ML19322A479

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Recommends Use of EPICOR-II & Retention of Unit 1 Storage Capacity for Emergency Use Only
ML19322A479
Person / Time
Site: Crane 
Issue date: 10/09/1979
From: Dieckamp P
METROPOLITAN EDISON CO.
To: Hendrie J
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
References
RTR-NUREG-0591, RTR-NUREG-591 NUDOCS 7911060060
Download: ML19322A479 (2)


Text

_ - _ _ _ _ _ _

e PO 1 F C..

r m.7 Metropolitan Edison Company

}/Nf kJ,

{

i Post Office Box 480 e

(;(

Middletown, Pennsytvania 17057 gY 717 9444041 gG N October 9, 1979 9' I CO

.9 9

o$.uo 8,

k Dr. Joseph Hendrie 2

C311 g 1

Chairman M

Nuclear Regulatory Commission a g'

{

Washington, DC 20555

  • M.M

Dear Dr. Hendrie:

/g y

Mr. Arnold's letter of October 1, 1979, to Mr. Vollmer of your staff provided an assessment of alternatives to the prompt operation of the EPICOR II System and recocmended NRC autnorization of the use of EPICOR II by October 15, 1979. Your staff has concluded, in its environmental assess-ment of the operation of EPICOR II, that operation of the system can be con-ducted in full compliance with the Commission's regulations.

We strongly recommend the use of EPICOR II and the retention of Unit 1 storage capacity for emergency use only.

There exists in the wake of the Three Mile Island Unit 2 accident a public skepticism and concern surrounding the contaminated material in TMI-2.

The aura that some have attached to the TMI-2 radioactive waste, separate from all other radioactive materials, is without sound technical merit.

Yet, despite the lack of technical justification, some continue to portray the Unit 2 contam-ination as different and as requiring different atandards.

Commission action to date has not dispelled this concern.

Failure to authorize EPICOR II ecause of the availability of Unit 1 storage capacity will only delay the inevitable requirement for action. At the same time it will further spread Unit 2 contamination to Unit 1 and thereby burden all activities at the site with the technical, political, and psychologi-cal factors associated with the Unit 2 radioactive materials.

The end result can only be to impede future decisions which will be necessary to protect the health and safety of the public.

The transfer of Unit 2 radioactive materials to Unit 1 is contrary to paragraph 4 of.he Commission's August 9, 1979, order which states:

The licensee shall demonstrate that decontamination and/or restoration operations at TMI-2 will no. affect safe operations at TMI-1.

The licensee shall provide separation and/or isola-tion of TMI-1/2 radioactive liquid transf-- lines, fuel handl-ing areas, ventilation systems, and sampling lines.

Effluent monitoring instruments shall have the cg ability of discriminat-ing between effluents resulting from Unit 1 or Unit 2 operations.

79u oeo O 6 O MetroccMan Ecson Corncany is a Memeer of me Generr Put' c Uut es Sys:crn i

. ')

[

r s o 7

Dr. Joseph Hendrie Page Two October 9, 1979 To date the perceived and the demonstrated problems peculiar to Unit 2 contaminated materials have not infringed on activities in Unit 1.

We are convinced that this should remain the case.

We. urge you to take these factors into account as well as the environmental aasessment of your staff, the summary of alternatives contained in Mr. Arnold's letter, cnd the availability of EPICOR II which has been constructed and can be operated in compliance with applicable Commission standards.

We must emphasize that our ability to discharge our ongoing responsibili-ties is critically dependent upon the availability of Commission approved and supported standards for design, construction, operations, radiological controls and administration controls for nuclear facilities. We urge the Commission to evaluate and to authorize the use of EPICOR II on the basis of established standards. To do otherwise would reinforce the unfounded opinion of those who suggest that the existing Commission standards are inadequate to protect the health and safety of the public.

Sin

ely, s

WCA./

<<w H. Dieckamp President (acting.

cib cc:

Commissioners Victor Gilinsky Richard T. Kennedy Peter A. Bradford John F. Ahearne Mr. Harold R. Denton 1

S L

. _ _..