ML19323C256
| ML19323C256 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/04/1980 |
| From: | Ebersole J Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| To: | Fraley R Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19323C237 | List: |
| References | |
| ACRS-1716, NUDOCS 8005150211 | |
| Download: ML19323C256 (4) | |
Text
UNITED STATES
' /
'o, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 80051 5o 7gg j'
'n g
I ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS 7,
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 e
g 5.,....a/
February 4,1980 i
Ray:
Your remark concerning the issue of the supplementary)
SER following the ACRS letter to (among other things?
convert the generally broad and somewhat vague ACRS ad-vice into partial or complete ACTION ITEMS suggests that, as a ritual procedure we must thoroughly review that SER in this context and either approve or disap-prove the SER.
It is not my impression that we do this - but why not?
I realize this puts a sort of hybrid decision burden on ACRS (which it deliberately now avoids) but some-how when we are really convinced that an issue should be satisfactorily resolved, we cannot avoid a decision-making role except in a final administrative sense.
J. Ebersole
/
ATTACHMENT 5
.. e
?
DRAFT 1:MWL:bjw:1/21/80 Proposal for Reorganization, Reassignment and Establishment
)
of New Functions ( M cit :. PW 3 o
Background:
Current Staff 1
Management 2
Supervisory Professional engineering 9
Secretarial 5
Engineering Af de 1
18 Proposed Addition:
10 28 Proposed New Organization:
(assuming the addition of 10 full-time, permanent positions)
Management 1
Supervisory 3
Professional Engineering 16 Secretarial 7'
27 Asst. Exec. Dir. - Analysis 1*
f h
S Y W n N Ax : Ca W d
% g w t.5 Q A " W
%M m ole M VrMPp.
sws T
i ATTACHMENT 6
- ' o.
A.
Proposed Functional Organization Operating Reactors and Licensing actions (including the periodic preparation of Category B summary reports)
GE Reactors 2
Westinghouse Reactors 2
B&W Reactors 1
CE Reactors 1
6*
This group would also be responsible for Committee activities in connection with evaluation of LERs, Requests and Reconmendations and Reactor Operations.
The remaining 10 professional Staff would be assigned as follows:
(assignnent would include preparation of periodic status reports covering areas assigned, handling all Subcommittee Meetings in areas assigned, etc.
In the event of a conflict, Branch Chief, etc. could cover meeting. The 9xisting standing and ad hoc Sub-committee functional assignments have been divided in sone cases) 1.
Concrete and Concrete Structures Metal Components Spent Fuel Storage and Design (structural)
Safeguards and Security (structural) 2.
ECCS ATWS Fluid Dynamics Combination of Dynamic Loads 3.
Reactor Fuel Core Performance Spent Fuel Storage and Design (physics)
Based on the first, imperfect, report from the MPS system, about 1/3 of
- NOTE:
the current 9 engineers' activity is in the areas to be assigned in expanded form to the new personnel, and would not have to be duplicated.
Six seems like the proper number, therefore.
I
<:o 4.
Power and Electrical Systems Plant Arrangements Fire Protection Safeguards and Security (d:di::t:d ch tle_,,,mm., ;,,,, separation, other design features) 5.
Radiobiological Effects and Site Evaluation Extreme External Phenomena Transportation of Radioactive Materials Generic Items (Include Task Action Plans for dealina with Generic Items) 6.
Regulatory Activities Three Mile Island 2 Accident Implications (include action plan) 7.
Three Mile Island 2 Accident Bulletins and Orders Reactor Safety Research (include LOFT reactor) 8.
Improved Safety Systems Advanced Reactors 9.
Waste Management Enrichment Plants
- 10. Reliability and Probabilistic Assessment Consideration of Class 9 Accidents Single - Failure Criterion
.