ML19323B292

Forwards Second Request for Addl Info Re QA Program

ML19323B292
Person / Time
Site:	Marble Hill
Issue date:	04/28/1980
From:	Rubenstein L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Shields S PSI ENERGY, INC. A/K/A PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF INDIANA
References
NUDOCS 8005120202
Download: ML19323B292 (6)

Text

.

tlc 8005120101 usu,(o a

g UNITED STATES 8

NUCLEAR REGULA TORY COMMISSION o

g aj WASHINGTO N, D. C. 20555 t

e

)

O e

APR 281980 1

Docket Nos.:~ STN 50-546 STN 50-547 Mr. S. W. Shields Vice President, Electric Systems Public Service of Indiana 1000 E. Main Street Plainfield, Indiana 46168

SUBJECT:

MARBLE HILL QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM In my letter of April 1,1980, I requested consolidation of the Marble Hill quality assurance program description into a single document.

In addition.

I enclosed a request for additional information.

During our meeting of April 11, 1980, we reviewed a draft of your proposed consolidated report and ycur responses to our April 1st questions. As a result of our meeting, we determined that additional information should be incorporated into the consolidated report.

Therefore, a second request for additional information is enclosed.

If you have any questions on this matter, please contact us.

Sincerely,

$I u du.

CRT L. S. Rubenstein, Acting Chief Light Water Reactors, Branch No. 4 Division of Project Management

Enclosure:

As stated cc: See next p. age i

, +.

ccs: Charles W. Canpbell, Esq.

Vice President and General Counsel Public Service of Indiana 1000 E. Main Street Plainfield, Indiana 46168 Mr. William Kortier Atomic Power Distribution Westinghouse Electric Corporation P. O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 Mr. P. L. Wattelet Sargent & Lundy Engineers 55 East Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 Harry H. Voigt, Esq.

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae 1333 New Hanpshire Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D. C.

20036 George A. Leininger, Jr., Esq.

City Attorney, City of Madison P. O. Box 826 Madison, Indiana 47250 Mr. Robert Gray Rural Route #1 Hanover, Indiana 47243 J. Bruce Miller, Esq.

Jefferson County Attorney 1129 Kentucky Home Life Building Louisville, Kentucky 40202 Ted R. Todd, Esq.

Attorney for the Board of Commissioners of the County of Jefferson, Indiana 427 East Main Street Madison, Indiana 47250 Thomas M. Dattilo, Esq.

Metford & Dattilo 311 Fast Main Street

~

c-Madison, Indiana 47250 e

6

{

cc (continued)-

-J-Joseph'B. Helm, Esq.

Brown, Todd & Heyburn Sixteenth Floor Citizens Plea 4 Louisville, Kentucky '40202 o

Michael'd. Walro, Esq.

Attorney for the Planning Board and the Board of Zoning Appeals of Jefferson County 427 East Main Street Madison, Indiana 47250 Mr. Robert C. Slover Save the Valley, Inc.

P. O. Box 813 Madison, Indiana 47250 Walker C. Cunningham, Jr., Esq.

1129 Kentucky Home Life Building Of fice of the Jefferson County Attorney Louisville, Kentucky 40202 David K. Martin, Esq Assistant Attorney Generals Room 34, State Capitol Frankfort, Kentucky 40601 Donald J. Ridings, Esq.

Attorney for Jefferson County 610 Old Louisville Trust Building Louisville, Kentucky 40202 Bill V. Seiller, Esq.

Ewen, MacKensie and Peden 2100 Commonwealth Building Louisville, Kentucky 40202 Ms. Marie Horine, President Save Marble Hill Rural Route #2 Lexington, Indiana 47138 Mrs. David G. Frey Solar ~ Energy Committee, SAS 2625 S. Smith Road Bloomington, Indiana 47401 Mr. Ralph C. Pickard

\\

o Indiana State Board of Health 1330 West Michigan Street Indianapolis,-Indiana 46205 v

cc (continued) Mr. Donald L. Cox Assistant Director of Law City of Louisville 200 City Hall Louisville, Kentucky 40202 John A. Eyed, President Sassafras Audubon Society 10 0' Clock Ridge Road Nashville, Indiana 47488 Resident inspector / Marble Hill NPS

~

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 148 Sellersburg, Indiana 47172 Mr. Richard S. Salzman, Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comnission Washington, D. C. 20555 Mr. John H. Buck Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Mr. Michael Farrar Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555

~

I O

I l

J

Marble Hill QA Pro. gram Request for Additional Information 1.

Within the QA program, identify those structures, systems, and components under the control of the QA progren or reference a particular section of the PSAR where this subject is addressed.

2.

In Section 1.2.8 of the QA program, expand on the responsibility and meeting frequency of the Quality Assurance Review Committee.

3.

In Section 1.2.3 of the QA program, identify those regulatory guides and ANSI standards including revision number and/or date to which PSI will comply for the Marble Hill project. The response should include the extent PSI will comply with Regulatory Guide 1.94, Rev. 1 and Regulatory Guide 1.116, Rev. 0-R.

4.

Describe those QA controls which assure that computer codes will be approved for each particular use.

5.

In Section 1.7.1 of the QA program, describe in more detail the involvement of the QA organization in the verification of suppliers' activities.

6.

In Section 1.10.1 of the QA program, describe in more detail those QA controls which assure that inspection and test procedures, instructions, or check lists specify the necessary measuring and testing accura".y requirements.

7.

In Section 1.12(g) of the QA program, describe the organization responsible for establishing,, implementing, and assuring effectiveness of the calibration program and describe the involvement of the QA organization in this area.

8.

In Section 1.9 of the QA program, describe. in more detail the criteria for deter-mining those special processes that are controlled under the QA program.

9.

In Section 1.17 of the QA program, identify and describe the organizational responsibilities for the definition and implementation of activities related to QA records.

10.

In Section 1.13 of the Quality Assurance program, identify or clarify the reporting relationship of the Quality Assurance Organization Group.

11.

Within the QA program, describe in more detail both in description form and through organizational charts, those organizations responsible for establishing and implementing the QA program.

Particular attention should be given to the QA organization addressing each department within the QA organization.

The PSI organ-izational information addressed in Section IIF of the March 6,1980 submittal to 4

H. Denton and in Section~ III C1.b.i of the February 28, 1980 submittal to V. Stello should be consolidated and incorporated into the QA program.

12. Within the appropriate sections of the QA program, consolidate the following QA controls which appear in the PSI February 28, 1980 submittal to V. Stello:

.,o (a)

Staffing Section IIICl.b.iii (b) Training Section IIIC1.b.iv c)

Reporting Resolving DeficienciesSection III E.1, 2, and 3.a and 3.b.iii d)

Management Awareness of ProblemsSection III E.4.c and d e)

Stop Work Authority Section III F.1, 2, 3, and 4 (f)

Inspection Planning Section IIIG (g) ASME Code Program Section III H.1, 2, 3, and 4 (h)

Training and Indoctrination Section III.I.1 and 2 13.

Clarify which revisions of the Westinghouse and Sargent and Lundy Quality Assurance Programs will be used for the Marble Hill fluclear_ Station. This description should be identified in the Marble Hill PSAR Quality Assurance Program and Table of Contents.

14.

Clarify that PSI Project Management Procedures are approved by the Marble Hill Quality Assurance organization.

15.

In your consolidated QA program description, identify by a solid vertical bar all those changes from the previously approved QA program in the PSAR since Amendment 18, May 1977.

k e

e