ML19322E977

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
QA Program for Packaging Licensed Radioactive Matl for Shipment
ML19322E977
Person / Time
Site: 07100035
Issue date: 03/07/1980
From: Glass D, Joseph R, Mcdermott R
ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML19322E974 List:
References
15770, N001PP000002, N1PP2, NUDOCS 8004040403
Download: ML19322E977 (24)


Text

.

v N

NUMBER REV LTR/CHG NO.

  1. k Rockvvediintomational A

SUPPORTING DOCUMENT N001PP000002 s,,_,,,,,,,.,

DOCUMENT TYPE PROGRAM T4TLE QA Program P1an QA Program for Packaging Licensed Radioactive geyNouNS Material for Shipment QA, Packaging, Licensed Radioactive Material DOCUMENT TITLE ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE QA Program Plan for Packaging Licensed Radioactive Material for Shipment GO NO.

S/A NO.

PAGE 10F 24 All All

^

PR BQATE DEPT MAIL ADOR RE D,A R. 9. aseph 754 KB44 SECURITY CLASSIFIC ATION I '

(CHECK ONE BOX ONLY)

(CHECK ONE BOX ONLY)

IR&D PROGRAMP YES NO h IF YES. ENTER TPA NO.

DOE 000 RESTRICTED Q

APPROVALS DATE UNCL C C

DATA

_ 't CONF. O O

DEF NSE O

D. N. G1 ass 4G"prM _/gC'. 7-fe

,y R. J. McDermo.tt i'/ A,/

S -.f.4#

SECRET O O

f AUTHORIZED DATE M. E. Reml ey /./, g. ;.,,,, c.d o.J t s.

CLASSIFIER DISTRIBUTION ABSTRACT

[0bL

^

  • X-NAME R

M. T. A. Gentry KB07 10 CM 71.51 requires each NRC licensee to D. N. Glass KB44 establish and maintain a QA program for the R. L. Jaseph KB44 design, fabrication, assembly, tescing, use, R. J. McDermott KB44 and maintenance of packaging for licensed K. D. Miller JB02 radioactive material for shipment. This M. E. Remley NB08 document describes the requirements which V. J. Schaubert NP10 apply to all activities affecting the com-R. J. Tuttle NB13 ponents of the packaging which are signi-ficant to safety, including designing, purchasing, fabricating, handling, shipping, storing, cleaning, assembling, inspecting, testing, operating, maintaining, repairing, and modifying.

RESERVED FOR PROPRIETARY / LEGAL NOTICES NOTICE In providing this information, Rockwell International Corporation makes no repre-sentation, either expressed or implied, as to its adequacy, sufficiency, or freedom from fault and incurs no responsibility or 754-B*20/sjd obligation whatsoever by reason thereof;

-X-COMPLETE DOCUMENT and the furnishing of such infomation NO A$ s ERISK. TITLE PAGE/

SUMMARY

shall not convey any rights or license l

l OF CHANGE PAGE ONLY with respect thereto.

FORM 7344 REV.11 77 80040404-03 1

152m l

.h RockwellIntemational NO N001PP000002 tri.rw svu. croup PAGE 2

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Effective October 18, 1977, the Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC) amended its regulations for packaging and transport of radioactive material.

These amendments, published as changes to CFR Part 71, upgrade requirements for quality assurance in the design, fabrication, assembly, testing, use, and maintenance of packagings for shipping and transporting licensed radio-active material.

In general, the upgrading consists of applying the 18 criteria of 10 CFR.50 Appendix B to the packaging of radioactive material; the criteria are published as 10 CFR 71 Appendix E.

2.0 SCOPE This QA program applies to all organizations and personnel who perform activities affecting the safety-related functions associated with designing, fabricating, maintaining, and using packages for licensed radioactive material.

It does not apply to packages used only for onsite shipments (i.e., where the vehicle never leaves ESG or government-owned land), to license-exempt activi-ties (e.g.', where ESG has a G0C0 (Government owned-contractor operated) con-tract with Department of Energy (DOE), or to shipments in government-owned, government-escorted vehicles.

3.0 APPLICATION In detennining how to apply the r equirements of this program to a particular activity, responsible management shall consider:

1)

The importance of malfunction or failure of the item to safety; 2)

The design or fabrication complexity or uniqueness of the item; 3)

The need for special controls or suoveillance over processes and equipment; 4)

The degree to which functional compliance can be demonstrated by inspection or test; and 5)

The quality history and degree of standardization of the item.

