ML19323G606

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Help in Drafting Testimony Re Contention IIE-3 Concerning Criticality of Spent Fuel Pool Mods.Util Believes Info Provided Constitutes Thorough & Adequate Analysis of Criticality Considerations Affecting Proposed Mods
ML19323G606
Person / Time
Site: Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/08/1980
From: Steptoe P
ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE
To: Oneill J
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
References
NUDOCS 8006060366
Download: ML19323G606 (2)


Text

1 ET MUCN 8mg,% M4.5b-/SJ~

ISHAM. LINCOLN & BEALE

.,.:~

- ~,-

COUNSELORS AT LAW ON C FIRST N ATIONAL PLA2 A FORTV SCCONO FLOOR CHICAGO. t LLINotS 60603 TELCPMON C 312 *S$8* 7500 TELCx* 2-5288 WA$MINGTON OFFICC p

Q it2o CONNECTICUT AVCNUC. N.W.

May 8, 1980 su'Tc s:s G

J **"5"o',IUf$'o

, DOCKETED S.

USNRC Q

~

b' MAY 131980 >

t Mr. John O'Neill, II Ollice of the[SectM

'//

Route 2, Box 44 C8 Dcchtig Maple City, Michigan 49664

. c.,

.p

Dear John:

Consumers Power Company is having some difficulty in drafting testimony addressing your contention IIE-3, which reads:

The application has not adequately analyzed the possibility of criticality occurring in the fuel pool because of the increased density of storage without a gross distortion of the racks.

We want our testimony to be truly responsive to your conten-tion and we think that would not be the case if the testimony takes the form of a generalized treatise on criticality, with the detailed criticality calculations performed for the Big Rock Point spent fuel pool attached.

The purpose of this letter is to solicit your help.

As you know, Section 4 of the Description and Safety Analysis which accompanied Consumers' application in this matter, dated April 23, 1979, contains a nine-page summary of criticality considerations for the new racks.

More recently, Consumers sent you its answers to Christa-Maria's Interrogatories 9-22 through 9-30 which explained at some length the statements and conclusions relating to criticality contained in the Description and Safety Analysis.

In addi-tion, Consumers provided copies of the detailed technical calculations supporting this criticality analysis.

Consumers believes that the information we have provided constitutes a thorough and adequate analysis of criticality considerations affecting the proposed Big Rock Point spent fuel pool modifica-tion.

We hope that you agree and will withdraw this contention so that we can all focus on other issues in this proceeding.

8 0 0 6 0 8 u36 4

($

~

Mr. John O'Neill, II i

May 8, 1980 Page Two l

If, however, you are not satisfied with our treat-ment of criticality, we would appreciate any guidance you can give us as to the specific aspects of these materials which you find inadequate or'need further explanation.

We 1

appreciate that you are not an expert in criticality, but if you have any specific concerns or basic questions relating to criticality analyses in general'or the Big Rock Point application in particular, we would like to address them in our testimony.

The reference to pages 57-58 of Dr. Caldicott's book, " Nuclear Madness," in your answers to our Interrogatories does not help us much, sin.ce she merely raises the spectre of a melt-down in the fuel storage pool without explaining why criticality analyses generally performed by licensees are inadequate to avoid such a calamity.

(You should know that the unfinished " safety study" Dr. Caldicott refers to was published as NUREG 0575 in August 1979.

I think the NRC Staff would probably send you a copy free if you asked for one.)

With respect to your " Motion for Clarification of Legal Language:" inter alla meann "among other things."

" Slip op" is short for " slip opinion," which is the way lawyers cite to a decision which is so recent that it has not yet been published in bound volumes.

Supra ("above") is a reference to a previous portion of the brief.

Infra ("below")

is a reference to a subsequent portion of the briet.

Sub nomine, which we also used in our brief, means "under the name of" and indicates that the case changed names during the appeal process.

Id., or " Ibid." stands for the Latin,

" Ibidem," meaning "In the same place" or "in the same book,"

etc.

In the future I will try to keep Latin and legal terms to a minimum.

Sincerely,,

/

/

Phiiip P. 3 eptoe PPS/kb CC:

Big Rock Point Service List

.,.=.

. _.. -.