ML19323E554

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Info to Clarify Suitability of License Fee for 791218 Submittal Re Electrical Qualification Testing. Question Is Whether Previously Paid Fee Covers Requested Action
ML19323E554
Person / Time
Site: Cook 
Issue date: 05/06/1980
From: Varga S
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Diggs R
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
References
NUDOCS 8005230752
Download: ML19323E554 (1)


Text

8005 230 7N DFUTli A"&l : rif".fq' ' m b.?r se$7 A-e Ln %,' p :.. u =

.a 1 n-l DISTRIBUTI0il 192 D-ocket F-ilej50-316 /

M 6

j ORB 1 R-eading v t

D. Wigginton 9

Docket flo. 50-316

.' Fee Form F-ile MEMORAilDUM FOR: Reba Diggs License Fee Management Branch FROM:

Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #1, DL

SUBJECT:

LICEllSE FEE FOR D. C. COOK SUBMITTAL i

On December 18, 1979, D. C. Cool; submitted additional infomation on Panel and Electrical Switchgear Qualification Testing. The mail control number i

is 7912200509 and the TAC number is 12619.

In our Amendment l10. 6 to the Unit 2 license, we approved their systems for an interim period and required the licensee to submit the additional infomation. The licensee had paid $4,000 for that review. We had originally filed a fee detemination fom for the latest submittal of infomation and classified the fee as a Class III.

D. C. Cook on March 28, 1980 objected to the additional fee on the basis that this is a continuation of the review from Amendment flo. 6.

We did not perfom the entire review necessary to close out the issue in Amendment fio. 6.

We reviewed the infomation that was available and acted upon it at the time. We requested the necessary additional infomation on the same issue to close it out and D. C. Cook has supplied that information. ' We will perfom a review, perhaps ask questions on the material submitted, write an SER, and delete the residual license conditions on this subject.

We trust this is sufficient information to allow the License Fee Management Branc.h to clear up any questions on appropriatness of fees for this review activity.

If you need any further information, please let us know. The question for you to deside is whether the original fee, which was paid, appropriately covers the requested action, part of which was acted upon when we issued Amendment flo. 6 and part of which will be acted upon under TAC :10. 12619.

t

(

bigiral Signed by:

/

Steven A. Varga, Chief j

era g Reactors e inen W, A

. [B1..

..D..L...:.0..R. ~B 1..,

i

..DWi.gg,i,n to,n;,D Vaf,9 a,,,,,,,,

..dt..\\.tD.9.......

.h.'!.80..

=c -- m <,.m -c-.u.

-