Ponu 71s-P msv. 7 7s

Rockweillntemational PAGE 3

Energy SM Group Any change to design documents that changes conditions specified in the NRC approval of a package or container must also be approved by NRC.

When ESG purchases materials or services, measures to assure adequate quality shall be included in the procurement documents. Subtier contractors shall be required to provide quality assurance programs to the extent necessary to assure adequate quality. The degree to which QA requirements are passed down to subtier suppliers shall specifically be considered by Engineering and QA personnel during P.O. initiation and review.

This program is implemented at ESG by the instructions and procedures listed in N001QFP810001.

4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM The subsections below describe ESG's Quality Assurance program for packaging licensed radioactive materials for shipment. The subsections are numbered as in N001QFP810001, which describes the ESG procedures that imple-ment this program.

4.1 ORGANIZATION 4.1.1 The responsibility for the QA program is retained and exercised by Energy Systems Group (ESG) of Rockwell International.

4.1.2 The QA/QC functions, performed by ESG or delegated to other organiza-tions, are identified and described, providing controls to assure all elements of Appendix E will be implemented.

4.1.3 Clear and effective lines of communication between the QA organization and principal contractors are established to assure proper direction of the QA program and resolution of QA problems.

l l

l P O R M 719-P R E v. 7.7s

(,mg Rockwelllntemational NO N001PP000002 PAGE 4

En.rer sr.i

cro, 4.1.4 Organization charts identify the organizational elements which function j

under the control of the QA program (such as Design Engineering, Procurement, Manufacturing, Construction Inspecting (QC), Testing, and QA) and demonstrate adequate control over quality aspects within and between organizations.

4.1.5 The interface relationships and QA responsibilities of each organiza-tional element identified in Item 4.1.4 above are described and demonstrate assignment of responsibilities for requirements of Appendix E.

4.1.6 ESG's President is responsible for establishing the corporate or company QA policies, goals, and objectives and maintains a continuing involvement in QA matters. The Director of QA reports directly to the President.

4.1.7 ESG designates a position, to be filled by a qualified individual, to retain overall authority and responsibility for the QA program.

4.1.8 The authority and independence of the individual responsible for managing the QA program are such that he can direct and control the organi-zation's QA/QC program, can effectively assure the conformance to quality requirements, and is independent of undue influences and responsibilities for schedules and costs, i

4.1.9 Positions or groups responsible for defining and controlling the content of the QA program and related manuals and the management level responsible for i

final review and approval have appropriate organizational position and authority.

4.1.10 The person responsible for directing and managing the QA program at the construction site has appropriate organizational position, responsibili-ties, and authority to exercise proper control over these functions. This individual is free of non-QA duties and can thus give full attention to assuring that the QA program at the plant site is being effectively imple-l mented.

4.1.11 The qualification requirements for the principal QA/QC management positions demonstrate competence comensurate with the responsibilities of these positions.

FO R M 719 P M EV. 7 78

No 00002 Rockwellintomational Energy Systems Group PAGE o

4.1.12 Verification of conformance to established requirements is accom-plished by individuals or groups who do not have direct responsibility for performing the work being verified.

4.1.13 Persons and organizations performing QA/QC functions have direct access to management levels which will assure accomplishment of quality-affecting activities. These personnel have sufficient authority and organi-zational freedom to perform their QA/QC functions effectively and without reservation. They can:

1)

Identify quality problems 2)

Initiate, recomend, or provide solutions through designated channels 3)

Verify implementation of solutions.

4.1.14 Designated QA individuals have the responsibility and authority, delineated in writing, to stop unsatisfactory work and control further pro-cessing, delivery, or installation of nonconfoming material.

4.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 4.2.1 Measures are provided by ESG and principal contractors, as appropriate, that demonstrate how their QA program meets 10 CFR Part 71, Appendix E criteria.

4.2.2 Management regularly assesses the scope, status, implementation, and effectiveness of the QA program to assure that the program is adequate and complies with 10 CFR Part 71, Appendix E criteria.

4.2.3 Measures are provided by ESG to assure that trained, qualified per-sonnel within his organization are assigned to determine that functions delegated to his principal contractors are being properly accomplished.

