ML19322C635

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Telcon W/L Narrows Re 770316 Response to Insp Rept 50-320/77-02 Citing Schedule Pressures as Reason for Noncompliances
ML19322C635
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/20/1979
From: Vandenberg R
NRC - NRC THREE MILE ISLAND TASK FORCE
To:
References
TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8001180215
Download: ML19322C635 (1)


See also: IR 05000320/1977002

Text

.

1

-

'o

UNITED STATES

[ % ,. y'g

'

g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

}.

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

~

.....

RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION

Monday, August 20, 1979

8:15 a.m. - 8:25 a.m.

Mr. Lou Narrows

Reactor Construction Inspector

IE Region I

8-488-1285

I called Lou to find out the background behind a statement in a letter

from Met Ed to Region I.

The letter from R. C. Arnold, dated March 16,

1977, was in response to IE Inspection Report No. 50-320/77-02.

The statement referencing schedule pressures is enclosed.

Shortly after the site inspection, R. W. (Dick) Heward, tnen the GPU Project

Manager, called Lou Narrows to discuss the unusually large number (three)

of noncompliances.

This was normal procedure for Heward, who apparently

liked to find out the inspector's point of view and insight into the causes

for the noncompliances.

No record was made of the phone conversation.

Lou recalls that "we knew they were under pressure to get the job completed."

Asked how he knew, Lou responded that they (IE) knew the licensee was behind

schedule, knew from . e Site Construction Manager, W. T. (Bill) Gunn, that

..

he was pushing har. to complete construction,and further the inspectors

could see a buildup of manpower especially in the electrical area, which is

normally the last item to be completed.

i

Lou reports that IE inspectio,s at that tire focused on the qualifications

of 1ic2nsee electrical inspectcrs, and that IE encouraged the licensec to

bring on additional inspectors.

IE knew the licensee was pushing hard and

IE wanted to make sure that the quality of the construction program did not

suffer.

Heward and Gunn were responsible for establishing the schedule subject to

j

approval at the V.P. level .

'

Lou felt that even though there was pressure for completion, there was nothing

unusual or detrimental about it.

R. L. Vandenberg

Enclcsure:

, ,, [

Statement

'

1I'k

800'1180 A W

'

G