ML19322D693

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of Regulatory Review Committee 760109 Meeting 43 Re Proposed Reg Guide 1.XX,QA Requirements for Installation Insp & Testing of Mechanical Equipment & Sys, Reg Guide 1.52 Proposed Revision 1 to Reg Guide 1.32
ML19322D693
Person / Time
Site: Crane 
Issue date: 03/03/1976
From: Case E
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Gossick L
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
References
RTR-REGGD-01.020, RTR-REGGD-01.032, RTR-REGGD-01.062, RTR-REGGD-01.064, RTR-REGGD-1.032, TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8002210539
Download: ML19322D693 (2)


Text

.

s j

M UNITE 3 STATES 4

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o

(

o WASHINGTON. D. C. 20658 3

E

\\,+,.../

feiAR 3 1978 Lee V. Gossick Executive Director for Operations REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NO. 43, JANUARY 9, 1976 The Committee reviewed the following items:

1.

Proposed Regulatory Guide 1.XX, QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR INSTALLATION, INSPECTION, AND TESTING OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS and recommended approval subject to the following comment:

The implementation section should indicate that the guide a.

is effective on the issuance date, rather than 1 month after issuance.

This guide was characterized by the Committee as Category 1 No backfit.

2.

Regulatory Guide 1.52 (Revision 1), DESIGN, TESTING AND MAIN-TENANCE CRITERIA FOR EN3INEERED-SAFETY-FEATURE ATMO UP SYSTEM AIR FILTRATION AND ADSORPTION UNITS OF LIGHT COOLED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS and recommended approval, noting that the impact statement accompanying this proposed revision was very well done.

This guide was characterized by the Committee as Category 2 Further staff consideration of individual cases required in order to determine the need for backfitting.

3.

Proposed Revision 1 to Regulatory Guide 1.32 (DS 535-5), CRITERIA FOR SAFETY RELATED ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS FOR NUC and recommended approval subject to the following comments:

In the Discussion section (83), a statement should be provided a.

that IEE-450-1975 describes a battery service test but that no test frequency is specified and that IEE-308-1975 does not mention battery service testing.

I N07n j dY

~ m p :_ ~ o

E D

3 1976 L. V. Gossick i 3.

(Cont'd) i

~

b.

In the Regulatory Position section (Cic) a statement should be included that allows a five year discharge test frequency provided that a service test is performed every 18 months.

This guide was characterized by the Comittee as Category 1 -

No backfit.

4.

Proposed Revision 2 to Regulatory Guide 1.64, QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DESIGN OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS and recommended approval. This guide was characterized by the Comittee as Cgegory1-No backfit.

5.

Proposed Revision 2 of Regulatory Guide 1.20, COMPREHENSIVE VIBRATION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM FOR REACTOR INTERNALS DURING PREOPERATIONAL AND INITIAL STARTUP TESTING and recommended approval subject to the following cement:

The implementation section should include the original wording a.

(shown as lined-out on the draft, page 1.20-8) rather than the wording shown in brackets at the bottom of page 1.20-8, except that the effective date should be 8 months after publication of the guide for comment.

This guide was characterized by the Comittee as Category 1 -

No backfit.

son

.C e

Chainnan,

gulatory Requirements Review Committee cc:

B. Rusche S. Hanauer H. Kouts D. Knuth R. Minogue J. Davis T. Rehm R. Boyd M. Grossman R. Heineman R. Cunningham V. Stello L. Rouse H. Denton PM AD's H. Shapar SS AD's F. Schroeder OR AD's S. Varga SS&EA AD's C

o