FOR M 719 P R E V. 7 78

,,~,

NO N001PP000002 Rockwellintemational an n,sr croup PAGE 6

4.2.4 A brief summary of the Company's corporate QA policies, goals, and objectives is given and a meaningful channel for transmittal of these poli-cies, goals, and objectives down through the levels of management is established.

4.2.5 The QA program procedures are derived from QA policies, goals, and objectives.

4.2.6 QA/QC responsibilities are designated for the implementation of the major activities contained in the QA manuals.

4.2.7 Provisions are established to control the districution of the QA manuals and revisions thereto.

4.2.8 Provisions are established for communicating to all responsible organizations and individuals that quality policies, QA manuals, and pro-cedures are mandatory requirements and are procedurally controlled.

4.2.9 A listing of the QA procedures plus a matrix of these procedures cross referenced to each criterion of Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 71 demon-strates that Appendix E provisions are fully implemented by documented procedures.

4.2.10 The safety-related structures, systems, and components controlled by the QA program are identified.

4.2.11 ESG reviews and documents agreement wi+h the QA program provisions of his principal contractors to the extent that he can be assured that Appendix E will be implemented.

4.2.12 Provisions are established for the resolution of disputes involving quality, arising from a difference of opinion between QA/QC personnel and other department (engineering, procurement, manufacturing, etc.) personnel.

P O R M 719.P M E V, 7.MB

..... ~

NO N001PP000002 f Rockwelllntemational 7

PAGE Energy Systems Group 4.2.13 An indoctrination and training program is established such that:

1)

Personnel responsible for perfoming quality-affecting acti-vities are instructed as to the purpose, scope, and implemen-tation of the quality-related manuals, instructions, and procedures.

2)

Personnel performing quality-affecting activities are trained and qualified in the principles and techniques of the activity being perfomed.

3)

The scope, the objective, and the method of implementing the indoctrination and training program are documented.

4)

Proficiency of personnel perfoming quality-affecting activi-ties is maintained by retraining, reexamining, and/or recerti-fying.

4.2.14 (Deleted. Discussion of the PSAR is not applicable to ESG's activities under 10 CFR 71.)

4.2.15 Quality-related activities are performed with specified equipment and under suitable environmental conditions, and prerequisites have been satisfied prior to inspection and test.

4.2.16 ESG and his principal contractors, as appropriate, demonstrate that their QA programs comply with 10 CFR 71 Appendix E or describe acceptable alternatives in equivalent detail.

4.2.17 (Deleted. Applicable only to reactor plants.)

4.2.18 (Deleted. Discussion of the PSAR is not applicable to ESG's activities l

under 10 CFR 71.)

l 4.2.19 Provisions are prov!ded for keeping the QA program current.

l 8 0 R M 719.P R E V. 7 78

NO N001PP000002 d'~%

RockwellIntemational PAGE g

Erwer svu.me Group 4.2.20 (Deleted. Discussion of Reg. Guide 1.28 is not applicable to ESG's activities under 10 CFR 71.)

4.3 DESIGN CONTROL 4.3.1 Measures are established to carry out design activities in a planned, controlled, and orderly manner.

4.3.2 Measures are established correctly to translate the applicable regula-tory requirements and design bases into specifications, drawings, written procedures, and instructions.

4.3.3 Quality standards are specified in the design documents, and deviations and changes from these quality standards are controlled.

4.3.4 Suitable design controls are applied to such activities as reactor physics; seismic, stress, thermal, hydraulic, radiation, and accident analyses; compatibility of materials; and accessibility for inservice inspection, main-tenance, and repair.

4.3.5 Designs are reviewed to assure that (1) design characteristics can be controlled, inspected, and tested and (2) inspection and test criteria are identified.

4.3.6 Internal and external design interface controls are established. These i

controls include the review, approval, release, distribution, and revision of j

documents involving design interfaces with participating design organizations.

l

4. 3. 7 Proper selection and accomplishment of design verification or checking processes such as by design reviews, alternate calculations, or qualification testing are performed. When a test program is used to verify the adequacy of a design, a qualification test of a prototype unit under adverse design con-ditions shall be used.

F O R M 719 P R E V. 778

~

b NO N001PP000002 gj Rockwellintemational PAGE 9

Erwgy Systems Group 4.3.8 Individuals or groups responsible for design verification are other than the original designer and the designer's imediate supervisor.

