ML19323B119
| ML19323B119 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 05/06/1980 |
| From: | Doherty J AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0662, RTR-NUREG-662 NUDOCS 8005090442 | |
| Download: ML19323B119 (1) | |
Text
8005o905/19fU
- 27 6, '933 4327.ilcan'aury Lane #3
- Iouston, Tex. 77021 (713) 741-4437 T;;l du7' ort Staff (or.;escansi ole ':fficials',
Office of ::uclear.'eac;or :e. ul;;ix.
U. 3..:uelear ".] ;ula :ry 20s issi:n asaia;bsn J.
J. '.]555
,,,~.....,.,.,,m..,
.,,... - ~.. -...,.
,..~,,y.-
-.c : C u, m.,.,
..u..
.r sco2,
- m..<L
.m..
m.._..._
._v..
JZL::2.JII:!..ZI;.i CF 2 L; 2_2'.3 :. IL2 I3L....D U::IT 2 23AC2C2 30IiJI::G 4LCSELf,25.
'20 "hom it ma7 coacern:
T'. tis " Draft Eeoort" does not consider the feasibility of usin; plans #2 throuch #5 with plan $1 (Reactor Building rurse) as a standby.
In regard to such plans, it appears the Staff does not weigh heavily the importance of the fact many members of the oublic simply do not accent the idea that the releases are harmless.
ilith that in mind, it is important that any of the alternative 6exceot " Reactor Building Purge" be started.
One has the feeling the public is asserting it does not want any more burden regardless of the dose of radioactivity.
In that situation for a government azency to make the c'loice and have General Zublic Utilities proceed with the
" Reactor Building Purge" makes it in o?;osition to the people it " serves".
It makes no difference if you can nrove there will be no " harm" to the public by doing the building purge.
The rer tit can only be further animosity for the :30 and the ut.'.lity.
1herefore, the " Reactor luil'.in~ lurce" shouldn't be a plan, but rather the back-up to any other plan among the four listed from page 6-9 to 6-38 of the docuuent.
I bel.ieve EU12G-0652 might e::pand on the ootions and
- roblems involved if the last monitoring is lost between th) 2.M.I-2 reactor and the control room.
'lould it mean an effort would have to be made at once to enter the buil-
-~
ding?
3ut, coing bach to my original point.
Since no prep-aration is needed to perform the " Reactor 3uidlin: Purge" it is superior to make a try at another arrangement in order to avoid doing some action the public is clearly opposed pg/T to.
Sb C'7cere1,
7hh lD John F. Joherty 1