ML19323G463

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50:items of Lesser Importance Should Not Be Mixed W/Requirements to Report Items of Actual Potential Hazard to Public.Separate & Distinct Reporting Mechanism Should Be Established
ML19323G463
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  
Issue date: 05/02/1980
From: Russell L
BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-45FR13435, RULE-PR-50 NUDOCS 8006020532
Download: ML19323G463 (2)


Text

y d

B ALTIMORE G AS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY f(' re, P.O. B O X 14 7 5 M

\\

B ALTIM OR E. M A R YLAN D 21203 g

D WMC 4

ELECTRIC PRODUCTION DEPARTMENT MAY 7 1980

  • O CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT May 2, 1980 D

%/ -

Lussy.waRytano 2oss7 Office of h %

/

Docketing & Smice Bratich g

g

~

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Docket Nos. 50-317 Washington, D. C.

20555 50-318 Attention:

Mr. Samuel J. Chilk Secretary of the Commission N 8M81TR )

g PRQppsty pyg,

~~

(45 FR 13104) -

This refers to an amendment to the NRC regulations published in the Federal Register on February 29, 1980. This amendment added new section 50.72,

" Notification of Significant Events."

As required, we have implemented the regulation at our Calvert Cliffs Plant and, based on our experience, offer comments as follows:

1.

In general, the initial purpose for the direct phone line is substantially dilute.J by a number of relatively mundane re-porting requirements contained in the new section. The initial 0IE Bulletins and letters directed that reports to the NRC Operations Center be made for situations which could impact the public health and safety.

In our estimation, these circum-stances might include plant conditions which require engineered safety features to function or which result in actual radiation releases in excess of Technical Specification limits.

Instead, the reporting requirements set forth by new section 50.72 seem to be aimed at situations which may attract news media interest, as well as situations of a more severe nature.

In lowering the reporting threshold to this extent, a mechanism which could have a very useful purpose, such as obtaining assistance wh'en it is actually needed, has been transformed to a device by which the NRC staff can keep themselves informed of relatively -

trivial occurrences at the licensed plants.

If, in fact, it is absolutely necessary that items of lesser importance be re-ported, we do not feel that they should be " mixed in" with the requirement to report items of actual potential hazard to the public; a separate and distinct reporting mechanism should be established.

8006020 % 2.

2.

Whenever reports are made over the dedicated phone, it is Nr policy that the Shift Supervisor, as the senior member of the shift organization, make these reports. This policy assures that complete and accurate reports are made.

It has been our recent experience that the personnel manning the Operations Center are required to obtain answers for a checklist; many of the checklist items do not pertain to the situation being reported.

For instance, a straight-forward plant trip requires answers regarding engineered safety features, reactor coolant parameters, etc.

Answering this list of questions is time-consuming for a valuable member of the shift organization.

A similar checklist is used by the OIE Resident Inspector, once again at the expense of members of the shift, if the inspector is on-site at the time of the reported incident. (Such du-plicity of reporting requirements is overly burdensome and dis tracting.

We appreciate the opportunity to have our comments considered in this recent rulemaking; should you have questions regarding these comments, we would be pleased to discuss them with you.

Very tnaly yours, LUMfd L. B. P,ussell {

Chief Engineer Calvert Cliffs fluclear Power Plant LBR/ RED / erb