ML19323H157
| ML19323H157 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Marble Hill |
| Issue date: | 04/11/1980 |
| From: | William Ford SENATE, COMMERCE, SCIENCE & TRANSPORTATION |
| To: | Hendrie J NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19323H149 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8006120150 | |
| Download: ML19323H157 (1) | |
Text
_
m
~
k
- rr L"NCEU.H. FORD comenerrtums.
W MorfucMY COM MEncs, scapecs AND TRANSPORTATION ENERGY AND 9)Cnifeb Sicdes Senafe
"^"" - -
RUL.ES AND WASHINGTON. O.C. 20510 ADMIN sTRATION g
it.r hiWB i==-
!EEf3 EME"
- xx Nbb h5l?=
~
April 11, 1980
.=
F..
- g-
Dear Mr. Hendrie :
We are forwarding for your review correspondence from Ms. Deborah H.
McCarthy regarding the meeting at Madison, Indiana on March 25, 1980 concerning Marble Esi~'
Hill.
s Sincerely,
)
:
b
.' M Mr. Joseph M.
Hendrie, Chairman Nuclear Regulatory Commission 6 31 Park Ave King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19 406 Enclosure
-=e es cis sic? crrit.rs.
343 % un avthus 172-C htw FcatmAL Sun meses t9 U.S. Pott orn s asc3 Cousmoowst 305 FestnAL Bus.De*se Laa =ste=e M ahrssa, a.:L'a Lamy /:2,6g. Mamv:prv ac232 Cavim MrwrucstY elet t OWENSEONO. MDffWCMY 42301
(&M ' *,*,.3 2484
(%*C 142 4:St (6.38J 4317529 (SC2) 685 5154 800e28o 150
IL'0 l"n" 'O /fl g.gporah H. McCarthy 298 Elm Eminence, Kentucky 40019 iD April 2, 1980 g
h l
Mr. Joseph M. Hendrie, Chairman Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue 1
King of Prussa*.;, Pennsylvania 19406
Dear Mr. Hendrie,
I attended the meeting at Madison on March 25, 1980, regarding the issue of whether or not to lift the stop-work order at Marble Hill; I ask that the following. questions and comments be included in the record of that proceeding as allowed by the U.S.C.A..
(Mr. Stello stated there would be a transcript of the meeting, as required, although our local papers reported that the NRC had. refused to make such a record.)
(
1.
You (NRC representatives) stated that you write the regulations (regarding qualifications for employment, inspection procedures, training requirements, etc.) for PSI; so I ask who, specifically, among you writes them and what training and qualifications (specifically) does that person (s) have to do so?
2.
It was noted by M'r. Keppler (I believe) that it has come to your attention that there are inconsistencies in some instances between your procedure manual and PSI's procedure manuals.
With regard to this problem (which should be enough by itself to continue the stop-work order),
you merely asked PSI to explain.
Did you consider that singular question, and PSI's nonspecific reply, adequate investigation?
Why did you not present examples of such inconsistencies and ask them, specifically, to explain the problem and how and when it arose and will be corrected?
following adequate i
l does not conform to d to write its own DUPLICATE DOCUMENT at rely on them to Entire document previously entered into system under:
ANO Y M lNO b No. of pages:
hp
_ _....