A,f y.f"g' g.

p u

r. -

v.

u..,,. '

~. y;

\\.,

3 p

QQ wlW: 5 \\ w '.$r(($%@@W i lp;.yh.'h W. & Nk$;ltu. d.O f M '"Q $ $ &

,g o..

,,, (

j n.

~+

u.,. g.

=.

** ' ~ ' ?C'"1 % M i'**c We=tM

n M.Tll."&W

. %%, u3. !&h6 mMsS,nWa,6..Y., es **m'-~~~~.*.w m*~'**W %...-l 9

m;"Nm.% '

[

-.. a..

._.,._-w--

m

.m.

4, r&.

e w.

%s,-.gx. e.

r Ws?632fc;i:

-m.nr;c%n.J.w; L'.re7

'1 ". #(.$~ W.w, m.w~c~-cTY40.M W4.C(M W _r 22., n% Q(L.#,j WfRQjMM 3

.:L~

7

.L

g.. /R.A...

t.j_ %.~ a,Q g $ % 2 % % %

x s ;.

a.; 4._

1 y

y-3; w4

. e pr3 m

.Oh D<l C, -

'W h g

~.

t u,.,m n

i r

Q v JL!

i nQ.%',

6-

.. w

~~

k.h,k_

[E r[ $[

U 3.'

hm %

"In its consideration of Appendix D, the Cocunission has b i > %27

.e j bMN Yelh;L recognized the public interest in protecting the environ-

'T

~

ment as well as the public interest in avoiding unreason '

%f(%91EV$$M able delay in meeting the growing national need for.

' ff'-Mif,@g electric power."

e,' f 2M

..q 3 - yy%.

+

p*pa,.-'

The approach adopted reflects an appropriate balancing of the various jggg'g.n*

m.. - :. _ ~

r public interest considerations involved-particularly in the light of L,- g,w g, g ;p. p

~

. sg.s

. r. n..,

. /j 'h-ck.' y=

the transitional period reasonably required to implement NEPA. This'

~

K 7.

. a y,.

approach does not ignore the nonradiological envirornnental effects of

~ QQ#

the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station since both an environmental

.dI$$.

R we

. M y.

v, yy t

~

report and detailed statement were prepared.

..; ce n_..

s.:

..a:gg.y y

'l

@p s

a.-.., ng. p Finally, LIFE has contended that the staff failed to comply with the; b;.3EpMg

9. ~ 3.;n%[p

. ;~,

Commission's interim guidance contained in the proposdd' amendment of

]Q

{

~

- s

.x

....~o n..q,.

, m.3 e

Appendix D to 10 CFR Part 50 published on June 3,1970. A review of~'

• yi je

.m m.

Q'. MR&

the record in this proceeding clearly indicates that this contention

.e

' - Q.hY is unfounded. _The procedures specified in the interim guidance were -

~

.. M.%ggyW

.f d@.

t followed by both the applicants and the AEC regulatory staff as.can '_ w.lf Q eg t q.g ww.v.

x.

/

9 -

.,x wn 6.

a, - g-be noted in the record.

,,$. ge ss Neither the effective Appendix D publish.ed fcgg.f n

u f,;

ny

, :~ <fy 4..

\\

on April 2,1970, or the proposed revision published on June 3,1970,

. w %p.~.

wm

\\

which were applicable to th' is proposed'licansing action ' equired that ~

, j, QQ r

g..

m :e

- mMn 5.I '

the detailed statement of environmental consiferations be made a part ' 7- ;" %NF

?-

h i

. e. +,,z_+ :

4 of the evidentiary record.' ~ The only v'; qui emer.t in this regard is that s tyg, s

a.

, f "

I (f -

l

" i,,

, *;3

< ~

. +, ; J-@* a 1

.. L

p% 4f:y

.9/

e

% i J,4,4 r -

-. re a '.w

$ DS~NMkm E

-Transcript pages 495-498.'

O..

