ML19322D262

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Significant Items Highlighted at Kemeny Commission Aug 1979 Hearing & Requiring Followup
ML19322D262
Person / Time
Site: Crane 
Issue date: 09/20/1979
From: Rogovin M
NRC - NRC THREE MILE ISLAND TASK FORCE
To: Cornell E
NRC - NRC THREE MILE ISLAND TASK FORCE
Shared Package
ML19322D253 List:
References
TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8002100102
Download: ML19322D262 (1)


Text

-

pf g mwgr

e. vyrw s (z

/J.]t., W t!ucwo

$ <3b '\\$ vA;

N,.,#'g g T V.

t UNITED STATES estY tf /

/-h ni

'sLLLAr. HEGULATORY COr.1 MISSION

, //

/

ON P

3. h' M./'*'I

!/

I

[ & A 'd' A

. ASm tm T oN, D. C. 20555 DI-

,> t ombe r 20, 1979

[6 t. JE

^

V Q

MEM0PEDUM TO:

evin Cornell FROM:

Mitchell Rogovin

SUBJECT:

ITEMS FOR FOLLOWUP At the August public hearings of the Kemeny Commission a number of items that we have been working on were highlighted.

I want to make sure we are following up on them:

1.

The Denton-Kennedy testimony highlights the procedural posture Scw. W -

o f th e N RC 1. e., that the 5 Commissioners are not publicly perceived as being in charge.

The public announcement to resume licensing of reactors came from the Director of NRR, not the Coamission.

'l 2.

The Taylor-Denton colloque on safety.

3.

LaFleur's testimony on Bernau and the lack of a requirement on A,

"r- [F# '

vendor's to notify NRC of any accident.

LaFleur was to send us

~

materials supporting his view that any agreements with foreign countries is better than none even if they put a veil of secrecy around public reporting.

f.

O I # #qW -

~

1 4.

Creswell's testomony regarding the handling of his dissent.

These are all significant points and I hope they are not 1 st in the moving ab o u t.

r

./.*

.-g.~

Futchell Rogovin, Director NRC/TMI Special Inquiry Group cc:

George Fr.

om Dick DeYot 4g i

8002100/0 2