ML19322C262
| ML19322C262 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear, Crane  |
| Issue date: | 02/05/1975 |
| From: | Pendergrass M ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Cavanaugh W, Mcclintock W, Woodward J ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8001160708 | |
| Download: ML19322C262 (3) | |
Text
__
yy-r r - 7.- r/m-y+w==usurge-
?*'"
w.
.... s m,.+,e. -,,, m.~
n.m * *Y ' -
. -w b'
' V '4.-
'.' 7?.
9%y%mrMpryj.y.Q&~. &er-t-g. i f, M y w* W, +%y"=.'v.,-
A, nf Mit<&i16QQftf#4i=c~{k,,?f N Sjd%., vt.
J.
,#,, %* 'N ".W *m * ~ ~
~..
,4.e,W-i "Vi k"X,3. y...f, % l $., +,,,Y. s h
% tis 9%
~ a = au -
umn.e.
yi
~
r..
acm y
- ts,s,e,n, s
t.A h, [E,7, ARKANSAS POWEA & LIGHT COfVIPANY mina company connssposossca
[,.
February 5,1975
- v. n 1
t.
l g
2 :
s V
NDIURNJXN k
i k
r t
a lj TU:
SAFEU REVIEW CCfNITTEE g
Mr. J. H. Woodward Mr.'E. P. Fitzgerald Mr. W. McClintock
- Mr. T. Cogburn-
,Y
' V -
b y
Mr. W. Cavanaugh,
Dr. C. C. Onezen '
W7#<'
h Mr. J. W. Anderson Mr. 7. Baker
~
4 c.
t Dr. D. Mathews Mr. J. Iloiman
[
, FRON:
Harsha11 L. Pendergrass, Secretary t
.=.
e p.
1 f
i b
SUBJECT:
ARKANSAS NUCLEAR CEE - UNIT 1 t-4; J
SAFETY REVIDt (INNITTEE HEETING
' '# i 'O - #i
'7 j
- N1.UTES OF FEBRUARY 4,1975,. :, '
7"
.s, t m, y.
, ~_.
~4
', ~ (FILE:- 0280.3) v g
.w sa c
- s y.
s a
=..
p ",..
m +.:. ~
v.a
.s y
q
' '" Attached 'are the Minuies for t5e February 4,1975, meeting of the f
' Safety Review Cowdttee. If you have any comments.or corrections
. s I-y,.
?
to <these Minutes,' p1' ease bring them to my attention at the next,
-f P
et1n.
g
. 'h N;h u e... a &. n :
sa x
' _ #b
[
/
[
Y
~,
h' 5
. **' J b 'l "hN.
' 7
- 7 Y f ' ' % iYa
- f N ". ? NN..
gg,
,.y s.
, 7. dem N ' *$'
l l-
,fb E
- h..e, w s.p.tacs.;.9 w+ %9. n[Wls,n m' -vN,.u. gu, npr_ y',
m e~
?
5' m
s m.
-o
-t r
+.3 w e.
N 6 %.
Nf. J.' O.1 %ill{p$ h,
'?
.t y, m.. - M Me % i ' o q[ ty ',. w$rry r ft ~# [ ?C
$ - [ w p jCC.,cyg.x d 4b.x. gr d W ' bf % N[M; j' M 4'
.. 6
/ ~,.- [j, ';
.,4, Nf h': '
[
^ g O,,3,Nf'b; N "h'YM-
/
@.ia A
- p4c, C 14
.. % w< :m v v.e u,
4 s v WW m.
g
%n. Q s.
- ) s n.
i+
ynL Mh.s. 4(, W s:^n w:m +
a 4
%h
.m e,, c
... t r Mc"b pW Y@.0 : I.li 4.[yh *f 'f' L., et. ' '
- .M.
... h jd THIS D0DUME.. U.mkW-.
.d}N;, I_W:MUN %.t.9
+'
Ni.f
^#
'5 i
~
l75,2iT L 9R654 N
T i
g
(
.U
.m
.w
.,.e p wn w
.m o.r m. we p'
P00R;. UAUTY PAGES y'*
a m~
wW
.A M.
.,,u. % [r, e..:. m n a v> ;; p..
y"r n e e a" n " m"
.~,
n.
u., ~ < a A M. n; ; Y..'
-~
&. &-Q,,n?
N 4M.*W. l ?
w} s.s.,pm. r74. ye*.
w y +,.Mf,]>u,} 7'G *2.. J. ?
?.
+
<\\
AhDC.
A
~
^
nw
-, W J1 &xs&.
. pm? c
- x
+
^ a.,'
.n.. L, b ;s.r'r' &-
.Q,4,J., k :P. &~n e g,... m t :a; ys s.e.,,
~, ",, n ' h. k.s.llk"$
,. 4*
- +L.**'
, t,,;,<
4.
wp A W @pw z
s
. e
.s
~~.a.-
lp M &iA % '+*T. Q,i**4
, ; t. p x Q ps; f.f,.p;r.m, i8 C_
j em 7, J
- g. s S ni n % & #3:f f Q,Y h i r
? y & M fl &, &,gMGWD, m
V J.; Ji',Y@,$@6MA &%$ 7 & ~ C S, -
f t
- 79g n.M,@i;y4WY %e n,"
.f(.