4.3.9 Design and specification changes, including field changes, are subject to the same design controls and approvals that were applicable to the original design unless ESG designates another qualified responsible organization.

4.3.10 Errors and deficiencies in the design, including the design process, that could adversely affect safety-related structures, systems, and components are documented; and corrective action is taken to preclude repetition.

4.3.11 Materials, parts, and equipment which are standard, comercial (off the shelf) or which have been previously approved for a different application are reviewed for suitability prior to selection.

4.3.12 The positions or groups responsible for design reviews and other design verification activities and their authority and responsibility are identified and controlled by written procedures.

4.3.13 Measures are established for the selection of suitable materials, parts, equipment, and processes for safety-related structures, systems, and components which include the use of valid industry standards and specifica-tions.

4.3.14 (Deleted. Discussion of Reg. Guide 1.64 is not applicable to ESG's activities under 10 CFR 71.)

4.4 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL 4.4.1 Procedures are estabished that clearly delineate the sequence of actions to be accomplished in the preparation, review, approval, and control of procurement documents.

F O R M 719 P R E V. 7 78

No N001PP000002 Rockwellintemational PAGE 10 Energy Systems Group 4.4.2 A review and concurrence of the adequacy of quality requirements stated in procurement documents is performed by qualified personnel. This review should determine that quality requirements are correctly stated, inspectable, and controllable; there are adequate acceptance and rejection criteria; and the procurement document has been prepared, reviewed, and approved in accor-dance with QA program requirements.

4.4.3 The review and approval of procurement documents are documented prior to release and available for verification.

4.4.4 Procurement documents identify the applicable 10 CFR Part 71, Appen-dix E requirements which must be complied with and described in the supplier's QA program. This QA program or portions thereof shall be reviewed and con-curred with by qualified personnel in QA prior to initiation of activities affected by the program.

4.4.5 Procurement documents contain or reference the design basis technical requirements including the applicable regulatory requirements, material and component identification requirements, drawings, specifications, codes and industrial standards, test and inspection requirements, and special process instructions.

4.4.6 Procurement documents identify the documentation (e.g., drawings, specifications, procedures, inspection and fabrication plans, inspection and test records, personnel and procedure qualifications, and chemical and physical test results of material) to be prepared, maintained, and submitted l

to the purchaser for review and approval.

i 4.4.7 Procurement documents identify those records to be retained, controlled, and maintained by the supplier, and those delivered to the purchaser prior to I

l use or installation of the hardware.

P O R M 719 P R E Y. 778

r No N001PP000002 g Rockwelllnternational Energy Systems Group PAGE 11 4.4.8 Procurement documents contain the procuring agency's right to access to supplier's facilities and records for source inspection and audit.

4.4.9 Changes and revisions to procurement documents are sut, ject to at least the same review and approval as the original document.

4.4.10 Procurement documents for spare or replacement parts of safety-related structures, systems, and components are subject to controls at least equiva-lent to those used for the original equipment.

4.4.11 (Deleted. Discussion of procurement of nuclear power plant items is not applicable to ESG's activities under 10 CFR 71.)

4.5 INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, AND DRAWINGS 4.5.1 Activities affecting quality are prescribed and accomplished in accordance with documented instructions, procedures, and drawings.

4.5.2 Provisions are established which clearly delineate the sequence of actions to be accomplished in the preparation, review, approval, and control of instructions, procedures, and drawings.

4.5.3 Methods for complying with each of the 18 criteria of 10 CFR Part 71, Appendix E are specified in instructions, procedures, and drawings.

4.5.4 Instructions, procedures, and drawings include quantitative (such as dimensions, tolerances, and operating limits) and qualitative (such as work-manship samples) acceptance criteria to verify that important activities have

(

been satisfactorily accomplished.

4.5.5 The QA organization reviews and concurs with inspection plans; test, l

calibration, and special process procedures; drawings and specifications; l

and changes thereto or acceptable alternatives are described.

F O R M 719 P R E V, 7 78

NO N001PP000002

Rockwelllntemational e

PAos 12 Ewgy Symems Group 4.6 DOCUMENT CONTROL 4.6.1 The review, approval, and issue of documents (such as listed in Item 4.6.8 below) and changes thereto, prior to releae.e, are procedurally controlled to assure they are adequate and the quality requirements are stated.