'i,

+

y 3,

s r

m g

. W.,2 o ' g*=

h.,

^

y

'l

-N_

r.

g.Lb h

- k,

$?Y

'N s

s

-r -

[

,a sj r

~,.

s n

?. y, ;

. y

,1,,y

,y.w m,g d.' N/._.. dwM.y[Og-d' hp.QNd i m, s

,a h Q[

c,.-

- g.3

> f R..%qq

&hh,. h.h.hi h h Q$b v $[M?.'h.(b?';Nfh.1;q$(.

p +j { '.

- i,,

s

.. M ;

N-

$iF:J

+q

(;l 7

.h3 n.-.

. =

-~ =

~ - - -

F-m~;.: 7; ; ;=..,-. - vn n-W w = :.Y m W 6, 4 %

-~

Asses =ww.c tsa =, 9=sau ve'utrate-arcerYaq ~8***h ee ry.e.: -, -- -,i;*hy;.- 7 '...

---j&

a an" a PAW

1. y _

_ - f; -~

-. ',:m 4._

-4 m

_..^i,

+-. nWesey,essupp-=+.i.ph p ' era.i.saan.:- J - y

M',, ;

- ces sw-w vc.4 m..

s

n. w.,, m m: a s. M. r-c a,.... M, _

- c-.j

...~_.

w._.

c.

we

.e-a.1 h ag,* m.- - v

.s,=d *GP, env.g uy

~:*e=a=,n v,.. a{n. " " ',+

q y*

p ;,

ahs YY. dN '

~

~&.- n;.a,.. p; v,;; y. W w +; -ar'g;-=;&gwyp,ggtDw* ~;, :w,.n.,n.c : a.n, ad.w> w.,;-

,',%,,,. 4, h c.

+w: m-wm.t.e, w,, ~ u:@..s,w.m.

+

m.;

m-wn:.u.

+

w

.a.

w

v. g D w g g g ( ( {.

(i.,

,g,,yg;; g

.x,4'-

q 'yw.4

%c,.g:p.3;, p 2,

~ -

,m

v. y

' i -.

n : me

.e,

g n Wp

{

%Q m-7 _-

vv

..s, s

s

.. w...

.,. [ h.- )

4, -

1 t

... w

,j\\

-) /. 4,,; &

v L

+

x..,g.m 3.y t!ie detailed stutemcut accompany the application throu;;h the. review -

, y.JWo r

. ggy r

.. 4,

~

Of fering.the detailed statement in evidence,' as was done x

w pioec,s s.

MI4:^

?

• ym,m

.t

~.

~

• g j' in this proceeding, for the limited purpose of showing compliance with ~

~,., We 3

i ep 1

3 F,h i

. Appendix D is an appropriate means to identify the statement for the

_,+7.,67* k y

M.

that it accompanies the application through the reviewg,g(.g

• ', N g.sq c

v f.

record and assure,,.

-. c m.n v.A l

process.

. E,,f, Ac s.

- W;!b.n L m

.)> :.

v. %

. m p, W ;' x, Although LIFE has contended in its brief that the Commission has abused,t y:-, #.3 %

I

). f 4 L.j e

dh, Mc:m:p--

its discretion with respect to its implementation of NEPA, LIFE has 9.. m. n failed to offer any persuasive arguments to support such a contention. jyM$

.h Q,

.c-

., ~,

s,w O..

w +h;+fkhk.

EU.h The record in this proceeding fails to support..uch a content' ion.

N j [ '<

- (

s-

[i[

f

.g The cases cited by LIFE in its brief do not support the proposition that ihy%.;w

~m

,.,,,,..,9q

- +,

w: gd_pWW

.s.

o

., g o

s NEPA requires'an evidentiary hearing o'n unquantified environmental amenities -Yed'.

a v. 3%.,~

2 u

or that the detailed environmental ' statement must be part of the evidentiaryl

~

j

~

s

. m f... a,t m ; %

.u

=

w o

'd

~

-i. '

s. 4-

*1. *" 1m s record.

