ML19322A388

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Revised Contentions of Intervenors in Matter of Utils Before ASLB Re Fuel Densification,Aircraft Accidents,Sabotage, Evacuation & Emergency Procedures,Transportation of Fuel & Waste to & from Facility & Icing & Fog from Cooling Towers
ML19322A388
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/10/1973
From: Sager L
SAGER & SAGER ASSOCIATES
To:
Shared Package
ML19322A387 List:
References
NUDOCS 7910170959
Download: ML19322A388 (4)


Text

_

s

. +...r.4

  • r

.P

) ('..",

.~.. v.

s.

r..

t ll

.g

. r. g

.. t :..

e. g. - ~

y -.-..sa.. -..,....

t.

.cc i..

I I,f t

'.'c *. t O r O f

)

j }t i n T' tj

)

OOcket.'. O. E O - 2..

l, i.. ~t ... p, i.. -.... :..r: t..q u,t e-u.,.>*-,..s r u n s

.... : s o..

]

J..

)

! J I. T.S T. V C E N T T..".I.

P OWE ?. i LI!:T COMPMY

)

l!.

)

. i.

and

!i'ED:45':LVD l A ELECTT;iC COMT!:<Y

(

D o o DI m

t l (Thrce hiie Island Nuclear Stctien' w o 1'

i i

in t-
3. ) -

~

'3'Tg' D

C P.E V I S E D C O.",T E *lT I O'{ 5 v

i 1.

The facility should not be operated at levels that s

would cause unsafe conditions as a result of ~ fuel densification.

. ~....-

Adec,uate protection against the effects of fuel densificcice nt:st ce provided before tne facility ' ecomes operable.

The applicont c

should hevo accoucte cronitorina facilities to investigat~e and Il cc'.edt any effects of fuel densification and fuel densification

~

p itse,f.

1 (l'

2.

The facility should be so constructed, arior to or.cration, so as to,si ths tanti a cirect i cT.c c t vrer e tu7 Jet m

.irplcae crash cr frem the crcsh of a sener jet.

It is center.ded

~

O t:c t tne pechnility ci a 707 or surer jet crasing i:sto t'ac f asil i ty is s i c.'.i fi cantly ni c$ entuch to trc rrer.t such pr::tec'ie,.

l t

[ it ii i '.; Pt he r cie n d nde

  • th6t ir %:.e incilit/ i s i t' t dt. s i:.:cJ 10-i 6

f I

8

...h

. Ih.

.m.'

.e g

I Ke : e '. r. <., r i c e: sys t c r s ::e s : De n r.wi e9 : cnd a da c e r. w.

7. r r a n c c - - ': - 0; d;j n e c.r..y u r-c : s r.m t oc :ade i r, e e e r u. c ic u fi t n n t :. :.

u 2 0 ' t. c i a'c r c f t UCtr or G*/e" tite _ r !. 0 *7 '." t.",

erit p

fl il 7910170f; i

ng P

( f

\\

,(

r n

2.

1..cil;.y r..

. Or Pt :t:c.ec cs

'c<.'_-

t.t

91. th e :: Te ty
I ck r c.f t h e f.t cr i c C 'w rgy Corn.f r n i e n to vnir il!::c5ctate at the facility itself :.nd fer all trtnsecrtetico cf 5i'; fuel er. to reduce lor:- level ;

radiation.

If it further contenced that the chiculctions of the epplicant and the AEt cannot take into consideration the. full radicactive inventory in that the cladding fcilure, for erensle, is 200 conservative, and the additional releases resulting frc.m abncrnal transients is not fully dcolt with.

It is further radiction through the pasture--cow--l cor.tonced that the low level ailk pathway cad to infants and pregnant fennies is not c 1:w as 7racticcble.

C.

It is contendcd that the dites for the facility hcet-not neon construc cd for the prob.1ble ncxirum fload.

It in cor.).enced thtt there is not adequats protectim-in the event r

} flocc.ino for the facility'.

l l

9.

It is contendec thet the concrete prurin' uf :h:

e h C o n t h i ".rc r; t e n <i r f :19 q i r d e r h a ; n6 0 b e a n [. r c n e ri y do n :. ccd U.:

licect nex11tv cesarcr.cc stan.;:res.

D en en D,)

o...R ll g

m i

.J]_ll.

a

(v' (v)

V-s h

~

10.

It is cer.ter.s +

5ct 15 S E P '. -cvi..

bent.fi t U:alys i ciid al t'irnati ve s i s i:9t cocpletc i t: t i. ; t '. h ;

h/

I)Icost of governriental subsidies for'tec inology cr.d i 1:Urcnce J not beer included, the cost of s.ater consuaption lias not bet.::

dealt with, cspacity fcctors are incorrect, the cost ofLthe cr.c.-

'tainr.ient repcuring ha3 'not been included in tha ccst analy i:

and established, the health cects fro'n low-les.'el radiction has ne.'

been included, the adverse economic costs resulting.from limitet.-

directly or_ indirectly, in development in.the area of the facility has not been included, the cost of this facility as opposed to alternate facilities to rate payers has not oeen tully considerec.

~g t.

SAGER & SAG". ASSOCIATES pf

,y.o L..-.- 3A.;xJ s/

- \\* s, so e

La#rence Sager

//

6*'**-'

4 D11m)

D 11 y

o

~ 9 ~ Tg=

.n 4