4.6.2 Provisions are established which identifl< those individuals or groups responsible for reviewing, approving, and issuiag documents and revisions thereto.

4.6.3 Changes to documents are reviewed and approved by the same organiza-tions that perfonned the original review and approval or by other qualified responsible organizations delegated by ESG.

4.6.4 Approved changes are included in instructions, procedures, drawings, and other documents prior to implementation of the change.

4.6.5 Obsolete or superseded documents are controlled to prevent inadvertent use.

4.6.6 Documents are available at the location where the activity will be performed prior to commencing the work.

4.6.7 A master list or equivalent is established to identify the current revision number of instructions, procedures, specifications, drawings, and procurement documents. This list is updated and distributed to predeter-mined, responsible personnel to preclude use of superseded documents.

~

4.6.8 The documents that are controlled under this subsection are identified, including:

l 1)

Design specifications.

2)

Design, manufacturing, construction, and installation drawings.

3)

Procurement documents.

l FORM 719.P REV. 7 78

/m NO N001PP000002 Rockwell!ntemational PAGE Energy Systems Group 13 4)

QA manuals.

5)

(Deleted. PSAR's are NA.)

6)

Manufacturing, inspection, and testing instructions.

7)

Test procedures.

8)

Design change requests 9)

Nonconformance reports.

4.7 CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES 4.7.1 Qualified personnel evaluate the supplier's capability to provide acceptable quality services and products before the award of the procurement order or contract. The QA and engineering groups participate in the evalua-tion of those suppliers providing critical components.

4.7.2 The evaluation of suppliers is based on one or more of the following:

1)

The supplier's capability to comply with the elements of 10 CFR Part 71, Appendix E or 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, that are applicable to the type of material, equipment, or ser-

" ice being procured.

2)

A review of previous records and perfonnance of suppliers who have provided similar articles of the type being procured.

3)

A survey of the supplier's facilities and QA program to determine his capability to supply a product which meets the design, manufacturing, and quality requirements.

4.7.3 The results of supplier evaluations are documented and filed.

4.7.4 Surveillance of suppliers during fabrication, inspection, testing, and shipment of materials, equipment, and components is planned and per-formed in accordance with written procedures to assure confonnance to the purchase order requirements. These proc!dures provide for:

I FORM 719 P M E V. 7 78

N001PP000002 F' Rockwellintemational No L

PAGE 14 ELnergy Ses Gro, 1)

Instructions that specify the characteristics or processes to be witnessed, inspected or verified, and accepted; the method of surveillance and the extent of documentation required; and those responsible for implementing these instructions.

2)

Audits and surveillance which assure that the supplier complies with the quality requirements. Surveillance is performed on those items where verification of procurement requirements cannot be determined upon receipt.

4.7.5 The supplier furnishes the following records as a minimum to the purchaser:

1)

Documentation that identifies the purchased material or equip-ment and the specific procurement requirements (e.g., codes, standards, and specifications) met by the items.

2)

Documentation that identifies any procurement requirements which have not been met together with a description of those nonconformances dispositioned " accept as is" or " repair."

The review and acceptance of these documents shall be described in the purchaser's QA program and as a minimum shall be undertaken by a responsible QA individual.

4.7.6 Supplier's certificates of conformance are periodically evaluated by audits, independent inspections, or tests to assure they are valid.

4.7.7 Receiving inspection of the supplier-furnished material, equipment, and services is perfonned to assure:

1)

The material, component, or equipment is properly identified and corresponds with the identification on receiving documen-tation.

2)

Material, components, equipments, and acceptance records are inspected and judged acceptable in accordance with predeter-mined inspection instructions, prior to installation or use.

FO RM 719-P PiEV. 7 78

N001PP000002 q

NO Rockwellintomational s

PAGE 15 en.ra r.i... crou.

3)

Inspection records or certificates of confonnance attesting to the acceptance of material, components, and equipment are avail-able prior to installation or use.

4)

Items accepted and released are identified as to their inspec-tion status prior to forwarding them to a controlled storage area or releasing then for installation or further work.

4.7.8 The effectiveness of the control of quality by suppliers is assessed by the applicant at intervals consistent with the importance, complexity, and quantity of the item.