4 s.
y : W 9 j' 'j 6 0. @M ' $ r s
>r W~
itV f g
3
,o ~.; m&.o m w p
u nelnmui nwma g;. W: ~4,4 g%%.gm g rm p.. n. W, t w g:..Q *.. e;, y
- s ' n x,
ski e4MVR f
. W
' Y " %.g. p.9+@m-W A;; w s.1;. D r f g
x
' *: e r
7 m.t. + ww:+h$fN i M
l N
NM Ub i
' N wm
.:.- ~ -. - + ~ e > ~ m~.- ~-~ men.em m,a,,
m N
7
. m
,..,e~. o - n w ' -. w.<
w. w.. m%.m, e.
q:.. ~,e. &...
. n n
.;.v:p:. n - -
p m:
u.m.
v ~.. w,. w w,, m. ~ w q8e a.:
a m. a y:
p.M,f;Jgjypv&uyfffkQpy,QNt W;&XfQQM w w,% 4%W@nikw*=% ', ' '
. ~..
m..
m.
a.
yxws:mw%w:;.cm WL M..W w.
,m.-w..
g<sm, s.
a
- w. MmLh;;a,a;: x,.,? Wy,,,,G _,.a x
( Y> a-T HDidTL5 OT THE SAFETY RPVIEr Wr:ITTEF MEETU,';
b/
FESRUAM 4,1975 s.
L' I
Attendecs:
h'oodward, McClintock, Cavanaugh, Fitzgerald, Pendergrass, liolmar.
01.D BUSINTSS 1.
The cormittee reviewed and app-oved the minutes from the following meetings: Decerber 20, January 7, January 8, January 23, and January 30.
NEW BUSINESS 5
l 1.
The coasaittee reviewed and approved Plant Safety Committee Meeting
- I
~
minutes fro.a the following dates: December 2, 17, 30, 31, January 2,
{
7, 10, 21, 24.
t 1
The committee reviewed letters sent to the AEC on the following dates g"
2.
i conceming the noted subjects:
I f
A.
Dececher 20, 1974 - Industrial Security Plan revisions page 11 h
m and Figure 5.
3 s
r.
3.
December 30, 1974 - response to apparent violation cited in' AEC F
~
letter of November 29, 1974 J
p.
v.
C.
January 6,1975 - revision 1 to Quality Assurance Nantial-Operations u
f.'
'e D.
January 6,1975 - response to AEC questions concerning~ SLBIC;
. c ;-
b
= :- _
m P
s-E.
January 8,1975 - negative response to DRO Bulletin 74-15 I
KM V ?
C ' ;',,. F.
January 14,'1975 - justification for deletion of g e.
...v. 1,
4 v
s enerator ;e N T +9 % "'.'
g WJ s a,;
C'2
. separatice test from 100% full power.'
' TT ^b
. ( i r.-
... v e. c
~
y-1 : ^L':
'h M N.
NT ~ ' ; W.
,..+
G.'
January 16, 1975 - response to AEC's recoseendations for'an
xc C
j-expanded fish monitoring progsan.
- r, s."Af ",*.17 I f.,
rv 1
s 3.,
-s M..' January 17, 1975 - response to violation cited in ABC letter of.
n.
- -m n
y*
4 January 6,1975.-
?<
, 4 ' <.
r y <.>.;C..
c-u s;
3 I,
January 31, 1975 - concurred with B4W's calculational parameters & <,
1-L 2
i used in BAN-10099, " Babcock and Wilcox Anticipated Transients %c / O M.,
Without Scras Analysis".
4 :+
, u.. u.. w le q,
4.
',f 1
5
,f.
F *'
t k.
p b.
- N
'*/
I. v. A, n,..w l' M { [. J O k1,.b,f 'u.h k $..l h, J... / f!
2* ' (Vi y,, - d..E Y. M.. k %,. D., e N.' ! % -R.-
2
- .u G.
.- ~,. f 1 ",
%,.a.{ c f.- 2 % [ ~ r.).
~
-'5 6
4 k g y t,f > Q* f ' J < l' Q ~#. ) :. &
-~
'.*>t-s 4
.g-
., p a s t ;
.(
vc 5J,
-~,y~
-J M *" :
. c'
. - ~ -
v i ;
~g
.. j,, y. A y g,g u. g
- s. + t p
m$'4 'y. p.. -,.
k VN.(e ").
-:,t 4
h.
'l,
' ' ' ', i iM f_' ' N,,. $z.h_ sg.,E U, 4' M *=*
NQ
+
WQ(M.4 Q.? ~7 s,y.j .,(*@ Ij,.pl " s
. g
.s n ;g.w w..m m.m 4 '([i
.g
. g d.) f ri g h g 8 -
ke
.. 4
.g*..q<..-
g, 4. 7:
c[.u.