...n af. ip%.,..

m

.x e p

,n. t ~d.,%,

d

+

x -

N i -

~

~,L',,

v Conclusion

.r.. ' s.Wg/cg Q '. ~ % **C g

w:

4

., f...j-

,[$ $ w,e. M.m=e'

/

._.T-_

For'the reasons' stated...above, there is,no ' support for the contentions oft.. As9

. y ?gg x. ? d;.w..QM R

~

t,

,7 LIFE regarding the Commission's implementation of NEPA and the applica'- :( g@{

$u. n"Th

1. Qj tion of the Cocznission's NEPA guidance to the licensing action which is

.j y g 3

-.s

> a m, e

+

c? -

. the subject of this proceeding...

In-summary, LIFE has failed to show that,.

2.<pp q: : w s.

... v.

U.. p w.

&g'ing M.

^

- l

~

?

+

,1_Of

./

i..

- f., ; g.s c ;w.m

-'( (

10 CFR Part 50,' Appendix D, Paragraph 2.~ as published on April 2, q ;,gg.

~

1970, and Paragraph 7. as published,on June 3, 1970.

f-

_ p.-.g; N;g%+Tj.

f,yp

. m

~..

~v' r

.i

- y,;,,

7,.

,y, c '-Q R ; g_ y,c;%

y

'M

• T.

- O'-

, VM n '

,%,-. ;sj..'a j a'.l 8"y'* *ff)

.., 4

/

g :._f

,- (,

fg-

[

, e[J,., q '* y 'g

_ r 5

gN ( _

~_j.v ' y. 2 2 c v,

'u_,. y.r.'y.siiase y

.y

,. > c

,x

,3

. g -

T. -V.,#.. ~ +*1,..". j;,A tv ~N$

_ u,2 s -

3--.

4

' k.i '

',.,. d. f e

' '1

'.N

. ( ~. ' ', ",..., W 'Yy e

m. o - -

a.

w 3,~

-v...-

w..s i

i;:' h,;pfiRh %h.',,,l ;$V['.:.f (> w_

a. 2 l y ? y % & ^ '\\ f%3%&

ree,de.nw. _____

r

. ~.,

\\

~., -+

~- wm-f..'~.=%41_2 4fhW-ME...

-m ;asm.,. 07...-e.~. M-> -_M66M.- -sef".w*. - e%M. W~ pf,

n

~m

~

m..e...+~~ w L ~... - - a y +:._ _- g.. s..n.m.. + w

--=. x, %y.,.,.,.n.w&h.w, _.m.xmp.mp.m~,m. s %m.+s u,4e 3.,e

'-s%

c=yc spp

,x1 r

s wwxy em-~- t

- s w,

.m

.v.c. w.::4.~.~ m... +w-w : v m.

m

__~: - ',,.

...w.. f ~, m -,;c s

g %

9 m y,

g.

p., w,..,.x p9.s 9 a,..

..,;, p y

.4.c~ p

. y s

a

~

Y

--L

v

,, o,A.1w-y p

.s

n. ? w'" > Qi w,p+h QD b

g m

, ; mm.

. - y*e - s m., +

gQg QV J

i

_- 3 m-

~ rg ' ~

~

Q p.

O A

- 'm-e -+' ~

7

- )-

_.3 ad.

f-

~.

v

... cq v p. %. q:.~.~ &.

w.,

/

. Appendix D to 10 CFR Part 50 was not within the Commission's au

' 4W41 w

.// -,

~, L. -

.y ;

was not promulgated in accordance with applicable procedural, require-j,,gg,a:4

(

4

.s t

r n.

.y.

v.jp#

ments, or was not 'a reasonable exercise of the Commission's discretion.E,.y%,N. N..

'4.

-y e

-e

,:.;x. y,

Accordingly, the proposed. conclusions of law submitted by LIFE in this

..@m[W

s a : :a.,.

g3

. 9r /

connection should be rejected.