4.7.9 Spare or replacement parts of safety-related structures, systems, and components are subject to controls at least equivalent to those used for the original equipment.

4.7.10 (Deleted. Discussion of procurements for nuclear power plants does not apply to ESG's activities under 10 CFR 71.)

4.8 IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF MATERIALS, PARTS, AND COMPONENTS 4.8.1 Procedures are established to identify and control materials, parts, and components including partially fabricated subassemblies.

4.8.2 Identification requiremnts are determined during generation of speci-Tications and design drawings.

4.8.3 The identification and control procedures assure that identification i

is maintained either on the item or on records traceable to the item to pre-clude use of incorrect or defective items.

4.8.4 Identification of materials and parts important to the function of safety-related structures, systems, and components can be traced to the appropriate documentation such as drawings, specifications, purchase orders, manufacturing and inspection documents, deviation reports, and physical and chemical mill test reports.

P O R M 719.P M E y, 7 73

) Rockwellintomational NO N001PP000002 PAGE 16 en.rw r o,

s 4.8.5 The location and the method of identification do not affect the fit, function, or quality of the item being identified.

4.8.6 Correct identification of material, parts, and components is verified and documented prior to release for fabrication, assembling, shipping, and installation.

4.9 CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES 4.9.1 Special processes such as welding, heat treating, nondestructive testing, and cleaning are procedurally contrclied.

4.9.2 Procedures, equipment, and personnel connected with special processes are qualified in accordance with applicable codes, standards, and specifica-tions.

4.9.3 Special processes are performed by qualified personnel and accomplished in accordance with written process sheets or equivalent with recorded evidence of verification.

4.9.4 Qualification records of procedures, equipment, and personnel associated with special processes are established, filed, and kept current.

4.9.5 (Deleted. NA to ESG's activities under 10 CFR 71.)

4.10 INSPECTION 4.10.1 An inspection program which verifies conformance of quality-affecting activities with requirements is established, documented, and accomplished in accordance with written controlled procedures.

4.10.2 Inspection personnel are independent from the individuals perfonning the activity being inspected.

FO RM 719-P Rtv. 7 73

NO N00 W 000002

/

Rockwellintomational PAGE.

17 En.ra sr c,.u.

4.10.3 Inspection procedures, instructions, 'nd check lists provide for the a

following:

1)

Identification of characteristics and activities to be inspected.

2)

Identification of the individuals or groups responsible for performing the inspection operation.

3)

Acceptance and rejection criteria.

4)

A description of the method of inspection.

5)

Recording evidence of completing and verifying a manufacturing, inspection, or test operation.

6)

Recording inspector or data recorder and the results of the inspection operation.

4.10.4 Inspection procedures or instructions are used with necessary drawings and specifications when performing inspection operations.

4.10.5 Inspectors are qualified in accordance with applicable codes, stan-dards, and company training programs; and their qualifications and certifica-tions are kept current.

4.10.6 Modifications, repairs, and replacements are inspected in accordance with the original design and inspection requirements or acceptable alternatives.

4.10.7 Provisions are established that identify mandatory inspection hold points fcr witness by an inspector.

4.10.8 The individuals or groups who perform receiving and process verifica-tion inspections are identified and shown to have sufficient independence and qualifications.

4.10.9 Provisions are established for indirect control by monitoring pro-cessing methods, equipment, and personnel if direct inspection is not possible.

l FOMM 719# RE V. 7 78

NO N001PP000002

(

RockweH intemaconal PAGE en.,, se o,=o yg 4.10.10 (Deleted, NA to ESG's activities under 10 CFR 71.)

4.11 TEST CONTROL 4.11.1 A test program to demonstrate that the item will perform satisfac-torily in service is established, documented, and accomplished in accordance with written controlled procedures.

4.11.2 Modifications, repairs, and replacements are tested in accordance with the original design and testing requirements or acceptable alternatives.

4.11.3 Written test procedures incorporate or reference:

1)

The requirements and acceptance limits contained in applicable design and procurement documents.

2)

Instructions for perfoming the test.

3)

Test prerequisites such as:

a)

Calibrated instrumentation b)

Adequate and appropriate equipment c)

Trained, qualified, and licensed or certified personnel d)

Completeness of item to be tested e)

Suitable and controlled environmental conditions f)

Provisions for data col'lection and storage.

