ML19323A258

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Subcommittee on Energy & Water Development W/ Rept to Congress on Resident Inspector Program, in Response to Committee on Interstate & Foreign Commerce Request Accompanying NRC Authorization Bill for FY79.W/o Encl
ML19323A258
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/25/1980
From: Ahearne J
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To: Johnston B
SENATE, APPROPRIATIONS
Shared Package
ML19323A239 List:
References
NUDOCS 8004180153
Download: ML19323A258 (2)


Text

  • %

.t UNITED STATES

[qfkJ['F2j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

    • I*

-9T(#

WASHINGTON. D.C. 205SS l

o March 25, 1980 OFFICE OF THE CHAtRMAN The Honorable Bennett Johnston, Chairman Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development l

Committee on Appropriations j

United States Senate Washington, D.C.

20510

Dear Mr. Chairman:

In the report accompanying the NRC Authorization Bill for FY 1979, the House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce requested that NRC submit in January, 1980, an evaluation of the progress and problems associated with the Resident Inspector Program.

We have made this evaluation and the report'of the results is enclosed.

However, our evaluation is limited by the amount of experience we have had with the resident inspection program.

In summary we now have 53 reactor sites at which resident inspectors have been located, 13 at construction sites and 40 at operating sites (including sites where a reactor is being prepared for initial startup).

We have two resident inspectors at fuel facilities.

By the end of 1980 we expect to station resident inspectors at all operating reactor sites, 20 reactor construction sites, and two fuel facilities, for a total of 83 sites.

In the Resident Inspector Program we have encountered some difficulties.

The pool of experienced reactor inspectors in regional offices has been reduced.

Also, there is a higher than desirable ratio of inspectors to supervisors since we have limited the number of new supervisory positions in order to put most of the experienced inspectors out on the sites.

However, these difficul-ties should be resolved as the newly recruited inspectors become trained and attain some experience with the Program.

Relocation of inspectors from the regional offices to reactor sites has created some severe personal financial problems associated with sale and purchase of homes.

These have arisen because of delays in the sale of homes, j

higher interest rates on new homes, and the fact that a substantial portion of reimbursed costs are subject to the federal income tax.

The prospect of experiencing similar difficulties after a three year tour at.the site only-exacerbates the situation.

NRC is determining what can be done to alleviate l

the firiancial problems associated with frequent relocations.

The solution to some of these problems may require legislation.

In its FY 1979 report, the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce expressed concern about the possible loss of objectivity which resident inspectors might experience and the possibility that individual resident 800.4180153-

inspectors might not possess the breadth of technical knowledge required to properly oversee all aspects of the construction and operation of nuclear power plants.

We share these concerns.

In the enclosed report we have described our efforts to deal with each of the Committee's concerns.

Sincerely,

'{[

k CJonF.Ahearne Chairman cc:

Senator Mark Hatfield i

e 9

b t

4 f

a 4

, - +.