ML19323C006

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of NRC Re NRC Study,Environ Assessment for Decontamination of Reactor Bldg Atmosphere & Addenda.Requests Consideration of More Complex & Costly Options for Decontamination,Including Selective Absorption
ML19323C006
Person / Time
Site: Crane 
Issue date: 05/07/1980
From: Gross T
PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV., UNIVERSITY PARK, PA
To: Snyder B
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RTR-NUREG-0662, RTR-NUREG-662 NUDOCS 8005140510
Download: ML19323C006 (1)


Text

i l 80 0514 o f/ O T HE P ENNSYLVANI A S TATE U NIVERSITY THE CAPITOL CAMPUS MIDDLETOWN PENNSYLVANIA 17057 May 7, 1980 Office of the Provost (717) 783-6100 Dr. Bernard J. Snyder, Program Director Three Mile Island Program Office Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Dr. Snyder:

Thank you for your letter of April 21 regarding the Commission's

" Environmental Assessment for Decontamination of the Three Mile Island Unit 2 Reactor Building Atmosphere" and addenda. The documents clearly present the need for action and the various alternatives for decontami-nation. The report also makes a compelling case for the Reactor Build-ing Purge Method.

Nevertheless, I hope that serious consideration will be given to the more complex and costly options, including the novel selective ab-aorption system. Although I recognize the risks of long-term storage and surveillance of Kr-85, I believe the risks of release, both perceived and real, are serious.

I further believe the resources of the federal government should be applied to this problem so that the final decision is not influenced by the licensee's financial considerations.

I appreciate this opportunity to comment on the staff report and would be happy to discuss my response if you wish.

Sincerely, j

k

,L sw cw Theodore L. Gross l

Provost and Dean l

TLG:ame l

l

(

l I

f l

% go

-.