ML19322A298
| ML19322A298 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 03/09/1979 |
| From: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Like I SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7904060058 | |
| Download: ML19322A298 (2) | |
Text
.. _ _ _
l r
s
~
MAR :9 B79 ol
.. p NO MN
}
Il-2;oche: Sc. 50-322.
s y\\
f 7
&a **s #
l
.:ving Lile, zsg 1:e y
Si>=
'=! Co= sel !c: the Coc= y
.o! S:' folk 3[
2:0 West F= '-~ street 1
- a..51c=, sev York 1.1702 L
t
~.ee~ 2:.'Like:
He h.sve received go:: letter, dated Deew&* 11, 1978, to the Secreta.ry cf the 2:cle_1.: R e g-~' n o r g t ~ e see'cn regarding application of NRC Staff
?=licy ca 0=ec Meetings to aeetings held ca the Sh::*Mm " review. Since the policy in q=estica is c=e applied by the NRC Staff as distinguished b
f::c the t' ~acsian itself, ycc: letter has been direc'ad to me fo:
4 -esp::=se.
E Ls i: 1.s stated in the 7ede:al Recister o' Jane 28, 1978, the Open heeti=g Policg is a fc::11 articulatica of the general practice that has %-
followed by the Sta!" in the past.
In accorh n ~ vith this pra:~ ice, need.ngs th.rt were held to ere' ~~ge te% fcal information and -
vi.evs necessarg fc: the tech =ical review of applications have been
=rt'M and ws-ized bg the 12: Sta!!.
For tbose S2'oreMm meetings chat have been held to ">H 11 tate this t~~%4 cal exchange of information hetweea 'the Icog TcT>-> Lighting Corceng (LILco) and the R?c Sta**,
y yac have heen se=t the appropriate r.ctices and s~-fes.
J
- 1
.o >//' tion to the t~~k! cal zeetings,'other meeti.ngs have been held ll hersemen represe=tatives of LZZCO and SRC.canagene=t that were not
)
=c' ' ea'.
You and c'Mr pa.: ties to the Sho *b=
proceeding were infor:ed c! these ceetings by a letter fro = KRC Staff Counsel dated J.emry 3, Y
'L579.
These teeti:%s ve.:e held to discuss the status of the ShoreMm
vcing reviev and s.hed"'ing of appilcant ing:t daEi sk2d Staff reviev a==.! ities for the vari =s, sta!! branches involved in the review of the Shc.wb y f> & 11ty. Since ~%e~ ase'4mgs did not icrolve' the' exr-M, ge of. tech =ical infor: etic =, or any other %"o cation which would affek-t the : esnit of c:: reviev, sr~-r ~ r!es have not been prepared.
In ng view, holding such noc-substantive sitedn14ng tgpe meetkes with
.a ' 4~--c* applicant without providing notice to othe.: parties or
!=tarested ; 5 5 is ct in~ -~cistent with the policy sta'omt.
Ecr ever, fo~ the Shor*Mw case, such meetings are no longer ruwr d e
~
THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS POOR QUAUTY PAGES gggg
Irvi~.1 Like ~.
~
5.
.... ~...
- as far'as the Sta!! is caacerned, and I have 1.nstruc*A my Staff to
~'o:= pc= of all schedu. led meetings with the applicant in the
. future. -
si.ocerely,
~
a
- s....
Or!:1.a.2! 5!;.ud by i ii. E. h::i:n
"=~'old R. Denton, Director Of!!oe of Euclear Reactor Regulation b
. ~. ':
- i-.
~
~
e l
I~
l i
l
[.
o I
e l
i b
~t
-p L
...~3.-,,..a......
, _, _,,