ML19320D661

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Request for Addl Info Re 790615 Application Requesting Amend for Model 51032-1 & 51032-1a Packages. Info Should Be Incorporated as Revised Pages Into Application
ML19320D661
Person / Time
Site: 07106581
Issue date: 07/07/1980
From: Macdonald C
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To: Hansen L
SIEMENS POWER CORP. (FORMERLY SIEMENS NUCLEAR POWER
References
NUDOCS 8007220046
Download: ML19320D661 (2)


Text

._. -

oed A ~-

s-,

8 jg UNITED STATES y

2

,,,(3 g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

.g jj WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

+ [,

JUL 0 71980 FCTC: RHO 71-6581 Exxon Nuclear Company, Inc.

ATTN: Mr. L. E. Hansen 2955 George Washington Way Richland, WA 99352 Gentlemen:

This refers to your application dated June 15, 1979, as amended, requesting an amendment for the Model Nos. 51032-1 and 51032-la packagings.

In connection with our review, we need the information identified in the enclosure to this letter.

please advise us within thirty (30) days from the date of this letter when this infomation will be provided. The' additional information should be incorporated as revised pages into t!.e consolidated applicatior. with the revised portions marked in the margin of each page.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, we would be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely, (kCharles E. MacDonald, Chief

)

Transportation Certification Branch Division of Fuel Cycle and Material Safety

Enclosure:

As stated 1

8007220 M

.d

y=-

g=>

4-_..

Exxon Nuclear Company, Inc.

Docket No. 71-6581 JUL 0 71980 Encl to ltr dtd:

1.

The discussion in Section 10.1.2.2 (page 10-6) is not adequate to show that the aluminum clips are acceptable for the following reasons:

a.

The text does not provide a sketch or otherwise clarify that the aluminum clamps were loaded for the load-deflection test (Figure 10.1) in the same manner as they would be loaded under accident conditions when installed in the container.

b.

Figure 10.1 does not show that an aluminum clamp can develop as large a resisting force as a steel clamp.

c.

Figure 10.1 does not show that the energy to deform an aluminum clamp is as large as the energy to deform.a steel' clamp.

d.

Figure 10.1 does not show that an aluminum' clamp can deform as much as a steel clamp without failing.

e.

The text doet not show that the clamps are adequate for the fire test.

2.

Provide a table which shows the minimum number of separator blocks, full clamps, shock mounts and restraining bars that will be utilized for different strongbacks and for various types of fuel in the Model 51032-1 and the Model 51032-la packages.

O m

-