4)

Mandatory inspection hold points for witness by owner, con-tractor, or inspector.

5)

Acceptance and rejection criteria.

6)

Methods of documenting or recording test data and results.

4.11.4 Test results are documented, evaluated, and their acceptability determined by a qualified, responsible individual or group.

4.11.5 (Deleted.

NA to ESG's activities under 10 CFR 71.)

P O R M 719.P M E V 7 78

NO N001PP000002 Rockwell!ntemational Energy Systems Group PAGE yg 4.12 CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT 4.12.1 Provisions, contained in procedures, describe the calibration tech-i nique and frequency, maintenance, and control of the measuring and test equipment (instruments, tools, gages, fixtures, reference and transfer stan-dards, and nondestructive test equipment) which is used in the measurement, inspection, and monitoring of safety-related components, systems, and structures.

4.12.2 Measuring and test equipment is identified and traceable to the calibration test data.

4.12.3 Measuring and test equipment is labeled or tagged to indicate date i

of the next calibration.

4.12.4 Measuring and test instruments are calibrated at specified intervals based on the required accuracy, purpose, degree of usage, stability charac-teristics, and other conditions affecting the measurement.

4.12.5 Measures are taken and documented to determine the validity of pre-vious inspections performed when measuring and test equipment is found to be out of calibration.

4.12.6 Calibrating standards have an uncertainty (error) requirement of no more than 1/4th of the tolerance of the equipment being calibrated. A greater uncertainty may be acceptable when limited by the " state-of-the-art."

4.12.7 The complete status of all items under the calibration system is recorded and maintained.

4.12.8 Reference and transfer standards are traceable to nationally recog-nized standards; or, where national st.sndards do not exist, provisions are tstablished to document the basis for calibration.

FO RM 719 P M EV. 7 78

No N001PP000002

( ] Rockwellintemational en. rey sr.i. cro, PAGE 20 4.13 HANDLING, STORAGE, AND SHIPPING 4.13.1 Special handling, preservation, storage, cleaning, packaging, and shipping requirements are established and accomplished by qualified indi-viduals in accordance with predetermined work and inspection instructions.

4.13.2 Procedures are prepared which control the cleaning, handling, storage, packaging, shipping, and preservation of materials, components, and systems in accordance with design and specification reauirements to preclude damage, loss, or deterioration by environmental conditions such as temperature or humidity.

4.13.3 (Deleted. NA to ESG's activities under 10 CFR 71.)

4.14 INSPECTION, TEST, AND OPERATING STATUS 4.14.1 Identification of the inspection, test, and operatirg status of structures, systems, and components is known throughout manufacturing and j

installation.

4.14.2 The application and removal of inspection and welding stamps and status indicators such as tags, markings, labels, and stamps are procedurally controlled.

4.14.3 Bypassing of required inspections, tests, and other critical opera-tions is procedurally controlled under the cognizance of the QA organization.

4.14.4 The status of nonconforming, inoperative, or malfunctioning struc-tures, systems, or components is identified to prevent inadvertent use.

4.15 NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS, OR COMPONENTS 4.15.1 The identification, documentation, segregation, review, disposition, and notification to affected organizations of nonconfonning materials, parts, components, or services are procedurally controlled.

F O R M 719 P R E v. 7 75

N001PP000002 p RockwellIntemationai No PAGE.

21 Energy systeme Group 1

4.15.2 Documeritation identifies the nonconforming item; describes the non-conformance, the disposition of the nonconformance, and the inspection require-ments; and incicues signature approval of the disposition.

4.15.3 Provisions are established identifying those individuals or groups delegated the responsibility and authority for the disposition and approval of nonconforming items.

4.15.4 Nonconfonning items are segregated from acceptable ite:ns and identified as discrepant until properly dispositioned.

4.15.5 Acceptability of rework or repair of materials, parts, components, systems, and structures is verified 'j :9nspecting and retesting the item u

as originally inspected and tested or by a method which is at least equal to the original inspection and testing method.

Inspection, testing, rework, and repair procedures are documented.

4.15.6 Nonconformance reports dispositioned " accept as is" or " repair" are made part of the inspection records and forwarded with the hardware to the purchaser for review and assessment.

4.15.7 Nonconfonnance reports are periodically analyzed to show quality trends, and the results are reported to management for review and assessment.

