ML19319C523
| ML19319C523 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi, Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 12/05/1974 |
| From: | Peltier I US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Schwencer A US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8002190953 | |
| Download: ML19319C523 (2) | |
Text
m
]
~~ ~~
-~
,g.
.- 9 yn 5 1974 Docket Nos. 50-34 50-341 50-500 and 50-501 A. Schwencer, Chief, Light Water Reactoss Branch 2-3, Licensing LAIZ ZRIE HYDROLOGY MEETING The and Data:
1:00 p.m., Thursday December 19, 1974 Location:
Room P-110 Bethesda, MD Purpose of Meet 3ng:
To discuss Lake Eria hydrology as it applies to the Davis-Bessa and Fer:ni II applications. Topics for discussions are attached.
Participants:
AEC - I. Peltier, B. Euckley, L.1:intner, R. Benedict, L. Hul-um Toledo Edison Company Detroit Edison Company ~
Dames & Moore CIDAISigred by Irting A. Peltier, Project Mavager Light Water Reactors Branch 2-3 Directorate of Licensing DISTRIBUTION:
RBenedict I
Docket Files FSchroeder W ""
L Reading ACES (16) l LWR 2-3 Reading SVarga l
EGCase IFeltier l
Miambuseo BThompson RSBoyd OCC
,p
==m-
=_a c)
I8 (3)
.,,RJ, ls7886 2 -3 ev=~43eci. ley IPe t.: :jb Trt=*=--
..r. *
._12/5/14 Forum AEC-518 (Rev. 9 5 5) AECM 0240
- u. s. sovanmusar reswruse orrics see4.ees.ies
--8002-190 b d
.s
,s
/
LAKE ERIE WIND TIDES DECEMBER 19, 1974 MEETING AGENDA
- 1. Discuss the conservatism of the shear stress k values used, and the sensitivity of the surge estimates to these values.
- 2. Discuss the validity and/or conservatism of the.tvo foot correction of calculated wind setup values as portrayed on plate 9 of appendix 2D.
Discuss bases for assuming curve is a straight line of the slope shown.
- 3. Discuss the ramifications of previously (1970) computed values of 16.9 and 21.2 feet of wind set-up at Toledo by the Platzman and TR-4 methods respectively. These computations were made for the Fermi II site.
- 4. Discuss results of other methods and or models used to predict wind tide at Davis Besse or other Lake Erie sites and compare with Platzman.
- 5. Discuss the ramifications of calibrating the Platzman model for maximum historic event and then using the caliorated model to predict the smaximum wind tide at Davis Besse due to a PMME.
- 6. Discuss the conservatism of the predicted maximum dynamic water level at Davis Besse, with regara to the duplication of wind tide error in the maximum wave height, since this wave height is based on the maximum supportable wave due to the maximum static water level.
- 7. Apparently approximately two feet of transverse seiche was used in the model verifications runs, whereas only one foot is assumed for the maximum static water level at the Davis Besse site. Some explanation should be provided'for this apparent descrepancy.
~
- 8. Discuss the validity of historical data at selected stations.
- 9. Discuss the validity of historical surge values at sites and at Toledo.
i
.w-.
..m
-