4.i -

.r G. n u.g< w.;ga%n. _g

~~.

~

, n$.. * ' 4

n ;

s K.g,s.g, \\

• .{

-4*

..n,.,!

g t

Respectfully submitted,

.r 4

g-p %

%m4

..'.;yy.p

,,/

s#

am %

,, -f'

, ~,'

m%m x24 3;[,.. '; ?

/Y.

{

- //-

Q c

p, y.

4-

. p j

Paul W. Wallig Up Counsel for AEC Regulatory Staf f; g.g&%#

']

, m e-

~.;, %

J. JQ

'^

Dated at Bethesda, Maryland,

' ' ^ '

' : ~ JW. y.,r.WW r

m,@uw.S.t t this 3rd day of March,1971.

- ' '. W.. s

4..

lk f

.j g

~' y n W y'.di.%g,.ifh '

i

.#M.,'

cp.

.-i

. 4 t

%(.k.qEQ

,e u

ye, l. y T a

f,.

.,e.. ',, LT &

y.~

'.a.

~-.. p. jg' 7#t.

w

~ m,'4,.^'y ~.h.n.

' =.

y I

• .o s,_,.y.,-

• I s

g.

f-d.' pO f. 5)%_

o.p ey

,I pr.'

e' c ;:+

. f ; d 'a u.

...J,,.

p

.r*

h&

~ *.,

'e W "f+Q:f?&v.'.

w., y,+n v1

-~

,. v.s..m:..,3 &w

~

~

,.e

?.

H.i G

'J.wy,.y w j s

=

je

, $.:% g g. f.

g,,

,4 t.

,. ',.' ~

"r 3 +

~

• a ]*.s 9.,31:g 4p.

- sy.q v.s1 % V s...K y, s

,e 1

a w-

, g y' ',

s e

e

_.ns-

,4

,lc'

- f,._ m,_\\vgj3 ppgy*

?

a

.E h' ',

4 s

-y-QuM4h s.

y~ t

~.

~

5 --

p, cfm y 0, -.s.,i h. " 5,,,TW,-

e

,".('"

Y m

e

^

o

-r",-'*..,,. Y h y

.. v..

u Wee *2.

-?s

~

2 w.

.e Y g,,, 'g,.

,W

. w-y q 2 s.-

,s

-. C, %g,

4 u

..c

.g

~

e 1

3

.a..

j

,.,.. y o

., y ::. - n

.'s0

,.'q:

l.*

_ l p w.3 m

M w*L. I s: ;

t a

f*

p*.,

J, A,

"4 g.

s*'

f cc g.

> ' M45.+;%

~.

.y.-.

~

4 c -

. a gg.py 4,; j (

.:.. m.n a.

~

s.'

)

..&.,; *>:"p*,. ',4 "4 *I.u

, < ~. >

J '$ J 4 rA' v =,'

'.n* '. g g,"

""* N (;..

s a

t - _-

'?

a 7

a

~ *. _

e

,-y in,.

1 4,

e 4* g,, u v

ye~-

=

d g

k

.. W 6

'N w

t -.>n g

s M M8.^

a.

a s Ge w -A..

s'

. ~

.. k - V.T e 2

+ -- +

v..

~

~

s 3-

,o.. /'.; Q;, y. K..A.

s S.

[M v

s

..,a s

i c

g 1..

e

{'

-. -,,.; -Q g ? A w a.-

m. %... -

3 4

'V

.4.,

1

% f ',le^ {"f y? ~ Y -,

J.,-

y 7

,, p.-

,_I us 9

, '* g.

t

%rs,w.

..n_

.,y,

-~

..., i e,

r-

, a r.., n e g s.44. y

• a

.-Q Qg %../ m v.Q..

~

.w. g -

.q. ) 4 (u 4..,.,,-

j "

.g e h.. y,,., = ~][

ch[4..q. ; s.'

W..,. r.

.- s - ~>

, =.., ;.;,

.vw e

g.p..~. -..w, -

w.-

m -- -

' "