ML19320C104
| ML19320C104 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/30/1980 |
| From: | Barnes I, Hunnicutt D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19320C102 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900021 NUDOCS 8007160146 | |
| Download: ML19320C104 (6) | |
Text
O U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV Report No. 99900021/80-01 Program No. 51300 Company:
Pullman Power Products Division of Pullman Incorporated P. O. Box 3308, Reach Road Williasport, Pennsylvania 17701 Inspection Conducted: April 21-24, 1980 Inspector:
fA' )
$30f.?O M
I. Barnes, Contractor Inspector
/
Date ComponentsSection II Vendor Inspection Branch Approved by:
3kj 8/8d/l[O D. M. Hunnicutt, Chief Date ComponentsSection II Vendor Inspection Branch Summary Inspection on April 21-24, 1980 (99900021/80-01)
Areas Inspected:
Implementation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, criteria and appli-cable codes and standards; including action on previous inspection findings, internal audits, heat treatment and nonconformances and corrective action.
The inspection involved twenty-five (25) inspector-hours on site.
Results:
In the four (4) areas inspected, no apparent deviations or unre-solved items were identified.
i e
8007160)h
i 2
DETAILS SECTION A.
Persons Contacted R. N. Babcock, Manager, Purchasing
- A. Bair, QA Manager
- E. L. Baker, Plant Manager W. L. Cox, Senior QA Auditor
- T.
Daniels, QA Director
- J. A. Koch, Manager, Manufacturing Engineering
- J. J. Krommenhoek, Production Manager
- T. C. Myers, Welding Engineer
- F. J. Richards, Welding Engineer
- R. A. Stryker, QA/QC Supervisor J. R. Weaver, Project Engineer
- H. J. Donlin, Authorized Nuclear Inspection Specialist, Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Co.
- D. Klose, Authorized Nuclear Inspector, Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Co.
- Denotes those persons attending the exit meeting.
B.
Action on Previous Inspection Findings 1.
(Closed) Deviation (Item A, Notice of Deviation, Inspection Report i
No. 79-02): Use of chain slings on stainless steel sub-assemblies without prior wrapping in burlap or cloth.
The inspector verified that the committed directive had been issued to responsible supervision. Observation by the inspector of shop handling activities relative to stainless steel assemblies, revealed no further instance of deviation frca QA program commitments.
2.
(Closed) Deviation (Item B, Notice of Deviation, Inspection Report No. 79-02): Failure to fully provide applicable quality requirements on a certain purchase order and non-submittal to QA of two purchase order revisions for review and approval.
The inspector verified that thn committed purchase order review and training session had been condacted.
C.
Internal Audits l
1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to:
a.
Ascertain that a system has been prescribed and documented for auditing, which is consistent with the commitments of the QA program.
3 b.
Determine that the system has been properly and effectively Laplemented.
2.
Method of Accomplishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
Review of Section XVIII, revision dated February 15, 1979, of a.
the QA Manual, " Audits."
b.
Review of Williamsport Shop Procedure No. XVIII - IW, revision dated May 25,1979, " Internal Auditing Procedure of Shop QA Programs by QEG."
Examination of audit check lists used to perform audits in c.
1979 of the Williamsport plant.
d.
Verification that the audit check lists provided for adequate seasurement of plant compliance with the documented QA program, e.
Review of team leader qualifications and team orientation records.
f.
Verification of reporting of audit results to responsible levels of management.
g.
Review of follow-up actions regarding implementation of agreed corrective actions for audit findings.
h.
Review of audit frequencies relative to QA program commitments.
t 1.
Discussions with cognizant QA personnel relative to proposed scope of internal audit activities for 1980.
J.
Review of the results of the 1979 management audit of the Pullman Power Products, Williamsport Plant (PPPA) QA program and follow-up actions taken.
3.
Findings Within this area of the inspection, no deviations from commitment or unresolved items were identified.
D.
Heat Treatment 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that elevated temperature heat treatments were being performed in accordance i
l l
l
_..-__.._,m_..-.._.
4 with written procedures and that the procedures were consistent with applicable code, customer and material specification requirements.
2.
Method of Accomplishment The preceding objectives were accomplish <d by:
a.
Review of Section IX, tevision dated February 15, 1979, of the QA Manual, " Control Cf Special Process."
b.
Review of solution annealing requirements in Bechtel Specifi-cation No. X4AQ01, Revision 6, " Specification For Shop Fabri-cation Of Nuclear Service Piping For The Georgia Power Company Alvin W. Vogtle Nuclear Plant Burke County, Georgia Units 1, 2 And Common."
c.
Review of solution annealing requirements in PPPA Project Pro-cedure IX-3-S75, revision dated November 17, 1977, " Fabrication
& Field Installation Specification For Nuclear Power Plant Com-ponents, Piping Systems And Appurtenances - ASME Section III."
d.
Review of PPPA Shop Procedure No. X-14W, revision dated November 14, 1977, " Furnace Load Check."
Examination of four (4) solution annealing charts and cooling e.
certifications.
f.
Verification of calibration status of temperature recorders installed in the furnate utilized for solution annealing heat treatment.
3.
Findinas Within this area of the inspection, no deviations from commitment or unresolved items were identified.
E.
Nonconformances and Corrective Action 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to ascertain that:
a.
A system had been established for the control af nonconformances and for assuring effective corrective actions.
b.
The system was Laplemented.
i o
5 2.
Method of Accomplishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
Review of Section XV, revision dated February 15, 1979, of the a.
QA Manual, " Nonconforming Materials, Parts or Components."
b.
Review of Section XVI, revision dated February 15, 1979, of the QA Manual, " Corrective Action."
c.
Review of PPPA Shop Procedure No. XV-IW, revision dated October 17, 1979, " Processing and Handling Nonconformances."
d.
Examination of 1979 Defective Material Reports and Nonconformance Reports with respect to:
(1) Identification of item.
(2) Description of nonconformance and identity of reporting party.
(3)
Identification of party responsible for the nonconformance and party responsible for resolution.
(4) Verification that proposed dispositions were subject to QA progrsa required reviews and that the dispositions were in accordance with ASME Code requirements.
(5) Evidence of Authorized Nuclear Inspector cognizance of nonconforming conditions.
(6) Performance of corrective action measures in accordance with approved dispositions.
Verification of performance of required review by QA management e.
of 1979 nonconformance reports.
3.
Findings Within this area of the inspection, no deviations from commitment or unresolved items were identified.
F.
Exit Meeting The inspector met with the management and Authorized Inspection Agency representatives denoted in paragraph A. above on April 24, 1980, at the conclusion of the inspection. The scope and results of the inspection were summarized by the inspector.
The inspector also informed the management
~
... e 6
represen*3tives present that his program assignment had been essentially completer at the Pullman Power Products Williamsport facility and another NRC inspector would most probably be aasigned inspection responsibilities for the facility. ifapri;aent acknowledged the statements of the inspector and had no specific questions regarding the information presented to them.
1 l
)
)
t l
l t
l l
.