ML19322A388

Revised Contentions of Intervenors in Matter of Utils Before ASLB Re Fuel Densification,Aircraft Accidents,Sabotage, Evacuation & Emergency Procedures,Transportation of Fuel & Waste to & from Facility & Icing & Fog from Cooling Towers

ML19322A388
Person / Time
Site:	Three Mile Island
Issue date:	09/10/1973
From:	Sager L SAGER & SAGER ASSOCIATES
To:
Shared Package
ML19322A387	List: ML19322A388
References
NUDOCS 7910170959
Download: ML19322A388 (4)

Text

__

• r .P '

) .('. .",

. +. . .r .4

.~ .. v.

s

. .. s. ...

r ..

t

.g ll ,,;- ; y - .- . .sa t.

. . r. g

.cc .

. . t :. .

e. g

.. -. ~- . .. ,.,. . i..

I I,f t

j }t i n T' '.'c *. t O r O f

)

tj ) OOcket .'. O . E O - 2. .

l , i . . ~t . . ....p ., i.: .s-.o.

. . .. :. .r: t. .q u ,t e-u.,.>*-,..s runs

]

J. . )

! J I. T.S T. V C E N T T..".I. P OWE ?. i LI!:T COMPMY )

l!.

)

and .

i.

!i'ED:45':LVD l A ELECTT;iC COMT!:<Y -

t

(

< Do o m DI l (Thrce hiie Island Nuclear Stctien' i -

w o 1'

_ i ;in t-

~

3. ) - ,

'3'Tg' D

P.E V I S E D C O.",T E *lT I O'{ 5 v - -

C

, i

1. The facility should not be operated at levels that s  :.

would cause unsafe conditions as a result of ~ fuel densification.

. ~ . . . .-

Adec,uate protection against the effects of fuel densificcice nt:st ce provided before tne facility 'c ecomes operable. The applicont should hevo accoucte cronitorina facilities to investigat~e and I

l cc'.edt any effects of fuel densification and fuel densification

~

p itse,f.

1 l

l (l' 2. The facility should be so constructed, arior to )

or.cration , so as to ,si ths tanti a cirect i cT.c c t vrer e tu7 Jet m

.irplcae crash cr frem the crcsh of a sener jet. It is center.ded

~

O t:c t tne pechnility ci a 707 or surer jet crasing i:sto t'ac f asil i ty is s i c.'.i fi cantly ni c$ entuch to trc rrer.t such pr::tec'ie,.

l t

[ it ii i '.; Pt he r cie n d nde

• th6t ir %:.e incilit/ i s i t' t dt. s i: .:cJ 10- i 1

6

. . . .e f I -  %

8

...h . Ih.

$ - ._ .m .'

g I Ke : e '. r. <., r i c e: sys t c r s ::e s : De n r.wi e9 : cnd a da c e r. w. 7. r r a n c c - - ': - 0; d

j n e c.r..y u r- c

s r.m t oc :ade i r, e e e r u. c ic u fi t n n t : . :. .

u .

l 2 0 ' t. c i a'c r c f t UCtr or G*/e" tite _ r !. 0 *7 '." t.", .

I er it ,

p  !

fl -

1 il 7910170f; ,

i

ng P

,( ( f , \

• r n 2. '...: 1..cil;.y r.. . Or Pt :t:c .ec cs . 'c<.'_- -

t.t

91. th e :: Te ty  : I ck r c.f t h e f.t cr i c C 'w rgy Corn.f r n i e n to vnir il

!::c5ctate at the facility itself :.nd fer all trtnsecrtetico cf 5

i'; fuel er.<i was te eroducts tc' ced frcr. the fscility. It i c cc a t c r.

I that the cpplicent hcs nnt pro tided for suf ficient u :tc'Pru :nd i.

a

electrenic surveillance , pcrticui crly wi.th referer.ce to *.

.trensportation of the fue.1 and itcste caterk41s to sed fre: ~tte n acility.