4.16 CORRECTIVE ACTION 4.16.1 Evaluation of conditions adverse to quality (such as nonconfonnances.

l failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, and defective material and j

equipment) is conducted to determine the need for corrective action in accor-i dance with estabiisheo procedures.

4.16.2 Corrective action is initiated following the determination of a condition adverse to quality to preclude recurrence.

romu no# aav.77 l

I i

NO N001PP000002 Rockweilintwnh Enerw Syesenis Group PAGE 22 4.16.3 Follow-up reviews are conducted to verify proper implementation of corrective actions and to close out the corrective action documentation.

4.16.4 Significant conditions adverse to quality, the cause of the conditions, and the corrective action taken are reported to cognizant levels of management for review and assessment.

4.17 QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS 4.17.1 Sufficient records are maintained to provide documentary evidence of the quality of items and the activities affecting quality.

4.17.2 QA records include operating logs; results of reviews, inspections, tests, audits, and material analyses; monitoring of work performance; quali-fication of personnel, procedures, and equipment; and other documentation such as drawings, specifications, procurement documents, calibration proce-dures and reports; nonconfonnance reports; and corrective action reports.

4.17.3 Records are identifiable and retrievable.

4.17.4 Requirements and responsibilities for record transmittals, retention (such as duration, location, fire protection, and assigned responsibilities) and maintenance subsequent to completion of work are consistent with appli-cable codes, standards, and procurement documents.

4.17.5 Inspection cnd test records contain the following where applicable:

i 1)

A description of the type of observation.

2)

Evidence of completing and verifying a manufacturing, inspec-tion, or test operation.

3)

The date and results of the inspection or test.

4)

Information related to conditions adverse to quality.

5)

Inspector or data recorder identification.

6)

Evidence as to the acceptability of the results.

F O R M 719.P R E V. 7 78

NO N001PP000002 3 Rcckwellinternational o=rn sym o,oup PAGE 23 4.17.6 Record storage facilities are constructed, located, and secured to prevent destruction of the records by fire, flooding, theft, and deterioration by environmental conditions such as temperature or humidity.

4.17.7 (Deleted. NA to ESG's activities under 10 CFR 71.)

4.18 AUDITS 4.18.1 Audits are performed in accordance with preestablished written proce-dures or check lists and conducted by trained personnel not having direct responsibilities in the areas being audited.

4.18.2 Audit results are documented and then reviewed with management having responsibility in the area audited.

4.18.3 Responsible management takes the necessary action to correct the deficiencies revealed by the audit.

4.18.4 Deficient areas are reaudited on a timely basis to verify implemen-tation of corrective actions which minimize recurrence of deficiencies.

4.18.5 Audits include an objective evaluation of quality-related practices, procedures, and instructions and the effectiveness of implementation.

4.18.6 Audits include the objective evaluation of work areas, activities, processes, and items, and the review of documents and records.

4.18.7 Audits to assure that procedures and activities are meaningful and comply with the overall QA program are performed by:

1)

The QA organization, to provide a. comprehensive independent verification and evaluation of quality-related procedures and activities.

2)

ESG and, as appropriate, principal subcontractors, to verify and evaluate their suppliers' QA programs, procedures, and activities.

FORM 719 P MEv. 7 M

l N001PP000002

(~s.

No ig) Rockwelllntemational PAGE 24 Energy Systems Group 4.18.8 Provisions are established requiring that audits be perfomed in those areas where the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 71 are being implemented. Areas which are often neglected include those activities associated with:

1)

(Deleted. NA to ESG's activities under 10 CFR 71.)

l 2)

The preparation, review, approval, and control of early procurenents.

3)

Indoctrination and training programs.

4)

Interface control among ESG and principal subcontractors.

4.18.9 Audits are regularly scheduled on the basis of the status and safety importance of the activities being performed and are initiated early enough to assure effective quality assurance during the design, procurement, and contracting activities.

4.18.10 Audit data are analyzed and the reports, which indicate quality trends and the effectiveness of the QA program, are reported to management for review and assessment.

4.18.11 The requirements and guidelines of ANSI N45.2.12 are complied with or acceptable alternatives are provided.

)

l 3

l l

754-B.20/sjd 15770

, o - m, m. >.7.

~

,