ML19322C650

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notification of 790626 Meeting W/Pa Public Util Commission. Forwards Topics for Discussion & Requests Testimony, Correspondence & Background Matl Be Available
ML19322C650
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/25/1979
From: Evans D
NRC - NRC THREE MILE ISLAND TASK FORCE
To: Malacesta J
PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OF
References
TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8001180268
Download: ML19322C650 (2)


Text

,

I Joseph Malacesta, Esq.

Deputy Chief Counsel

~

Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission North Office Building, Rm. G-28 P.O. Box 3265 Harrisburg, PA.

17120

Dear Joe:

Enclosed you will find a list of topics we would like to discuss at our scheduled meeting next Tuesday (June 26).

We would appreciate it if you could have the necessary financial people available, should our discussions move into those areas.

I have also requested that you make available to us certain If we testimony, correspondence and background material.

find this information valuble we can then make arrangements for its reproduction and mailing.

Again, the NRC appreciates your cooperation and that of the PUC Staff.

Looking forward to seeing you on the 26th around 10 a.m.

Sincerely, David J. Evans NRC/TMI Special Inquiry Q

v t $ giI A 9 { 8' 0

W l

a

o Topics for Discussion with: PennsylvaWia Piiblic Utilities Conmission Staff Tuesday June 26, 1979 Harrisburg, PA.

N. Description of Pennsylvania utility law procedures and standards, 1

including: "used and useful" relationship to rate base detennination; certificate of necessity; test years and evidenciary consequences (see PRES.COMM.TR at 51,5-30-79); appeal processes.

N 2. Analysis of rate proceedings involving GPU companies, including:

a.1978 proceeding involving Met-Ed

~

b. Other Met-Ed proceedings involving TMI-2 (most recent)

C ipa.PUC, p

c. Proceedings involving other TMI owners regulated by
3. Discussion of significance of " commercial operation" date of 'g db 12-30-78 on 1978 rate proceeding.
4. Discussion of GPU Companies grid responsibilities and TMI-2 y

relationship.

" Net electrical power" point of importance?

5. Rate law accounting: what is significance of shifting from AFUDC to capitalization in rate base? How related to commercial

^

opera tion?

6. FERC relationship with Pa.PUC.

Familiar with 120 day testing rule cited in PRES.COMM.TR. at 587

7. General financial position of Met _-Ed and other GPU companies as provided in Pa.PUC testimony.

0.io#

8. Please provide:

Dp[6

a. Copies of most recent GPU testimony on above issues
b. Personnel qualified to discuss rate base financial and 0p q l

economic issues

c. Relevant comunications with GPU on above topics
d. Any general background material which would be helpful in our analysis.
9. Relevance of NRC-granted licenses (Construction Permit, Operati,ng License) in Pa.PUC proceedings.

OTd68. d(ld.5 TIM'-

c h/\\AARK Ost'baFh sqs 4NMd David Evans

._ 7 g g,/lecwvaD?

R. Larry Vandenberg g g i

NRC/TMI Special Inquiry (s: TAR 4/r/ 7(),

7

'>% q W 47 m ouhcut; <p<wtgJ cu 3/A

@ CarEsicm onw d6tt lst ack.cf wo pawa.. > mu?

@ 17 gm. rear puh h re.Jm'de

"??*if? M -