4. It is contended that the evacuation anc ercrgency-plans nus t .be . fully developed, includinc' procedures, before.the applicant can.1xt given an operating license. ,

1 The ro u t e s fp r cyacuatien r.ust be clearly defined as well es all warning systers, radical care . centers, emergency drills, etc. . It is ferther contended in order to fu'lly analyze the environnental inpact of tr.c facility as well as the full cost of.the fccility, the appi t can t mus t es'tablish the evacuation rauta, the c.ad1 cal cr.re cer.tcrs, cod the cccts of the evacuation and energency pirins.

5. It i: contended that in crcer .to' cvaluate fully the e n vi re r.ne n t al icpact cf the fccility for a full and cmtrlete ' *e fGP A review, thc epplicent'nust set forth the exact rautas to and from t* c f acility for the trar.sr.cristian cf fuel cr.d etcte prede:::. It is furthcr c0ntendr.d' that the yplicte t should 0:-

.r cuirC te set certh specific rrot.:ct.iv: c. .. r u r - c . f c i .d t n .-

hiridir.g, escorts, ard sr.ecial .-cutes fer c.c tronr.rmrtrtier, ni fucl at:d .Ys te prnd.;ct! to nd frc-' the facii'* Myr+4 e ct f f .- ~

0 <

1 rui t a t i c,n re i : .n c s c n d s e!'c ta ce .

n' WWI D} _%~ T

' m A

- w ll JJ j _ _

2 l

-w

- ,. (m) (dm, y 6 I; 't c ct../1. ., . tht' t.m pic.t cheuic not r .

n Pif the cooling toutr creart Lny fog or icing that wou!c cr- : '.-

harcrd tc vchicu1cr End aircraft traffic.

If is furthcr c cr.-

tended that the applictnt should be required to es tchlich c c 0, sys te:a by tne ucc of the cooling . tower: thct would cir.irira chlorination but would be the test efficie,nt system c: the stet 2 ,

of the ert will cliow.

7. The low level radiation affluent frch t:,e fccility cr not as low as practicable in that tne facility does not hhyc the.

latest and most up-to-date state bf the art available redweste

\.

systen for ooth gaseous and liquid affiurnts > to reduce lor:- level ;

radiation. If it further contenced that the chiculctions of the epplicant and the AEt cannot take into consideration the. full radicactive inventory in that the cladding fcilure, for erensle, is 200 conservative, and the additional releases resulting frc.m abncrnal transients is not fully dcolt with. It is further  !

cor.tonced that the low level radiction through the pasture--cow--l l ailk pathway cad to infants and pregnant fennies is not c 1:w as 7racticcble. ,,

C. It is contendcd that the dites for the facility hcet-not neon construc cd for the prob.1ble ncxirum fload. It in cor.).enced thtt there is not adequats protectim- in the event r l l

} flocc.ino for the facility'. i l

l 9. It is contendec thet the concrete prurin' uf :h: e h C o n t h i ".rc r; t e n <i r f :19 q i r d e r h a ; n6 0 b e a n [. r c n e ri y do n :. ccd U.:

l icect nex11tv cesarcr.cc stan.;:res.

D en en D,)

. o . . .R m g -

ll i .

.J]_ll. a

V-(v' (v) s h

~

10. It is cer.ter.s + 5ct 15 S E P '. -cvi.. ":-

bent.fi t U:alys i ciid al t'irnati ve s i s i:9t cocpletc i t: t i. ; t '. h ;

I)

Icost of governriental subsidies for'tec inology cr.d i 1:Urcnce h/

• J not beer included, the cost of s.ater consuaption lias not bet.::

dealt with, cspacity fcctors are incorrect, the cost ofLthe cr.c.-

'tainr.ient repcuring ha3 'not been included in tha ccst analy i:

and established, the health cects fro'n low-les.'el radiction has ne.' .

been included, the adverse economic costs resulting .from limitet.-

directly or_ indirectly, in development in.the area of the facility has not been included, the cost of this facility as opposed to alternate facilities to rate payers has not oeen tully considerec.

~g t.

SAGER & SAG". ASSOCIATES '

. pf ,

,y .o L . .-.- 3A.;xJ so e s/ - \* s, La#rence Sager

// ..

6*'**-'

4 D

D11m)

~

11 y o .n 9

~ Tg=

4