ML19322D227
| ML19322D227 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane |
| Issue date: | 04/16/1979 |
| From: | Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| To: | |
| References | |
| TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8002100070 | |
| Download: ML19322D227 (2) | |
Text
ii kC.% Edschk 5
. c fj3.
4e/i s/w
{-
228 LL
' (75)
- I failed in this case?
There was some' talk about demineralizers,<
k 9
or something else coming out of, the rumor mill.
I'm not sure. !'
2
^
c 3}
y.
j MR. MAC MILLAN:
I heard the same rumors you did.
i I
i I don't really know what happened as the initiating event in j
h
[
j5 the loss of Leedwater.
l 6
DR. SHEWMON:
Okay.
i 7
InthehandoutthatTedescohadthismorning,hehad!
i
- 0 a list of six feedwater transients.
The PORV was activated in l five of them.
It stuck open in three of those five.
' jo i j
MR. MAC MILLAN:
Yes, sir.
I
~11 i
DR. SHEWMON:
That's not a batting record that 7
k 12 anybody outside of the Major Leagues would be very pleased
'13 with.
And I wonder if you ceuld say -- I assume, since that's 1
14.
{
l on the top of the pressurizer, that it's someth'ag you people 9
i 1
g
' 15 lspecify, if you don' t bu!.ld it.
4 I
16
}.
Could you tell ine something about how these are I
.s.
17 ]I i-tested, and whether we can see any improvements down the road?
3 1
'3 j
It's nice to tell the operator, to train him to tell him that
}
19"t
'd it always sticks open, but that doesn't quite seem like the t
k i j
. 20 ;
i way to whip it.
f
,,,,21
[-e$
Let me respond to several of --
t N,22 l!. where I think your question is at.
4
,.223 t 9
I think the implication Oas that three out of five
-1 l }._h Il ]
{.
ig.i we.had the valves stick.
That isn't really the right (f~
_I23 9 P
fl statistic.
We've had somewhere -
and I don't have an exact j.
b
1 F
o j jwb 229 number, but it's in the range of 150 events in the history of I
.I 2lf the B&W units which have caused the power-operated relief valve l'
3 Out of that 150, in 3 instances the valve has stuck to open.
for one reason or another.
That is not far from the
- open, 5
kind of statistics that have been generated in the evaluation 6;
of reactor safety, about a.02 probability.
It seems.to be I
i 7
right on target.
i B
Now there was some question this morning about i
whether all of these valves were the same valves, or whether 9
1
' they were different suppliers.
11 The valve at Oconee and the valve at Three Mile 12 !
Island 2 are Dresser valves and are essentially equivalent, I3l identical valves.
The valve at Davis-Besse is a Crosby valve l
1'* "i of a different denign.
I 15 :
valves are used extensively not only in the These i nuclear business, but in the fossil steam business, for i
17 r j
pressure relief, pressure control.
I I31 Il ISI h
b.
- 0,1
'4 21 l!
l,
!i 22 '.
- k, 1;
i.
23 !lt 2t l
{ "' N.
25 l
(g A;-
\\
_.