ML19323B900

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Task Force Rept,Recommendations Related to Development of Program Plan for Mgt of Ofc of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical Activities. Program Plan Establishes Basic Policy Framework
ML19323B900
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/15/1977
From: Aycock M, Check P, Chipman G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Rusche B
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19323B901 List:
References
TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8005140400
Download: ML19323B900 (2)


Text

f

~

s

((

NUCLEAR RE20LATORY COMMisslON

- ndosWe l UNITED STATES Jg o

^!

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 g...../

en o S" 8 0 0 514 0 t/00 MEMORANDUM FOR: Ben C. Rusche, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:

Michael B. Aycock Paul S. Check Gordon L. Chipman, Jr.

Lawrence P. Crocker John C. Guibert

.i

SUBJECT:

TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PROGRAM' PLAN FOR THE MANAGEMENT

~

OF NRR TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES In accordance with your directive of February 22, 1977, we have prepared the enclosed report providing our recomendations for a program plan for the management of NRR technical activities.

We believe the program plan ~

described in our report sets out a basic framework of policy, organizational structure and procedures that will provide the necessary tools to effectively F

manage the technical activities within NRR.

we have transmitted our report to the division directors for their con-By cop sideration.

The principal input to the report was our collective experience with t'he difficulties involved with this management activity in the past.

We readily admit that the program plan we have developed will not completely resolve all of these difficulties.

However, we believe that whatever difficulties remain can be overcome by a firm management comitment to the goal of timely completion of technical projects.

Such a comitment at the lower and intermediate management levels must I

resources and by providing unambiguous guidance as to NRR priorities and task responsibilities.

We will be most happy to discuss our recomendations with you, and the l

division directors should you find it appropriate.

discussions would be helpful in your deliberations. We suggest that such I

S y

L.

Mr. Den C. Rusche ME 15 TR7 Unless otherwise directed, we consider our task to be complete.

hf[s?

Michae B. Aycock Task Force Chairman Technical Assistant Program Support Branch f6 WM k*

Paul S. Check GordonL.Chipman),Jr.

Task Force Member Task Force Member Chief, Core Performance Branch Section Leader, Accident Analysis Division Systems Safety Branch l

Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis

/h4 k

[

Lawrence P. Crocker John C. Guibert Task Force 11 ember Task Force Member Technical Assistant Project Manager Division of Project Management Division of Operating Reactors

Enclosure:

Task Force Report cc:

E. G. Case R. Boyd H. Denton R. Heineman V. Stello

.m