. 4 o
e--
~,
., a.,s, e r y"* (. n),.
4,,.. #
,1..q g g g. g, j,
- e. r.-
..e a w / r, s.-,. q m. m
,4
[7 ?y.*
- A s' i '
- N Y -,'. ;,4 '..
4 U. s 4
2
-,m,.,-.-. u
.c.
.. I
, y 'krih'. ' 't -] I, A,*' # s # f g a q -
- p<t.4 t
.74 &. f '.
g
'? h < ' b['[
(.
l
.s h ~1 Q LOAb %.U,U N{.g*j'Es;i>)j j~, &_ f,h. O - n, 2 p' N 3
- '[$
- h d M
$,'NkM '
0
.m o
' %' QM, [Q.l@. sWM. *?YMl#.
W
.m.m,.
s, s. &e.
. _ . h an,--
e i
ik
^
.AL
.} e e
Safety Review Coassittee February $[1975 C i.-
?
y s -;ye w j
e i
3.
A'D-1 response to the SRC AuJa t Report was reviewed and the followirg h,,
actions were recommended:
h*.
so... y<.g 2r-
,,q r
A.
b Some SRC members should return to the plant to determine if the corrective measures taken were adcquate. Particular engassis
- . q shcs id be paid to any possible violations of the Industrial,1 g
Security Plan.
, b,, y j ',,i [ > '
u t'-
B.
Dvtensine who supplies certain materials (sua as gloves and/or.
gowns) to the emergency kit at St. Mary's Hospital.,
. 4.. '.. T.
' ~
,,r. s u u..
4 C.
A' htter should be written to the plant to detemine what decon '-.
n tamination supplies are available and where they are located. T,.i
?
,vu 4.
De comunittee reviewed and approved Unusual Event Report No.
p
~j yy '
s 4;rJ f 8 " +l50-313/7$-
The report was filed due to the error in 84W's analysis to. predict F.
.I ejected rod worth at hot zero power.
.' 4 8 5'
E j
r g, 4 d, /.,,, y;u S.
Abnonnal Occurrence Report No. 50-313/74-10A was reviewed and ' approved.P ['
His was a follow-up report on 50-313/74-10 describing a leak is a :' ~ 5 e P 3
1 inch drain line from the cold leg of the RCS.
- l'
>,, - (f ); y.
6.
Abnormal Occurrence Report No. 50-313/74-11A 'was reviewed and' aNrovk,
' E This was a follow-up metallurgical report on the cracks that accessed d.SR; in RCS drain line HC5-t-1.
'. ( 'e. 7, j h' EU 7 'Mt *' NL 'p 2
- K M M' l
O t' w
9
+
7.
The committee reviewed and approved the Environmental T$ch. 5pe'c.D i i 'df g
changes to paragraph 4.2.2.
nis change would delete the to a specific type, future Tech. Spec, changes wi!! not be;refesences Q.,...tg.' B m
if 71.D technology say indicate some new type of material.ot
- required, mf' TLD 100 or 1LD 200 should be used.
1g /h Q', r,! n n
- f y
comunittee reviewed and approved the Environmental Te
.. u m r
' ;4.
H e.
W.m change to paragraph 4.1.2.a(3).
De change would require biologica(g$,. g.y ;
g
.'s [8Peration to corres;ond to the interval specified.in the,tganc water samp
- 7 j #.. ;. >
t f ffg
- iD Q Jk [3 [-1 I ;NI d}tM * ",.,, c. # ' if. I' h.'[.
.M h M h
. -s (tg. 4 p. ;h'Q..
(ee.,
- . g f
<t,
zq.
f y
^
e
-, "4.,,
~
' i '. ( ~ ' -
9.',y Marshall 1.. Pendergrass, fiscp54any q yka,e f 7Q
. e. '.
J..,
Safety Review Committee
- 9 4 plii a,
g 1 Lj s C
WG.y[&galN.
'3
. %:f.,: f 'r l
. u.,. % ;, f fx l
p -.. d.4. e ; q;
. n..
..e
- . t.
o.
19 p
.a,o., s w.x t
J.,.)
t.,W(*-.
..h t v '..l ' - g ~y; c ys#*T 3. s a 3
,,/ m yy?v%. s -
I
+
C. *.. pr. v 'Y.
- w 3
8r*"
w'4' d-o4
. ~,
l $./, v. 1 3 w
1
- +i m'kl*MJ s
UDi
- V f
7 44 b MS 48, f
w w.+ r.a., tg, w.f es in. M y.
y1 m.:. y W. g p, q. a. r
%y-,m.r.c(g' '-
m M.
. n n,.r, wy 9p., w.,..a. s y.v. e, s,su..-. -
w 1
k
' lt t e
w n u p p&@7pn e +. s.M19 &nw w n w_anc g w w:. ~ z u p q p '. x.y<.
w w.egc
.m s, y%n
,_ 4 w..w.Q n~T wj. w.m py m
.3.,a 4:.~n '; 4. mGx;,g
,4 c}+r24.
W.~i 1
A
% md w,* F k
__ _