ML19325D596
| ML19325D596 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 10/17/1989 |
| From: | Matt Young NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC) |
| To: | Cole R, Mccollom K, Smith I Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| CON-#489-9319 OL, NUDOCS 8910250112 | |
| Download: ML19325D596 (2) | |
Text
.
UNITED STATES m
~o 8
NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION n
{
]
wAsenworow, c. c, sones k.....
October 17, 1989
.gg g 18 A9 56
)[r' N"
Ivan W. Smith Esq., Chairman Kenneth A. McCollom Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 1107 West Knapp Street U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Stillwater, O K 74705 Washington. DC 20555 Richard F. Cole Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 In the Matter of PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, ET AL.
(Seabrook Station Units 1 and 2)
Docket Nos. 50-443, 50-444 Off-Site Emergency Planning - O b
Dear Administrative Judges:
Enclosed for insertion in the affidavit attached to the "NRC Response to Intervenors' Motion to Admit Contentions on September 27, 1989 Exercise,"
dated October 16, 1989, is a signed and notarized copy of the signature page of the " Affidavit of Edwin F. Fox, Jr. Regarding Onsite Exercise."
Mr. Fox wes not available to execute his affidavit at the time the Staff's pleading wes filed.
Sincerely, "G.Y
',Mi z A. Young Counsel for NRC Staff
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/cnc1:
Service list 8910250112 891017 ADOCK 050 3
gDR
>so'7
.y.
]
I that report concludes. *No violations, deviettons er unresolved items were J
)
identified. The licensee's response actions for this exercise demonstrated the l
ebility to implement the emergency plan in a manner which would provide adequate protective measures for the health and safety of the public."
The j
ecepe of the September 1989 exercise was sufficient to test the mejor elements l
ef the soebrook onsite emergency response plan.
The information relied on by the intervonors does not show a deficiency in the scope of the onsite exercise f
and, thus does not reise e significent safety issue.
1 The foregoing is true end correct to the best of my k ledgeandbelief.
l HWin T. ToK tubscribed and sworn to before this / 7 day of October,1989 g$djAbA 3
gigJ:;isse6tres: &#b 1
-,1i Ob l1 MCMP1$ 4 WCL*LMOfW 8 i,
LOWEA ** TEN 7WW.UAuW WNTY V9LC l$
WYCCIM88CN s%Plf43 WMCH f.tygt Wady.Pemsteed $24tmf fNree i
- j i
I
(
.m-----em
-. - - -. - -